docs: update all documentation and add AI tooling configs

- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack
- Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360)
- Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL
- Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente)
- Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index
- Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference
- Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md
- Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad)
- Add netbird VPN configuration
- Add status report

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-03-19 13:29:03 -04:00
parent c5b377e788
commit 647cbec54f
3246 changed files with 479789 additions and 983 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,430 @@
# Specification Audit Report
**Date:** {YYYY-MM-DD}
**Auditor:** {Name/Agent}
**Scope:** {Scenario name or Page name}
**Audit Level:** {Quick/Standard/Complete}
**Project:** {Project name}
---
## Executive Summary
**Overall Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Pass with Issues / ❌ Fail}
**Issue Counts:**
- 🔴 Critical Issues: {count}
- 🟡 Warnings: {count}
- 🔵 Suggestions: {count}
**Recommendation:** {Ready for development / Needs fixes before development / Major rework required}
---
## Level 0: Specification Formatting & Standards
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
### Markdown Structure
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Proper heading hierarchy (H1 → H2 → H3 → H4)
- [ ] Only one H1 per page
- [ ] No skipped heading levels
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description, line number, and severity}
---
### Area Label Format
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Format: `**AREA LABEL**: `{label}``
- [ ] Naming convention: `{page}-{section}-{element}`
- [ ] Consistent throughout
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description, line number, and severity}
---
### Translation Format
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Each language on separate line
- [ ] Format: `- {LANG}: "{content}"`
- [ ] All product languages present
- [ ] Consistent language order
- [ ] No inline translations
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description, line number, and severity}
---
### List & Code Formatting
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Use `-` for bullets (not `*` or `+`)
- [ ] Consistent indentation
- [ ] Code blocks have language specified
- [ ] Proper spacing
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description, line number, and severity}
---
### Section Organization
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Sections in standard order
- [ ] No missing required sections
- [ ] Logical flow maintained
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description, line number, and severity}
---
### File Naming
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Follows WDS naming conventions
- [ ] No generic names (README.md, GUIDE.md)
- [ ] Descriptive and specific
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description and severity}
---
## Level 1: Scenario-Level Findings
### Strategic Foundation
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] User situation clearly defined
- [ ] Usage context documented
- [ ] Strategic context (Trigger Map) defined and linked
- [ ] Scenario purpose stated
- [ ] Success criteria defined
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description and severity}
---
### Navigation Flow
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] All pages in scenario identified
- [ ] Entry points documented for each page
- [ ] Exit points documented for each page
- [ ] User can navigate through all pages
- [ ] Navigation paths logical and complete
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description and severity}
---
## Level 2: Page-Level Findings
### Structure & Organization
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Page purpose clearly stated
- [ ] Success criteria defined
- [ ] Trigger Map reference present
- [ ] Sections properly separated and named
- [ ] Section purposes defined
- [ ] Page layout logical and flows well
**Structural Area Labels:**
- [ ] Page container (`{page-name}-page`)
- [ ] Header section (`{page-name}-header`)
- [ ] Main content area (`{page-name}-main`)
- [ ] Form container (`{page-name}-form`)
- [ ] Section containers (`{page-name}-{section}-section`)
- [ ] Section header bars (`{page-name}-{section}-header-bar`)
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description and severity}
---
### Visual-Spec Alignment
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Sketch/visualization exists
- [ ] Sketch linked in specification
- [ ] All objects in sketch documented in spec
- [ ] All objects in spec visible in sketch
- [ ] Visual hierarchy matches spec structure
**Misalignments Found:**
- **Objects in sketch but missing from spec:**
- {Object name and location}
- **Objects in spec but missing from sketch:**
- {Object name and location}
- **Visual discrepancies:**
- {Description of mismatch}
---
### Area Label Coverage
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] All interactive elements have Area Labels
- [ ] Labels follow naming convention (`{page}-{section}-{element}`)
- [ ] Labels are unique within page
- [ ] ARIA labels match Area Labels
**Missing Area Labels:**
- {Element description and suggested label}
**Naming Convention Issues:**
- {ID that doesn't follow pattern and suggested fix}
