initial commit
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-create-product-brief
|
||||
description: 'Create product brief through collaborative discovery. Use when the user says "lets create a product brief" or "help me create a project brief"'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
stepsCompleted: []
|
||||
inputDocuments: []
|
||||
date: {{system-date}}
|
||||
author: {{user_name}}
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Product Brief: {{project_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Content will be appended sequentially through collaborative workflow steps -->
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 1: Product Brief Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Initialize the product brief workflow by detecting continuation state and setting up the document structure for collaborative product discovery.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on initialization and setup - no content generation yet
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to look ahead to future steps or assume knowledge from them
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic setup with clear reporting to user
|
||||
- 📋 Detect existing workflow state and handle continuation properly
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis of current state before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Initialize document structure and update frontmatter appropriately
|
||||
- 📖 Set up frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until user selects 'C' (Continue)
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Variables from workflow.md are available in memory
|
||||
- Focus: Workflow initialization and document setup only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't assume knowledge from other steps or create content yet
|
||||
- Dependencies: Configuration loaded from workflow.md initialization
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Check for Existing Workflow State
|
||||
|
||||
First, check if the output document already exists:
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow State Detection:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for file `{outputFile}`
|
||||
- If exists, read the complete file including frontmatter
|
||||
- If not exists, this is a fresh workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Handle Continuation (If Document Exists)
|
||||
|
||||
If the document exists and has frontmatter with `stepsCompleted`:
|
||||
|
||||
**Continuation Protocol:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **STOP immediately** and load `./step-01b-continue.md`
|
||||
- Do not proceed with any initialization tasks
|
||||
- Let step-01b handle all continuation logic
|
||||
- This is an auto-proceed situation - no user choice needed
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Fresh Workflow Setup (If No Document)
|
||||
|
||||
If no document exists or no `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter:
|
||||
|
||||
#### A. Input Document Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
load context documents using smart discovery. Documents can be in the following locations:
|
||||
- {planning_artifacts}/**
|
||||
- {output_folder}/**
|
||||
- {product_knowledge}/**
|
||||
- {project-root}/docs/**
|
||||
|
||||
Also - when searching - documents can be a single markdown file, or a folder with an index and multiple files. For Example, if searching for `*foo*.md` and not found, also search for a folder called *foo*/index.md (which indicates sharded content)
|
||||
|
||||
Try to discover the following:
|
||||
- Brainstorming Reports (`*brainstorming*.md`)
|
||||
- Research Documents (`*research*.md`)
|
||||
- Project Documentation (generally multiple documents might be found for this in the `{product_knowledge}` or `docs` folder.)
|
||||
- Project Context (`**/project-context.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
<critical>Confirm what you have found with the user, along with asking if the user wants to provide anything else. Only after this confirmation will you proceed to follow the loading rules</critical>
|
||||
|
||||
**Loading Rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Load ALL discovered files completely that the user confirmed or provided (no offset/limit)
|
||||
- If there is a project context, whatever is relevant should try to be biased in the remainder of this whole workflow process
|
||||
- For sharded folders, load ALL files to get complete picture, using the index first to potentially know the potential of each document
|
||||
- index.md is a guide to what's relevant whenever available
|
||||
- Track all successfully loaded files in frontmatter `inputDocuments` array
|
||||
|
||||
#### B. Create Initial Document
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Setup:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Copy the template from `../product-brief.template.md` to `{outputFile}`, and update the frontmatter fields
|
||||
|
||||
#### C. Present Initialization Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup Report to User:**
|
||||
"Welcome {{user_name}}! I've set up your product brief workspace for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Setup:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Created: `{outputFile}` from template
|
||||
- Initialized frontmatter with workflow state
|
||||
|
||||
**Input Documents Discovered:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Research: {number of research files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
- Brainstorming: {number of brainstorming files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
- Project docs: {number of project files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
- Project Context: {number of project context files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
|
||||
**Files loaded:** {list of specific file names or "No additional documents found"}
|
||||
|
||||
Do you have any other documents you'd like me to include, or shall we continue to the next step?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Proceeding to product vision discovery...**"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- After setup report is presented, without delay, read fully and follow: ./step-02-vision.md
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- This is an initialization step with auto-proceed after setup completion
|
||||
- Proceed directly to next step after document setup and reporting
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN [setup completion is achieved and frontmatter properly updated], will you then read fully and follow: `./step-02-vision.md` to begin product vision discovery.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Existing workflow detected and properly handed off to step-01b
|
||||
- Fresh workflow initialized with template and proper frontmatter
|
||||
- Input documents discovered and loaded using sharded-first logic
|
||||
- All discovered files tracked in frontmatter `inputDocuments`
|
||||
- Menu presented and user input handled correctly
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated with `stepsCompleted: [1]` before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Proceeding with fresh initialization when existing workflow exists
|
||||
- Not updating frontmatter with discovered input documents
|
||||
- Creating document without proper template structure
|
||||
- Not checking sharded folders first before whole files
|
||||
- Not reporting discovered documents to user clearly
|
||||
- Proceeding without user selecting 'C' (Continue)
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 1B: Product Brief Continuation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Resume the product brief workflow from where it was left off, ensuring smooth continuation with full context restoration.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative continuation tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on understanding where we left off and continuing appropriately
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to modify content completed in previous steps
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic state analysis with clear progress reporting
|
||||
- 📋 Resume workflow from exact point where it was interrupted
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis of current state before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Keep existing frontmatter `stepsCompleted` values
|
||||
- 📖 Only load documents that were already tracked in `inputDocuments`
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to discover new input documents during continuation
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Current document and frontmatter are already loaded
|
||||
- Focus: Workflow state analysis and continuation logic only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't assume knowledge beyond what's in the document
|
||||
- Dependencies: Existing workflow state from previous session
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Analyze Current State
|
||||
|
||||
**State Assessment:**
|
||||
Review the frontmatter to understand:
|
||||
|
||||
- `stepsCompleted`: Which steps are already done
|
||||
- `lastStep`: The most recently completed step number
|
||||
- `inputDocuments`: What context was already loaded
|
||||
- All other frontmatter variables
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Restore Context Documents
|
||||
|
||||
**Context Reloading:**
|
||||
|
||||
- For each document in `inputDocuments`, load the complete file
|
||||
- This ensures you have full context for continuation
|
||||
- Don't discover new documents - only reload what was previously processed
|
||||
- Maintain the same context as when workflow was interrupted
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Present Current Progress
|
||||
|
||||
**Progress Report to User:**
|
||||
"Welcome back {{user_name}}! I'm resuming our product brief collaboration for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Progress:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Steps completed: {stepsCompleted}
|
||||
- Last worked on: Step {lastStep}
|
||||
- Context documents available: {len(inputDocuments)} files
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Status:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current product brief is ready with all completed sections
|
||||
- Ready to continue from where we left off
|
||||
|
||||
Does this look right, or do you want to make any adjustments before we proceed?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Determine Continuation Path
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Step Logic:**
|
||||
Based on `lastStep` value, determine which step to load next:
|
||||
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 1` → Load `./step-02-vision.md`
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 2` → Load `./step-03-users.md`
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 3` → Load `./step-04-metrics.md`
|
||||
- Continue this pattern for all steps
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 6` → Workflow already complete
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Handle Workflow Completion
|
||||
|
||||
**If workflow already complete (`lastStep = 6`):**
|
||||
"Great news! It looks like we've already completed the product brief workflow for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
The final document is ready at `{outputFile}` with all sections completed through step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like me to:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review the completed product brief with you
|
||||
- Suggest next workflow steps (like PRD creation)
|
||||
- Start a new product brief revision
|
||||
|
||||
What would be most helpful?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**If workflow not complete:**
|
||||
Display: "Ready to continue with Step {nextStepNumber}: {nextStepTitle}?
|
||||
|
||||
**Select an Option:** [C] Continue to Step {nextStepNumber}"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF C: Read fully and follow the appropriate next step file based on `lastStep`
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: respond and redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- User can chat or ask questions about current progress
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [current state confirmed], will you then read fully and follow the appropriate next step file to resume the workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All previous input documents successfully reloaded
|
||||
- Current workflow state accurately analyzed and presented
|
||||
- User confirms understanding of progress before continuation
|
||||
- Correct next step identified and prepared for loading
|
||||
- Proper continuation path determined based on `lastStep`
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Discovering new input documents instead of reloading existing ones
|
||||
- Modifying content from already completed steps
|
||||
- Loading wrong next step based on `lastStep` value
|
||||
- Proceeding without user confirmation of current state
|
||||
- Not maintaining context consistency from previous session
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2: Product Vision Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct comprehensive product vision discovery to define the core problem, solution, and unique value proposition through collaborative analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on product vision, problem, and solution discovery
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to generate vision without real user input and collaboration
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic discovery from problem to solution
|
||||
- 📋 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based vision crafting
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Generate vision content collaboratively with user
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation through menu
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Current document and frontmatter from step 1, input documents already loaded in memory
|
||||
- Focus: This will be the first content section appended to the document
|
||||
- Limits: Focus on clear, compelling product vision and problem statement
|
||||
- Dependencies: Document initialization from step-01 must be complete
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Vision Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
**Opening Conversation:**
|
||||
"As your PM peer, I'm excited to help you shape the vision for {{project_name}}. Let's start with the foundation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Tell me about the product you envision:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What core problem are you trying to solve?
|
||||
- Who experiences this problem most acutely?
|
||||
- What would success look like for the people you're helping?
|
||||
- What excites you most about this solution?
|
||||
|
||||
Let's start with the problem space before we get into solutions."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Deep Problem Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem Discovery:**
|
||||
Explore the problem from multiple angles using targeted questions:
|
||||
|
||||
- How do people currently solve this problem?
|
||||
- What's frustrating about current solutions?
|
||||
- What happens if this problem goes unsolved?
|
||||
- Who feels this pain most intensely?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Current Solutions Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Landscape:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What solutions exist today?
|
||||
- Where do they fall short?
|
||||
- What gaps are they leaving open?
|
||||
- Why haven't existing solutions solved this completely?
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Solution Vision
|
||||
|
||||
**Collaborative Solution Crafting:**
|
||||
|
||||
- If we could solve this perfectly, what would that look like?
|
||||
- What's the simplest way we could make a meaningful difference?
|
||||
- What makes your approach different from what's out there?
|
||||
- What would make users say 'this is exactly what I needed'?
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Unique Differentiators
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Advantage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What's your unfair advantage?
|
||||
- What would be hard for competitors to copy?
|
||||
- What insight or approach is uniquely yours?
|
||||
- Why is now the right time for this solution?
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Executive Summary Content
|
||||
|
||||
**Content to Append:**
|
||||
Prepare the following structure for document append:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[Executive summary content based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Vision
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem Statement
|
||||
|
||||
[Problem statement content based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Problem Impact
|
||||
|
||||
[Problem impact content based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Existing Solutions Fall Short
|
||||
|
||||
[Analysis of existing solution gaps based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Proposed Solution
|
||||
|
||||
[Proposed solution description based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Differentiators
|
||||
|
||||
[Key differentiators based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Presentation:**
|
||||
"I've drafted the executive summary and core vision based on our conversation. This captures the essence of {{project_name}} and what makes it special.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with current vision content to dive deeper and refine
|
||||
- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill to bring different perspectives to positioning and differentiation
|
||||
- IF C: Save content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with stepsCompleted: [1, 2], then read fully and follow: ./step-03-users.md
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu with updated content
|
||||
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [vision content finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then read fully and follow: `./step-03-users.md` to begin target user discovery.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear problem statement that resonates with target users
|
||||
- Compelling solution vision that addresses the core problem
|
||||
- Unique differentiators that provide competitive advantage
|
||||
- Executive summary that captures the product essence
|
||||
- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly with proper task execution
|
||||
- Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2]
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Accepting vague problem statements without pushing for specificity
|
||||
- Creating solution vision without fully understanding the problem
|
||||
- Missing unique differentiators or competitive insights
|
||||
- Generating vision without real user input and collaboration
|
||||
- Not presenting standard A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
- Not updating frontmatter properly
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 3: Target Users Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Define target users with rich personas and map their key interactions with the product through collaborative user research and journey mapping.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on defining who this product serves and how they interact with it
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to create generic user profiles without specific details
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic persona development with journey mapping
|
||||
- 📋 COLLABORATIVE persona development, not assumption-based user creation
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Generate user personas and journeys collaboratively with user
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation through menu
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Current document and frontmatter from previous steps, product vision and problem already defined
|
||||
- Focus: Creating vivid, actionable user personas that align with product vision
|
||||
- Limits: Focus on users who directly experience the problem or benefit from the solution
|
||||
- Dependencies: Product vision and problem statement from step-02 must be complete
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin User Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
**Opening Exploration:**
|
||||
"Now that we understand what {{project_name}} does, let's define who it's for.
|
||||
|
||||
**User Discovery:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Who experiences the problem we're solving?
|
||||
- Are there different types of users with different needs?
|
||||
- Who gets the most value from this solution?
|
||||
- Are there primary users and secondary users we should consider?
|
||||
|
||||
Let's start by identifying the main user groups."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Primary User Segment Development
|
||||
|
||||
**Persona Development Process:**
|
||||
For each primary user segment, create rich personas:
|
||||
|
||||
**Name & Context:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Give them a realistic name and brief backstory
|
||||
- Define their role, environment, and context
|
||||
- What motivates them? What are their goals?
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem Experience:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How do they currently experience the problem?
|
||||
- What workarounds are they using?
|
||||
- What are the emotional and practical impacts?
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Vision:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What would success look like for them?
|
||||
- What would make them say "this is exactly what I needed"?
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary User Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- "Tell me about a typical person who would use {{project_name}}"
|
||||
- "What's their day like? Where does our product fit in?"
|
||||
- "What are they trying to accomplish that's hard right now?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Secondary User Segment Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary User Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- "Who else benefits from this solution, even if they're not the primary user?"
|
||||
- "Are there admin, support, or oversight roles we should consider?"
|
||||
- "Who influences the decision to adopt or purchase this product?"
|
||||
- "Are there partner or stakeholder users who matter?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. User Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
**Journey Elements:**
|
||||
Map key interactions for each user segment:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Discovery:** How do they find out about the solution?
|
||||
- **Onboarding:** What's their first experience like?
|
||||
- **Core Usage:** How do they use the product day-to-day?
|
||||
- **Success Moment:** When do they realize the value?
|
||||
- **Long-term:** How does it become part of their routine?
|
||||
|
||||
**Journey Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- "Walk me through how [Persona Name] would discover and start using {{project_name}}"
|
||||
- "What's their 'aha!' moment?"
|
||||
- "How does this product change how they work or live?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Generate Target Users Content
|
||||
|
||||
**Content to Append:**
|
||||
Prepare the following structure for document append:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Target Users
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Users
|
||||
|
||||
[Primary user segment content based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Secondary Users
|
||||
|
||||
[Secondary user segment content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
|
||||
### User Journey
|
||||
|
||||
[User journey content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Presentation:**
|
||||
"I've mapped out who {{project_name}} serves and how they'll interact with it. This helps us ensure we're building something that real people will love to use.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 5]
|
||||
|
||||
**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with current user content to dive deeper into personas and journeys
|
||||
- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill to bring different perspectives to validate user understanding
|
||||
- IF C: Save content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3], then read fully and follow: ./step-04-metrics.md
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#6-present-menu-options)
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu with updated content
|
||||
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [user personas finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then read fully and follow: `./step-04-metrics.md` to begin success metrics definition.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Rich, believable user personas with clear motivations
|
||||
- Clear distinction between primary and secondary users
|
||||
- User journeys that show key interaction points and value creation
|
||||
- User segments that align with product vision and problem statement
|
||||
- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly with proper task execution
|
||||
- Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Creating generic user profiles without specific details
|
||||
- Missing key user segments that are important to success
|
||||
- User journeys that don't show how the product creates value
|
||||
- Not connecting user needs back to the problem statement
|
||||
- Not presenting standard A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
- Not updating frontmatter properly
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 4: Success Metrics Definition
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Define comprehensive success metrics that include user success, business objectives, and key performance indicators through collaborative metric definition aligned with product vision and user value.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on defining measurable success criteria and business objectives
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to create vague metrics that can't be measured or tracked
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic metric definition that connects user value to business success
|
||||
- 📋 COLLABORATIVE metric definition that drives actionable decisions
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Generate success metrics collaboratively with user
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation through menu
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Current document and frontmatter from previous steps, product vision and target users already defined
|
||||
- Focus: Creating measurable, actionable success criteria that align with product strategy
|
||||
- Limits: Focus on metrics that drive decisions and demonstrate real value creation
|
||||
- Dependencies: Product vision and user personas from previous steps must be complete
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Success Metrics Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
**Opening Exploration:**
|
||||
"Now that we know who {{project_name}} serves and what problem it solves, let's define what success looks like.
