cassel/bi-agents
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: update all documentation and add AI tooling configs

Browse Source 
- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack
- Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360)
- Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL
- Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente)
- Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index
- Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference
- Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md
- Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad)
- Add netbird VPN configuration
- Add status report

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Cassel
2026-03-19 13:29:03 -04:00
parent c5b377e788
commit 647cbec54f
3246 changed files with 479789 additions and 983 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
.claude/skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/SKILL.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
---
name: bmad-advanced-elicitation
description: 'Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output.'
---
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.

1
.claude/skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
type: skill

51
.claude/skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/methods.csv Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
num,category,method_name,description,output_pattern
1,collaboration,Stakeholder Round Table,Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests,perspectives → synthesis → alignment
2,collaboration,Expert Panel Review,Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed,expert views → consensus → recommendations
3,collaboration,Debate Club Showdown,Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground,thesis → antithesis → synthesis
4,collaboration,User Persona Focus Group,Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs,reactions → concerns → priorities
5,collaboration,Time Traveler Council,Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures,past wisdom → present choice → future impact
6,collaboration,Cross-Functional War Room,Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability,constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
7,collaboration,Mentor and Apprentice,Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching,explanation → questions → deeper understanding
8,collaboration,Good Cop Bad Cop,Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address,encouragement → criticism → balanced view
9,collaboration,Improv Yes-And,Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building,idea → build → build → surprising result
10,collaboration,Customer Support Theater,Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps,complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
11,advanced,Tree of Thoughts,Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches,paths → evaluation → selection
12,advanced,Graph of Thoughts,Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns,nodes → connections → patterns
13,advanced,Thread of Thought,Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency,context → thread → synthesis
14,advanced,Self-Consistency Validation,Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters,approaches → comparison → consensus
15,advanced,Meta-Prompting Analysis,Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving,current → analysis → optimization
16,advanced,Reasoning via Planning,Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making,model → planning → strategy
17,competitive,Red Team vs Blue Team,Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions,defense → attack → hardening
18,competitive,Shark Tank Pitch,Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition,pitch → challenges → refinement
19,competitive,Code Review Gauntlet,Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices,reviews → debates → standards
20,technical,Architecture Decision Records,Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented,options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
21,technical,Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved,Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels,simple → detailed → technical → aha
22,technical,Algorithm Olympics,Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison,implementations → benchmarks → winner
23,technical,Security Audit Personas,Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles,vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
24,technical,Performance Profiler Panel,Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack,symptoms → analysis → optimizations
25,creative,SCAMPER Method,Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation,S→C→A→M→P→E→R
26,creative,Reverse Engineering,Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints,end state → steps backward → path forward
27,creative,What If Scenarios,Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration,scenarios → implications → insights
28,creative,Random Input Stimulus,Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking,random word → associations → novel ideas
29,creative,Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm,Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration,contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
30,creative,Genre Mashup,Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination,domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
31,research,Literature Review Personas,Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality,sources → critiques → synthesis
32,research,Thesis Defense Simulation,Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions,thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
33,research,Comparative Analysis Matrix,Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring,options → criteria → scores → recommendation
34,risk,Pre-mortem Analysis,Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches,failure scenario → causes → prevention
