initial commit

2026-03-16 19:54:53 -04:00
commit bfe0e01254
3341 changed files with 483939 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/SKILL.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/SKILL.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+---
+name: bmad-testarch-framework
+description: 'Initialize test framework with Playwright or Cypress. Use when the user says "lets setup test framework" or "I want to initialize testing framework"'
+---
+
+Follow the instructions in [workflow.md](workflow.md).
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/bmad-skill-manifest.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+type: skill
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/checklist.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/checklist.md
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+# Test Framework Setup - Validation Checklist
+
+This checklist ensures the framework workflow completes successfully and all deliverables meet quality standards.
+
+---
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+Before starting the workflow:
+
+- [ ] Project root contains a valid project manifest (`package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`, `build.gradle`, `go.mod`, `*.csproj`, `Gemfile`, or `Cargo.toml`)
+- [ ] No existing test framework detected that conflicts with the target setup
+- [ ] Project type identifiable (React, Vue, Angular, Next.js, Node, Python, Java, Go, .NET, Ruby, Rust, etc.)
+- [ ] Bundler identifiable (Vite, Webpack, Rollup, esbuild) or not applicable (backend projects)
+- [ ] User has write permissions to create directories and files
+
+---
+
+## Process Steps
+
+### Step 1: Preflight Checks
+
+- [ ] Stack type detected (`frontend`, `backend`, or `fullstack`)
+- [ ] Project manifest successfully read and parsed (`package.json`, `pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`, `go.mod`, etc.)
+- [ ] Project type extracted correctly
+- [ ] Bundler identified (or marked as N/A for backend projects)
+- [ ] No framework conflicts detected
+- [ ] Architecture documents located (if available)
+
+### Step 2: Framework Selection
+
+- [ ] Framework auto-detection logic executed
+- [ ] Framework choice justified (Playwright vs Cypress for frontend; pytest/JUnit/Go test/xUnit/RSpec for backend)
+- [ ] Framework preference respected (if explicitly set via `config.test_framework`)
+- [ ] User notified of framework selection and rationale
+
+### Step 3: Directory Structure
+
+- [ ] `tests/` root directory created
+- [ ] `tests/e2e/` directory created (or user's preferred structure)
+- [ ] `tests/support/` directory created (critical pattern)
+- [ ] `tests/support/fixtures/` directory created
+- [ ] `tests/support/fixtures/factories/` directory created
+- [ ] `tests/support/helpers/` directory created
+- [ ] `tests/support/page-objects/` directory created (if applicable)
+- [ ] All directories have correct permissions
+
+**Note**: Test organization is flexible (e2e/, api/, integration/). The **support/** folder is the key pattern.
+
+### Step 4: Configuration Files
+
+- [ ] Framework config file created (`playwright.config.ts` or `cypress.config.ts`)
+- [ ] Config file uses TypeScript (if `use_typescript: true`)
+- [ ] Timeouts configured correctly (action: 15s, navigation: 30s, test: 60s)
+- [ ] Base URL configured with environment variable fallback
+- [ ] Trace/screenshot/video set to retain-on-failure
+- [ ] Multiple reporters configured (HTML + JUnit + console)
+- [ ] Parallel execution enabled
+- [ ] CI-specific settings configured (retries, workers)
+- [ ] Config file is syntactically valid (no compilation errors)
+
+### Step 5: Environment Configuration
+
+- [ ] `.env.example` created in project root
+- [ ] `TEST_ENV` variable defined
+- [ ] `BASE_URL` variable defined with default
+- [ ] `API_URL` variable defined (if applicable)
+- [ ] Authentication variables defined (if applicable)
+- [ ] Feature flag variables defined (if applicable)
+- [ ] `.nvmrc` created with appropriate Node version
+
+### Step 6: Fixture Architecture
+
+- [ ] `tests/support/fixtures/index.ts` created
+- [ ] Base fixture extended from Playwright/Cypress
+- [ ] Type definitions for fixtures created
+- [ ] mergeTests pattern implemented (if multiple fixtures)
+- [ ] Auto-cleanup logic included in fixtures
+- [ ] Fixture architecture follows knowledge base patterns
+
+### Step 7: Data Factories
+
+- [ ] At least one factory created (e.g., UserFactory)
+- [ ] Factories use @faker-js/faker for realistic data
+- [ ] Factories track created entities (for cleanup)
+- [ ] Factories implement `cleanup()` method
+- [ ] Factories integrate with fixtures
+- [ ] Factories follow knowledge base patterns
+
+### Step 8: Sample Tests
+
+- [ ] Example test file created (`tests/e2e/example.spec.ts`)
+- [ ] Test uses fixture architecture
+- [ ] Test demonstrates data factory usage
+- [ ] Test uses proper selector strategy (data-testid)
+- [ ] Test follows Given-When-Then structure
+- [ ] Test includes proper assertions
+- [ ] Network interception demonstrated (if applicable)
+
+### Step 9: Helper Utilities
+
+- [ ] API helper created (if API testing needed)
+- [ ] Network helper created (if network mocking needed)
+- [ ] Auth helper created (if authentication needed)
+- [ ] Helpers follow functional patterns
+- [ ] Helpers have proper error handling
+
+### Step 10: Documentation
+
+- [ ] `tests/README.md` created
+- [ ] Setup instructions included
+- [ ] Running tests section included
+- [ ] Architecture overview section included
+- [ ] Best practices section included
+- [ ] CI integration section included
+- [ ] Knowledge base references included
+- [ ] Troubleshooting section included
+
+### Step 11: Build & Test Script Updates
+
+- [ ] Minimal test script added to appropriate config (`package.json` for frontend, `Makefile`/`pyproject.toml`/`build.gradle` for backend)
+- [ ] Test framework dependency added (if not already present)
+- [ ] Type definitions added (if TypeScript)
+- [ ] Users can extend with additional scripts as needed
+
+---
+
+## Output Validation
+
+### Configuration Validation
+
+- [ ] Config file loads without errors
+- [ ] Config file passes linting (if linter configured)
+- [ ] Config file uses correct syntax for chosen framework
+- [ ] All paths in config resolve correctly
+- [ ] Reporter output directories exist or are created on test run
+
+### Test Execution Validation
+
+- [ ] Sample test runs successfully
+- [ ] Test execution produces expected output (pass/fail)
+- [ ] Test artifacts generated correctly (traces, screenshots, videos)
+- [ ] Test report generated successfully
+- [ ] No console errors or warnings during test run
+
+### Directory Structure Validation
+
