docs: update all documentation and add AI tooling configs

- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack
- Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360)
- Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL
- Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente)
- Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index
- Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference
- Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md
- Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad)
- Add netbird VPN configuration
- Add status report

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-19 13:29:03 -04:00
parent c5b377e788
commit 647cbec54f
3246 changed files with 479789 additions and 983 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
---
name: 'step-02-analyze-scope'
description: 'Determine site type, list all pages/views, assess scale, and select approach mode'
# File References
nextStepFile: './step-03-build-strategic-context.md'
---
# Step 2: Analyze Scope & Scale Strategy
## STEP GOAL:
Determine site type, list all pages/views, assess scale, select approach mode, and present the analysis for user approval at this critical checkpoint.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a UX Scenario Facilitator collaborating with the project owner
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and identity, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring scenario thinking and user journey expertise, user brings their project knowledge, together we create concrete UX scenario outlines
- ✅ Maintain collaborative equal-partner tone throughout
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus only on scope analysis, page inventory, and scale strategy
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed past the user checkpoint without explicit user approval
- 💬 Approach: Present structured analysis and wait for user confirmation
- 📋 This is a USER CHECKPOINT — do not auto-proceed
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 🔍 Classify site type based on Product Brief data
- 📋 Create complete page inventory from all sources
- 📊 Assess scale and recommend approach mode
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip user checkpoint — must wait for explicit approval
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: Product Brief data, Trigger Map data loaded in Step 1
- Focus: Site classification, page inventory, scale assessment
- Limits: No scenario creation, no strategic context building — only scope analysis
- Dependencies: Step 1 context must be loaded
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
### 1. Site Type Detection
Based on Product Brief, classify the site:
**Presentation Site** (marketing, service catalog, company profile, portfolio):
- Scenario format: **Screen Flow** (page-to-page navigation)
- Coverage: Expose all pages
- Storyboarding: Minimal (only for complex interactions like booking forms)
**Dynamic App** (SaaS, booking system, social platform, productivity tool):
- Scenario format: **Storyboard** (document states within views)
- Coverage: Focus on core workflow first
- Screen flow: Only for multi-step processes (onboarding, checkout)
**Mixed** (presentation site with dynamic features):
- Use both formats as needed per scenario
### 2. List All Pages/Views
Create a complete list of every page or view from the Product Brief.
**Format:**
```
## Page Inventory
1. [Page Name] — [Brief purpose]
2. [Page Name] — [Brief purpose]
3. [Page Name] — [Brief purpose]
...
**Total: [N] pages/views**
```
**Rules:**
- Include every page mentioned in Product Brief
- Include pages implied by navigation structure
- Include pages implied by business goals (e.g., if goal mentions "booking" there's a booking page)
- Do NOT include generic shared elements (header, footer, navigation) — these are documented separately
### 3. Scale Assessment
Based on page count, determine strategy:
**Small (< 20 pages):**
- Strategy: **Comprehensive coverage** — document all pages across scenarios
- Mode recommendation: **Dream** or **Suggest**
- Every page must appear in exactly one scenario
**Medium (20-50 pages):**
- Strategy: **Comprehensive coverage** with natural groupings
- Mode recommendation: **Suggest**
- Group pages by navigation patterns, service types, or content categories
**Large (100+ pages):**
- Strategy: **Selective ignorance** — focus on most valuable workflow
- Mode recommendation: **Dialog**
- Deep work on business-critical flow (learning effect reveals patterns for rest)
### 4. Page Documentation Strategy
Determine how to handle similar pages:
**Few pages + high variation** → Document as separate pages
- Each page substantially different in structure, content, or purpose
- Example: 13 vehicle pages with different positioning
**Many pages + low variation** → Document as template with content variations
- Structurally identical pages with only content differences
- Example: 500 product pages with same layout, different product data
### 5. Present Analysis (USER CHECKPOINT)
Present to user and **wait for approval**:
```
## Scope Analysis
**Site Type:** [Presentation / Dynamic / Mixed]
**Total Pages:** [N]
**Scale:** [Small / Medium / Large]
**Recommended Mode:** [Dream / Suggest / Dialog]
**Scenario Format:** [Screen Flow / Storyboard / Mixed]
### Page Inventory
[numbered list from step 2]
### Page Strategy
- [X] pages documented individually (high variation)
- [Y] pages as templates (low variation groups: [list groups])
**Does this look right? Any pages missing or that should be grouped differently?**
```
**WAIT for user response.** Do not proceed until user confirms.
### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display: "Are you ready to [C] Continue to Building Strategic Context?"
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF C: Load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [user has explicitly approved the scope analysis], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin building strategic context.
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Site type correctly classified from Product Brief data
- Complete page inventory created with all pages accounted for
- Scale assessment matches page count
- Page documentation strategy determined
- Analysis presented clearly at user checkpoint
- User explicitly approves before proceeding
- Menu presented and user input handled correctly
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Proceeding without user approval at checkpoint
- Missing pages from the inventory
- Incorrect site type classification
- Skipping scale assessment or mode recommendation
- Auto-proceeding past the user checkpoint
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.