35,risk,Failure Mode Analysis,Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems,components → failures → prevention
36,risk,Challenge from Critical Perspective,Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink,assumptions → challenges → strengthening
37,risk,Identify Potential Risks,Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation,categories → risks → mitigations
38,risk,Chaos Monkey Scenarios,Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully,break → observe → harden
39,core,First Principles Analysis,Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems,assumptions → truths → new approach
40,core,5 Whys Deep Dive,Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures,why chain → root cause → solution
41,core,Socratic Questioning,Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery,questions → revelations → understanding
42,core,Critique and Refine,Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts,strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
43,core,Explain Reasoning,Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency,steps → logic → conclusion
44,core,Expand or Contract for Audience,Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities,audience → adjustments → refined content
45,learning,Feynman Technique,Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding,complex → simple → gaps → mastery
46,learning,Active Recall Testing,Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps,test → gaps → reinforcement
47,philosophical,Occam's Razor Application,Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging,options → simplification → selection
48,philosophical,Trolley Problem Variations,Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions,dilemma → analysis → decision
49,retrospective,Hindsight Reflection,Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews,future view → insights → application
50,retrospective,Lessons Learned Extraction,Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement,experience → lessons → actions
1 num category method_name description output_pattern
2 1 collaboration Stakeholder Round Table Convene multiple personas to contribute diverse perspectives - essential for requirements gathering and finding balanced solutions across competing interests perspectives → synthesis → alignment
3 2 collaboration Expert Panel Review Assemble domain experts for deep specialized analysis - ideal when technical depth and peer review quality are needed expert views → consensus → recommendations
4 3 collaboration Debate Club Showdown Two personas argue opposing positions while a moderator scores points - great for exploring controversial decisions and finding middle ground thesis → antithesis → synthesis
5 4 collaboration User Persona Focus Group Gather your product's user personas to react to proposals and share frustrations - essential for validating features and discovering unmet needs reactions → concerns → priorities
6 5 collaboration Time Traveler Council Past-you and future-you advise present-you on decisions - powerful for gaining perspective on long-term consequences vs short-term pressures past wisdom → present choice → future impact
7 6 collaboration Cross-Functional War Room Product manager + engineer + designer tackle a problem together - reveals trade-offs between feasibility desirability and viability constraints → trade-offs → balanced solution
8 7 collaboration Mentor and Apprentice Senior expert teaches junior while junior asks naive questions - surfaces hidden assumptions through teaching explanation → questions → deeper understanding
9 8 collaboration Good Cop Bad Cop Supportive persona and critical persona alternate - finds both strengths to build on and weaknesses to address encouragement → criticism → balanced view
10 9 collaboration Improv Yes-And Multiple personas build on each other's ideas without blocking - generates unexpected creative directions through collaborative building idea → build → build → surprising result
11 10 collaboration Customer Support Theater Angry customer and support rep roleplay to find pain points - reveals real user frustrations and service gaps complaint → investigation → resolution → prevention
12 11 advanced Tree of Thoughts Explore multiple reasoning paths simultaneously then evaluate and select the best - perfect for complex problems with multiple valid approaches paths → evaluation → selection
13 12 advanced Graph of Thoughts Model reasoning as an interconnected network of ideas to reveal hidden relationships - ideal for systems thinking and discovering emergent patterns nodes → connections → patterns
14 13 advanced Thread of Thought Maintain coherent reasoning across long contexts by weaving a continuous narrative thread - essential for RAG systems and maintaining consistency context → thread → synthesis
15 14 advanced Self-Consistency Validation Generate multiple independent approaches then compare for consistency - crucial for high-stakes decisions where verification matters approaches → comparison → consensus
16 15 advanced Meta-Prompting Analysis Step back to analyze the approach structure and methodology itself - valuable for optimizing prompts and improving problem-solving current → analysis → optimization
17 16 advanced Reasoning via Planning Build a reasoning tree guided by world models and goal states - excellent for strategic planning and sequential decision-making model → planning → strategy
18 17 competitive Red Team vs Blue Team Adversarial attack-defend analysis to find vulnerabilities - critical for security testing and building robust solutions defense → attack → hardening
19 18 competitive Shark Tank Pitch Entrepreneur pitches to skeptical investors who poke holes - stress-tests business viability and forces clarity on value proposition pitch → challenges → refinement
20 19 competitive Code Review Gauntlet Senior devs with different philosophies review the same code - surfaces style debates and finds consensus on best practices reviews → debates → standards