+- [ ] All required directories exist
+- [ ] Directory structure matches framework conventions
+- [ ] No duplicate or conflicting directories
+- [ ] Directories accessible with correct permissions
+
+### File Integrity Validation
+
+- [ ] All generated files are syntactically correct
+- [ ] No placeholder text left in files (e.g., "TODO", "FIXME")
+- [ ] All imports resolve correctly
+- [ ] No hardcoded credentials or secrets in files
+- [ ] All file paths use correct separators for OS
+
+---
+
+## Quality Checks
+
+### Code Quality
+
+- [ ] Generated code follows project coding standards
+- [ ] TypeScript types are complete and accurate (no `any` unless necessary)
+- [ ] No unused imports or variables
+- [ ] Consistent code formatting (matches project style)
+- [ ] No linting errors in generated files
+
+### Best Practices Compliance
+
+- [ ] Fixture architecture follows pure function → fixture → mergeTests pattern
+- [ ] Data factories implement auto-cleanup
+- [ ] Network interception occurs before navigation
+- [ ] Selectors use data-testid strategy
+- [ ] Artifacts only captured on failure
+- [ ] Tests follow Given-When-Then structure
+- [ ] No hard-coded waits or sleeps
+
+### Knowledge Base Alignment
+
+- [ ] Fixture pattern matches `fixture-architecture.md`
+- [ ] Data factories match `data-factories.md`
+- [ ] Network handling matches `network-first.md`
+- [ ] Config follows `playwright-config.md` or `test-config.md`
+- [ ] Test quality matches `test-quality.md`
+
+### Pact Consumer CDC Alignment (when `tea_use_pactjs_utils` enabled)
+
+- [ ] `vitest.config.pact.ts` is minimal (no pool/coverage/setup copied from unit config)
+- [ ] Script names match pactjs-utils (`test:pact:consumer`, `publish:pact`, `can:i:deploy:consumer`, `record:consumer:deployment`)
+- [ ] Scripts source `env-setup.sh` inline in package.json
+- [ ] Shell scripts use `pact-broker` not `npx pact-broker`
+- [ ] Shell scripts use `PACTICIPANT` env var pattern (not hardcoded service names)
+- [ ] `can-i-deploy.sh` has `--retry-while-unknown=10 --retry-interval=30`
+- [ ] `record-deployment.sh` has branch guard (only records on main/master)
+- [ ] `env-setup.sh` uses `set -eu`; broker scripts use `set -euo pipefail` — each with explanatory comment
+- [ ] CI workflow named `contract-test-consumer.yml`
+- [ ] CI has workflow-level env block (not per-step)
+- [ ] CI has `detect-breaking-change` step before install
+- [ ] CI step numbering skips (3) — webhook-triggered provider verification
+- [ ] CI can-i-deploy has `PACT_BREAKING_CHANGE != 'true'` condition
+- [ ] CI has NO upload-artifact step (broker is source of truth)
+- [ ] `.github/actions/detect-breaking-change/action.yml` exists
+- [ ] Consumer tests use `.pacttest.ts` extension
+- [ ] Consumer tests use PactV4 `addInteraction()` builder (not PactV3 fluent API)
+- [ ] Consumer tests call REAL consumer code (actual API client functions), NOT raw `fetch()`
+- [ ] Consumer code exposes URL injection mechanism (`setApiUrl()`, env var, or constructor param)
+- [ ] Local consumer-helpers shim present if `@seontechnologies/pactjs-utils` not installed
+- [ ] `.gitignore` includes `/pacts/` and `pact-logs/`
+
+### Security Checks
+
+- [ ] No credentials in configuration files
+- [ ] .env.example contains placeholders, not real values
+- [ ] Sensitive test data handled securely
+- [ ] API keys and tokens use environment variables
+- [ ] No secrets committed to version control
+
+---
+
+## Integration Points
+
+### Status File Integration
+
+- [ ] Framework initialization logged in Quality & Testing Progress section
+- [ ] Status file updated with completion timestamp
+- [ ] Status file shows framework: Playwright or Cypress
+
+### Knowledge Base Integration
+
+- [ ] Relevant knowledge fragments identified from tea-index.csv
+- [ ] Knowledge fragments successfully loaded
+- [ ] Patterns from knowledge base applied correctly
+- [ ] Knowledge base references included in documentation
+
+### Workflow Dependencies
+
+- [ ] Can proceed to `ci` workflow after completion
+- [ ] Can proceed to `test-design` workflow after completion
+- [ ] Can proceed to `atdd` workflow after completion
+- [ ] Framework setup compatible with downstream workflows
+
+---
+
+## Completion Criteria
+
+**All of the following must be true:**
+
+- [ ] All prerequisite checks passed
+- [ ] All process steps completed without errors
+- [ ] All output validations passed
+- [ ] All quality checks passed
+- [ ] All integration points verified
+- [ ] Sample test executes successfully
+- [ ] User can run the appropriate test command without errors (`npm run test:e2e`, `pytest`, `go test ./...`, etc.)
+- [ ] Documentation is complete and accurate
+- [ ] No critical issues or blockers identified
+
+---
+
+## Post-Workflow Actions
+
+**User must complete:**
+
+1. [ ] Copy `.env.example` to `.env`
+2. [ ] Fill in environment-specific values in `.env`
+3. [ ] Run `npm install` to install test dependencies
+4. [ ] Run `npm run test:e2e` to verify setup
+5. [ ] Review `tests/README.md` for project-specific guidance
+
+**Recommended next workflows:**
+
+1. [ ] Run `ci` workflow to set up CI/CD pipeline
+2. [ ] Run `test-design` workflow to plan test coverage
+3. [ ] Run `atdd` workflow when ready to develop stories
+
+---
+
+## Rollback Procedure
+
+If workflow fails and needs to be rolled back:
+
+1. [ ] Delete `tests/` directory
+2. [ ] Remove test scripts from package.json
+3. [ ] Delete `.env.example` (if created)
+4. [ ] Delete `.nvmrc` (if created)
+5. [ ] Delete framework config file
+6. [ ] Remove test dependencies from package.json (if added)
+7. [ ] Run `npm install` to clean up node_modules
+
+---
+
+## Notes
+
+### Common Issues
+
+**Issue**: Config file has TypeScript errors
+
+- **Solution**: Ensure `@playwright/test` or `cypress` types are installed
+
+**Issue**: Sample test fails to run
+
+- **Solution**: Check BASE_URL in .env, ensure app is running
+
+**Issue**: Fixture cleanup not working
+
+- **Solution**: Verify cleanup() is called in fixture teardown
+
+**Issue**: Network interception not working
+
+- **Solution**: Ensure route setup occurs before page.goto()
+
+### Framework-Specific Considerations
+
+**Playwright:**
+
+- Requires Node.js 18+
+- Browser binaries auto-installed on first run
+- Trace viewer requires running `npx playwright show-trace`
+
+**Cypress:**
+
+- Requires Node.js 18+
+- Cypress app opens on first run
+- Component testing requires additional setup
+
+### Version Compatibility
+
+- [ ] Node.js version matches .nvmrc
+- [ ] Framework version compatible with Node.js version
+- [ ] TypeScript version compatible with framework
+- [ ] All peer dependencies satisfied
+
+---
+
+**Checklist Complete**: Sign off when all items checked and validated.