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Discovery:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How will we know we're succeeding for our users?
|
||||
- What would make users say 'this was worth it'?
|
||||
- What metrics show we're creating real value?
|
||||
|
||||
Let's start with the user perspective."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. User Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
**User Success Questions:**
|
||||
Define success from the user's perspective:
|
||||
|
||||
- "What outcome are users trying to achieve?"
|
||||
- "How will they know the product is working for them?"
|
||||
- "What's the moment where they realize this is solving their problem?"
|
||||
- "What behaviors indicate users are getting value?"
|
||||
|
||||
**User Success Exploration:**
|
||||
Guide from vague to specific metrics:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Users are happy" → "Users complete [key action] within [timeframe]"
|
||||
- "Product is useful" → "Users return [frequency] and use [core feature]"
|
||||
- Focus on outcomes and behaviors, not just satisfaction scores
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Business Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**Business Success Questions:**
|
||||
Define business success metrics:
|
||||
|
||||
- "What does success look like for the business at 3 months? 12 months?"
|
||||
- "Are we measuring revenue, user growth, engagement, something else?"
|
||||
- "What business metrics would make you say 'this is working'?"
|
||||
- "How does this product contribute to broader company goals?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Business Success Categories:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Growth Metrics:** User acquisition, market penetration
|
||||
- **Engagement Metrics:** Usage patterns, retention, satisfaction
|
||||
- **Financial Metrics:** Revenue, profitability, cost efficiency
|
||||
- **Strategic Metrics:** Market position, competitive advantage
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Key Performance Indicators
|
||||
|
||||
**KPI Development Process:**
|
||||
Define specific, measurable KPIs:
|
||||
|
||||
- Transform objectives into measurable indicators
|
||||
- Ensure each KPI has a clear measurement method
|
||||
- Define targets and timeframes where appropriate
|
||||
- Include leading indicators that predict success
|
||||
|
||||
**KPI Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- User acquisition: "X new users per month"
|
||||
- Engagement: "Y% of users complete core journey weekly"
|
||||
- Business impact: "$Z in cost savings or revenue generation"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Connect Metrics to Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Alignment:**
|
||||
Ensure metrics align with product vision and user needs:
|
||||
|
||||
- Connect each metric back to the product vision
|
||||
- Ensure user success metrics drive business success
|
||||
- Validate that metrics measure what truly matters
|
||||
- Avoid vanity metrics that don't drive decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Success Metrics Content
|
||||
|
||||
**Content to Append:**
|
||||
Prepare the following structure for document append:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
[Success metrics content based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
[Business objectives content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Performance Indicators
|
||||
|
||||
[Key performance indicators content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Presentation:**
|
||||
"I've defined success metrics that will help us track whether {{project_name}} is creating real value for users and achieving business objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with current metrics content to dive deeper into success metric insights
|
||||
- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill to bring different perspectives to validate comprehensive metrics
|
||||
- IF C: Save content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4], then read fully and follow: ./step-05-scope.md
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu with updated content
|
||||
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [success metrics finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then read fully and follow: `./step-05-scope.md` to begin MVP scope definition.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- User success metrics that focus on outcomes and behaviors
|
||||
- Clear business objectives aligned with product strategy
|
||||
- Specific, measurable KPIs with defined targets and timeframes
|
||||
- Metrics that connect user value to business success
|
||||
- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly with proper task execution
|
||||
- Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Vague success metrics that can't be measured or tracked
|
||||
- Business objectives disconnected from user success
|
||||
- Too many metrics or missing critical success indicators
|
||||
- Metrics that don't drive actionable decisions
|
||||
- Not presenting standard A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
- Not updating frontmatter properly
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 5: MVP Scope Definition
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Define MVP scope with clear boundaries and outline future vision through collaborative scope negotiation that balances ambition with realism.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative discovery tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on defining minimum viable scope and future vision
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to create MVP scope that's too large or includes non-essential features
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic scope negotiation with clear boundary setting
|
||||
- 📋 COLLABORATIVE scope definition that prevents scope creep
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Generate MVP scope collaboratively with user
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation through menu
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Current document and frontmatter from previous steps, product vision, users, and success metrics already defined
|
||||
- Focus: Defining what's essential for MVP vs. future enhancements
|
||||
- Limits: Balance user needs with implementation feasibility
|
||||
- Dependencies: Product vision, user personas, and success metrics from previous steps must be complete
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Scope Definition
|
||||
|
||||
**Opening Exploration:**
|
||||
"Now that we understand what {{project_name}} does, who it serves, and how we'll measure success, let's define what we need to build first.
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope Discovery:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What's the absolute minimum we need to deliver to solve the core problem?
|
||||
- What features would make users say 'this solves my problem'?
|
||||
- How do we balance ambition with getting something valuable to users quickly?
|
||||
|
||||
Let's start with the MVP mindset: what's the smallest version that creates real value?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. MVP Core Features Definition
|
||||
|
||||
**MVP Feature Questions:**
|
||||
Define essential features for minimum viable product:
|
||||
|
||||
- "What's the core functionality that must work?"
|
||||
- "Which features directly address the main problem we're solving?"
|
||||
- "What would users consider 'incomplete' if it was missing?"
|
||||
- "What features create the 'aha!' moment we discussed earlier?"
|
||||
|
||||
**MVP Criteria:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Solves Core Problem:** Addresses the main pain point effectively
|
||||
- **User Value:** Creates meaningful outcome for target users
|
||||
- **Feasible:** Achievable with available resources and timeline
|
||||
- **Testable:** Allows learning and iteration based on user feedback
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Out of Scope Boundaries
|
||||
|
||||
**Out of Scope Exploration:**
|
||||
Define what explicitly won't be in MVP:
|
||||
|
||||
- "What features would be nice to have but aren't essential?"
|
||||
- "What functionality could wait for version 2.0?"
|
||||
- "What are we intentionally saying 'no' to for now?"
|
||||
- "How do we communicate these boundaries to stakeholders?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Boundary Setting:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear communication about what's not included
|
||||
- Rationale for deferring certain features
|
||||
- Timeline considerations for future additions
|
||||
- Trade-off explanations for stakeholders
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. MVP Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Validation:**
|
||||
Define what makes the MVP successful:
|
||||
|
||||
- "How will we know the MVP is successful?"
|
||||
- "What metrics will indicate we should proceed beyond MVP?"
|
||||
- "What user feedback signals validate our approach?"
|
||||
- "What's the decision point for scaling beyond MVP?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Gates:**
|
||||
|
||||
- User adoption metrics
|
||||
- Problem validation evidence
|
||||
- Technical feasibility confirmation
|
||||
- Business model validation
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Future Vision Exploration
|
||||
|
||||
**Vision Questions:**
|
||||
Define the longer-term product vision:
|
||||
|
||||
- "If this is wildly successful, what does it become in 2-3 years?"
|
||||
- "What capabilities would we add with more resources?"
|
||||
- "How does the MVP evolve into the full product vision?"
|
||||
- "What markets or user segments could we expand to?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Future Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Post-MVP enhancements that build on core functionality
|
||||
- Scale considerations and growth capabilities
|
||||
- Platform or ecosystem expansion opportunities
|
||||
- Advanced features that differentiate in the long term
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate MVP Scope Content
|
||||
|
||||
**Content to Append:**
|
||||
Prepare the following structure for document append:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## MVP Scope
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Features
|
||||
|
||||
[Core features content based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Out of Scope for MVP
|
||||
|
||||
[Out of scope content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
|
||||
### MVP Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[MVP success criteria content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Vision
|
||||
|
||||
[Future vision content based on conversation, or N/A if not discussed]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**Content Presentation:**
|
||||
"I've defined the MVP scope for {{project_name}} that balances delivering real value with realistic boundaries. This gives us a clear path forward while keeping our options open for future growth.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with current scope content to optimize scope definition
|
||||
- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill to bring different perspectives to validate MVP scope
|
||||
- IF C: Save content to {outputFile}, update frontmatter with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], then read fully and follow: ./step-06-complete.md
|
||||
- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#7-present-menu-options)
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- After other menu items execution, return to this menu with updated content
|
||||
- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
|
||||
|
||||
## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
|
||||
|
||||
ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [MVP scope finalized and saved to document with frontmatter updated], will you then read fully and follow: `./step-06-complete.md` to complete the product brief workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- MVP features that solve the core problem effectively
|
||||
- Clear out-of-scope boundaries that prevent scope creep
|
||||
- Success criteria that validate MVP approach and inform go/no-go decisions
|
||||
- Future vision that inspires while maintaining focus on MVP
|
||||
- A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly with proper task execution
|
||||
- Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- MVP scope too large or includes non-essential features
|
||||
- Missing clear boundaries leading to scope creep
|
||||
- No success criteria to validate MVP approach
|
||||
- Future vision disconnected from MVP foundation
|
||||
- Not presenting standard A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
- Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
- Not updating frontmatter properly
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File References
|
||||
outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{{project_name}}-{{date}}.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 6: Product Brief Completion
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Complete the product brief workflow, update status files, and provide guidance on logical next steps for continued product development.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a product-focused Business Analyst facilitator
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision
|
||||
- ✅ Maintain collaborative completion tone throughout
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus only on completion, next steps, and project guidance
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to generate new content for the product brief
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic completion with quality validation and next step recommendations
|
||||
- 📋 FINALIZE document and update workflow status appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Update the main workflow status file with completion information
|
||||
- 📖 Suggest potential next workflow steps for the user
|
||||
- 🚫 DO NOT load additional steps after this one (this is final)
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Complete product brief document from all previous steps, workflow frontmatter shows all completed steps
|
||||
- Focus: Completion validation, status updates, and next step guidance
|
||||
- Limits: No new content generation, only completion and wrap-up activities
|
||||
- Dependencies: All previous steps must be completed with content saved to document
|
||||
|
||||
## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Announce Workflow Completion
|
||||
|
||||
**Completion Announcement:**
|
||||
"🎉 **Product Brief Complete, {{user_name}}!**
|
||||
|
||||
I've successfully collaborated with you to create a comprehensive Product Brief for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**What we've accomplished:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Executive Summary with clear vision and problem statement
|
||||
- ✅ Core Vision with solution definition and unique differentiators
|
||||
- ✅ Target Users with rich personas and user journeys
|
||||
- ✅ Success Metrics with measurable outcomes and business objectives
|
||||
- ✅ MVP Scope with focused feature set and clear boundaries
|
||||
- ✅ Future Vision that inspires while maintaining current focus
|
||||
|
||||
**The complete Product Brief is now available at:** `{outputFile}`
|
||||
|
||||
This brief serves as the foundation for all subsequent product development activities and strategic decisions."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Document Quality Check
|
||||
|
||||
**Completeness Validation:**
|
||||
Perform final validation of the product brief:
|
||||
|
||||
- Does the executive summary clearly communicate the vision and problem?
|
||||
- Are target users well-defined with compelling personas?
|
||||
- Do success metrics connect user value to business objectives?
|
||||
- Is MVP scope focused and realistic?
|
||||
- Does the brief provide clear direction for next steps?
|
||||
|
||||
**Consistency Validation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Do all sections align with the core problem statement?
|
||||
- Is user value consistently emphasized throughout?
|
||||
- Are success criteria traceable to user needs and business goals?
|
||||
- Does MVP scope align with the problem and solution?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Suggest Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Next Workflow:**
|
||||
Provide guidance on logical next workflows:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `create-prd` - Create detailed Product Requirements Document
|
||||
- Brief provides foundation for detailed requirements
|
||||
- User personas inform journey mapping
|
||||
- Success metrics become specific acceptance criteria
|
||||
- MVP scope becomes detailed feature specifications
|
||||
|
||||
**Other Potential Next Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. `create-ux-design` - UX research and design (can run parallel with PRD)
|
||||
2. `domain-research` - Deep market or domain research (if needed)
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- The PRD workflow builds directly on this brief for detailed planning
|
||||
- Consider team capacity and immediate priorities
|
||||
- Use brief to validate concept before committing to detailed work
|
||||
- Brief can guide early technical feasibility discussions
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Congrats to the user
|
||||
|
||||
"**Your Product Brief for {{project_name}} is now complete and ready for the next phase!**"
|
||||
|
||||
Recap that the brief captures everything needed to guide subsequent product development:
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear vision and problem definition
|
||||
- Deep understanding of target users
|
||||
- Measurable success criteria
|
||||
- Focused MVP scope with realistic boundaries
|
||||
- Inspiring long-term vision
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Suggest next steps
|
||||
|
||||
Product Brief complete. Invoke the `bmad-help` skill.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Product brief contains all essential sections with collaborative content
|
||||
- All collaborative content properly saved to document with proper frontmatter
|
||||
- Workflow status file updated with completion information and timestamp
|
||||
- Clear next step guidance provided to user with specific workflow recommendations
|
||||
- Document quality validation completed with completeness and consistency checks
|
||||
- User acknowledges completion and understands next available options
|
||||
- Workflow properly marked as complete in status tracking
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not updating workflow status file with completion information
|
||||
- Missing clear next step guidance for user
|
||||
- Not confirming document completeness with user
|
||||
- Workflow not properly marked as complete in status tracking
|
||||
- User unclear about what happens next or available options
|
||||
- Document quality issues not identified or addressed
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
|
||||
|
||||
## FINAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION
|
||||
|
||||
This product brief is now complete and serves as the strategic foundation for the entire product lifecycle. All subsequent design, architecture, and development work should trace back to the vision, user needs, and success criteria documented in this brief.
|
||||
|
||||
**Congratulations on completing the Product Brief for {{project_name}}!** 🎉
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
||||
# Product Brief Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create comprehensive product briefs through collaborative step-by-step discovery as creative Business Analyst working with the user as peers.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:** In addition to your name, communication_style, and persona, you are also a product-focused Business Analyst collaborating with an expert peer. This is a partnership, not a client-vendor relationship. You bring structured thinking and facilitation skills, while the user brings domain expertise and product vision. Work together as equals.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
|
||||
|
||||
This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is a self contained instruction file that is a part of an overall workflow that must be followed exactly
|
||||
- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only the current step file is in memory - never load future step files until told to do so
|
||||
- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
|
||||
- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
|
||||
- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
|
||||
|
||||
### Step Processing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
|
||||
2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
|
||||
3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
|
||||
4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
|
||||
5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
|
||||
6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
|
||||
- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
|
||||
- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
|
||||
- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
|
||||
- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
|
||||
- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
|
||||
- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Configuration Loading
|
||||
|
||||
Load and read full config from {project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml and resolve:
|
||||
|
||||
- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`, `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
|
||||
|
||||
✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the configured `{communication_language}`.
|
||||
✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. First Step EXECUTION
|
||||
|
||||
Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-init.md` to begin the workflow.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-product-brief-preview
|
||||
description: Create or update product briefs through guided or autonomous discovery. Use when the user requests to 'create a product brief', 'help me create a project brief', or 'update my product brief'.
|
||||
argument-hint: "[optional --create, --edit, --optimize, --distillate, --inputs, --headless] [brief idea]"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Create Product Brief
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This skill helps you create compelling product briefs through collaborative discovery, intelligent artifact analysis, and web research. Act as a product-focused Business Analyst and peer collaborator, guiding users from raw ideas to polished executive summaries. Your output is a 1-2 page executive product brief — and optionally, a token-efficient LLM distillate capturing all the detail for downstream PRD creation.
|
||||
|
||||
The user is the domain expert. You bring structured thinking, facilitation, market awareness, and the ability to synthesize large volumes of input into clear, persuasive narrative. Work together as equals.
|
||||
|
||||
**Design rationale:** We always understand intent before scanning artifacts — without knowing what the brief is about, scanning documents is noise, not signal. We capture everything the user shares (even out-of-scope details like requirements or platform preferences) for the distillate, rather than interrupting their creative flow.
|
||||
|
||||
## Activation Mode Detection
|
||||
|
||||
Check activation context immediately:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Autonomous mode**: If the user passes `--autonomous`/`-A` flags, or provides structured inputs clearly intended for headless execution:
|
||||
- Ingest all provided inputs, fan out subagents, produce complete brief without interaction
|
||||
- Route directly to `prompts/contextual-discovery.md` with `{mode}=autonomous`
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Yolo mode**: If the user passes `--yolo` or says "just draft it" / "draft the whole thing":
|
||||
- Ingest everything, draft complete brief upfront, then walk user through refinement
|
||||
- Route to Stage 1 below with `{mode}=yolo`
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Guided mode** (default): Conversational discovery with soft gates
|
||||
- Route to Stage 1 below with `{mode}=guided`
|
||||
|
||||
## On Activation
|
||||
|
||||
1. Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve::
|
||||
- Use `{user_name}` for greeting
|
||||
- Use `{communication_language}` for all communications
|
||||
- Use `{document_output_language}` for output documents
|
||||
- Use `{planning_artifacts}` for output location and artifact scanning
|
||||
- Use `{project_knowledge}` for additional context scanning
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Greet user** as `{user_name}`, speaking in `{communication_language}`. Be warm but efficient — dream builder energy.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Stage 1: Understand Intent** (handled here in SKILL.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### Stage 1: Understand Intent
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Know WHY the user is here and WHAT the brief is about before doing anything else.
|
||||
|
||||
**Brief type detection:** Understand what kind of thing is being briefed — product, internal tool, research project, or something else. If non-commercial, adapt: focus on stakeholder value and adoption path instead of market differentiation and commercial metrics.
|
||||
|
||||
**Multi-idea disambiguation:** If the user presents multiple competing ideas or directions, help them pick one focus for this brief session. Note that others can be briefed separately.
|
||||
|
||||
**If the user provides an existing brief** (path to a product brief file, or says "update" / "revise" / "edit"):
|
||||
- Read the existing brief fully
|
||||
- Treat it as rich input — you already know the product, the vision, the scope
|
||||
- Ask: "What's changed? What do you want to update or improve?"
|
||||
- The rest of the workflow proceeds normally — contextual discovery may pull in new research, elicitation focuses on gaps or changes, and draft-and-review produces an updated version
|
||||
|
||||
**If the user already provided context** when launching the skill (description, docs, brain dump):
|
||||
- Acknowledge what you received — but **DO NOT read document files yet**. Note their paths for Stage 2's subagents to scan contextually. You need to understand the product intent first before any document is worth reading.
|
||||
- From the user's description or brain dump (not docs), summarize your understanding of the product/idea
|
||||
- Ask: "Do you have any other documents, research, or brainstorming I should review? Anything else to add before I dig in?"
|
||||
|
||||
**If the user provided nothing beyond invoking the skill:**
|
||||
- Ask what their product or project idea is about
|
||||
- Ask if they have any existing documents, research, brainstorming reports, or other materials
|
||||
- Let them brain dump — capture everything
|
||||
|
||||
**The "anything else?" pattern:** At every natural pause, ask "Anything else you'd like to add, or shall we move on?" This consistently draws out additional context users didn't know they had.
|
||||
|
||||
**Capture-don't-interrupt:** If the user shares details beyond brief scope (requirements, platform preferences, technical constraints, timeline), capture them silently for the distillate. Don't redirect or stop their flow.
|
||||
|
||||
**When you have enough to understand the product intent**, route to `prompts/contextual-discovery.md` with the current mode.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stages
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Stage | Purpose | Prompt |
|
||||
|---|-------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| 1 | Understand Intent | Know what the brief is about | SKILL.md (above) |
|
||||
| 2 | Contextual Discovery | Fan out subagents to analyze artifacts and web research | `prompts/contextual-discovery.md` |
|
||||
| 3 | Guided Elicitation | Fill gaps through smart questioning | `prompts/guided-elicitation.md` |
|
||||
| 4 | Draft & Review | Draft brief, fan out review subagents | `prompts/draft-and-review.md` |
|
||||
| 5 | Finalize | Polish, output, offer distillate | `prompts/finalize.md` |
|
||||
|
||||
## External Skills
|
||||
|
||||
This workflow uses:
|
||||
- `bmad-init` — Configuration loading (module: bmm)
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
# Artifact Analyzer
|
||||
|
||||
You are a research analyst. Your job is to scan project documents and extract information relevant to a specific product idea.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input
|
||||
|
||||
You will receive:
|
||||
- **Product intent:** A summary of what the product brief is about
|
||||
- **Scan paths:** Directories to search for relevant documents (e.g., planning artifacts, project knowledge folders)
|
||||
- **User-provided paths:** Any specific files the user pointed to
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Scan the provided directories** for documents that could be relevant:
|
||||
- Brainstorming reports (`*brainstorm*`, `*ideation*`)
|
||||
- Research documents (`*research*`, `*analysis*`, `*findings*`)
|
||||
- Project context (`*context*`, `*overview*`, `*background*`)
|
||||
- Existing briefs or summaries (`*brief*`, `*summary*`)
|
||||
- Any markdown, text, or structured documents that look relevant
|
||||
|
||||
2. **For sharded documents** (a folder with `index.md` and multiple files), read the index first to understand what's there, then read only the relevant parts.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **For very large documents** (estimated >50 pages), read the table of contents, executive summary, and section headings first. Read only sections directly relevant to the stated product intent. Note which sections were skimmed vs read fully.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Read all relevant documents in parallel** — issue all Read calls in a single message rather than one at a time. Extract:
|
||||
- Key insights that relate to the product intent
|
||||
- Market or competitive information
|
||||
- User research or persona information
|
||||
- Technical context or constraints
|
||||
- Ideas, both accepted and rejected (rejected ideas are valuable — they prevent re-proposing)
|
||||
- Any metrics, data points, or evidence
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Ignore documents that aren't relevant** to the stated product intent. Don't waste tokens on unrelated content.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Return ONLY the following JSON object. No preamble, no commentary. Maximum 8 bullets per section.
