docs: update all documentation and add AI tooling configs
- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack - Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360) - Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL - Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente) - Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index - Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference - Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md - Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad) - Add netbird VPN configuration - Add status report Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: '3-logical-view-breakdown'
|
||||
description: 'Select a logical view to build and break it into implementable sections'
|
||||
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
nextStepFile: './4a-announce-and-gather.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 3: Logical View Selection & Section Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Select a logical view to build and break it into implementable sections. This creates the work plan, but NOT the story files yet (those are created just-in-time).
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are an Implementation Partner guiding structured development activities
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring software development methodology expertise, user brings domain knowledge and codebase familiarity
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain clear and structured tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on confirming view selection, gathering objects from specs, proposing section breakdown, and creating the work file
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to create story files or begin implementing — those are later steps
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Collaboratively break down the view into 4-8 sections with user approval
|
||||
- 📋 Group objects logically, consider all states, estimate time per section
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Work file created with approved section breakdown
|
||||
- 💾 Create `work/[View-Name]-Work.yaml` with section plan
|
||||
- 📖 Read all scenario step specs that use the selected logical view
|
||||
- 🚫 Do not create story files or write any HTML/JS
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Logical view map from Step 2; all scenario step specifications
|
||||
- Focus: Section breakdown planning — objects, grouping, estimation
|
||||
- Limits: No story files, no implementation
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step 2 must be complete (logical view map exists)
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Confirm Logical View Selection
|
||||
|
||||
**User says**: "Let's build [Logical View Name]" or selects from list
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Gather All Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Read all scenario step specs** that use this logical view
|
||||
2. **Extract all Object IDs** across all states
|
||||
3. **Identify unique objects** vs **state-specific objects**
|
||||
4. **Note functional requirements** from all specs
|
||||
|
||||
Present objects to user for confirmation.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. User Confirms Objects
|
||||
|
||||
**If user says "N"**: Ask what's missing or should be removed, update, re-present
|
||||
**If user says "Y"**: Continue to section breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Propose Section Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
**Actions**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Group objects logically** into 4-8 sections
|
||||
2. **Consider all states** when grouping
|
||||
3. **Estimate time** per section
|
||||
|
||||
Present breakdown to user for approval.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. User Reviews Section Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
**If user says "N"**: Ask what needs adjustment, revise, re-present
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Create Work File
|
||||
|
||||
**When user approves**: Create `work/[View-Name]-Work.yaml` with section details, statuses, and estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Step 4a: Announce and Gather"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
- IF C: Update design log, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options]
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then redisplay menu options
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN the section breakdown is approved and work file is created will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
- Logical view selection confirmed
|
||||
- All objects extracted from specifications
|
||||
- User confirmed object list
|
||||
- Section breakdown approved (4-8 sections)
|
||||
- Work file created with section plan
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
- Creating story files before work file is approved
|
||||
- Beginning implementation before planning
|
||||
- Not getting user approval on section breakdown
|
||||
- Not extracting all objects from specs
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user