+
+**Completed by:** {name}
+**Date:** {date}
+**Framework:** { Playwright / Cypress or something else}
+**Notes:** {notes}
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/instructions.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/instructions.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+<!-- Powered by BMAD-CORE™ -->
+
+# Test Framework Setup
+
+**Workflow ID**: `_bmad/tea/testarch/bmad-testarch-framework`
+**Version**: 5.0 (Step-File Architecture)
+
+---
+
+## Overview
+
+Initialize a production-ready test framework (Playwright or Cypress) with fixtures, helpers, configuration, and best practices.
+
+---
+
+## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
+
+This workflow uses **step-file architecture**:
+
+- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is self-contained
+- **JIT Loading**: Only the current step file is in memory
+- **Sequential Enforcement**: Execute steps in order without skipping
+
+---
+
+## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
+
+### 1. Configuration Loading
+
+From `workflow.yaml`, resolve:
+
+- `config_source`, `test_artifacts`, `user_name`, `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `date`
+- `test_dir`, `use_typescript`, `framework_preference`, `project_size`
+
+### 2. First Step
+
+Load, read completely, and execute:
+`./steps-c/step-01-preflight.md`
+
+### 3. Resume Support
+
+If the user selects **Resume** mode, load, read completely, and execute:
+`./steps-c/step-01b-resume.md`
+
+This checks the output document for progress tracking frontmatter and routes to the next incomplete step.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-01-preflight.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-01-preflight.md
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+---
+name: 'step-01-preflight'
+description: 'Verify prerequisites and gather project context'
+nextStepFile: './step-02-select-framework.md'
+outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-setup-progress.md'
+---
+
+# Step 1: Preflight Checks
+
+## STEP GOAL
+
+Verify the project is ready for framework scaffolding and gather key context.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
+
+- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+- 🚫 Halt if preflight requirements fail
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
+- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
+- Focus: this step's goal only
+- Limits: do not execute future steps
+- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
+
+## 1. Stack Detection
+
+**Read `config.test_stack_type`** from `{config_source}`.
+
+**Auto-Detection Algorithm** (when `test_stack_type` is `"auto"` or not configured):
+
+- Scan `{project-root}` for project manifests:
+  - **Frontend indicators**: `package.json` with react/vue/angular/next dependencies, `playwright.config.*`, `vite.config.*`, `webpack.config.*`
+  - **Backend indicators**: `pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`/`build.gradle`, `go.mod`, `*.csproj`/`*.sln`, `Gemfile`, `Cargo.toml`
+  - **Both present** = `fullstack`; only frontend = `frontend`; only backend = `backend`
+- Explicit `test_stack_type` config value overrides auto-detection
+- **Backward compatibility**: if `test_stack_type` is not in config, treat as `"auto"` (preserves current frontend behavior for existing installs)
+
+Store result as `{detected_stack}` = `frontend` | `backend` | `fullstack`
+
+---
+
+## 2. Validate Prerequisites
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+- `package.json` exists in project root
+- No existing E2E framework (`playwright.config.*`, `cypress.config.*`, `cypress.json`)
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+- At least one backend project manifest exists (`pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`, `build.gradle`, `go.mod`, `*.csproj`, `Gemfile`, `Cargo.toml`)
+- No existing test framework config that conflicts (e.g., `conftest.py` with full pytest suite, `src/test/` with JUnit suite)
+
+- Architecture/stack context available (project type, bundler, dependencies)
+
+If any fail, **HALT** and report the missing requirement.
+
+---
+
+## 3. Gather Project Context
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+- Read `package.json` to identify framework, bundler, dependencies
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+- Read the relevant project manifest (`pyproject.toml`, `pom.xml`, `go.mod`, `*.csproj`, `Gemfile`, `Cargo.toml`) to identify language, framework, and dependencies
+
+- Check for architecture docs (`architecture.md`, `tech-spec*.md`) if available
+- Note auth requirements and APIs (if documented)
+
+---
+
+## 3. Confirm Findings
+
+Summarize:
+
+- Project type and bundler
+- Whether a framework is already installed
+- Any relevant context docs found
+
+---
+
+### 4. Save Progress
+
+**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
+
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  stepsCompleted: ['step-01-preflight']
+  lastStep: 'step-01-preflight'
+  lastSaved: '{date}'
+  ---
+  ```
+
+  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
+  - Add `'step-01-preflight'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
+  - Set `lastStep: 'step-01-preflight'`
+  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
+  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
+
+Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Step completed in full with required outputs
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
+  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-01b-resume.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-01b-resume.md
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+---
+name: 'step-01b-resume'
+description: 'Resume interrupted workflow from last completed step'
+outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-setup-progress.md'
+---
+
+# Step 1b: Resume Workflow
+
+## STEP GOAL
+
+Resume an interrupted workflow by loading the existing progress document, verifying previously created artifacts still exist on disk, displaying progress, and routing to the next incomplete step.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
+
+- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: Output document with progress frontmatter
+- Focus: Load progress and route to next step
+- Limits: Do not re-execute completed steps
+- Dependencies: Output document must exist from a previous run
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
+
+### 1. Load Output Document
+
+Read `{outputFile}` and parse YAML frontmatter for:
+
+- `stepsCompleted` — array of completed step names
+- `lastStep` — last completed step name
+- `lastSaved` — timestamp of last save
+
+**If `{outputFile}` does not exist**, display:
+
+"⚠️ **No previous progress found.** There is no output document to resume from. Please use **[C] Create** to start a fresh workflow run."