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"documents_found": [
|
||||
{"path": "file path", "relevance": "one-line summary"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"key_insights": [
|
||||
"bullet — grouped by theme, each self-contained"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"user_market_context": [
|
||||
"bullet — users, market, competition found in docs"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"technical_context": [
|
||||
"bullet — platforms, constraints, integrations"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"ideas_and_decisions": [
|
||||
{"idea": "description", "status": "accepted|rejected|open", "rationale": "brief why"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"raw_detail_worth_preserving": [
|
||||
"bullet — specific details, data points, quotes for the distillate"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# Opportunity Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
You are a strategic advisor reviewing a product brief draft. Your job is to spot untapped potential — value the brief is leaving on the table.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input
|
||||
|
||||
You will receive the complete draft product brief.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Lens
|
||||
|
||||
Ask yourself:
|
||||
|
||||
- **What adjacent value propositions are being missed?** Are there related problems this solution naturally addresses?
|
||||
- **What market angles are underemphasized?** Is the positioning leaving opportunities unexplored?
|
||||
- **What partnerships or integrations could multiply impact?** Who would benefit from aligning with this product?
|
||||
- **What's the network effect or viral potential?** Is there a growth flywheel the brief doesn't describe?
|
||||
- **What's underemphasized?** Which strengths deserve more spotlight?
|
||||
- **What user segments are overlooked?** Could this serve audiences not yet mentioned?
|
||||
- **What's the bigger story?** If you zoom out, is there a more compelling narrative?
|
||||
- **What would an investor want to hear more about?** What would make someone lean forward?
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Return ONLY the following JSON object. No preamble, no commentary. Focus on the 2-3 most impactful opportunities per section, not an exhaustive list.
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"untapped_value": [
|
||||
{"opportunity": "adjacent problem or value prop", "rationale": "why it matters"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"positioning_opportunities": [
|
||||
{"angle": "market angle or narrative", "impact": "how it strengthens the brief"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"growth_and_scale": [
|
||||
"bullet — network effects, viral loops, expansion paths"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"strategic_partnerships": [
|
||||
{"partner_type": "who", "value": "why this alliance matters"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"underemphasized_strengths": [
|
||||
{"strength": "what's underplayed", "suggestion": "how to elevate it"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# Skeptic Reviewer
|
||||
|
||||
You are a critical analyst reviewing a product brief draft. Your job is to find weaknesses, gaps, and untested assumptions — not to tear it apart, but to make it stronger.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input
|
||||
|
||||
You will receive the complete draft product brief.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Lens
|
||||
|
||||
Ask yourself:
|
||||
|
||||
- **What's missing?** Are there sections that feel thin or glossed over?
|
||||
- **What assumptions are untested?** Where does the brief assert things without evidence?
|
||||
- **What could go wrong?** What risks aren't acknowledged?
|
||||
- **Where is it vague?** Which claims need more specificity?
|
||||
- **Does the problem statement hold up?** Is this a real, significant problem or a nice-to-have?
|
||||
- **Are the differentiators actually defensible?** Could a competitor replicate them easily?
|
||||
- **Do the success metrics make sense?** Are they measurable and meaningful?
|
||||
- **Is the MVP scope realistic?** Too ambitious? Too timid?
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Return ONLY the following JSON object. No preamble, no commentary. Maximum 5 items per section. Prioritize — lead with the most impactful issues.
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"critical_gaps": [
|
||||
{"issue": "what's missing", "impact": "why it matters", "suggestion": "how to fix"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"untested_assumptions": [
|
||||
{"assumption": "what's asserted", "risk": "what could go wrong"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"unacknowledged_risks": [
|
||||
{"risk": "potential failure mode", "severity": "high|medium|low"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"vague_areas": [
|
||||
{"section": "where", "issue": "what's vague", "suggestion": "how to sharpen"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"suggested_improvements": [
|
||||
"actionable suggestion"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
# Web Researcher
|
||||
|
||||
You are a market research analyst. Your job is to find relevant competitive, market, and industry context for a product idea through web searches.
|
||||
|
||||
## Input
|
||||
|
||||
You will receive:
|
||||
- **Product intent:** A summary of what the product is about, the problem it solves, and the domain it operates in
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Identify search angles** based on the product intent:
|
||||
- Direct competitors (products solving the same problem)
|
||||
- Adjacent solutions (different approaches to the same pain point)
|
||||
- Market size and trends for the domain
|
||||
- Industry news or developments that create opportunity or risk
|
||||
- User sentiment about existing solutions (what's frustrating people)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Execute 3-5 targeted web searches** — quality over quantity. Search for:
|
||||
- "[problem domain] solutions comparison"
|
||||
- "[competitor names] alternatives" (if competitors are known)
|
||||
- "[industry] market trends [current year]"
|
||||
- "[target user type] pain points [domain]"
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Synthesize findings** — don't just list links. Extract the signal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
Return ONLY the following JSON object. No preamble, no commentary. Maximum 5 bullets per section.
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"competitive_landscape": [
|
||||
{"name": "competitor", "approach": "one-line description", "gaps": "where they fall short"}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"market_context": [
|
||||
"bullet — market size, growth trends, relevant data points"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"user_sentiment": [
|
||||
"bullet — what users say about existing solutions"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"timing_and_opportunity": [
|
||||
"bullet — why now, enabling shifts"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"risks_and_considerations": [
|
||||
"bullet — market risks, competitive threats, regulatory concerns"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"module-code": "bmm",
|
||||
"replaces-skill": "bmad-create-product-brief",
|
||||
"capabilities": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "create-brief",
|
||||
"menu-code": "CB",
|
||||
"description": "Produces executive product brief and optional LLM distillate for PRD input.",
|
||||
"supports-headless": true,
|
||||
"phase-name": "1-analysis",
|
||||
"after": ["brainstorming, perform-research"],
|
||||
"before": ["create-prd"],
|
||||
"is-required": true,
|
||||
"output-location": "{planning_artifacts}"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
||||
**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
|
||||
**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
|
||||
**Output Location:** `{planning_artifacts}`
|
||||
|
||||
# Stage 2: Contextual Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Armed with the user's stated intent, intelligently gather and synthesize all available context — documents, project knowledge, and web research — so later stages work from a rich, relevant foundation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Subagent Fan-Out
|
||||
|
||||
Now that you know what the brief is about, fan out subagents in parallel to gather context. Each subagent receives the product intent summary so it knows what's relevant.
|
||||
|
||||
**Launch in parallel:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Artifact Analyzer** (`../agents/artifact-analyzer.md`) — Scans `{planning_artifacts}` and `{project_knowledge}` for relevant documents. Also scans any specific paths the user provided. Returns structured synthesis of what it found.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Web Researcher** (`../agents/web-researcher.md`) — Searches for competitive landscape, market context, trends, and relevant industry data. Returns structured findings scoped to the product domain.
|
||||
|
||||
### Graceful Degradation
|
||||
|
||||
If subagents are unavailable or fail:
|
||||
- Read only the most relevant 1-2 documents in the main context and summarize (don't full-read everything — limit context impact in degraded mode)
|
||||
- Do a few targeted web searches inline
|
||||
- Never block the workflow because a subagent feature is unavailable
|
||||
|
||||
## Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
Once subagent results return (or inline scanning completes):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Merge findings** with what the user already told you
|
||||
2. **Identify gaps** — what do you still need to know to write a solid brief?
|
||||
3. **Note surprises** — anything from research that contradicts or enriches the user's assumptions?
|
||||
|
||||
## Mode-Specific Behavior
|
||||
|
||||
**Guided mode:**
|
||||
- Present a concise summary of what you found: "Here's what I learned from your documents and web research..."
|
||||
- Highlight anything surprising or worth discussing
|
||||
- Share the gaps you've identified
|
||||
- Ask: "Anything else you'd like to add, or shall we move on to filling in the details?"
|
||||
- Route to `guided-elicitation.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Yolo mode:**
|
||||
- Absorb all findings silently
|
||||
- Skip directly to `draft-and-review.md` — you have enough to draft
|
||||
- The user will refine later
|
||||
|
||||
**Headless mode:**
|
||||
- Absorb all findings
|
||||
- Skip directly to `draft-and-review.md`
|
||||
- No interaction
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage Complete
|
||||
|
||||
This stage is complete when subagent results (or inline scanning fallback) have returned and findings are merged with user context. Route per mode:
|
||||
- **Guided** → `guided-elicitation.md`
|
||||
- **Yolo / Headless** → `draft-and-review.md`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
|
||||
**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
|
||||
**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
|
||||
**Output Location:** `{planning_artifacts}`
|
||||
|
||||
# Stage 4: Draft & Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Produce the executive product brief and run it through multiple review lenses to catch blind spots before the user sees the final version.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 1: Draft the Executive Brief
|
||||
|
||||
Use `../resources/brief-template.md` as a guide — adapt structure to fit the product's story.
|
||||
|
||||
**Writing principles:**
|
||||
- **Executive audience** — persuasive, clear, concise. 1-2 pages.
|
||||
- **Lead with the problem** — make the reader feel the pain before presenting the solution
|
||||
- **Concrete over abstract** — specific examples, real scenarios, measurable outcomes
|
||||
- **Confident voice** — this is a pitch, not a hedge
|
||||
- Write in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
**Create the output document at:** `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Include YAML frontmatter:
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Product Brief: {project_name}"
|
||||
status: "draft"
|
||||
created: "{timestamp}"
|
||||
updated: "{timestamp}"
|
||||
inputs: [list of input files used]
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 2: Fan Out Review Subagents
|
||||
|
||||
Before showing the draft to the user, run it through multiple review lenses in parallel.
|
||||
|
||||
**Launch in parallel:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Skeptic Reviewer** (`../agents/skeptic-reviewer.md`) — "What's missing? What assumptions are untested? What could go wrong? Where is the brief vague or hand-wavy?"
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Opportunity Reviewer** (`../agents/opportunity-reviewer.md`) — "What adjacent value propositions are being missed? What market angles or partnerships could strengthen this? What's underemphasized?"
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Contextual Reviewer** — You (the main agent) pick the most useful third lens based on THIS specific product. Choose the lens that addresses the SINGLE BIGGEST RISK that the skeptic and opportunity reviewers won't naturally catch. Examples:
|
||||
- For healthtech: "Regulatory and compliance risk reviewer"
|
||||
- For devtools: "Developer experience and adoption friction critic"
|
||||
- For marketplace: "Network effects and chicken-and-egg problem analyst"
|
||||
- For enterprise: "Procurement and organizational change management reviewer"
|
||||
- **When domain is unclear, default to:** "Go-to-market and launch risk reviewer" — examines distribution, pricing, and first-customer acquisition. Almost always valuable, frequently missed.
|
||||
Describe the lens, run the review yourself inline.
|
||||
|
||||
### Graceful Degradation
|
||||
|
||||
If subagents are unavailable:
|
||||
- Perform all three review passes yourself, sequentially
|
||||
- Apply each lens deliberately — don't blend them into one generic review
|
||||
- The quality of review matters more than the parallelism
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 3: Integrate Review Insights
|
||||
|
||||
After all reviews complete:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Triage findings** — group by theme, remove duplicates
|
||||
2. **Apply non-controversial improvements** directly to the draft (obvious gaps, unclear language, missing specifics)
|
||||
3. **Flag substantive suggestions** that need user input (strategic choices, scope questions, market positioning decisions)
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 4: Present to User
|
||||
|
||||
**Headless mode:** Skip to `finalize.md` — no user interaction. Save the improved draft directly.
|
||||
|
||||
**Yolo and Guided modes:**
|
||||
|
||||
Present the draft brief to the user. Then share the reviewer insights:
|
||||
|
||||
"Here's your product brief draft. Before we finalize, my review panel surfaced some things worth considering:
|
||||
|
||||
**[Grouped reviewer findings — only the substantive ones that need user input]**
|
||||
|
||||
What do you think? Any changes you'd like to make?"
|
||||
|
||||
Present reviewer findings with brief rationale, then offer: "Want me to dig into any of these, or are you ready to make your revisions?"
|
||||
|
||||
**Iterate** as long as the user wants to refine. Use the "anything else, or are we happy with this?" soft gate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage Complete
|
||||
|
||||
This stage is complete when: (a) the draft has been reviewed by all three lenses and improvements integrated, AND either (autonomous) save and route directly, or (guided/yolo) the user is satisfied. Route to `finalize.md`.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
|
||||
**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
|
||||
**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
|
||||
**Output Location:** `{planning_artifacts}`
|
||||
|
||||
# Stage 5: Finalize
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Save the polished brief, offer the LLM distillate, and point the user forward.
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 1: Polish and Save
|
||||
|
||||
Update the product brief document at `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md`:
|
||||
- Update frontmatter `status` to `"complete"`
|
||||
- Update `updated` timestamp
|
||||
- Ensure formatting is clean and consistent
|
||||
- Confirm the document reads well as a standalone 1-2 page executive summary
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 2: Offer the Distillate
|
||||
|
||||
Throughout the discovery process, you likely captured detail that doesn't belong in a 1-2 page executive summary but is valuable for downstream work — requirements hints, platform preferences, rejected ideas, technical constraints, detailed user scenarios, competitive deep-dives, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Ask the user:**
|
||||
"Your product brief is complete. During our conversation, I captured additional detail that goes beyond the executive summary — things like [mention 2-3 specific examples of overflow you captured]. Would you like me to create a detail pack for PRD creation? It distills all that extra context into a concise, structured format optimized for the next phase."
|
||||
|
||||
**If yes, create the distillate** at `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}-distillate.md`:
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Product Brief Distillate: {project_name}"
|
||||
type: llm-distillate
|
||||
source: "product-brief-{project_name}.md"
|
||||
created: "{timestamp}"
|
||||
purpose: "Token-efficient context for downstream PRD creation"
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Distillate content principles:**
|
||||
- Dense bullet points, not prose
|
||||
- Each bullet carries enough context to be understood standalone (don't assume the reader has the full brief loaded)
|
||||
- Group by theme, not by when it was mentioned
|
||||
- Include:
|
||||
- **Rejected ideas** — so downstream workflows don't re-propose them, with brief rationale
|
||||
- **Requirements hints** — anything the user mentioned that sounds like a requirement
|
||||
- **Technical context** — platforms, integrations, constraints, preferences
|
||||
- **Detailed user scenarios** — richer than what fits in the exec summary
|
||||
- **Competitive intelligence** — specifics from web research worth preserving
|
||||
- **Open questions** — things surfaced but not resolved during discovery
|
||||
- **Scope signals** — what the user indicated is in/out/maybe for MVP
|
||||
- Token-conscious: be concise, but give enough context per bullet so an LLM reading this later understands WHY each point matters
|
||||
|
||||
**Headless mode:** Always create the distillate automatically — unless the session was too brief to capture meaningful overflow (in that case, note this in the completion output instead of creating an empty file).
|
||||
|
||||
## Step 3: Present Completion
|
||||
|
||||
"Your product brief for {project_name} is complete!
|
||||
|
||||
**Executive Brief:** `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md`
|
||||
[If distillate created:] **Detail Pack:** `{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}-distillate.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended next step:** Use the product brief (and detail pack) as input for PRD creation — tell your assistant 'create a PRD' and point it to these files."
|
||||
[If distillate created:] "The detail pack contains all the overflow context (requirements hints, rejected ideas, technical constraints) specifically structured for the PRD workflow to consume."
|
||||
|
||||
**Headless mode:** Output the file paths as structured JSON and exit:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"status": "complete",
|
||||
"brief": "{planning_artifacts}/product-brief-{project_name}.md",
|
||||
"distillate": "{path or null}",
|
||||
"confidence": "high|medium|low",
|
||||
"open_questions": ["any unresolved items"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage Complete
|
||||
|
||||
This is the terminal stage. After delivering the completion message and file paths, the workflow is done. If the user requests further revisions, loop back to `draft-and-review.md`. Otherwise, exit.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
**Language:** Use `{communication_language}` for all output.
|
||||
**Output Language:** Use `{document_output_language}` for documents.
|
||||
|
||||
# Stage 3: Guided Elicitation
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Fill the gaps in what you know. By now you have the user's brain dump, artifact analysis, and web research. This stage is about smart, targeted questioning — not rote section-by-section interrogation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Skip this stage entirely in Yolo and Autonomous modes** — go directly to `draft-and-review.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Approach
|
||||
|
||||
You are NOT walking through a rigid questionnaire. You're having a conversation that covers the substance of a great product brief. The topics below are your mental checklist, not a script. Adapt to:
|
||||
- What you already know (don't re-ask what's been covered)
|
||||
- What the user is excited about (follow their energy)
|
||||
- What's genuinely unclear (focus questions where they matter)
|
||||
|
||||
## Topics to Cover (flexibly, conversationally)
|
||||
|
||||
### Vision & Problem
|
||||
- What core problem does this solve? For whom?