21 20 technical Architecture Decision Records Multiple architect personas propose and debate architectural choices with explicit trade-offs - ensures decisions are well-reasoned and documented options → trade-offs → decision → rationale
22 21 technical Rubber Duck Debugging Evolved Explain your code to progressively more technical ducks until you find the bug - forces clarity at multiple abstraction levels simple → detailed → technical → aha
23 22 technical Algorithm Olympics Multiple approaches compete on the same problem with benchmarks - finds optimal solution through direct comparison implementations → benchmarks → winner
24 23 technical Security Audit Personas Hacker + defender + auditor examine system from different threat models - comprehensive security review from multiple angles vulnerabilities → defenses → compliance
25 24 technical Performance Profiler Panel Database expert + frontend specialist + DevOps engineer diagnose slowness - finds bottlenecks across the full stack symptoms → analysis → optimizations
26 25 creative SCAMPER Method Apply seven creativity lenses (Substitute/Combine/Adapt/Modify/Put/Eliminate/Reverse) - systematic ideation for product innovation S→C→A→M→P→E→R
27 26 creative Reverse Engineering Work backwards from desired outcome to find implementation path - powerful for goal achievement and understanding endpoints end state → steps backward → path forward
28 27 creative What If Scenarios Explore alternative realities to understand possibilities and implications - valuable for contingency planning and exploration scenarios → implications → insights
29 28 creative Random Input Stimulus Inject unrelated concepts to spark unexpected connections - breaks creative blocks through forced lateral thinking random word → associations → novel ideas
30 29 creative Exquisite Corpse Brainstorm Each persona adds to the idea seeing only the previous contribution - generates surprising combinations through constrained collaboration contribution → handoff → contribution → surprise
31 30 creative Genre Mashup Combine two unrelated domains to find fresh approaches - innovation through unexpected cross-pollination domain A + domain B → hybrid insights
32 31 research Literature Review Personas Optimist researcher + skeptic researcher + synthesizer review sources - balanced assessment of evidence quality sources → critiques → synthesis
33 32 research Thesis Defense Simulation Student defends hypothesis against committee with different concerns - stress-tests research methodology and conclusions thesis → challenges → defense → refinements
34 33 research Comparative Analysis Matrix Multiple analysts evaluate options against weighted criteria - structured decision-making with explicit scoring options → criteria → scores → recommendation
35 34 risk Pre-mortem Analysis Imagine future failure then work backwards to prevent it - powerful technique for risk mitigation before major launches failure scenario → causes → prevention
36 35 risk Failure Mode Analysis Systematically explore how each component could fail - critical for reliability engineering and safety-critical systems components → failures → prevention
37 36 risk Challenge from Critical Perspective Play devil's advocate to stress-test ideas and find weaknesses - essential for overcoming groupthink assumptions → challenges → strengthening
38 37 risk Identify Potential Risks Brainstorm what could go wrong across all categories - fundamental for project planning and deployment preparation categories → risks → mitigations
39 38 risk Chaos Monkey Scenarios Deliberately break things to test resilience and recovery - ensures systems handle failures gracefully break → observe → harden
40 39 core First Principles Analysis Strip away assumptions to rebuild from fundamental truths - breakthrough technique for innovation and solving impossible problems assumptions → truths → new approach
41 40 core 5 Whys Deep Dive Repeatedly ask why to drill down to root causes - simple but powerful for understanding failures why chain → root cause → solution
42 41 core Socratic Questioning Use targeted questions to reveal hidden assumptions and guide discovery - excellent for teaching and self-discovery questions → revelations → understanding
43 42 core Critique and Refine Systematic review to identify strengths and weaknesses then improve - standard quality check for drafts strengths/weaknesses → improvements → refined
44 43 core Explain Reasoning Walk through step-by-step thinking to show how conclusions were reached - crucial for transparency steps → logic → conclusion
45 44 core Expand or Contract for Audience Dynamically adjust detail level and technical depth for target audience - matches content to reader capabilities audience → adjustments → refined content
46 45 learning Feynman Technique Explain complex concepts simply as if teaching a child - the ultimate test of true understanding complex → simple → gaps → mastery
47 46 learning Active Recall Testing Test understanding without references to verify true knowledge - essential for identifying gaps test → gaps → reinforcement
48 47 philosophical Occam's Razor Application Find the simplest sufficient explanation by eliminating unnecessary complexity - essential for debugging options → simplification → selection
49 48 philosophical Trolley Problem Variations Explore ethical trade-offs through moral dilemmas - valuable for understanding values and difficult decisions dilemma → analysis → decision
50 49 retrospective Hindsight Reflection Imagine looking back from the future to gain perspective - powerful for project reviews future view → insights → application
51 50 retrospective Lessons Learned Extraction Systematically identify key takeaways and actionable improvements - essential for continuous improvement experience → lessons → actions

135
.claude/skills/bmad-advanced-elicitation/workflow.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
---
agent_party: '{project-root}/_bmad/_config/agent-manifest.csv'