+
+**THEN:** Halt. Do not proceed.
+
+---
+
+### 2. Verify Previously Created Artifacts
+
+Since this workflow creates code files, verify that artifacts from completed steps still exist on disk:
+
+- If `step-01-preflight` completed: Confirm `package.json` still exists
+- If `step-03-scaffold-framework` completed: Confirm directory structure and config files exist
+- If `step-04-docs-and-scripts` completed: Confirm `{test_dir}/README.md` exists
+
+If any expected artifacts are missing, warn the user and suggest re-running from the step that created them.
+
+---
+
+### 3. Display Progress Dashboard
+
+Display:
+
+"📋 **Workflow Resume — Test Framework Setup**
+
+**Last saved:** {lastSaved}
+**Steps completed:** {stepsCompleted.length} of 5
+
+1. ✅/⬜ Preflight Checks (step-01-preflight)
+2. ✅/⬜ Select Framework (step-02-select-framework)
+3. ✅/⬜ Scaffold Framework (step-03-scaffold-framework)
+4. ✅/⬜ Docs & Scripts (step-04-docs-and-scripts)
+5. ✅/⬜ Validate & Summary (step-05-validate-and-summary)"
+
+---
+
+### 4. Route to Next Step
+
+Based on `lastStep`, load the next incomplete step:
+
+- `'step-01-preflight'` → `./step-02-select-framework.md`
+- `'step-02-select-framework'` → `./step-03-scaffold-framework.md`
+- `'step-03-scaffold-framework'` → `./step-04-docs-and-scripts.md`
+- `'step-04-docs-and-scripts'` → `./step-05-validate-and-summary.md`
+- `'step-05-validate-and-summary'` → **Workflow already complete.** Display: "✅ **All steps completed.** Use **[V] Validate** to review outputs or **[E] Edit** to make revisions." Then halt.
+
+**If `lastStep` does not match any value above**, display: "⚠️ **Unknown progress state** (`lastStep`: {lastStep}). Please use **[C] Create** to start fresh." Then halt.
+
+**Otherwise**, load the identified step file, read completely, and execute.
+
+The existing content in `{outputFile}` provides context from previously completed steps.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Output document loaded and parsed correctly
+- Previously created artifacts verified on disk
+- Progress dashboard displayed accurately
+- Routed to correct next step
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Not loading output document
+- Not verifying existing artifacts
+- Incorrect progress display
+- Routing to wrong step
+- Re-executing completed steps
+
+**Master Rule:** Resume MUST route to the exact next incomplete step. Never re-execute completed steps.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-02-select-framework.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-02-select-framework.md
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+---
+name: 'step-02-select-framework'
+description: 'Select Playwright or Cypress and justify choice'
+nextStepFile: './step-03-scaffold-framework.md'
+outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-setup-progress.md'
+---
+
+# Step 2: Framework Selection
+
+## STEP GOAL
+
+Choose the most appropriate framework and document the rationale.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
+
+- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
+- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
+- Focus: this step's goal only
+- Limits: do not execute future steps
+- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
+
+## 1. Selection Logic
+
+Use `{detected_stack}` from Step 1 to guide framework selection.
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack` (browser-based testing):**
+
+Default to **Playwright** unless strong reasons suggest Cypress.
+
+**Playwright recommended when:**
+
+- Large or complex repo
+- Multi-browser support needed
+- Heavy API + UI integration
+- CI speed/parallelism is important
+
+**Cypress recommended when:**
+
+- Small team prioritizes DX
+- Component testing focus
+- Simpler setup needed
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` (no browser-based testing):**
+
+Select the framework matching the project language:
+
+- **Python**: pytest (default), unittest
+- **Java/Kotlin**: JUnit 5 (default), TestNG
+- **Go**: Go test (built-in)
+- **C#/.NET**: xUnit (default), NUnit, MSTest
+- **Ruby**: RSpec (default), Minitest
+- **Rust**: cargo test (built-in)
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `fullstack`:**
+
+Select both a browser-based framework (Playwright/Cypress) AND the appropriate backend framework for the detected language.
+
+Respect `config.test_framework` if explicitly set (not `"auto"`).
+
+---
+
+## 2. Announce Decision
+
+State the selected framework and reasoning.
+
+---
+
+### 3. Save Progress
+
+**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
+
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  stepsCompleted: ['step-02-select-framework']
+  lastStep: 'step-02-select-framework'
+  lastSaved: '{date}'
+  ---
+  ```
+
+  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
+  - Add `'step-02-select-framework'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
+  - Set `lastStep: 'step-02-select-framework'`
+  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
+  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
+
+Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Step completed in full with required outputs
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
+  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-03-scaffold-framework.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-03-scaffold-framework.md
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+---
+name: 'step-03-scaffold-framework'
+description: 'Create framework scaffold with adaptive orchestration (agent-team, subagent, or sequential)'
+nextStepFile: './step-04-docs-and-scripts.md'
+knowledgeIndex: '{project-root}/_bmad/tea/testarch/tea-index.csv'
+outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-setup-progress.md'
+---
+
+# Step 3: Scaffold Framework
+
+## STEP GOAL
+
+Generate the test directory structure, configuration files, fixtures, factories, helpers, and sample tests using deterministic mode selection with runtime fallback.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
+
+- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+- ✅ Apply knowledge base patterns where required
+- ✅ Resolve execution mode from explicit user request first, then config
+- ✅ Apply fallback rules deterministically when requested mode is unsupported
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
+- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
+- Focus: this step's goal only
+- Limits: do not execute future steps
+- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
+
+## 0. Resolve Execution Mode (User Override First)
+
+```javascript
+const parseBooleanFlag = (value, defaultValue = true) => {
+  if (typeof value === 'string') {
+    const normalized = value.trim().toLowerCase();
+    if (['false', '0', 'off', 'no'].includes(normalized)) return false;
+    if (['true', '1', 'on', 'yes'].includes(normalized)) return true;
+  }
+  if (value === undefined || value === null) return defaultValue;
+  return Boolean(value);
+};
+
+const orchestrationContext = {
+  config: {
+    execution_mode: config.tea_execution_mode || 'auto', // "auto" | "subagent" | "agent-team" | "sequential"
+    capability_probe: parseBooleanFlag(config.tea_capability_probe, true), // supports booleans and "false"/"true" strings
+  },
+  timestamp: new Date().toISOString().replace(/[:.]/g, '-'),
+};
+
+const normalizeUserExecutionMode = (mode) => {
+  if (typeof mode !== 'string') return null;
+  const normalized = mode.trim().toLowerCase().replace(/[-_]/g, ' ').replace(/\s+/g, ' ');
+
+  if (normalized === 'auto') return 'auto';
+  if (normalized === 'sequential') return 'sequential';
+  if (normalized === 'subagent' || normalized === 'sub agent' || normalized === 'subagents' || normalized === 'sub agents') {
+    return 'subagent';
+  }
+  if (normalized === 'agent team' || normalized === 'agent teams' || normalized === 'agentteam') {
+    return 'agent-team';
+  }
+
+  return null;
+};
+
+const normalizeConfigExecutionMode = (mode) => {
+  if (mode === 'subagent') return 'subagent';
+  if (mode === 'auto' || mode === 'sequential' || mode === 'subagent' || mode === 'agent-team') {
+    return mode;
+  }
+  return null;
+};
+
+// Explicit user instruction in the active run takes priority over config.