|
||||
- How do people solve this today? What's frustrating about current approaches?
|
||||
- What would success look like for the people this helps?
|
||||
- What's the insight or angle that makes this approach different?
|
||||
|
||||
### Users & Value
|
||||
- Who experiences this problem most acutely?
|
||||
- Are there different user types with different needs?
|
||||
- What's the "aha moment" — when does a user realize this is what they needed?
|
||||
- How does this fit into their existing workflow or life?
|
||||
|
||||
### Market & Differentiation
|
||||
- What competitive or alternative solutions exist? (Leverage web research findings)
|
||||
- What's the unfair advantage or defensible moat?
|
||||
- Why is now the right time for this?
|
||||
|
||||
### Success & Scope
|
||||
- How will you know this is working? What metrics matter?
|
||||
- What's the minimum viable version that creates real value?
|
||||
- What's explicitly NOT in scope for the first version?
|
||||
- If this is wildly successful, what does it become in 2-3 years?
|
||||
|
||||
## The Flow
|
||||
|
||||
For each topic area where you have gaps:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Lead with what you know** — "Based on your input and my research, it sounds like [X]. Is that right?"
|
||||
2. **Ask the gap question** — targeted, specific, not generic
|
||||
3. **Reflect and confirm** — paraphrase what you heard
|
||||
4. **"Anything else on this, or shall we move on?"** — the soft gate
|
||||
|
||||
If the user is giving you detail beyond brief scope (requirements, architecture, platform details, timelines), **capture it silently** for the distillate. Acknowledge it briefly ("Good detail, I'll capture that") but don't derail the conversation.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Move On
|
||||
|
||||
When you have enough substance to draft a compelling 1-2 page executive brief covering:
|
||||
- Clear problem and who it affects
|
||||
- Proposed solution and what makes it different
|
||||
- Target users (at least primary)
|
||||
- Some sense of success criteria or business objectives
|
||||
- MVP-level scope thinking
|
||||
|
||||
You don't need perfection — you need enough to draft well. Missing details can be surfaced during the review stage.
|
||||
|
||||
If the user is providing complete, confident answers and you have solid coverage across all four topic areas after fewer than 3-4 exchanges, proactively offer to draft early.
|
||||
|
||||
**Transition:** "I think I have a solid picture. Ready for me to draft the brief, or is there anything else you'd like to add?"
|
||||
|
||||
## Stage Complete
|
||||
|
||||
This stage is complete when sufficient substance exists to draft a compelling brief and the user confirms readiness. Route to `draft-and-review.md`.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
||||
# Product Brief Template
|
||||
|
||||
This is a flexible guide for the executive product brief — adapt it to serve the product's story. Merge sections, add new ones, reorder as needed. The product determines the structure, not the template.
|
||||
|
||||
## Sensible Default Structure
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Product Brief: {Product Name}
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[2-3 paragraph narrative: What is this? What problem does it solve? Why does it matter? Why now?
|
||||
This should be compelling enough to stand alone — if someone reads only this section, they should understand the vision.]
|
||||
|
||||
## The Problem
|
||||
|
||||
[What pain exists? Who feels it? How are they coping today? What's the cost of the status quo?
|
||||
Be specific — real scenarios, real frustrations, real consequences.]
|
||||
|
||||
## The Solution
|
||||
|
||||
[What are we building? How does it solve the problem?
|
||||
Focus on the experience and outcome, not the implementation.]
|
||||
|
||||
## What Makes This Different
|
||||
|
||||
[Key differentiators. Why this approach vs alternatives? What's the unfair advantage?
|
||||
Be honest — if the moat is execution speed, say so. Don't fabricate technical moats.]
|
||||
|
||||
## Who This Serves
|
||||
|
||||
[Primary users — vivid but brief. Who are they, what do they need, what does success look like for them?
|
||||
Secondary users if relevant.]
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[How do we know this is working? What metrics matter?
|
||||
Mix of user success signals and business objectives. Be measurable.]
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
|
||||
[What's in for the first version? What's explicitly out?
|
||||
Keep this tight — it's a boundary document, not a feature list.]
|
||||
|
||||
## Vision
|
||||
|
||||
[Where does this go if it succeeds? What does it become in 2-3 years?
|
||||
Inspiring but grounded.]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Adaptation Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
- **For B2B products:** Consider adding a "Buyer vs User" section if they're different people
|
||||
- **For platforms/marketplaces:** Consider a "Network Effects" or "Ecosystem" section
|
||||
- **For technical products:** May need a brief "Technical Approach" section (keep it high-level)
|
||||
- **For regulated industries:** Consider a "Compliance & Regulatory" section
|
||||
- **If scope is well-defined:** Merge "Scope" and "Vision" into "Roadmap Thinking"
|
||||
- **If the problem is well-known:** Shorten "The Problem" and expand "What Makes This Different"
|
||||
|
||||
The brief should be 1-2 pages. If it's longer, you're putting in too much detail — that's what the distillate is for.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-domain-research
|
||||
description: 'Conduct domain and industry research. Use when the user says "lets create a research report on [domain or industry]"'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Step 1: Domain Research Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ FOCUS EXCLUSIVELY on confirming domain research scope and approach
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A DOMAIN RESEARCH PLANNER, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 ACKNOWLEDGE and CONFIRM understanding of domain research goals
|
||||
- 🔍 This is SCOPE CONFIRMATION ONLY - no web research yet
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after scope confirmation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research type = "domain" is already set
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - discovered from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - captured from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on industry/domain analysis with web research
|
||||
- Web search is required to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm domain research scope and approach for **{{research_topic}}** with the user's goals in mind.
|
||||
|
||||
## DOMAIN SCOPE CONFIRMATION:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Start with domain scope understanding:
|
||||
"I understand you want to conduct **domain research** for **{{research_topic}}** with these goals: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain Research Scope:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Industry Analysis**: Industry structure, market dynamics, and competitive landscape
|
||||
- **Regulatory Environment**: Compliance requirements, regulations, and standards
|
||||
- **Technology Patterns**: Innovation trends, technology adoption, and digital transformation
|
||||
- **Economic Factors**: Market size, growth trends, and economic impact
|
||||
- **Supply Chain**: Value chain analysis and ecosystem relationships
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- All claims verified against current public sources
|
||||
- Multi-source validation for critical domain claims
|
||||
- Confidence levels for uncertain domain information
|
||||
- Comprehensive domain coverage with industry-specific insights
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Present clear scope confirmation:
|
||||
"**Domain Research Scope Confirmation:**
|
||||
|
||||
For **{{research_topic}}**, I will research:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Industry Analysis** - market structure, key players, competitive dynamics
|
||||
✅ **Regulatory Requirements** - compliance standards, legal frameworks
|
||||
✅ **Technology Trends** - innovation patterns, digital transformation
|
||||
✅ **Economic Factors** - market size, growth projections, economic impact
|
||||
✅ **Supply Chain Analysis** - value chain, ecosystem, partnerships
|
||||
|
||||
**All claims verified against current public sources.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Does this domain research scope and approach align with your goals?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Begin domain research with this scope
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Document scope confirmation in research file
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-02-domain-analysis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append scope confirmation:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Domain Research Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Topic:** {{research_topic}}
|
||||
**Research Goals:** {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Domain Research Scope:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Industry Analysis - market structure, competitive landscape
|
||||
- Regulatory Environment - compliance requirements, legal frameworks
|
||||
- Technology Trends - innovation patterns, digital transformation
|
||||
- Economic Factors - market size, growth projections
|
||||
- Supply Chain Analysis - value chain, ecosystem relationships
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Methodology:**
|
||||
|
||||
- All claims verified against current public sources
|
||||
- Multi-source validation for critical domain claims
|
||||
- Confidence level framework for uncertain information
|
||||
- Comprehensive domain coverage with industry-specific insights
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope Confirmed:** {{date}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Domain research scope clearly confirmed with user
|
||||
✅ All domain analysis areas identified and explained
|
||||
✅ Research methodology emphasized
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Scope confirmation documented when user proceeds
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next domain research step
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not clearly confirming domain research scope with user
|
||||
❌ Missing critical domain analysis areas
|
||||
❌ Not explaining that web search is required for current facts
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option
|
||||
❌ Proceeding without user scope confirmation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to next domain research step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-02-domain-analysis.md` to begin industry analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: This is SCOPE CONFIRMATION ONLY - no actual domain research yet, just confirming the research approach and scope!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Step 2: Industry Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE AN INDUSTRY ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on market size, growth, and industry dynamics
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after industry analysis content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE INDUSTRY ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from step-01 are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on market size, growth, and industry dynamics
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct industry analysis focusing on market size, growth, and industry dynamics. Search the web to verify and supplement current facts.
|
||||
|
||||
## INDUSTRY ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Industry Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different industry areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with industry research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **industry analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand market dynamics.
|
||||
|
||||
**Industry Analysis Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size and valuation metrics
|
||||
- Growth rates and market dynamics
|
||||
- Market segmentation and structure
|
||||
- Industry trends and evolution patterns
|
||||
- Economic impact and value creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current industry insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Industry Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market size value"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market growth rate dynamics"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market segmentation structure"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} industry trends evolution"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for recent market research reports and industry analyses
|
||||
- Search for authoritative sources (market research firms, industry associations)
|
||||
- Identify market size, growth rates, and segmentation data
|
||||
- Research industry trends and evolution patterns
|
||||
- Analyze economic impact and value creation metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate industry findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size and valuation analysis
|
||||
- Growth rates and market dynamics
|
||||
- Market segmentation and structure
|
||||
- Industry trends and evolution patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Industry Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting market dynamics, segmentation, and trends]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Industry Analysis Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare industry analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Industry Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Size and Valuation
|
||||
|
||||
[Market size analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Total Market Size: [Current market valuation]_
|
||||
_Growth Rate: [CAGR and market growth projections]_
|
||||
_Market Segments: [Size and value of key market segments]_
|
||||
_Economic Impact: [Economic contribution and value creation]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Dynamics and Growth
|
||||
|
||||
[Market dynamics analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Growth Drivers: [Key factors driving market growth]_
|
||||
_Growth Barriers: [Factors limiting market expansion]_
|
||||
_Cyclical Patterns: [Industry seasonality and cycles]_
|
||||
_Market Maturity: [Life cycle stage and development phase]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Structure and Segmentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Market structure analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Primary Segments: [Key market segments and their characteristics]_
|
||||
_Sub-segment Analysis: [Detailed breakdown of market sub-segments]_
|
||||
_Geographic Distribution: [Regional market variations and concentrations]_
|
||||
_Vertical Integration: [Supply chain and value chain structure]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Industry Trends and Evolution
|
||||
|
||||
[Industry trends analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Emerging Trends: [Current industry developments and transformations]_
|
||||
_Historical Evolution: [Industry development over recent years]_
|
||||
_Technology Integration: [How technology is changing the industry]_
|
||||
_Future Outlook: [Projected industry developments and changes]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitive dynamics analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Market Concentration: [Level of market consolidation and competition]_
|
||||
_Competitive Intensity: [Degree of competition and rivalry]_
|
||||
_Barriers to Entry: [Obstacles for new market entrants]_
|
||||
_Innovation Pressure: [Rate of innovation and change]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **industry analysis** for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Industry Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size and valuation thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Growth dynamics and market structure documented
|
||||
- Industry trends and evolution patterns identified
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics clearly mapped
|
||||
- Multiple sources verified for critical insights
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to competitive landscape analysis?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to competitive landscape
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-03-competitive-landscape.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Market size and valuation thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Growth dynamics and market structure documented
|
||||
✅ Industry trends and evolution patterns identified
|
||||
✅ Competitive dynamics clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Multiple sources verified for critical insights
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (competitive landscape)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying on training data instead of web search for current facts
|
||||
❌ Missing critical market size or growth data
|
||||
❌ Incomplete market structure analysis
|
||||
❌ Not identifying key industry trends
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to competitive landscape step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## INDUSTRY RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research market research reports and industry analyses
|
||||
- Use authoritative sources (market research firms, industry associations)
|
||||
- Analyze market size, growth rates, and segmentation data
|
||||
- Study industry trends and evolution patterns
|
||||
- Search the web to verify facts
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## INDUSTRY ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative industry research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable industry insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-03-competitive-landscape.md` to analyze competitive landscape, key players, and ecosystem analysis for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and search the web to verify facts!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Step 3: Competitive Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A COMPETITIVE ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on key players, market share, and competitive dynamics
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after competitive analysis content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on key players, market share, and competitive dynamics
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct competitive landscape analysis focusing on key players, market share, and competitive dynamics. Search the web to verify and supplement current facts.
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Competitive Landscape Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different competitive areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with competitive research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **competitive landscape analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand the competitive ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Landscape Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key players and market leaders
|
||||
- Market share and competitive positioning
|
||||
- Competitive strategies and differentiation
|
||||
- Business models and value propositions
|
||||
- Entry barriers and competitive dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current competitive insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Competitive Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} key players market leaders"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} market share competitive landscape"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} competitive strategies differentiation"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} entry barriers competitive dynamics"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for recent competitive intelligence reports and market analyses
|
||||
- Search for company websites, annual reports, and investor presentations
|
||||
- Research market share data and competitive positioning
|
||||
- Analyze competitive strategies and differentiation approaches
|
||||
- Study entry barriers and competitive dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate competitive findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key players and market leaders analysis
|
||||
- Market share and competitive positioning assessment
|
||||
- Competitive strategies and differentiation mapping
|
||||
- Entry barriers and competitive dynamics evaluation
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Competitive Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting players, strategies, and market dynamics]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Competitive Landscape Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare competitive landscape analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Players and Market Leaders
|
||||
|
||||
[Key players analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Market Leaders: [Dominant players and their market positions]_
|
||||
_Major Competitors: [Significant competitors and their specialties]_
|
||||
_Emerging Players: [New entrants and innovative companies]_
|
||||
_Global vs Regional: [Geographic distribution of key players]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Share and Competitive Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
[Market share analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Market Share Distribution: [Current market share breakdown]_
|
||||
_Competitive Positioning: [How players position themselves in the market]_
|
||||
_Value Proposition Mapping: [Different value propositions across players]_
|
||||
_Customer Segments Served: [Different customer bases by competitor]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Strategies and Differentiation
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitive strategies analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Cost Leadership Strategies: [Players competing on price and efficiency]_
|
||||
_Differentiation Strategies: [Players competing on unique value]_
|
||||
_Focus/Niche Strategies: [Players targeting specific segments]_
|
||||
_Innovation Approaches: [How different players innovate]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Models and Value Propositions
|
||||
|
||||
[Business models analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Primary Business Models: [How competitors make money]_
|
||||
_Revenue Streams: [Different approaches to monetization]_
|
||||
_Value Chain Integration: [Vertical integration vs partnership models]_
|
||||
_Customer Relationship Models: [How competitors build customer loyalty]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Dynamics and Entry Barriers
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitive dynamics analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Barriers to Entry: [Obstacles facing new market entrants]_
|
||||
_Competitive Intensity: [Level of rivalry and competitive pressure]_
|
||||
_Market Consolidation Trends: [M&A activity and market concentration]_
|
||||
_Switching Costs: [Costs for customers to switch between providers]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Ecosystem and Partnership Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Ecosystem analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Supplier Relationships: [Key supplier partnerships and dependencies]_
|
||||
_Distribution Channels: [How competitors reach customers]_
|
||||
_Technology Partnerships: [Strategic technology alliances]_
|
||||
_Ecosystem Control: [Who controls key parts of the value chain]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **competitive landscape analysis** for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Competitive Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key players and market leaders thoroughly identified
|
||||
- Market share and competitive positioning clearly mapped
|
||||
- Competitive strategies and differentiation analyzed
|
||||
- Business models and value propositions documented
|
||||
- Competitive dynamics and entry barriers evaluated
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to regulatory focus analysis?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to regulatory focus
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-04-regulatory-focus.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Key players and market leaders thoroughly identified
|
||||
✅ Market share and competitive positioning clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Competitive strategies and differentiation analyzed
|
||||
✅ Business models and value propositions documented
|
||||
✅ Competitive dynamics and entry barriers evaluated
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (regulatory focus)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying on training data instead of web search for current facts
|
||||
❌ Missing critical key players or market leaders
|
||||
❌ Incomplete market share or positioning analysis
|
||||
❌ Not identifying competitive strategies
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to regulatory focus step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research competitive intelligence reports and market analyses
|
||||
- Use company websites, annual reports, and investor presentations
|
||||
- Analyze market share data and competitive positioning
|
||||
- Study competitive strategies and differentiation approaches
|
||||
- Search the web to verify facts
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative competitive intelligence sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable competitive insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-04-regulatory-focus.md` to analyze regulatory requirements, compliance frameworks, and legal considerations for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and search the web to verify facts!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Step 4: Regulatory Focus
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A REGULATORY ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on compliance requirements and regulatory landscape
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after regulatory content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE REGULATORY ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on regulatory and compliance requirements for the domain
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct focused regulatory and compliance analysis with emphasis on requirements that impact {{research_topic}}. Search the web to verify and supplement current facts.
|
||||
|
||||
## REGULATORY FOCUS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Regulatory Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with regulatory research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll focus on **regulatory and compliance requirements** that impact **{{research_topic}}**.
|
||||
|
||||
**Regulatory Focus Areas:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Specific regulations and compliance frameworks
|
||||
- Industry standards and best practices
|
||||
- Licensing and certification requirements
|
||||
- Data protection and privacy regulations
|
||||
- Environmental and safety requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current regulatory requirements.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Web Search for Specific Regulations
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current regulatory information:
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} regulations compliance requirements"
|
||||
|
||||
**Regulatory focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Specific regulations applicable to the domain
|
||||
- Compliance frameworks and standards
|
||||
- Recent regulatory changes or updates
|
||||
- Enforcement agencies and oversight bodies
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Web Search for Industry Standards
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current industry standards:
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} standards best practices"
|
||||
|
||||
**Standards focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Industry-specific technical standards
|
||||
- Best practices and guidelines
|
||||
- Certification requirements
|
||||
- Quality assurance frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Web Search for Data Privacy Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current privacy regulations:
|
||||
Search the web: "data privacy regulations {{research_topic}}"
|
||||
|
||||
**Privacy focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- GDPR, CCPA, and other data protection laws
|
||||
- Industry-specific privacy requirements
|
||||
- Data governance and security standards
|
||||
- User consent and data handling requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Generate Regulatory Analysis Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare regulatory content with source citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Regulatory Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Applicable Regulations
|
||||
|
||||
[Specific regulations analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Industry Standards and Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
[Industry standards analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Compliance Frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
[Compliance frameworks analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Protection and Privacy
|
||||
|
||||
[Privacy requirements analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Licensing and Certification
|
||||
|
||||
[Licensing requirements analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[Practical implementation considerations with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Regulatory and compliance risk assessment]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated regulatory analysis and present continue option:
|
||||
"I've completed **regulatory requirements analysis** for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Regulatory Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Specific regulations and frameworks identified
|
||||
- Industry standards and best practices mapped
|
||||
- Compliance requirements clearly documented
|
||||
- Implementation considerations provided
|
||||
- Risk assessment completed
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to technical trends?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to technical trends
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-05-technical-trends.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 5. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Applicable regulations identified with current citations
|
||||
✅ Industry standards and best practices documented
|
||||
✅ Compliance frameworks clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Data protection requirements analyzed
|
||||
✅ Implementation considerations provided
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying on training data instead of web search for current facts
|
||||
❌ Missing critical regulatory requirements for the domain
|
||||
❌ Not providing implementation considerations for compliance
|
||||
❌ Not completing risk assessment for regulatory compliance
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## REGULATORY RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for specific regulations by name and number
|
||||
- Identify regulatory bodies and enforcement agencies
|
||||
- Research recent regulatory changes and updates
|
||||
- Map industry standards to regulatory requirements
|
||||
- Consider regional and jurisdictional differences
|
||||
|
||||
## SOURCE VERIFICATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite regulatory agency websites
|
||||
- Use official government and industry association sources
|
||||
- Note effective dates and implementation timelines
|
||||
- Present compliance requirement levels and obligations
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-05-technical-trends.md` to analyze technical trends and innovations in the domain.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Search the web to verify regulatory facts and provide practical implementation considerations!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Step 5: Technical Trends
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A TECHNOLOGY ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on emerging technologies and innovation patterns
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after technical trends content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE TECHNICAL TRENDS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on emerging technologies and innovation patterns in the domain
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct comprehensive technical trends analysis using current web data with emphasis on innovations and emerging technologies impacting {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNICAL TRENDS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Technical Trends Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with technology research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **technical trends and emerging technologies** analysis for **{{research_topic}}** using current data.