---
# Advanced Elicitation Workflow
**Goal:** Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output.
---
## CRITICAL LLM INSTRUCTIONS
- **MANDATORY:** Execute ALL steps in the flow section IN EXACT ORDER
- DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence
- HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met
- Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step
- Sections outside flow (validation, output, critical-context) provide essential context - review and apply throughout execution
- **YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the `communication_language`**
---
## INTEGRATION (When Invoked Indirectly)
When invoked from another prompt or process:
1. Receive or review the current section content that was just generated
2. Apply elicitation methods iteratively to enhance that specific content
3. Return the enhanced version back when user selects 'x' to proceed and return back
4. The enhanced content replaces the original section content in the output document
---
## FLOW
### Step 1: Method Registry Loading
**Action:** Load and read `./methods.csv` and `{agent_party}`
#### CSV Structure
- **category:** Method grouping (core, structural, risk, etc.)
- **method_name:** Display name for the method
- **description:** Rich explanation of what the method does, when to use it, and why it's valuable
- **output_pattern:** Flexible flow guide using arrows (e.g., "analysis -> insights -> action")
#### Context Analysis
- Use conversation history
- Analyze: content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, and creative potential
#### Smart Selection
1. Analyze context: Content type, complexity, stakeholder needs, risk level, creative potential
2. Parse descriptions: Understand each method's purpose from the rich descriptions in CSV
3. Select 5 methods: Choose methods that best match the context based on their descriptions
4. Balance approach: Include mix of foundational and specialized techniques as appropriate
---
### Step 2: Present Options and Handle Responses
#### Display Format
```
**Advanced Elicitation Options**
_If party mode is active, agents will join in._
Choose a number (1-5), [r] to Reshuffle, [a] List All, or [x] to Proceed:
1. [Method Name]
2. [Method Name]
3. [Method Name]
4. [Method Name]
5. [Method Name]
r. Reshuffle the list with 5 new options
a. List all methods with descriptions
x. Proceed / No Further Actions
```
#### Response Handling
**Case 1-5 (User selects a numbered method):**
- Execute the selected method using its description from the CSV
- Adapt the method's complexity and output format based on the current context
- Apply the method creatively to the current section content being enhanced
- Display the enhanced version showing what the method revealed or improved
- **CRITICAL:** Ask the user if they would like to apply the changes to the doc (y/n/other) and HALT to await response.
- **CRITICAL:** ONLY if Yes, apply the changes. IF No, discard your memory of the proposed changes. If any other reply, try best to follow the instructions given by the user.
- **CRITICAL:** Re-present the same 1-5,r,x prompt to allow additional elicitations
**Case r (Reshuffle):**
- Select 5 random methods from methods.csv, present new list with same prompt format
- When selecting, try to think and pick a diverse set of methods covering different categories and approaches, with 1 and 2 being potentially the most useful for the document or section being discovered
**Case x (Proceed):**
- Complete elicitation and proceed
- Return the fully enhanced content back to the invoking skill
- The enhanced content becomes the final version for that section
- Signal completion back to the invoking skill to continue with next section
**Case a (List All):**
- List all methods with their descriptions from the CSV in a compact table
- Allow user to select any method by name or number from the full list
- After selection, execute the method as described in the Case 1-5 above
**Case: Direct Feedback:**
- Apply changes to current section content and re-present choices
**Case: Multiple Numbers:**
- Execute methods in sequence on the content, then re-offer choices
---
### Step 3: Execution Guidelines
- **Method execution:** Use the description from CSV to understand and apply each method
- **Output pattern:** Use the pattern as a flexible guide (e.g., "paths -> evaluation -> selection")
- **Dynamic adaptation:** Adjust complexity based on content needs (simple to sophisticated)
- **Creative application:** Interpret methods flexibly based on context while maintaining pattern consistency
- Focus on actionable insights
- **Stay relevant:** Tie elicitation to specific content being analyzed (the current section from the document being created unless user indicates otherwise)
- **Identify personas:** For single or multi-persona methods, clearly identify viewpoints, and use party members if available in memory already
- **Critical loop behavior:** Always re-offer the 1-5,r,a,x choices after each method execution
- Continue until user selects 'x' to proceed with enhanced content, confirm or ask the user what should be accepted from the session
- Each method application builds upon previous enhancements
- **Content preservation:** Track all enhancements made during elicitation
- **Iterative enhancement:** Each selected method (1-5) should:
1. Apply to the current enhanced version of the content
2. Show the improvements made
3. Return to the prompt for additional elicitations or completion