+const explicitModeFromUser = normalizeUserExecutionMode(runtime.getExplicitExecutionModeHint?.() || null);
+
+const requestedMode = explicitModeFromUser || normalizeConfigExecutionMode(orchestrationContext.config.execution_mode) || 'auto';
+const probeEnabled = orchestrationContext.config.capability_probe;
+
+const supports = { subagent: false, agentTeam: false };
+if (probeEnabled) {
+  supports.subagent = runtime.canLaunchSubagents?.() === true;
+  supports.agentTeam = runtime.canLaunchAgentTeams?.() === true;
+}
+
+let resolvedMode = requestedMode;
+if (requestedMode === 'auto') {
+  if (supports.agentTeam) resolvedMode = 'agent-team';
+  else if (supports.subagent) resolvedMode = 'subagent';
+  else resolvedMode = 'sequential';
+} else if (probeEnabled && requestedMode === 'agent-team' && !supports.agentTeam) {
+  resolvedMode = supports.subagent ? 'subagent' : 'sequential';
+} else if (probeEnabled && requestedMode === 'subagent' && !supports.subagent) {
+  resolvedMode = 'sequential';
+}
+```
+
+Resolution precedence:
+
+1. Explicit user request in this run (`agent team` => `agent-team`; `subagent` => `subagent`; `sequential`; `auto`)
+2. `tea_execution_mode` from config
+3. Runtime capability fallback (when probing enabled)
+
+## 1. Create Directory Structure
+
+Use `{detected_stack}` from Step 1 to determine directory layout.
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+- `{test_dir}/e2e/`
+- `{test_dir}/support/fixtures/`
+- `{test_dir}/support/helpers/`
+- `{test_dir}/support/page-objects/` (optional)
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Create the idiomatic test directory for the detected language:
+
+- **Python (pytest)**: `tests/` with `conftest.py`, `tests/unit/`, `tests/integration/`, `tests/api/`
+- **Java/Kotlin (JUnit)**: `src/test/java/` mirroring `src/main/java/` package structure, with `unit/`, `integration/`, `api/` sub-packages
+- **Go**: `*_test.go` files alongside source files (Go convention), plus `testdata/` for fixtures
+- **C#/.NET (xUnit)**: `tests/` project with `Unit/`, `Integration/`, `Api/` directories
+- **Ruby (RSpec)**: `spec/` with `spec/unit/`, `spec/integration/`, `spec/api/`, `spec/support/`
+- **Rust**: `tests/` for integration tests, inline `#[cfg(test)]` modules for unit tests
+
+**If `config.tea_use_pactjs_utils` is enabled and runtime is Node.js/TypeScript** (i.e., `{detected_stack}` is `frontend` or `fullstack`, or `{detected_stack}` is `backend` with Node.js/TypeScript runtime):
+
+Create Node.js/TypeScript contract testing directory structure per `pact-consumer-framework-setup.md`:
+
+- `tests/contract/consumer/` — consumer contract test files (`.pacttest.ts` extension)
+- `tests/contract/support/` — pact config, provider state factories, consumer helpers shim
+- `scripts/` — shell scripts (`env-setup.sh`, `publish-pact.sh`, `can-i-deploy.sh`, `record-deployment.sh`)
+- `.github/actions/detect-breaking-change/` — PR checkbox-driven breaking change detection
+- `.github/workflows/contract-test-consumer.yml` — consumer CDC CI workflow
+
+---
+
+## 2. Generate Framework Config
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Create `playwright.config.ts` or `cypress.config.ts` with:
+
+- **Timeouts**: action 15s, navigation 30s, test 60s
+- **Base URL**: env fallback (`BASE_URL`)
+- **Artifacts**: retain-on-failure (trace/screenshot/video)
+- **Reporters**: HTML + JUnit + console
+- **Parallelism**: enabled (CI tuned)
+
+Use TypeScript if `use_typescript: true`.
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Create the idiomatic test config for the detected framework:
+
+- **pytest**: `pyproject.toml` `[tool.pytest.ini_options]` or `pytest.ini` with markers, test paths, coverage settings
+- **JUnit**: `build.gradle`/`pom.xml` test configuration with JUnit 5 dependencies, Surefire/Failsafe plugins
+- **Go test**: no config file needed (Go convention); optionally create `Makefile` test targets
+- **xUnit**: `.csproj` test project with xUnit and coverlet dependencies
+- **RSpec**: `.rspec` config file with `spec_helper.rb` and `rails_helper.rb` (if Rails)
+
+---
+
+## 3. Environment Setup
+
+Create `.env.example` with `TEST_ENV`, `BASE_URL`, `API_URL`.