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Trends Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Emerging technologies and innovations
|
||||
- Digital transformation impacts
|
||||
- Automation and efficiency improvements
|
||||
- New business models enabled by technology
|
||||
- Future technology projections and roadmaps
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current technology developments.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Web Search for Emerging Technologies
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current technology information:
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} emerging technologies innovations"
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- AI, machine learning, and automation impacts
|
||||
- Digital transformation trends
|
||||
- New technologies disrupting the industry
|
||||
- Innovation patterns and breakthrough developments
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Web Search for Digital Transformation
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current transformation trends:
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} digital transformation trends"
|
||||
|
||||
**Transformation focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Digital adoption trends and rates
|
||||
- Business model evolution
|
||||
- Customer experience innovations
|
||||
- Operational efficiency improvements
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Web Search for Future Outlook
|
||||
|
||||
Search for future projections:
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} future outlook trends"
|
||||
|
||||
**Future focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Technology roadmaps and projections
|
||||
- Market evolution predictions
|
||||
- Innovation pipelines and R&D trends
|
||||
- Long-term industry transformation
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Generate Technical Trends Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare technical analysis with source citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Technical Trends and Innovation
|
||||
|
||||
### Emerging Technologies
|
||||
|
||||
[Emerging technologies analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Digital Transformation
|
||||
|
||||
[Digital transformation analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Innovation Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Innovation patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Outlook
|
||||
|
||||
[Future outlook and projections with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation opportunity analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenges and Risks
|
||||
|
||||
[Challenges and risks assessment with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Adoption Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Technology adoption recommendations]
|
||||
|
||||
### Innovation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
[Innovation roadmap suggestions]
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[Risk mitigation strategies]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present Analysis and Complete Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated technical analysis and present complete option:
|
||||
"I've completed **technical trends and innovation analysis** for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Highlights:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Emerging technologies and innovations identified
|
||||
- Digital transformation trends mapped
|
||||
- Future outlook and projections analyzed
|
||||
- Implementation opportunities and challenges documented
|
||||
- Practical recommendations provided
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Trends Research Completed:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Emerging technologies and innovations identified
|
||||
- Digital transformation trends mapped
|
||||
- Future outlook and projections analyzed
|
||||
- Implementation opportunities and challenges documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to research synthesis and recommendations?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-06-research-synthesis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 5. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Emerging technologies identified with current data
|
||||
✅ Digital transformation trends clearly documented
|
||||
✅ Future outlook and projections analyzed
|
||||
✅ Implementation opportunities and challenges mapped
|
||||
✅ Strategic recommendations provided
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (research synthesis)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
❌ Missing critical emerging technologies in the domain
|
||||
❌ Not providing practical implementation recommendations
|
||||
❌ Not completing strategic recommendations
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for research workflow
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNICAL RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for cutting-edge technologies and innovations
|
||||
- Identify disruption patterns and game-changers
|
||||
- Research technology adoption timelines and barriers
|
||||
- Consider regional technology variations
|
||||
- Analyze competitive technological advantages
|
||||
|
||||
## RESEARCH WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All domain research steps completed
|
||||
- Comprehensive research document generated
|
||||
- All sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Research workflow status updated
|
||||
- Final recommendations provided to user
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEPS:
|
||||
|
||||
Research workflow complete. User may:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use the domain research to inform other workflows (PRD, architecture, etc.)
|
||||
- Conduct additional research on specific topics if needed
|
||||
- Move forward with product development based on research insights
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations on completing comprehensive domain research! 🎉
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,444 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Step 6: Research Synthesis and Completion
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A DOMAIN RESEARCH STRATEGIST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on comprehensive synthesis and authoritative conclusions
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📄 PRODUCE COMPREHENSIVE DOCUMENT with narrative intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after synthesis content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
- 📚 GENERATE COMPLETE DOCUMENT STRUCTURE with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - comprehensive domain analysis
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - achieved through exhaustive research
|
||||
- All domain research sections have been completed (analysis, regulatory, technical)
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- This is the final synthesis step producing the complete research document
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Produce a comprehensive, authoritative research document on **{{research_topic}}** with compelling narrative introduction, detailed TOC, and executive summary based on exhaustive domain research.
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPREHENSIVE DOCUMENT SYNTHESIS:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Document Structure Planning
|
||||
|
||||
**Complete Research Document Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Compelling Title]: Comprehensive {{research_topic}} Research
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[Brief compelling overview of key findings and implications]
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
- Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
- Industry Overview and Market Dynamics
|
||||
- Technology Trends and Innovation Landscape
|
||||
- Regulatory Framework and Compliance Requirements
|
||||
- Competitive Landscape and Key Players
|
||||
- Strategic Insights and Recommendations
|
||||
- Implementation Considerations and Risk Assessment
|
||||
- Future Outlook and Strategic Opportunities
|
||||
- Research Methodology and Source Documentation
|
||||
- Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Generate Compelling Narrative Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
**Introduction Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Hook reader with compelling opening about {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- Establish research significance and timeliness
|
||||
- Outline comprehensive research methodology
|
||||
- Preview key findings and strategic implications
|
||||
- Set professional, authoritative tone
|
||||
|
||||
**Web Search for Introduction Context:**
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} significance importance"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Synthesize All Research Sections
|
||||
|
||||
**Section-by-Section Integration:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Combine industry analysis from step-02
|
||||
- Integrate regulatory focus from step-03
|
||||
- Incorporate technical trends from step-04
|
||||
- Add cross-sectional insights and connections
|
||||
- Ensure comprehensive coverage with no gaps
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Complete Document Content
|
||||
|
||||
#### Final Document Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Compelling Title]: Comprehensive {{research_topic}} Domain Research
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[2-3 paragraph compelling summary of the most critical findings and strategic implications for {{research_topic}} based on comprehensive current research]
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Most significant market dynamics]
|
||||
- [Critical regulatory considerations]
|
||||
- [Important technology trends]
|
||||
- [Strategic implications]
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Recommendations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Top 3-5 actionable recommendations based on research]
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
1. Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
2. {{research_topic}} Industry Overview and Market Dynamics
|
||||
3. Technology Landscape and Innovation Trends
|
||||
4. Regulatory Framework and Compliance Requirements
|
||||
5. Competitive Landscape and Ecosystem Analysis
|
||||
6. Strategic Insights and Domain Opportunities
|
||||
7. Implementation Considerations and Risk Assessment
|
||||
8. Future Outlook and Strategic Planning
|
||||
9. Research Methodology and Source Verification
|
||||
10. Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Significance
|
||||
|
||||
[Compelling narrative about why {{research_topic}} research is critical right now]
|
||||
_Why this research matters now: [Strategic importance with current context]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive description of research approach including:]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Research Scope**: [Comprehensive coverage areas]
|
||||
- **Data Sources**: [Authoritative sources and verification approach]
|
||||
- **Analysis Framework**: [Structured analysis methodology]
|
||||
- **Time Period**: [current focus and historical context]
|
||||
- **Geographic Coverage**: [Regional/global scope]
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Goals and Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**Original Goals:** {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Achieved Objectives:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Goal 1 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Goal 2 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Additional insights discovered during research]
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. {{research_topic}} Industry Overview and Market Dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Size and Growth Projections
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive market analysis synthesized from step-02 with current data]
|
||||
_Market Size: [Current market valuation]_
|
||||
_Growth Rate: [CAGR and projections]_
|
||||
_Market Drivers: [Key growth factors]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Industry Structure and Value Chain
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete industry structure analysis]
|
||||
_Value Chain Components: [Detailed breakdown]_
|
||||
_Industry Segments: [Market segmentation analysis]_
|
||||
_Economic Impact: [Industry economic significance]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Technology Landscape and Innovation Trends
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Technology Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
[Technology trends analysis from step-04 with current context]
|
||||
_Emerging Technologies: [Key technologies affecting {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Adoption Patterns: [Technology adoption rates and patterns]_
|
||||
_Innovation Drivers: [Factors driving technology change]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Digital Transformation Impact
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive analysis of technology's impact on {{research_topic}}]
|
||||
_Transformation Trends: [Major digital transformation patterns]_
|
||||
_Disruption Opportunities: [Technology-driven opportunities]_
|
||||
_Future Technology Outlook: [Emerging technologies and timelines]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Regulatory Framework and Compliance Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Regulatory Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
[Regulatory analysis from step-03 with current updates]
|
||||
_Key Regulations: [Critical regulatory requirements]_
|
||||
_Compliance Standards: [Industry standards and best practices]_
|
||||
_Recent Changes: [current regulatory updates and implications]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk and Compliance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive risk assessment]
|
||||
_Compliance Risks: [Major regulatory and compliance risks]_
|
||||
_Risk Mitigation Strategies: [Approaches to manage regulatory risks]_
|
||||
_Future Regulatory Trends: [Anticipated regulatory developments]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Competitive Landscape and Ecosystem Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Positioning and Key Players
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitive analysis with current market positioning]
|
||||
_Market Leaders: [Dominant players and strategies]_
|
||||
_Emerging Competitors: [New entrants and innovative approaches]_
|
||||
_Competitive Dynamics: [Market competition patterns and trends]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Ecosystem and Partnership Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete ecosystem analysis]
|
||||
_Ecosystem Players: [Key stakeholders and relationships]_
|
||||
_Partnership Opportunities: [Strategic collaboration potential]_
|
||||
_Supply Chain Dynamics: [Supply chain structure and risks]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Strategic Insights and Domain Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
### Cross-Domain Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategic insights from integrating all research sections]
|
||||
_Market-Technology Convergence: [How technology and market forces interact]_
|
||||
_Regulatory-Strategic Alignment: [How regulatory environment shapes strategy]_
|
||||
_Competitive Positioning Opportunities: [Strategic advantages based on research]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[High-value opportunities identified through comprehensive research]
|
||||
_Market Opportunities: [Specific market entry or expansion opportunities]_
|
||||
_Technology Opportunities: [Technology adoption or innovation opportunities]_
|
||||
_Partnership Opportunities: [Strategic collaboration and partnership potential]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Implementation Considerations and Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Framework
|
||||
|
||||
[Practical implementation guidance based on research findings]
|
||||
_Implementation Timeline: [Recommended phased approach]_
|
||||
_Resource Requirements: [Key resources and capabilities needed]_
|
||||
_Success Factors: [Critical success factors for implementation]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Management and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive risk assessment and mitigation strategies]
|
||||
_Implementation Risks: [Major risks and mitigation approaches]_
|
||||
_Market Risks: [Market-related risks and contingency plans]_
|
||||
_Technology Risks: [Technology adoption and implementation risks]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Future Outlook and Strategic Planning
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Trends and Projections
|
||||
|
||||
[Forward-looking analysis based on comprehensive research]
|
||||
_Near-term Outlook: [1-2 year projections and implications]_
|
||||
_Medium-term Trends: [3-5 year expected developments]_
|
||||
_Long-term Vision: [5+ year strategic outlook for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive strategic recommendations]
|
||||
_Immediate Actions: [Priority actions for next 6 months]_
|
||||
_Strategic Initiatives: [Key strategic initiatives for 1-2 years]_
|
||||
_Long-term Strategy: [Strategic positioning for 3+ years]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Research Methodology and Source Verification
|
||||
|
||||
### Comprehensive Source Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete documentation of all research sources]
|
||||
_Primary Sources: [Key authoritative sources used]_
|
||||
_Secondary Sources: [Supporting research and analysis]_
|
||||
_Web Search Queries: [Complete list of search queries used]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
[Quality assurance and validation approach]
|
||||
_Source Verification: [All factual claims verified with multiple sources]_
|
||||
_Confidence Levels: [Confidence assessments for uncertain data]_
|
||||
_Limitations: [Research limitations and areas for further investigation]_
|
||||
_Methodology Transparency: [Complete transparency about research approach]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
### Detailed Data Tables
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive data tables supporting research findings]
|
||||
_Market Data Tables: [Detailed market size, growth, and segmentation data]_
|
||||
_Technology Adoption Data: [Detailed technology adoption and trend data]_
|
||||
_Regulatory Reference Tables: [Complete regulatory requirements and compliance data]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
[Valuable resources for continued research and implementation]
|
||||
_Industry Associations: [Key industry organizations and resources]_
|
||||
_Research Organizations: [Authoritative research institutions and reports]_
|
||||
_Government Resources: [Regulatory agencies and official resources]_
|
||||
_Professional Networks: [Industry communities and knowledge sources]_
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary of Key Findings
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive summary of the most important research findings]
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Assessment of strategic implications for {{research_topic}}]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Specific next steps for leveraging this research]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Completion Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Research Period:** Comprehensive analysis
|
||||
**Document Length:** As needed for comprehensive coverage
|
||||
**Source Verification:** All facts cited with sources
|
||||
**Confidence Level:** High - based on multiple authoritative sources
|
||||
|
||||
_This comprehensive research document serves as an authoritative reference on {{research_topic}} and provides strategic insights for informed decision-making._
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Complete Document and Final Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Completion Presentation:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed the **comprehensive research document synthesis** for **{{research_topic}}**, producing an authoritative research document with:
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Compelling Narrative Introduction**: Engaging opening that establishes research significance
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Table of Contents**: Complete navigation structure for easy reference
|
||||
- **Exhaustive Research Coverage**: All aspects of {{research_topic}} thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- **Executive Summary**: Key findings and strategic implications highlighted
|
||||
- **Strategic Recommendations**: Actionable insights based on comprehensive research
|
||||
- **Complete Source Citations**: Every factual claim verified with sources
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Completeness:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Industry analysis and market dynamics fully documented
|
||||
- Technology trends and innovation landscape comprehensively covered
|
||||
- Regulatory framework and compliance requirements detailed
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and ecosystem analysis complete
|
||||
- Strategic insights and implementation guidance provided
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Standards Met:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Exhaustive research with no critical gaps
|
||||
- Professional structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
- As long as needed for comprehensive coverage
|
||||
- Multiple independent sources for all claims
|
||||
- Proper citations throughout
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to complete this comprehensive research document?**
|
||||
[C] Complete Research - Save final comprehensive document
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Final Completion
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Replace** the template placeholder `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` in the `## Research Overview` section near the top of the document with a concise 2-3 paragraph overview summarizing the research scope, key findings, and a pointer to the full executive summary in the Research Synthesis section
|
||||
- Append the complete document to the research file
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
|
||||
- Complete the domain research workflow
|
||||
- Provide final document delivery confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the complete comprehensive research document using the full structure above. Also replace the `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` placeholder in the Research Overview section at the top of the document.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Compelling narrative introduction with research significance
|
||||
✅ Comprehensive table of contents with complete document structure
|
||||
✅ Exhaustive research coverage across all domain aspects
|
||||
✅ Executive summary with key findings and strategic implications
|
||||
✅ Strategic recommendations grounded in comprehensive research
|
||||
✅ Complete source verification with citations
|
||||
✅ Professional document structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Domain research workflow completed with comprehensive document
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not producing compelling narrative introduction
|
||||
❌ Missing comprehensive table of contents
|
||||
❌ Incomplete research coverage across domain aspects
|
||||
❌ Not providing executive summary with key findings
|
||||
❌ Missing strategic recommendations based on research
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
❌ Producing document without professional structure
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for final document
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPREHENSIVE DOCUMENT STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
This step ensures the final research document:
|
||||
|
||||
- Serves as an authoritative reference on {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- Provides compelling narrative and professional structure
|
||||
- Includes comprehensive coverage with no gaps
|
||||
- Maintains rigorous source verification standards
|
||||
- Delivers strategic insights and actionable recommendations
|
||||
- Meets professional research document quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
## DOMAIN RESEARCH WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All domain research steps completed (1-5)
|
||||
- Comprehensive domain research document generated
|
||||
- Professional document structure with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
- All sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Domain research workflow status updated to complete
|
||||
- Final comprehensive research document delivered to user
|
||||
|
||||
## FINAL DELIVERABLE:
|
||||
|
||||
Complete authoritative research document on {{research_topic}} that:
|
||||
|
||||
- Establishes professional credibility through comprehensive research
|
||||
- Provides strategic insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Serves as reference document for continued use
|
||||
- Maintains highest research quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations on completing comprehensive domain research! 🎉
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
stepsCompleted: []
|
||||
inputDocuments: []
|
||||
workflowType: 'research'
|
||||
lastStep: 1
|
||||
research_type: '{{research_type}}'
|
||||
research_topic: '{{research_topic}}'
|
||||
research_goals: '{{research_goals}}'
|
||||
user_name: '{{user_name}}'
|
||||
date: '{{date}}'
|
||||
web_research_enabled: true
|
||||
source_verification: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Research Report: {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Author:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
**Research Type:** {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Content will be appended sequentially through research workflow steps -->
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
# Domain Research Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Conduct comprehensive domain/industry research using current web data and verified sources to produce complete research documents with compelling narratives and proper citations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:** You are a domain research facilitator working with an expert partner. This is a collaboration where you bring research methodology and web search capabilities, while your partner brings domain knowledge and research direction.