---
## Level 3: Component-Level Findings
### Componentization
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Reusable sections identified
- [ ] Components properly separated from page specs
- [ ] Component specifications exist
- [ ] Component references valid and linked
**Issues Found:**
- **Components needing extraction:**
- {Component name and pages where it appears}
- **Missing component specs:**
- {Component name}
- **Broken component references:**
- {Reference location and issue}
---
### Design System Integration
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail / N/A}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] All components added to design system
- [ ] Components at proper hierarchy level
- [ ] Design tokens applied
- [ ] Figma components linked
**Issues Found:**
- {Issue description and severity}
---
## Level 4: Feature-Level Findings
### Shared Functionality
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] Common features identified
- [ ] Feature files created and documented
- [ ] Feature references consistent across pages
- [ ] Validation rules centralized
**Issues Found:**
- **Features needing extraction:**
- {Feature name and pages where it appears}
- **Inconsistent implementations:**
- {Feature name and inconsistency description}
---
## Level 5: Content Audit Findings
### Text Content
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**Checklist:**
- [ ] All content defined (no placeholders)
- [ ] Multi-language content complete
- [ ] Field labels present and clear
- [ ] Button text defined
- [ ] Error messages in all languages
- [ ] Success messages in all languages
- [ ] Empty state messages defined
- [ ] Loading state messages defined
- [ ] Meta content (page title, meta description) for public pages
- [ ] Social sharing content (title, description, image) for public pages
**Missing Content:**
- {Element and missing content type}
**Language Gaps:**
- {Content that's missing in specific languages}
**Meta Content Issues:**
- {Missing or incomplete meta tags for public pages}
---
### Accessibility Content
**Status:** {✅ Pass / ⚠️ Warning / ❌ Fail}
**ARIA Labels:**
- [ ] All interactive elements have aria-label
- [ ] ARIA labels descriptive and meaningful
**Missing ARIA Labels:**
- {Element description}
**Images:**
- [ ] All images have alt text
- [ ] Alt text descriptive
**Missing Alt Text:**
- {Image location and suggested alt text}
**Forms:**
- [ ] All inputs have labels
- [ ] Required fields marked
- [ ] Field instructions present
**Form Issues:**
- {Issue description}
**Keyboard Navigation:**
- [ ] Tab order documented
- [ ] Focus management specified
- [ ] Skip links present
**Keyboard Issues:**
- {Issue description}
**Screen Reader Support:**
- [ ] Semantic HTML specified
- [ ] Heading hierarchy logical
- [ ] ARIA live regions for dynamic content
**Screen Reader Issues:**
- {Issue description}
**Visual Accessibility:**
- [ ] Color contrast meets WCAG AA
- [ ] Information not color-dependent
- [ ] Focus indicators visible
**Visual Accessibility Issues:**
- {Issue description}
**WCAG Compliance:**
- [ ] Target level documented
- [ ] Known issues documented
**WCAG Issues:**
- {Issue description}
---
## Summary of Issues
### 🔴 Critical Issues (Must Fix Before Development)
1. **{Issue Title}**
- **Location:** {Page/Section}
- **Problem:** {Description}
- **Impact:** {Why this is critical}
- **Recommended Fix:** {Specific action to take}
2. **{Issue Title}**
- **Location:** {Page/Section}
- **Problem:** {Description}
- **Impact:** {Why this is critical}
- **Recommended Fix:** {Specific action to take}
---
### 🟡 Warnings (Should Fix)
1. **{Issue Title}**
- **Location:** {Page/Section}
- **Problem:** {Description}
- **Impact:** {Why this matters}
- **Recommended Fix:** {Specific action to take}
2. **{Issue Title}**
- **Location:** {Page/Section}
- **Problem:** {Description}
- **Impact:** {Why this matters}
- **Recommended Fix:** {Specific action to take}
---
### 🔵 Suggestions (Nice to Have)
1. **{Issue Title}**
- **Location:** {Page/Section}
- **Problem:** {Description}
- **Impact:** {Why this would improve quality}
- **Recommended Fix:** {Specific action to take}
2. **{Issue Title}**
- **Location:** {Page/Section}
- **Problem:** {Description}
- **Impact:** {Why this would improve quality}
- **Recommended Fix:** {Specific action to take}
---
## Recommendations
### Immediate Actions
1. {Action item with priority and owner}
2. {Action item with priority and owner}
### Before Development Handoff
1. {Action item with priority and owner}
2. {Action item with priority and owner}
### Future Improvements
1. {Action item with priority and owner}
2. {Action item with priority and owner}
---
## Next Steps
- [ ] Fix critical issues
- [ ] Address warnings
- [ ] Consider suggestions
- [ ] Re-audit after fixes
- [ ] Update specifications
- [ ] Update sketches if needed
- [ ] Notify development team when ready
---
## Audit Metrics
**Specification Completeness:** {percentage}%
- Structural Area Labels: {X/Y complete}
- Interactive Area Labels: {X/Y complete}
- Content defined: {X/Y complete}
- Accessibility: {X/Y complete}
**Quality Score:** {percentage}%
- Based on critical issues, warnings, and suggestions
**Development Readiness:** {Ready / Not Ready / Needs Review}
---
**Audit Completed:** {YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM}
**Next Audit Scheduled:** {YYYY-MM-DD or "After fixes"}
---
_Generated using WDS Specification Audit Workflow_