+
+**Stack-conditional environment files:**
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack` (Node.js):**
+
+- `.nvmrc` using current LTS Node (prefer Node 24+)
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend`:**
+
+Create the idiomatic version file for the detected language:
+
+- **Python**: `.python-version` with current stable Python (prefer 3.12+)
+- **Java**: `.java-version` or `JAVA_HOME` documentation in `.env.example`
+- **Go**: Go version is already in `go.mod` (no additional file needed)
+- **C#/.NET**: `global.json` with SDK version if not already present
+- **Ruby**: `.ruby-version` with current stable Ruby
+
+---
+
+## 4. Fixtures & Factories
+
+Read `{config_source}` and use `{knowledgeIndex}` to load fragments based on `config.tea_use_playwright_utils`:
+
+**If Playwright Utils enabled:**
+
+- `overview.md`, `fixtures-composition.md`, `auth-session.md`, `api-request.md`, `burn-in.md`, `network-error-monitor.md`, `data-factories.md`
+- Recommend installing `@seontechnologies/playwright-utils`
+
+**If disabled:**
+
+- `fixture-architecture.md`, `data-factories.md`, `network-first.md`, `playwright-config.md`, `test-quality.md`
+
+**If Pact.js Utils enabled** (`config.tea_use_pactjs_utils`):
+
+- `pact-consumer-framework-setup.md` (CRITICAL: load this for directory structure, scripts, CI workflow, and PactV4 patterns)
+- `pactjs-utils-overview.md`, `pactjs-utils-consumer-helpers.md`, `pactjs-utils-provider-verifier.md`, `pactjs-utils-request-filter.md`, `contract-testing.md`
+- Recommend installing `@seontechnologies/pactjs-utils` and `@pact-foundation/pact`
+
+**If Pact.js Utils disabled but contract testing relevant:**
+
+- `contract-testing.md`
+
+**If Pact MCP enabled** (`config.tea_pact_mcp` is `"mcp"`):
+
+- `pact-mcp.md`
+
+Implement:
+
+- Fixture index with `mergeTests`
+- Auto-cleanup hooks
+- Faker-based data factories with overrides
+
+---
+
+## 5. Sample Tests & Helpers
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Create example tests in `{test_dir}/e2e/` demonstrating:
+
+- Given/When/Then format
+- data-testid selector strategy
+- Factory usage
+- Network interception pattern (if applicable)
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Create example tests in the idiomatic location for the detected language:
+
+- **Python**: `tests/test_example.py` with pytest fixtures, parametrize, and factory usage
+- **Java**: `src/test/java/.../ExampleTest.java` with JUnit 5 annotations, `@BeforeEach` setup
+- **Go**: `example_test.go` alongside source with table-driven tests and `testify` assertions
+- **C#/.NET**: `tests/ExampleTests.cs` with xUnit `[Fact]`/`[Theory]` and fixture injection
+- **Ruby**: `spec/example_spec.rb` with RSpec `describe`/`context`/`it` and factory_bot
+
+Create helpers for:
+
+- API clients (if needed)
+- Network utilities (frontend/fullstack only)
+- Auth helpers
+- Test data factories (language-idiomatic patterns)
+
+**If `config.tea_use_pactjs_utils` is enabled and runtime is Node.js/TypeScript** (i.e., `{detected_stack}` is `frontend` or `fullstack`, or `{detected_stack}` is `backend` with Node.js/TypeScript runtime):
+
+Create Node.js/TypeScript contract test samples per `pact-consumer-framework-setup.md`:
+
+- **Consumer test**: Example using PactV4 `addInteraction()` builder + `createProviderState` + real consumer code with URL injection (`.pacttest.ts` extension)
+- **Support files**: Pact config factory (`pact-config.ts`), provider state factories (`provider-states.ts`), local consumer-helpers shim (`consumer-helpers.ts`)
+- **Vitest config**: Minimal `vitest.config.pact.ts` (do NOT copy settings from unit config)
+- **Shell scripts**: `env-setup.sh`, `publish-pact.sh`, `can-i-deploy.sh`, `record-deployment.sh` in `scripts/`
+- **CI workflow**: `contract-test-consumer.yml` with detect-breaking-change action
+- **package.json scripts**: `test:pact:consumer`, `publish:pact`, `can:i:deploy:consumer`, `record:consumer:deployment`
+- **.gitignore**: Add `/pacts/` and `pact-logs/`
+
+---
+
+### 6. Orchestration Notes for This Step
+
+For this step, treat these work units as parallelizable when `resolvedMode` is `agent-team` or `subagent`:
+
+- Worker A: directory + framework config + env setup (sections 1-3)
+- Worker B: fixtures + factories (section 4)
+- Worker C: sample tests + helpers (section 5)
+
+In parallel-capable modes, runtime decides worker scheduling and concurrency.
+
+If `resolvedMode` is `sequential`, execute sections 1→5 in order.
+
+Regardless of mode, outputs must be identical in structure and quality.
+
+### 7. Save Progress
+
+**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
+
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  stepsCompleted: ['step-03-scaffold-framework']
+  lastStep: 'step-03-scaffold-framework'
+  lastSaved: '{date}'
+  ---
+  ```
+
+  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
+  - Add `'step-03-scaffold-framework'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
+  - Set `lastStep: 'step-03-scaffold-framework'`
+  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
+  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
+
+Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Step completed in full with required outputs
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
+  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+---
+name: 'step-04-docs-and-scripts'
+description: 'Document setup and add package.json scripts'
+nextStepFile: './step-05-validate-and-summary.md'
+outputFile: '{test_dir}/README.md'
+progressFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-setup-progress.md'
+---
+
+# Step 4: Documentation & Scripts
+
+## STEP GOAL
+
+Create test documentation and add build/test scripts appropriate for `{detected_stack}`.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
+
+- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
+- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
+- Focus: this step's goal only
+- Limits: do not execute future steps
+- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
+
+## 1. tests/README.md
+
+Create `{outputFile}` and include:
+
+- Setup instructions
+- Running tests (local/headed/debug)
+- Architecture overview (fixtures, factories, helpers)
+- Best practices (selectors, isolation, cleanup)
+- CI integration notes
+- Knowledge base references
+
+---
+
+## 2. Build & Test Scripts
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `frontend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Add to `package.json` at minimum:
+
+- `test:e2e`: framework execution command (e.g., `npx playwright test`)
+
+**If {detected_stack} is `backend` or `fullstack`:**
+
+Add the idiomatic test commands for the detected framework:
+
+- **Python (pytest)**: Add to `pyproject.toml` scripts or `Makefile`: `pytest`, `pytest --cov`, `pytest -m integration`
+- **Java (JUnit)**: Add to `build.gradle`/`pom.xml`: `./gradlew test`, `mvn test`, `mvn verify` (integration)
+- **Go**: Add to `Makefile`: `go test ./...`, `go test -race ./...`, `go test -cover ./...`
+- **C#/.NET**: Add to CI scripts or `Makefile`: `dotnet test`, `dotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"`
+- **Ruby (RSpec)**: Add to `Gemfile` binstubs or `Makefile`: `bundle exec rspec`, `bundle exec rspec spec/integration`
+
+---
+
+### 3. Save Progress
+
+**Save this step's accumulated work to `{progressFile}`.**
+
+- **If `{progressFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
+
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  stepsCompleted: ['step-04-docs-and-scripts']
+  lastStep: 'step-04-docs-and-scripts'
+  lastSaved: '{date}'
+  ---
+  ```
+
+  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
+
+- **If `{progressFile}` already exists**, update:
+  - Add `'step-04-docs-and-scripts'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
+  - Set `lastStep: 'step-04-docs-and-scripts'`
+  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
+  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
+
+Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Step completed in full with required outputs
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
+  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-05-validate-and-summary.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-c/step-05-validate-and-summary.md
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+---
+name: 'step-05-validate-and-summary'
+description: 'Validate against checklist and summarize'
+outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-setup-progress.md'
+---
+
+# Step 5: Validate & Summarize
+
+## STEP GOAL
+
+Validate framework setup and provide a completion summary.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
+
+- 📖 Read the entire step file before acting
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+---
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 💾 Record outputs before proceeding
+- 📖 Load the next step only when instructed
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: config, loaded artifacts, and knowledge fragments
+- Focus: this step's goal only
+- Limits: do not execute future steps
+- Dependencies: prior steps' outputs (if any)
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise.