|
||||
|
||||
## PREREQUISITE
|
||||
|
||||
**⛔ Web search required.** If unavailable, abort and tell the user.
|
||||
|
||||
## CONFIGURATION
|
||||
|
||||
Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
|
||||
- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
|
||||
- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
|
||||
- `date` as a system-generated value
|
||||
|
||||
## QUICK TOPIC DISCOVERY
|
||||
|
||||
"Welcome {{user_name}}! Let's get started with your **domain/industry research**.
|
||||
|
||||
**What domain, industry, or sector do you want to research?**
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
- 'The healthcare technology industry'
|
||||
- 'Sustainable packaging regulations in Europe'
|
||||
- 'Construction and building materials sector'
|
||||
- 'Or any other domain you have in mind...'"
|
||||
|
||||
### Topic Clarification
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the user's topic, briefly clarify:
|
||||
1. **Core Domain**: "What specific aspect of [domain] are you most interested in?"
|
||||
2. **Research Goals**: "What do you hope to achieve with this research?"
|
||||
3. **Scope**: "Should we focus broadly or dive deep into specific aspects?"
|
||||
|
||||
## ROUTE TO DOMAIN RESEARCH STEPS
|
||||
|
||||
After gathering the topic and goals:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Set `research_type = "domain"`
|
||||
2. Set `research_topic = [discovered topic from discussion]`
|
||||
3. Set `research_goals = [discovered goals from discussion]`
|
||||
4. Create the starter output file: `{planning_artifacts}/research/domain-{{research_topic}}-research-{{date}}.md` with exact copy of the `./research.template.md` contents
|
||||
5. Load: `./domain-steps/step-01-init.md` with topic context
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** The discovered topic from the discussion should be passed to the initialization step, so it doesn't need to ask "What do you want to research?" again - it can focus on refining the scope for domain research.
|
||||
|
||||
**✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`**
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-market-research
|
||||
description: 'Conduct market research on competition and customers. Use when the user says "create a market research report about [business idea]".'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
stepsCompleted: []
|
||||
inputDocuments: []
|
||||
workflowType: 'research'
|
||||
lastStep: 1
|
||||
research_type: '{{research_type}}'
|
||||
research_topic: '{{research_topic}}'
|
||||
research_goals: '{{research_goals}}'
|
||||
user_name: '{{user_name}}'
|
||||
date: '{{date}}'
|
||||
web_research_enabled: true
|
||||
source_verification: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Research Report: {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Author:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
**Research Type:** {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Content will be appended sequentially through research workflow steps -->
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 1: Market Research Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate research content in init step
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS confirm understanding of user's research goals
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A MARKET RESEARCH FACILITATOR, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on clarifying scope and approach
|
||||
- 🔍 NO WEB RESEARCH in init - that's for later steps
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete research
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Confirm research understanding before proceeding
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after scope clarification
|
||||
- 💾 Write initial scope document immediately
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from main workflow discovery are available
|
||||
- Research type = "market" is already set
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - discovered from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - captured from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on market research scope clarification
|
||||
- Web search capabilities are enabled for later steps
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Initialize market research by confirming understanding of {{research_topic}} and establishing clear research scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH INITIALIZATION:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Confirm Research Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
**INITIALIZE - DO NOT RESEARCH YET**
|
||||
|
||||
Start with research confirmation:
|
||||
"I understand you want to conduct **market research** for **{{research_topic}}** with these goals: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**My Understanding of Your Research Needs:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Research Topic**: {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- **Research Goals**: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
- **Research Type**: Market Research
|
||||
- **Approach**: Comprehensive market analysis with source verification
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Areas We'll Cover:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size, growth dynamics, and trends
|
||||
- Customer insights and behavior analysis
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and positioning
|
||||
- Strategic recommendations and implementation guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Does this accurately capture what you're looking for?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Refine Research Scope
|
||||
|
||||
Gather any clarifications needed:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scope Clarification Questions:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Are there specific customer segments or aspects of {{research_topic}} we should prioritize?"
|
||||
- "Should we focus on specific geographic regions or global market?"
|
||||
- "Is this for market entry, expansion, product development, or other business purpose?"
|
||||
- "Any competitors or market segments you specifically want us to analyze?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Document Initial Scope
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Write initial research scope to document:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Market Research: {{research_topic}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Understanding Confirmed
|
||||
|
||||
**Topic**: {{research_topic}}
|
||||
**Goals**: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
**Research Type**: Market Research
|
||||
**Date**: {{date}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Scope
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Analysis Focus Areas:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size, growth projections, and dynamics
|
||||
- Customer segments, behavior patterns, and insights
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and positioning analysis
|
||||
- Strategic recommendations and implementation guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Methodology:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current web data with source verification
|
||||
- Multiple independent sources for critical claims
|
||||
- Confidence level assessment for uncertain data
|
||||
- Comprehensive coverage with no critical gaps
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Workflow:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ Initialization and scope setting (current step)
|
||||
2. Customer Insights and Behavior Analysis
|
||||
3. Competitive Landscape Analysis
|
||||
4. Strategic Synthesis and Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Status**: Scope confirmed, ready to proceed with detailed market analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present Confirmation and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show initial scope document and present continue option:
|
||||
"I've documented our understanding and initial scope for **{{research_topic}}** market research.
|
||||
|
||||
**What I've established:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Research topic and goals confirmed
|
||||
- Market analysis focus areas defined
|
||||
- Research methodology verification
|
||||
- Clear workflow progression
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Status:** Initial scope written to research file for your review
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to begin detailed market research?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Confirm scope and proceed to customer insights analysis
|
||||
[Modify] Suggest changes to research scope before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT — wait for user response before proceeding.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Handle User Response
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1]`
|
||||
- Add confirmation note to document: "Scope confirmed by user on {{date}}"
|
||||
- Load: `./step-02-customer-behavior.md`
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'Modify':
|
||||
|
||||
- Gather user changes to scope
|
||||
- Update document with modifications
|
||||
- Re-present updated scope for confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Research topic and goals accurately understood
|
||||
✅ Market research scope clearly defined
|
||||
✅ Initial scope document written immediately
|
||||
✅ User opportunity to review and modify scope
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Document properly updated with scope confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not confirming understanding of research topic and goals
|
||||
❌ Generating research content instead of just scope clarification
|
||||
❌ Not writing initial scope document to file
|
||||
❌ Not providing opportunity for user to modify scope
|
||||
❌ Proceeding to next step without user confirmation
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor research decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## INITIALIZATION PRINCIPLES:
|
||||
|
||||
This step ensures:
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear mutual understanding of research objectives
|
||||
- Well-defined research scope and approach
|
||||
- Immediate documentation for user review
|
||||
- User control over research direction before detailed work begins
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user confirmation and scope finalization, load `./step-02-customer-behavior.md` to begin detailed market research with customer insights analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Init steps confirm understanding and scope, not generate research content!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 2: Customer Behavior and Segments
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on customer behavior patterns and demographic analysis
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete research
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after customer behavior content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from step-01 are available
|
||||
- Focus on customer behavior patterns and demographic analysis
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- Previous step confirmed research scope and goals
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct customer behavior and segment analysis with emphasis on patterns and demographics.
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Customer Behavior Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different customer behavior areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with customer behavior research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **customer behavior analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand customer patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
**Customer Behavior Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior patterns and preferences
|
||||
- Demographic profiles and segmentation
|
||||
- Psychographic characteristics and values
|
||||
- Behavior drivers and influences
|
||||
- Customer interaction patterns and engagement
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current customer behavior insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Customer Behavior Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer behavior patterns"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer demographics"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} psychographic profiles"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer behavior drivers"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for customer behavior studies and research reports
|
||||
- Search for demographic segmentation and analysis
|
||||
- Research psychographic profiling and value systems
|
||||
- Analyze behavior drivers and influencing factors
|
||||
- Study customer interaction and engagement patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate customer behavior findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior patterns and preferences
|
||||
- Demographic profiles and segmentation
|
||||
- Psychographic characteristics and values
|
||||
- Behavior drivers and influences
|
||||
- Customer interaction patterns and engagement
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Behavior Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting demographics, psychographics, and behaviors]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Customer Behavior Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare customer behavior analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Customer Behavior and Segments
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Behavior Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer behavior patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Behavior Drivers: [Key motivations and patterns from web search]_
|
||||
_Interaction Preferences: [Customer engagement and interaction patterns]_
|
||||
_Decision Habits: [How customers typically make decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Demographic Segmentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Demographic analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Age Demographics: [Age groups and preferences]_
|
||||
_Income Levels: [Income segments and purchasing behavior]_
|
||||
_Geographic Distribution: [Regional/city differences]_
|
||||
_Education Levels: [Education impact on behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Psychographic Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[Psychographic analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Values and Beliefs: [Core values driving customer behavior]_
|
||||
_Lifestyle Preferences: [Lifestyle choices and behaviors]_
|
||||
_Attitudes and Opinions: [Customer attitudes toward products/services]_
|
||||
_Personality Traits: [Personality influences on behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Segment Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[Detailed customer segment profiles with source citations]
|
||||
_Segment 1: [Detailed profile including demographics, psychographics, behavior]_
|
||||
_Segment 2: [Detailed profile including demographics, psychographics, behavior]_
|
||||
_Segment 3: [Detailed profile including demographics, psychographics, behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Behavior Drivers and Influences
|
||||
|
||||
[Behavior drivers analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Emotional Drivers: [Emotional factors influencing behavior]_
|
||||
_Rational Drivers: [Logical decision factors]_
|
||||
_Social Influences: [Social and peer influences]_
|
||||
_Economic Influences: [Economic factors affecting behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Interaction Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer interaction analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Research and Discovery: [How customers find and research options]_
|
||||
_Purchase Decision Process: [Steps in purchase decision making]_
|
||||
_Post-Purchase Behavior: [After-purchase engagement patterns]_
|
||||
_Loyalty and Retention: [Factors driving customer loyalty]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **customer behavior analysis** for {{research_topic}}, focusing on customer patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Customer Behavior Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior patterns clearly identified with drivers
|
||||
- Demographic segmentation thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Psychographic profiles mapped and documented
|
||||
- Customer interaction patterns captured
|
||||
- Multiple sources verified for critical insights
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to customer pain points?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to pain points analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT — wait for user response before proceeding.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-03-customer-pain-points.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Customer behavior patterns identified with current citations
|
||||
✅ Demographic segmentation thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Psychographic profiles clearly documented
|
||||
✅ Customer interaction patterns captured
|
||||
✅ Multiple sources verified for critical insights
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (customer pain points)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical customer behavior patterns
|
||||
❌ Incomplete demographic segmentation analysis
|
||||
❌ Missing psychographic profile documentation
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to customer pain points analysis step
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor research decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research customer behavior studies and market research
|
||||
- Use demographic data from authoritative sources
|
||||
- Research psychographic profiling and value systems
|
||||
- Analyze customer interaction and engagement patterns
|
||||
- Focus on current behavior data and trends
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative customer research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable customer insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-03-customer-pain-points.md` to analyze customer pain points, challenges, and unmet needs for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current customer data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 3: Customer Pain Points and Needs
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A CUSTOMER NEEDS ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on customer pain points, challenges, and unmet needs
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after pain points content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CUSTOMER PAIN POINTS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Customer behavior analysis completed in previous step
|
||||
- Focus on customer pain points, challenges, and unmet needs
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct customer pain points and needs analysis with emphasis on challenges and frustrations.
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER PAIN POINTS ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Customer Pain Points Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different customer pain point areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with customer pain points research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **customer pain points analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand customer challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
**Customer Pain Points Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer challenges and frustrations
|
||||
- Unmet needs and unaddressed problems
|
||||
- Barriers to adoption or usage
|
||||
- Service and support pain points
|
||||
- Customer satisfaction gaps
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current customer pain points insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Pain Points Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer pain points challenges"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer frustrations"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} unmet customer needs"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer barriers to adoption"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for customer satisfaction surveys and reports
|
||||
- Search for customer complaints and reviews
|
||||
- Research customer support and service issues
|
||||
- Analyze barriers to customer adoption
|
||||
- Study unmet needs and market gaps
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate customer pain points findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer challenges and frustrations
|
||||
- Unmet needs and unaddressed problems
|
||||
- Barriers to adoption or usage
|
||||
- Service and support pain points
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Pain Points Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting different types of pain points]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Customer Pain Points Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare customer pain points analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Customer Pain Points and Needs
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Challenges and Frustrations
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer challenges analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Primary Frustrations: [Major customer frustrations identified]_
|
||||
_Usage Barriers: [Barriers preventing effective usage]_
|
||||
_Service Pain Points: [Customer service and support issues]_
|
||||
_Frequency Analysis: [How often these challenges occur]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Unmet Customer Needs
|
||||
|
||||
[Unmet needs analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Critical Unmet Needs: [Most important unaddressed needs]_
|
||||
_Solution Gaps: [Opportunities to address unmet needs]_
|
||||
_Market Gaps: [Market opportunities from unmet needs]_
|
||||
_Priority Analysis: [Which needs are most critical]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Barriers to Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
[Adoption barriers analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Price Barriers: [Cost-related barriers to adoption]_
|
||||
_Technical Barriers: [Complexity or technical barriers]_
|
||||
_Trust Barriers: [Trust and credibility issues]_
|
||||
_Convenience Barriers: [Ease of use or accessibility issues]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Service and Support Pain Points
|
||||
|
||||
[Service pain points analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Customer Service Issues: [Common customer service problems]_
|
||||
_Support Gaps: [Areas where customer support is lacking]_
|
||||
_Communication Issues: [Communication breakdowns and frustrations]_
|
||||
_Response Time Issues: [Slow response and resolution problems]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Satisfaction Gaps
|
||||
|
||||
[Satisfaction gap analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Expectation Gaps: [Differences between expectations and reality]_
|
||||
_Quality Gaps: [Areas where quality expectations aren't met]_
|
||||
_Value Perception Gaps: [Perceived value vs actual value]_
|
||||
_Trust and Credibility Gaps: [Trust issues affecting satisfaction]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Emotional Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Emotional impact analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Frustration Levels: [Customer frustration severity assessment]_
|
||||
_Loyalty Risks: [How pain points affect customer loyalty]_
|
||||
_Reputation Impact: [Impact on brand or product reputation]_
|
||||
_Customer Retention Risks: [Risk of customer loss from pain points]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Pain Point Prioritization
|
||||
|
||||
[Pain point prioritization with source citations]
|
||||
_High Priority Pain Points: [Most critical pain points to address]_
|
||||
_Medium Priority Pain Points: [Important but less critical pain points]_
|
||||
_Low Priority Pain Points: [Minor pain points with lower impact]_
|
||||
_Opportunity Mapping: [Pain points with highest solution opportunity]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **customer pain points analysis** for {{research_topic}}, focusing on customer challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Pain Points Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer challenges and frustrations thoroughly documented
|
||||
- Unmet needs and solution gaps clearly identified
|
||||
- Adoption barriers and service pain points analyzed
|
||||
- Customer satisfaction gaps assessed
|
||||
- Pain points prioritized by impact and opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to customer decision processes?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to decision processes analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT — wait for user response before proceeding.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-04-customer-decisions.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Customer challenges and frustrations clearly documented
|
||||
✅ Unmet needs and solution gaps identified
|
||||
✅ Adoption barriers and service pain points analyzed
|
||||
✅ Customer satisfaction gaps assessed
|
||||
✅ Pain points prioritized by impact and opportunity
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (customer decisions)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical customer challenges or frustrations
|
||||
❌ Not identifying unmet needs or solution gaps
|
||||
❌ Incomplete adoption barriers analysis
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to customer decisions analysis step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER PAIN POINTS RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research customer satisfaction surveys and reviews
|
||||
- Use customer feedback and complaint data
|
||||
- Analyze customer support and service issues
|
||||
- Study barriers to customer adoption
|
||||
- Focus on current pain point data
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## PAIN POINTS ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative customer research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable pain point insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-04-customer-decisions.md` to analyze customer decision processes, journey mapping, and decision factors for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current customer pain points data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 4: Customer Decisions and Journey
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A CUSTOMER DECISION ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on customer decision processes and journey mapping
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after decision processes content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CUSTOMER DECISIONS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Customer behavior and pain points analysis completed in previous steps
|
||||
- Focus on customer decision processes and journey mapping
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct customer decision processes and journey analysis with emphasis on decision factors and journey mapping.
