docs: update all documentation and add AI tooling configs

- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack
- Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360)
- Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL
- Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente)
- Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index
- Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference
- Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md
- Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad)
- Add netbird VPN configuration
- Add status report

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

.agents/skills/bmad-product-brief-preview/prompts/guided-elicitation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
+**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
+
+# Stage 3: Guided Elicitation
+
+**Goal:** Fill the gaps in what you know. By now you have the user's brain dump, artifact analysis, and web research. This stage is about smart, targeted questioning — not rote section-by-section interrogation.
+
+**Skip this stage entirely in Yolo and Autonomous modes** — go directly to `draft-and-review.md`.
+
+## Approach
+
+You are NOT walking through a rigid questionnaire. You're having a conversation that covers the substance of a great product brief. The topics below are your mental checklist, not a script. Adapt to:
+- What you already know (don't re-ask what's been covered)
+- What the user is excited about (follow their energy)
+- What's genuinely unclear (focus questions where they matter)
+
+## Topics to Cover (flexibly, conversationally)
+
+### Vision & Problem
+- What core problem does this solve? For whom?
+- How do people solve this today? What's frustrating about current approaches?
+- What would success look like for the people this helps?
+- What's the insight or angle that makes this approach different?
+
+### Users & Value
+- Who experiences this problem most acutely?
+- Are there different user types with different needs?
+- What's the "aha moment" — when does a user realize this is what they needed?
+- How does this fit into their existing workflow or life?
+
+### Market & Differentiation
+- What competitive or alternative solutions exist? (Leverage web research findings)
+- What's the unfair advantage or defensible moat?
+- Why is now the right time for this?
+
+### Success & Scope
+- How will you know this is working? What metrics matter?
+- What's the minimum viable version that creates real value?
+- What's explicitly NOT in scope for the first version?
+- If this is wildly successful, what does it become in 2-3 years?
+
+## The Flow
+
+For each topic area where you have gaps:
+
+1. **Lead with what you know** — "Based on your input and my research, it sounds like [X]. Is that right?"
+2. **Ask the gap question** — targeted, specific, not generic
+3. **Reflect and confirm** — paraphrase what you heard
+4. **"Anything else on this, or shall we move on?"** — the soft gate
+
+If the user is giving you detail beyond brief scope (requirements, architecture, platform details, timelines), **capture it silently** for the distillate. Acknowledge it briefly ("Good detail, I'll capture that") but don't derail the conversation.
+
+## When to Move On
+
+When you have enough substance to draft a compelling 1-2 page executive brief covering:
+- Clear problem and who it affects
+- Proposed solution and what makes it different
+- Target users (at least primary)
+- Some sense of success criteria or business objectives
+- MVP-level scope thinking
+
+You don't need perfection — you need enough to draft well. Missing details can be surfaced during the review stage.
+
+If the user is providing complete, confident answers and you have solid coverage across all four topic areas after fewer than 3-4 exchanges, proactively offer to draft early.
+
+**Transition:** "I think I have a solid picture. Ready for me to draft the brief, or is there anything else you'd like to add?"
+
+## Stage Complete
+
+This stage is complete when sufficient substance exists to draft a compelling brief and the user confirms readiness. Route to `draft-and-review.md`.