+
+## 1. Validation
+
+Validate against `checklist.md`:
+
+- Preflight success
+- Directory structure created
+- Config correctness
+- Fixtures/factories created
+- Docs and scripts present
+
+Fix any gaps before completion.
+
+---
+
+## 2. Completion Summary
+
+Report:
+
+- Framework selected
+- Artifacts created
+- Next steps (install deps, run tests)
+- Knowledge fragments applied
+
+---
+
+### 3. Save Progress
+
+**Save this step's accumulated work to `{outputFile}`.**
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` does not exist** (first save), create it with YAML frontmatter:
+
+  ```yaml
+  ---
+  stepsCompleted: ['step-05-validate-and-summary']
+  lastStep: 'step-05-validate-and-summary'
+  lastSaved: '{date}'
+  ---
+  ```
+
+  Then write this step's output below the frontmatter.
+
+- **If `{outputFile}` already exists**, update:
+  - Add `'step-05-validate-and-summary'` to `stepsCompleted` array (only if not already present)
+  - Set `lastStep: 'step-05-validate-and-summary'`
+  - Set `lastSaved: '{date}'`
+  - Append this step's output to the appropriate section of the document.
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Step completed in full with required outputs
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipped sequence steps or missing outputs
+  **Master Rule:** Skipping steps is FORBIDDEN.
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-e/step-01-assess.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-e/step-01-assess.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+---
+name: 'step-01-assess'
+description: 'Load an existing output for editing'
+nextStepFile: './step-02-apply-edit.md'
+---
+
+# Step 1: Assess Edit Target
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Identify which output should be edited and load it.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 📖 Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are the Master Test Architect
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Ask the user which output file to edit
+- 🚫 Do not edit until target is confirmed
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: existing outputs
+- Focus: select edit target
+- Limits: no edits yet
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly.
+
+### 1. Identify Target
+
+Ask the user to provide the output file path or select from known outputs.
+
+### 2. Load Target
+
+Read the provided output file in full.
+
+### 3. Confirm
+
+Confirm the target and proceed to edit.
+
+Load next step: `{nextStepFile}`
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Target identified and loaded
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Proceeding without a confirmed target
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+name: 'step-02-apply-edit'
+description: 'Apply edits to the selected output'
+---
+
+# Step 2: Apply Edits
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Apply the requested edits to the selected output and confirm changes.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 📖 Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are the Master Test Architect
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Only apply edits explicitly requested by the user
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: selected output and user changes
+- Focus: apply edits only
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly.
+
+### 1. Confirm Requested Changes
+
+Restate what will be changed and confirm.
+
+### 2. Apply Changes
+
+Update the output file accordingly.
+
+### 3. Report
+
+Summarize the edits applied.
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Changes applied and confirmed
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Unconfirmed edits or missing update
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-v/step-01-validate.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/steps-v/step-01-validate.md
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+---
+name: 'step-01-validate'
+description: 'Validate workflow outputs against checklist'
+outputFile: '{test_artifacts}/framework-validation-report.md'
+validationChecklist: '../checklist.md'
+---
+
+# Step 1: Validate Outputs
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Validate outputs using the workflow checklist and record findings.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 📖 Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- ✅ Speak in `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are the Master Test Architect
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Validate against `{validationChecklist}`
+- 🚫 Do not skip checks
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Follow the MANDATORY SEQUENCE exactly
+- 💾 Write findings to `{outputFile}`
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: workflow outputs and checklist
+- Focus: validation only
+- Limits: do not modify outputs in this step
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly.
+
+### 1. Load Checklist
+
+Read `{validationChecklist}` and list all criteria.
+
+### 2. Validate Outputs
+
+Evaluate outputs against each checklist item.
+
+### 3. Write Report
+
+Write a validation report to `{outputFile}` with PASS/WARN/FAIL per section.