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER DECISIONS ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Customer Decisions Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different customer decision areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with customer decisions research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **customer decision processes analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand customer decision-making.
|
||||
|
||||
**Customer Decisions Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer decision-making processes
|
||||
- Decision factors and criteria
|
||||
- Customer journey mapping
|
||||
- Purchase decision influencers
|
||||
- Information gathering patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current customer decision insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Decisions Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer decision process"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} buying criteria factors"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer journey mapping"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} decision influencing factors"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for customer decision research studies
|
||||
- Search for buying criteria and factor analysis
|
||||
- Research customer journey mapping methodologies
|
||||
- Analyze decision influence factors and channels
|
||||
- Study information gathering and evaluation patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate customer decision findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer decision-making processes
|
||||
- Decision factors and criteria
|
||||
- Customer journey mapping
|
||||
- Decision influence factors
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Decisions Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting decision factors and journey stages]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Customer Decisions Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare customer decisions analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Customer Decision Processes and Journey
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Decision-Making Processes
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision processes analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Decision Stages: [Key stages in customer decision making]_
|
||||
_Decision Timelines: [Timeframes for different decisions]_
|
||||
_Complexity Levels: [Decision complexity assessment]_
|
||||
_Evaluation Methods: [How customers evaluate options]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Factors and Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision factors analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Primary Decision Factors: [Most important factors in decisions]_
|
||||
_Secondary Decision Factors: [Supporting factors influencing decisions]_
|
||||
_Weighing Analysis: [How different factors are weighed]_
|
||||
_Evoluton Patterns: [How factors change over time]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
[Journey mapping analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Awareness Stage: [How customers become aware of {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Consideration Stage: [Evaluation and comparison process]_
|
||||
_Decision Stage: [Final decision-making process]_
|
||||
_Purchase Stage: [Purchase execution and completion]_
|
||||
_Post-Purchase Stage: [Post-decision evaluation and behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Touchpoint Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Touchpoint analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Digital Touchpoints: [Online and digital interaction points]_
|
||||
_Offline Touchpoints: [Physical and in-person interaction points]_
|
||||
_Information Sources: [Where customers get information]_
|
||||
_Influence Channels: [What influences customer decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Information Gathering Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Information patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Research Methods: [How customers research options]_
|
||||
_Information Sources Trusted: [Most trusted information sources]_
|
||||
_Research Duration: [Time spent gathering information]_
|
||||
_Evaluation Criteria: [How customers evaluate information]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Influencers
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision influencer analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Peer Influence: [How friends and family influence decisions]_
|
||||
_Expert Influence: [How expert opinions affect decisions]_
|
||||
_Media Influence: [How media and marketing affect decisions]_
|
||||
_Social Proof Influence: [How reviews and testimonials affect decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Purchase Decision Factors
|
||||
|
||||
[Purchase decision factors analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Immediate Purchase Drivers: [Factors triggering immediate purchase]_
|
||||
_Delayed Purchase Drivers: [Factors causing purchase delays]_
|
||||
_Brand Loyalty Factors: [Factors driving repeat purchases]_
|
||||
_Price Sensitivity: [How price affects purchase decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Decision Optimizations
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision optimization analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Friction Reduction: [Ways to make decisions easier]_
|
||||
_Trust Building: [Building customer trust in decisions]_
|
||||
_Conversion Optimization: [Optimizing decision-to-purchase rates]_
|
||||
_Loyalty Building: [Building long-term customer relationships]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **customer decision processes analysis** for {{research_topic}}, focusing on customer decision-making.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Decision Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer decision-making processes clearly mapped
|
||||
- Decision factors and criteria thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Customer journey mapping completed across all stages
|
||||
- Decision influencers and touchpoints identified
|
||||
- Information gathering patterns documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to competitive analysis?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to competitive analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT — wait for user response before proceeding.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-05-competitive-analysis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Customer decision-making processes clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Decision factors and criteria thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Customer journey mapping completed across all stages
|
||||
✅ Decision influencers and touchpoints identified
|
||||
✅ Information gathering patterns documented
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (competitive analysis)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical decision-making process stages
|
||||
❌ Not identifying key decision factors
|
||||
❌ Incomplete customer journey mapping
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to competitive analysis step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER DECISIONS RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research customer decision studies and psychology
|
||||
- Use customer journey mapping methodologies
|
||||
- Analyze buying criteria and decision factors
|
||||
- Study decision influence and touchpoint analysis
|
||||
- Focus on current decision data
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## DECISION ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative customer decision research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable decision insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-05-competitive-analysis.md` to analyze competitive landscape, market positioning, and competitive strategies for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current customer decision data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 5: Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A COMPETITIVE ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on competitive landscape and market positioning
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after competitive analysis content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Focus on competitive landscape and market positioning analysis
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- May need to search for specific competitor information
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct comprehensive competitive analysis with emphasis on market positioning.
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with competitive research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **competitive analysis** to understand the competitive landscape.
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Analysis Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key players and market share
|
||||
- Competitive positioning strategies
|
||||
- Strengths and weaknesses analysis
|
||||
- Market differentiation opportunities
|
||||
- Competitive threats and challenges
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current competitive information.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Generate Competitive Analysis Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare competitive analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Market Players
|
||||
|
||||
[Key players analysis with market share data]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Share Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Market share analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
[Positioning analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strengths and Weaknesses
|
||||
|
||||
[SWOT analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Differentiation
|
||||
|
||||
[Differentiation analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Threats
|
||||
|
||||
[Threats analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitive opportunities analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Present Analysis and Complete Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated competitive analysis and present complete option:
|
||||
"I've completed the **competitive analysis** for the competitive landscape.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Competitive Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key market players and market share identified
|
||||
- Competitive positioning strategies mapped
|
||||
- Strengths and weaknesses thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Market differentiation opportunities identified
|
||||
- Competitive threats and challenges documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to complete the market research?**
|
||||
[C] Complete Research - Save competitive analysis and proceed to research completion
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT — wait for user response before proceeding.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Handle Complete Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to the research document
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-06-research-completion.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document using the structure from step 2.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Key market players identified
|
||||
✅ Market share analysis completed with source verification
|
||||
✅ Competitive positioning strategies clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Strengths and weaknesses thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Market differentiation opportunities identified
|
||||
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
✅ Market research workflow completed successfully
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing key market players or market share data
|
||||
❌ Incomplete competitive positioning analysis
|
||||
❌ Not identifying market differentiation opportunities
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for research workflow
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for industry reports and competitive intelligence
|
||||
- Use competitor company websites and annual reports
|
||||
- Research market research firm competitive analyses
|
||||
- Note competitive advantages and disadvantages
|
||||
- Search for recent market developments and disruptions
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All market research steps completed
|
||||
- Comprehensive market research document generated
|
||||
- All sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Market research workflow status updated
|
||||
- Final recommendations provided to user
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-06-research-completion.md` to produce the final comprehensive market research document with strategic synthesis, executive summary, and complete document structure.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 6: Research Completion
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A MARKET RESEARCH STRATEGIST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on strategic recommendations and actionable insights
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after completion content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
- 📚 GENERATE COMPLETE DOCUMENT STRUCTURE with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - comprehensive market analysis
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - achieved through exhaustive market research
|
||||
- All market research sections have been completed (customer behavior, pain points, decisions, competitive analysis)
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- This is the final synthesis step producing the complete market research document
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Produce a comprehensive, authoritative market research document on **{{research_topic}}** with compelling narrative introduction, detailed TOC, and executive summary based on exhaustive market research.
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH COMPLETION SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Strategic Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with strategic synthesis approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll complete our market research with **strategic synthesis and recommendations** .
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Synthesis Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Integrated insights from market, customer, and competitive analysis
|
||||
- Strategic recommendations based on research findings
|
||||
- Market entry or expansion strategies
|
||||
- Risk assessment and mitigation approaches
|
||||
- Actionable next steps and implementation guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current strategic insights and best practices.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Web Search for Market Entry Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current market strategies:
|
||||
Search the web: "market entry strategies best practices"
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategy focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market entry timing and approaches
|
||||
- Go-to-market strategies and frameworks
|
||||
- Market positioning and differentiation tactics
|
||||
- Customer acquisition and growth strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Web Search for Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current risk approaches:
|
||||
Search the web: "market research risk assessment frameworks"
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market risks and uncertainty management
|
||||
- Competitive threats and mitigation strategies
|
||||
- Regulatory and compliance risks
|
||||
- Economic and market volatility considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Complete Market Research Document
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare comprehensive market research document with full structure:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Complete Document Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Compelling Title]: Comprehensive {{research_topic}} Market Research
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[Brief compelling overview of key market findings and strategic implications]
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
- Market Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
- {{research_topic}} Market Analysis and Dynamics
|
||||
- Customer Insights and Behavior Analysis
|
||||
- Competitive Landscape and Positioning
|
||||
- Strategic Market Recommendations
|
||||
- Market Entry and Growth Strategies
|
||||
- Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
- Implementation Roadmap and Success Metrics
|
||||
- Future Market Outlook and Opportunities
|
||||
- Market Research Methodology and Source Documentation
|
||||
- Market Research Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Market Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Significance
|
||||
|
||||
**Compelling market narrative about why {{research_topic}} research is critical now**
|
||||
_Market Importance: [Strategic market significance with up-to-date context]_
|
||||
_Business Impact: [Business implications of market research]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive description of market research approach including:]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Market Scope**: [Comprehensive market coverage areas]
|
||||
- **Data Sources**: [Authoritative market sources and verification approach]
|
||||
- **Analysis Framework**: [Structured market analysis methodology]
|
||||
- **Time Period**: [current focus and market evolution context]
|
||||
- **Geographic Coverage**: [Regional/global market scope]
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Goals and Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**Original Market Goals:** {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Achieved Market Objectives:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Market Goal 1 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Market Goal 2 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Additional market insights discovered during research]
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. {{research_topic}} Market Analysis and Dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Size and Growth Projections
|
||||
|
||||
_[Comprehensive market analysis]_
|
||||
_Market Size: [Current market valuation and size]_
|
||||
_Growth Rate: [CAGR and market growth projections]_
|
||||
_Market Drivers: [Key factors driving market growth]_
|
||||
_Market Segments: [Detailed market segmentation analysis]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Trends and Dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
[Current market trends analysis]
|
||||
_Emerging Trends: [Key market trends and their implications]_
|
||||
_Market Dynamics: [Forces shaping market evolution]_
|
||||
_Consumer Behavior Shifts: [Changes in customer behavior and preferences]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing and Business Model Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive pricing and business model analysis]
|
||||
_Pricing Strategies: [Current pricing approaches and models]_
|
||||
_Business Model Evolution: [Emerging and successful business models]_
|
||||
_Value Proposition Analysis: [Customer value proposition assessment]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Customer Insights and Behavior Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Behavior Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer insights analysis with current context]
|
||||
_Behavior Patterns: [Key customer behavior trends and patterns]_
|
||||
_Customer Journey: [Complete customer journey mapping]_
|
||||
_Decision Factors: [Factors influencing customer decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Pain Points and Needs
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive customer pain point analysis]
|
||||
_Pain Points: [Key customer challenges and frustrations]_
|
||||
_Unmet Needs: [Unsolved customer needs and opportunities]_
|
||||
_Customer Expectations: [Current customer expectations and requirements]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Segmentation and Targeting
|
||||
|
||||
[Detailed customer segmentation analysis]
|
||||
_Customer Segments: [Detailed customer segment profiles]_
|
||||
_Target Market Analysis: [Most attractive customer segments]_
|
||||
_Segment-specific Strategies: [Tailored approaches for key segments]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Competitive Landscape and Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive competitive analysis]
|
||||
_Market Leaders: [Dominant competitors and their strategies]_
|
||||
_Emerging Competitors: [New entrants and innovative approaches]_
|
||||
_Competitive Advantages: [Key differentiators and competitive advantages]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Positioning Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategic positioning analysis]
|
||||
_Positioning Opportunities: [Opportunities for market differentiation]_
|
||||
_Competitive Gaps: [Unserved market needs and opportunities]_
|
||||
_Positioning Framework: [Recommended positioning approach]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Strategic Market Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Opportunity Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategic market opportunities analysis]
|
||||
_High-Value Opportunities: [Most attractive market opportunities]_
|
||||
_Market Entry Timing: [Optimal timing for market entry or expansion]_
|
||||
_Growth Strategies: [Recommended approaches for market growth]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive strategic recommendations]
|
||||
_Market Entry Strategy: [Recommended approach for market entry/expansion]_
|
||||
_Competitive Strategy: [Recommended competitive positioning and approach]_
|
||||
_Customer Acquisition Strategy: [Recommended customer acquisition approach]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Market Entry and Growth Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### Go-to-Market Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive go-to-market approach]
|
||||
_Market Entry Approach: [Recommended market entry strategy and tactics]_
|
||||
_Channel Strategy: [Optimal channels for market reach and customer acquisition]_
|
||||
_Partnership Strategy: [Strategic partnership and collaboration opportunities]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Growth and Scaling Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Market growth and scaling analysis]
|
||||
_Growth Phases: [Recommended phased approach to market growth]_
|
||||
_Scaling Considerations: [Key factors for successful market scaling]_
|
||||
_Expansion Opportunities: [Opportunities for geographic or segment expansion]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Risk Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive market risk assessment]
|
||||
_Market Risks: [Key market-related risks and uncertainties]_
|
||||
_Competitive Risks: [Competitive threats and mitigation strategies]_
|
||||
_Regulatory Risks: [Regulatory and compliance considerations]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Mitigation Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
[Risk mitigation and contingency planning]
|
||||
_Risk Mitigation Approaches: [Strategies for managing identified risks]_
|
||||
_Contingency Planning: [Backup plans and alternative approaches]_
|
||||
_Market Sensitivity Analysis: [Impact of market changes on strategy]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Implementation Roadmap and Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Framework
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive implementation guidance]
|
||||
_Implementation Timeline: [Recommended phased implementation approach]_
|
||||
_Required Resources: [Key resources and capabilities needed]_
|
||||
_Implementation Milestones: [Key milestones and success criteria]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Metrics and KPIs
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive success measurement framework]
|
||||
_Key Performance Indicators: [Critical metrics for measuring success]_
|
||||
_Monitoring and Reporting: [Approach for tracking and reporting progress]_
|
||||
_Success Criteria: [Clear criteria for determining success]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Future Market Outlook and Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Market Trends
|
||||
|
||||
[Forward-looking market analysis]
|
||||
_Near-term Market Evolution: [1-2 year market development expectations]_
|
||||
_Medium-term Market Trends: [3-5 year expected market developments]_
|
||||
_Long-term Market Vision: [5+ year market outlook for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Market opportunity analysis and recommendations]
|
||||
_Emerging Opportunities: [New market opportunities and their potential]_
|
||||
_Innovation Opportunities: [Areas for market innovation and differentiation]_
|
||||
_Strategic Market Investments: [Recommended market investments and priorities]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Market Research Methodology and Source Verification
|
||||
|
||||
### Comprehensive Market Source Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete documentation of all market research sources]
|
||||
_Primary Market Sources: [Key authoritative market sources used]_
|
||||
_Secondary Market Sources: [Supporting market research and analysis]_
|
||||
_Market Web Search Queries: [Complete list of market search queries used]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
[Market research quality assurance and validation approach]
|
||||
_Market Source Verification: [All market claims verified with multiple sources]_
|
||||
_Market Confidence Levels: [Confidence assessments for uncertain market data]_
|
||||
_Market Research Limitations: [Market research limitations and areas for further investigation]_
|
||||
_Methodology Transparency: [Complete transparency about market research approach]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Market Research Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
### Detailed Market Data Tables
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive market data tables supporting research findings]
|
||||
_Market Size Data: [Detailed market size and growth data tables]_
|
||||
_Customer Analysis Data: [Detailed customer behavior and segmentation data]_
|
||||
_Competitive Analysis Data: [Detailed competitor comparison and positioning data]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Resources and References
|
||||
|
||||
[Valuable market resources for continued research and implementation]
|
||||
_Market Research Reports: [Authoritative market research reports and publications]_
|
||||
_Industry Associations: [Key industry organizations and market resources]_
|
||||
_Market Analysis Tools: [Tools and resources for ongoing market analysis]_
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Research Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary of Key Market Findings
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive summary of the most important market research findings]
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Market Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Assessment of market implications for {{research_topic}}]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps Market Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Specific next steps for leveraging this market research]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Completion Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Research Period:** current comprehensive market analysis
|
||||
**Document Length:** As needed for comprehensive market coverage
|
||||
**Source Verification:** All market facts cited with current sources
|
||||
**Market Confidence Level:** High - based on multiple authoritative market sources
|
||||
|
||||
_This comprehensive market research document serves as an authoritative market reference on {{research_topic}} and provides strategic market insights for informed decision-making._
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Complete Market Research Document and Final Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Document Completion Presentation:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed the **comprehensive market research document synthesis** for **{{research_topic}}**, producing an authoritative market research document with:
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Compelling Market Introduction**: Engaging opening that establishes market research significance
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Market TOC**: Complete navigation structure for market reference
|
||||
- **Exhaustive Market Research Coverage**: All market aspects of {{research_topic}} thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- **Executive Market Summary**: Key market findings and strategic implications highlighted
|
||||
- **Strategic Market Recommendations**: Actionable market insights based on comprehensive research
|
||||
- **Complete Market Source Citations**: Every market claim verified with current sources
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Completeness:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market analysis and dynamics fully documented
|
||||
- Customer insights and behavior analysis comprehensively covered
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and positioning detailed
|
||||
- Strategic market recommendations and implementation guidance provided
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Standards Met:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Exhaustive market research with no critical gaps
|
||||
- Professional market structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
- As long as needed for comprehensive market coverage
|
||||
- Multiple independent sources for all market claims
|
||||
- current market data throughout with proper citations
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to complete this comprehensive market research document?**
|
||||
[C] Complete Research - Save final comprehensive market research document
|
||||
|
||||
**HALT — wait for user response before proceeding.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Complete Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Replace** the template placeholder `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` in the `## Research Overview` section near the top of the document with a concise 2-3 paragraph overview summarizing the research scope, key findings, and a pointer to the full executive summary in the Research Synthesis section
|
||||
- Append the final content to the research document
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
|
||||
- Complete the market research workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document using the structure from step 4. Also replace the `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` placeholder in the Research Overview section at the top of the document.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Compelling market introduction with research significance
|
||||
✅ Comprehensive market table of contents with complete document structure
|
||||
✅ Exhaustive market research coverage across all market aspects
|
||||
✅ Executive market summary with key findings and strategic implications
|
||||
✅ Strategic market recommendations grounded in comprehensive research
|
||||
✅ Complete market source verification with current citations
|
||||
✅ Professional market document structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Market research workflow completed with comprehensive document
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not producing compelling market introduction
|
||||
❌ Missing comprehensive market table of contents
|
||||
❌ Incomplete market research coverage across market aspects
|
||||
❌ Not providing executive market summary with key findings
|
||||
❌ Missing strategic market recommendations based on research
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
❌ Producing market document without professional structure
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for final market document
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## STRATEGIC RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for current market strategy frameworks and best practices
|
||||
- Research successful market entry cases and approaches
|
||||
- Identify risk management methodologies and frameworks
|
||||
- Research implementation planning and execution strategies
|
||||
- Consider market timing and readiness factors
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPREHENSIVE MARKET DOCUMENT STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
This step ensures the final market research document:
|
||||
|
||||
- Serves as an authoritative market reference on {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- Provides strategic market insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Includes comprehensive market coverage with no gaps
|
||||
- Maintains rigorous market source verification standards
|
||||
- Delivers strategic market insights and actionable recommendations
|
||||
- Meets professional market research document quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All market research steps completed (1-4)
|
||||
- Comprehensive market research document generated
|
||||
- Professional market document structure with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
- All market sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Market research workflow status updated to complete
|
||||
- Final comprehensive market research document delivered to user
|
||||
|
||||
## FINAL MARKET DELIVERABLE:
|
||||
|
||||
Complete authoritative market research document on {{research_topic}} that:
|
||||
|
||||
- Establishes professional market credibility through comprehensive research
|
||||
- Provides strategic market insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Serves as market reference document for continued use
|
||||
- Maintains highest market research quality standards with current verification
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEPS:
|
||||
|
||||
Comprehensive market research workflow complete. User may:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use market research document to inform business strategies and decisions
|
||||
- Conduct additional market research on specific segments or opportunities
|
||||
- Combine market research with other research types for comprehensive insights
|
||||
- Move forward with implementation based on strategic market recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations on completing comprehensive market research with professional documentation! 🎉
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Conduct comprehensive market research using current web data and verified sources to produce complete research documents with compelling narratives and proper citations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:** You are a market research facilitator working with an expert partner. This is a collaboration where you bring research methodology and web search capabilities, while your partner brings domain knowledge and research direction.
