docs: update all documentation and add AI tooling configs

- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack
- Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360)
- Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL
- Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente)
- Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index
- Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference
- Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md
- Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad)
- Add netbird VPN configuration
- Add status report

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-19 13:29:03 -04:00
parent c5b377e788
commit 647cbec54f
3246 changed files with 479789 additions and 983 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
---
name: step-08-update-design-log
description: Document Phase 3 completion in the project design log
# File References
nextStepFile: './step-09-handover.md'
---
# Step 8: Update Design Log
## STEP GOAL:
Document Phase 3 completion in the project design log, recording all artifacts created, key decisions made, and quality scores achieved.
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
### Universal Rules:
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
### Role Reinforcement:
- ✅ You are a UX Scenario Facilitator collaborating with the project owner
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and identity, continue to use those while playing this new role
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
- ✅ You bring scenario thinking and user journey expertise, user brings their project knowledge, together we create concrete UX scenario outlines
- ✅ Maintain collaborative equal-partner tone throughout
### Step-Specific Rules:
- 🎯 Focus only on updating the design log with accurate Phase 3 data
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to overwrite existing log entries — only append
- 💬 Approach: Be specific and factual in documentation
- 📋 List every artifact file created — no summarizing with "etc."
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
- 📖 Read the existing design log before making changes
- 📋 Append progress entry after the last existing entry
- ✅ Record key decisions if any were made during Phase 3
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to use generic summaries — be specific
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
- Available context: All Phase 3 artifacts, quality review results, scenario data
- Focus: Design log documentation only
- Limits: No scenario modifications, only log updates
- Dependencies: Quality review must be complete from Step 7
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
### 1. Read the Current Log
Read `{output_folder}/_progress/00-design-log.md` to understand existing entries and format.
### 2. Append Progress Entry
Add the following under the `## Progress` section (after the last entry):
```
### [date] — Phase 3: UX Scenarios Complete
**Agent:** Saga (Scenario Outline)
**Scenarios:** [N] scenarios covering [N] pages
**Quality:** [Excellent / Good]
**Artifacts Created:**
- `C-UX-Scenarios/00-ux-scenarios.md` — Scenario index
- `C-UX-Scenarios/01-[slug]/01-[slug].md` — [Scenario name]
- [list ALL scenario files created]
**Summary:** [2-3 sentences: what scenarios were created, key design decisions made during the process, page coverage status]
**Next:** Phase 4 — UX Design
```
**Rules:**
- List every artifact file — do not summarize with "etc."
- Summary must mention specific decisions, not generic statements
- Use the actual date, not a placeholder
### 3. Record Key Decisions
Add rows to the `## Key Decisions` table for any significant choices made during Phase 3:
```
| [date] | [decision] | Phase 3: Scenarios | Saga + [user_name] |
```
Examples of key decisions worth logging:
- Scenario count adjustments (user added/removed scenarios)
- Page assignment changes
- Priority reordering
- Scope decisions (selective ignorance applied)
If no significant decisions were made, skip this section.
### 4. Verify
- [ ] Progress entry appended (not overwriting existing entries)
- [ ] All artifact files listed
- [ ] Summary is specific, not generic
- [ ] Key decisions recorded (if any)
### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
Display: "Are you ready to [C] Continue to Handover?"
#### Menu Handling Logic:
- IF C: Load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
#### EXECUTION RULES:
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [design log updated with all required information], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin the handover process.
---
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
### ✅ SUCCESS:
- Existing log read before making changes
- Progress entry appended (not overwriting)
- All artifact files listed individually
- Summary is specific with concrete decisions mentioned
- Key decisions recorded where applicable
- Verification checklist passes
- Menu presented and user input handled correctly
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
- Overwriting existing log entries
- Summarizing artifacts with "etc." instead of listing each
- Using generic summary statements
- Not reading existing log first
- Missing artifact files from the list
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.