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS:
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Validation report written
+- All checklist items evaluated
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipped checklist items
+- No report produced
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/validation-report-20260127-095021.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/validation-report-20260127-095021.md
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+---
+validationDate: 2026-01-27
+workflowName: testarch-framework
+workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/bmad-testarch-framework
+validationStatus: COMPLETE
+completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:03:10
+---
+
+# Validation Report: testarch-framework
+
+**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 09:50:21
+**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
+**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
+
+## File Structure & Size
+
+- workflow.md present: YES
+- instructions.md present: YES
+- workflow.yaml present: YES
+- step files found: 8
+
+**Step File Sizes:**
+
+- steps-c/step-01-preflight.md: 69 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-02-select-framework.md: 66 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-03-scaffold-framework.md: 107 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md: 63 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-05-validate-and-summary.md: 61 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 51 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 46 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 53 lines [GOOD]
+- workflow-plan.md present: YES
+
+## Frontmatter Validation
+
+- No frontmatter violations found
+
+## Critical Path Violations
+
+- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
+- No dead relative links detected
+
+## Menu Handling Validation
+
+- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
+
+## Step Type Validation
+
+- Last step steps-v/step-01-validate.md has no nextStepFile (final step OK)
+- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
+
+## Output Format Validation
+
+- No templates found in workflow root
+- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
+  - steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md
+  - steps-v/step-01-validate.md
+
+## Validation Design Check
+
+- checklist.md present: YES
+- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
+
+## Instruction Style Check
+
+- All steps include STEP GOAL, MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES, EXECUTION PROTOCOLS, CONTEXT BOUNDARIES, and SUCCESS/FAILURE metrics
+
+## Summary
+
+- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:03:10
+- Critical issues: 0
+- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
+- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/validation-report-20260127-102401.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/validation-report-20260127-102401.md
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+---
+validationDate: 2026-01-27
+workflowName: testarch-framework
+workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/bmad-testarch-framework
+validationStatus: COMPLETE
+completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
+---
+
+# Validation Report: testarch-framework
+
+**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 10:24:01
+**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
+**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
+
+## File Structure & Size
+
+- workflow.md present: YES
+- instructions.md present: YES
+- workflow.yaml present: YES
+- step files found: 8
+
+**Step File Sizes:**
+
+- steps-c/step-01-preflight.md: 68 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-02-select-framework.md: 65 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-03-scaffold-framework.md: 106 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md: 62 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-c/step-05-validate-and-summary.md: 60 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
+- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
+- workflow-plan.md present: YES
+
+## Frontmatter Validation
+
+- No frontmatter violations found
+
+## Critical Path Violations
+
+### Config Variables (Exceptions)
+
+Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name
+
+- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
+
+- No dead relative links detected
+
+- No module path assumptions detected
+
+**Status:** ✅ PASS - No critical violations
+
+## Menu Handling Validation
+
+- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
+
+## Step Type Validation
+
+- steps-c/step-01-preflight.md: Init [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-02-select-framework.md: Middle [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-03-scaffold-framework.md: Middle [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md: Middle [PASS]
+- steps-c/step-05-validate-and-summary.md: Final [PASS]
+- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
+
+## Output Format Validation
+
+- Templates present: NONE
+- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
+  - steps-c/step-04-docs-and-scripts.md
+  - steps-v/step-01-validate.md
+- checklist.md present: YES
+
+## Validation Design Check
+
+- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
+- Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
+- Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed
+
+## Instruction Style Check
+
+- Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
+- Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance
+
+## Collaborative Experience Check
+
+- Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
+- Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
+- Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals
+
+## Subagent Optimization Opportunities
+
+- No high-priority subagent optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
+- Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
+- Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
+- Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
+- Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only
+
+## Cohesive Review
+
+- Overall assessment: GOOD
+- Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
+- Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
+- Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)
+
+## Plan Quality Validation
+
+- Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
+- Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
+- Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented
+
+## Summary
+
+- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
+- Critical issues: 0
+- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
+- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/workflow-plan.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/workflow-plan.md
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+    # Workflow Plan: testarch-framework
+
+    ## Create Mode (steps-c)
+    - step-01-preflight.md
+
+- step-02-select-framework.md
+- step-03-scaffold-framework.md
+- step-04-docs-and-scripts.md
+- step-05-validate-and-summary.md
+
+  ## Validate Mode (steps-v)
+  - step-01-validate.md
+
+  ## Edit Mode (steps-e)
+  - step-01-assess.md
+  - step-02-apply-edit.md
+
+  ## Outputs
+  - Framework config (playwright.config.ts or cypress.config.ts)
+
+- {project-root}/tests/README.md
+- Test support scaffolding under {project-root}/tests
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/workflow.md
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/workflow.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+---
+name: bmad-testarch-framework
+description: Initialize test framework with Playwright or Cypress. Use when user says 'lets setup test framework' or 'I want to initialize testing framework'
+web_bundle: true
+---
+
+# Test Framework Setup
+
+**Goal:** Initialize production-ready test framework architecture (Playwright or Cypress) with fixtures, helpers, and configuration
+
+**Role:** You are the Master Test Architect.
+
+---
+
+## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
+
+This workflow uses **tri-modal step-file architecture**:
+
+- **Create mode (steps-c/)**: primary execution flow
+- **Validate mode (steps-v/)**: validation against checklist
+- **Edit mode (steps-e/)**: revise existing outputs
+
+---
+
+## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
+
+### 1. Mode Determination
+
+"Welcome to the workflow. What would you like to do?"
+
+- **[C] Create** — Run the workflow
+- **[R] Resume** — Resume an interrupted workflow
+- **[V] Validate** — Validate existing outputs
+- **[E] Edit** — Edit existing outputs
+
+### 2. Route to First Step
+
+- **If C:** Load `steps-c/step-01-preflight.md`
+- **If R:** Load `steps-c/step-01b-resume.md`
+- **If V:** Load `steps-v/step-01-validate.md`
+- **If E:** Load `steps-e/step-01-assess.md`
--- a/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/workflow.yaml
+++ b/.agents/skills/bmad-testarch-framework/workflow.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Test Architect workflow: bmad-testarch-framework
+name: bmad-testarch-framework
+# prettier-ignore
+description: 'Initialize test framework with Playwright or Cypress. Use when the user says "lets setup test framework" or "I want to initialize testing framework"'
+
+# Critical variables from config
+config_source: "{project-root}/_bmad/tea/config.yaml"
+output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
+test_artifacts: "{config_source}:test_artifacts"
+user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
+communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
+document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language"
+date: system-generated
+
+# Workflow components
+installed_path: "."
+instructions: "./instructions.md"
+validation: "./checklist.md"
+
+# Variables and inputs
+variables:
+  test_dir: "{project-root}/tests" # Root test directory
+  use_typescript: true # Prefer TypeScript configuration
+  framework_preference: "auto" # auto, playwright, cypress - user can override auto-detection
+  project_size: "auto" # auto, small, large - influences framework recommendation
+
+# Output configuration
+default_output_file: "{test_dir}/README.md" # Main deliverable is test setup README
+
+# Required tools
+required_tools:
+  - read_file # Read package.json, existing configs
+  - write_file # Create config files, helpers, fixtures, tests
+  - create_directory # Create test directory structure
+  - list_files # Check for existing framework
+  - search_repo # Find architecture docs
+
+tags:
+  - qa
+  - setup
+  - test-architect
+  - framework
+  - initialization
+
+execution_hints:
+  interactive: false # Minimize prompts; auto-detect when possible
+  autonomous: true # Proceed without user input unless blocked
+  iterative: true