|
||||
|
||||
## PREREQUISITE
|
||||
|
||||
**⛔ Web search required.** If unavailable, abort and tell the user.
|
||||
|
||||
## CONFIGURATION
|
||||
|
||||
Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
|
||||
- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
|
||||
- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
|
||||
- `date` as a system-generated value
|
||||
|
||||
## QUICK TOPIC DISCOVERY
|
||||
|
||||
"Welcome {{user_name}}! Let's get started with your **market research**.
|
||||
|
||||
**What topic, problem, or area do you want to research?**
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
- 'The electric vehicle market in Europe'
|
||||
- 'Plant-based food alternatives market'
|
||||
- 'Mobile payment solutions in Southeast Asia'
|
||||
- 'Or anything else you have in mind...'"
|
||||
|
||||
### Topic Clarification
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the user's topic, briefly clarify:
|
||||
1. **Core Topic**: "What exactly about [topic] are you most interested in?"
|
||||
2. **Research Goals**: "What do you hope to achieve with this research?"
|
||||
3. **Scope**: "Should we focus broadly or dive deep into specific aspects?"
|
||||
|
||||
## ROUTE TO MARKET RESEARCH STEPS
|
||||
|
||||
After gathering the topic and goals:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Set `research_type = "market"`
|
||||
2. Set `research_topic = [discovered topic from discussion]`
|
||||
3. Set `research_goals = [discovered goals from discussion]`
|
||||
4. Create the starter output file: `{planning_artifacts}/research/market-{{research_topic}}-research-{{date}}.md` with exact copy of the `./research.template.md` contents
|
||||
5. Load: `./steps/step-01-init.md` with topic context
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** The discovered topic from the discussion should be passed to the initialization step, so it doesn't need to ask "What do you want to research?" again - it can focus on refining the scope for market research.
|
||||
|
||||
**✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`**
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-technical-research
|
||||
description: 'Conduct technical research on technologies and architecture. Use when the user says "create a technical research report on [topic]".'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
stepsCompleted: []
|
||||
inputDocuments: []
|
||||
workflowType: 'research'
|
||||
lastStep: 1
|
||||
research_type: '{{research_type}}'
|
||||
research_topic: '{{research_topic}}'
|
||||
research_goals: '{{research_goals}}'
|
||||
user_name: '{{user_name}}'
|
||||
date: '{{date}}'
|
||||
web_research_enabled: true
|
||||
source_verification: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Research Report: {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Author:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
**Research Type:** {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Content will be appended sequentially through research workflow steps -->
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
# Technical Research Step 1: Technical Research Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ FOCUS EXCLUSIVELY on confirming technical research scope and approach
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A TECHNICAL RESEARCH PLANNER, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 ACKNOWLEDGE and CONFIRM understanding of technical research goals
|
||||
- 🔍 This is SCOPE CONFIRMATION ONLY - no web research yet
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after scope confirmation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research type = "technical" is already set
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - discovered from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - captured from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on technical architecture and implementation research
|
||||
- Web search is required to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm technical research scope and approach for **{{research_topic}}** with the user's goals in mind.
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNICAL SCOPE CONFIRMATION:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Start with technical scope understanding:
|
||||
"I understand you want to conduct **technical research** for **{{research_topic}}** with these goals: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Research Scope:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Architecture Analysis**: System design patterns, frameworks, and architectural decisions
|
||||
- **Implementation Approaches**: Development methodologies, coding patterns, and best practices
|
||||
- **Technology Stack**: Languages, frameworks, tools, and platforms relevant to {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- **Integration Patterns**: APIs, communication protocols, and system interoperability
|
||||
- **Performance Considerations**: Scalability, optimization, and performance patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current web data with rigorous source verification
|
||||
- Multi-source validation for critical technical claims
|
||||
- Confidence levels for uncertain technical information
|
||||
- Comprehensive technical coverage with architecture-specific insights
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Present clear scope confirmation:
|
||||
"**Technical Research Scope Confirmation:**
|
||||
|
||||
For **{{research_topic}}**, I will research:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Architecture Analysis** - design patterns, frameworks, system architecture
|
||||
✅ **Implementation Approaches** - development methodologies, coding patterns
|
||||
✅ **Technology Stack** - languages, frameworks, tools, platforms
|
||||
✅ **Integration Patterns** - APIs, protocols, interoperability
|
||||
✅ **Performance Considerations** - scalability, optimization, patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**All claims verified against current public sources.**
|
||||
|
||||
**Does this technical research scope and approach align with your goals?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Begin technical research with this scope
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Document scope confirmation in research file
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-02-technical-overview.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append scope confirmation:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Technical Research Scope Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Topic:** {{research_topic}}
|
||||
**Research Goals:** {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Research Scope:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Architecture Analysis - design patterns, frameworks, system architecture
|
||||
- Implementation Approaches - development methodologies, coding patterns
|
||||
- Technology Stack - languages, frameworks, tools, platforms
|
||||
- Integration Patterns - APIs, protocols, interoperability
|
||||
- Performance Considerations - scalability, optimization, patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Methodology:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current web data with rigorous source verification
|
||||
- Multi-source validation for critical technical claims
|
||||
- Confidence level framework for uncertain information
|
||||
- Comprehensive technical coverage with architecture-specific insights
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope Confirmed:** {{date}}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Technical research scope clearly confirmed with user
|
||||
✅ All technical analysis areas identified and explained
|
||||
✅ Research methodology emphasized
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Scope confirmation documented when user proceeds
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next technical research step
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not clearly confirming technical research scope with user
|
||||
❌ Missing critical technical analysis areas
|
||||
❌ Not explaining that web search is required for current facts
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option
|
||||
❌ Proceeding without user scope confirmation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to next technical research step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-02-technical-overview.md` to begin technology stack analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: This is SCOPE CONFIRMATION ONLY - no actual technical research yet, just confirming the research approach and scope!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
|
||||
# Technical Research Step 2: Technology Stack Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A TECHNOLOGY STACK ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on languages, frameworks, tools, and platforms
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after technology stack content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE TECHNOLOGY STACK ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from step-01 are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on languages, frameworks, tools, and platforms
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct technology stack analysis focusing on languages, frameworks, tools, and platforms. Search the web to verify and supplement current facts.
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNOLOGY STACK ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Technology Stack Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different technology stack areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with technology stack research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **technology stack analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand the technology landscape.
|
||||
|
||||
**Technology Stack Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Programming languages and their evolution
|
||||
- Development frameworks and libraries
|
||||
- Database and storage technologies
|
||||
- Development tools and platforms
|
||||
- Cloud infrastructure and deployment platforms
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current technology stack insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Technology Stack Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} programming languages frameworks"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} development tools platforms"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} database storage technologies"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} cloud infrastructure platforms"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for recent technology trend reports and developer surveys
|
||||
- Search for technology documentation and best practices
|
||||
- Research open-source projects and their technology choices
|
||||
- Analyze technology adoption patterns and migration trends
|
||||
- Study platform and tool evolution in the domain
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate technology stack findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Programming languages and frameworks analysis
|
||||
- Development tools and platforms evaluation
|
||||
- Database and storage technologies assessment
|
||||
- Cloud infrastructure and deployment platform analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Technology Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting language choices, frameworks, and platform decisions]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Technology Stack Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare technology stack analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Technology Stack Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Programming Languages
|
||||
|
||||
[Programming languages analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Popular Languages: [Most widely used languages for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Emerging Languages: [Growing languages gaining adoption]_
|
||||
_Language Evolution: [How language preferences are changing]_
|
||||
_Performance Characteristics: [Language performance and suitability]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Development Frameworks and Libraries
|
||||
|
||||
[Frameworks analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Major Frameworks: [Dominant frameworks and their use cases]_
|
||||
_Micro-frameworks: [Lightweight options and specialized libraries]_
|
||||
_Evolution Trends: [How frameworks are evolving and changing]_
|
||||
_Ecosystem Maturity: [Library availability and community support]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Database and Storage Technologies
|
||||
|
||||
[Database analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Relational Databases: [Traditional SQL databases and their evolution]_
|
||||
_NoSQL Databases: [Document, key-value, graph, and other NoSQL options]_
|
||||
_In-Memory Databases: [Redis, Memcached, and performance-focused solutions]_
|
||||
_Data Warehousing: [Analytics and big data storage solutions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Development Tools and Platforms
|
||||
|
||||
[Tools and platforms analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_IDE and Editors: [Development environments and their evolution]_
|
||||
_Version Control: [Git and related development tools]_
|
||||
_Build Systems: [Compilation, packaging, and automation tools]_
|
||||
_Testing Frameworks: [Unit testing, integration testing, and QA tools]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Cloud Infrastructure and Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
[Cloud platforms analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Major Cloud Providers: [AWS, Azure, GCP and their services]_
|
||||
_Container Technologies: [Docker, Kubernetes, and orchestration]_
|
||||
_Serverless Platforms: [FaaS and event-driven computing]_
|
||||
_CDN and Edge Computing: [Content delivery and distributed computing]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Adoption Trends
|
||||
|
||||
[Adoption trends analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Migration Patterns: [How technology choices are evolving]_
|
||||
_Emerging Technologies: [New technologies gaining traction]_
|
||||
_Legacy Technology: [Older technologies being phased out]_
|
||||
_Community Trends: [Developer preferences and open-source adoption]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **technology stack analysis** of the technology landscape for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Technology Stack Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Programming languages and frameworks thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Database and storage technologies evaluated
|
||||
- Development tools and platforms documented
|
||||
- Cloud infrastructure and deployment options mapped
|
||||
- Technology adoption trends identified
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to integration patterns analysis?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to integration patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-03-integration-patterns.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Programming languages and frameworks thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Database and storage technologies evaluated
|
||||
✅ Development tools and platforms documented
|
||||
✅ Cloud infrastructure and deployment options mapped
|
||||
✅ Technology adoption trends identified
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (integration patterns)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical programming languages or frameworks
|
||||
❌ Incomplete database and storage technology analysis
|
||||
❌ Not identifying development tools and platforms
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to integration patterns step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNOLOGY STACK RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research technology trend reports and developer surveys
|
||||
- Use technology documentation and best practices guides
|
||||
- Analyze open-source projects and their technology choices
|
||||
- Study technology adoption patterns and migration trends
|
||||
- Focus on current technology data
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNOLOGY STACK ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative technology research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable technology insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-03-integration-patterns.md` to analyze APIs, communication protocols, and system interoperability for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current technology data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
|
||||
# Technical Research Step 3: Integration Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE AN INTEGRATION ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on APIs, protocols, and system interoperability
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after integration patterns content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE INTEGRATION PATTERNS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on APIs, protocols, and system interoperability
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct integration patterns analysis focusing on APIs, communication protocols, and system interoperability. Search the web to verify and supplement current facts.
|
||||
|
||||
## INTEGRATION PATTERNS ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Integration Patterns Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different integration areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with integration patterns research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **integration patterns analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand system integration approaches.
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Patterns Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- API design patterns and protocols
|
||||
- Communication protocols and data formats
|
||||
- System interoperability approaches
|
||||
- Microservices integration patterns
|
||||
- Event-driven architectures and messaging
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current integration patterns insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Integration Patterns Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} API design patterns protocols"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} communication protocols data formats"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} system interoperability integration"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} microservices integration patterns"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for recent API design guides and best practices
|
||||
- Search for communication protocol documentation and standards
|
||||
- Research integration platform and middleware solutions
|
||||
- Analyze microservices architecture patterns and approaches
|
||||
- Study event-driven systems and messaging patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate integration patterns findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- API design patterns and protocols analysis
|
||||
- Communication protocols and data formats evaluation
|
||||
- System interoperability approaches assessment
|
||||
- Microservices integration patterns documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Integration Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting API choices, communication protocols, and system design]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Integration Patterns Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare integration patterns analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Integration Patterns Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### API Design Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[API design patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_RESTful APIs: [REST principles and best practices for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_GraphQL APIs: [GraphQL adoption and implementation patterns]_
|
||||
_RPC and gRPC: [High-performance API communication patterns]_
|
||||
_Webhook Patterns: [Event-driven API integration approaches]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Communication Protocols
|
||||
|
||||
[Communication protocols analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_HTTP/HTTPS Protocols: [Web-based communication patterns and evolution]_
|
||||
_WebSocket Protocols: [Real-time communication and persistent connections]_
|
||||
_Message Queue Protocols: [AMQP, MQTT, and messaging patterns]_
|
||||
_grpc and Protocol Buffers: [High-performance binary communication protocols]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Formats and Standards
|
||||
|
||||
[Data formats analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_JSON and XML: [Structured data exchange formats and their evolution]_
|
||||
_Protobuf and MessagePack: [Efficient binary serialization formats]_
|
||||
_CSV and Flat Files: [Legacy data integration and bulk transfer patterns]_
|
||||
_Custom Data Formats: [Domain-specific data exchange standards]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### System Interoperability Approaches
|
||||
|
||||
[Interoperability analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Point-to-Point Integration: [Direct system-to-system communication patterns]_
|
||||
_API Gateway Patterns: [Centralized API management and routing]_
|
||||
_Service Mesh: [Service-to-service communication and observability]_
|
||||
_Enterprise Service Bus: [Traditional enterprise integration patterns]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Microservices Integration Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Microservices integration analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_API Gateway Pattern: [External API management and routing]_
|
||||
_Service Discovery: [Dynamic service registration and discovery]_
|
||||
_Circuit Breaker Pattern: [Fault tolerance and resilience patterns]_
|
||||
_Saga Pattern: [Distributed transaction management]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Event-Driven Integration
|
||||
|
||||
[Event-driven analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Publish-Subscribe Patterns: [Event broadcasting and subscription models]_
|
||||
_Event Sourcing: [Event-based state management and persistence]_
|
||||
_Message Broker Patterns: [RabbitMQ, Kafka, and message routing]_
|
||||
_CQRS Patterns: [Command Query Responsibility Segregation]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Security Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Security patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_OAuth 2.0 and JWT: [API authentication and authorization patterns]_
|
||||
_API Key Management: [Secure API access and key rotation]_
|
||||
_Mutual TLS: [Certificate-based service authentication]_
|
||||
_Data Encryption: [Secure data transmission and storage]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **integration patterns analysis** of system integration approaches for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Integration Patterns Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- API design patterns and protocols thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Communication protocols and data formats evaluated
|
||||
- System interoperability approaches documented
|
||||
- Microservices integration patterns mapped
|
||||
- Event-driven integration strategies identified
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to architectural patterns analysis?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to architectural patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-04-architectural-patterns.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ API design patterns and protocols thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Communication protocols and data formats evaluated
|
||||
✅ System interoperability approaches documented
|
||||
✅ Microservices integration patterns mapped
|
||||
✅ Event-driven integration strategies identified
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (architectural patterns)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical API design patterns or protocols
|
||||
❌ Incomplete communication protocols analysis
|
||||
❌ Not identifying system interoperability approaches
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to architectural patterns step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## INTEGRATION PATTERNS RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research API design guides and best practices documentation
|
||||
- Use communication protocol specifications and standards
|
||||
- Analyze integration platform and middleware solutions
|
||||
- Study microservices architecture patterns and case studies
|
||||
- Focus on current integration data
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## INTEGRATION PATTERNS ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative integration research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable integration insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-04-architectural-patterns.md` to analyze architectural patterns, design decisions, and system structures for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current integration data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
||||
# Technical Research Step 4: Architectural Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A SYSTEMS ARCHITECT, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on architectural patterns and design decisions
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after architectural patterns content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE ARCHITECTURAL PATTERNS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on architectural patterns and design decisions
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct comprehensive architectural patterns analysis with emphasis on design decisions and implementation approaches for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
## ARCHITECTURAL PATTERNS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Architectural Patterns Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with architectural research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll focus on **architectural patterns and design decisions** for effective architecture approaches for [technology/domain].
|
||||
|
||||
**Architectural Patterns Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- System architecture patterns and their trade-offs
|
||||
- Design principles and best practices
|
||||
- Scalability and maintainability considerations
|
||||
- Integration and communication patterns
|
||||
- Security and performance architectural considerations
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current architectural patterns and approaches.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Web Search for System Architecture Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current architecture patterns:
|
||||
Search the web: "system architecture patterns best practices"
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Microservices, monolithic, and serverless patterns
|
||||
- Event-driven and reactive architectures
|
||||
- Domain-driven design patterns
|
||||
- Cloud-native and edge architecture patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Web Search for Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current design principles:
|
||||
Search the web: "software design principles patterns"
|
||||
|
||||
**Design focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- SOLID principles and their application
|
||||
- Clean architecture and hexagonal architecture
|
||||
- API design and GraphQL vs REST patterns
|
||||
- Database design and data architecture patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Web Search for Scalability Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current scalability approaches:
|
||||
Search the web: "scalability architecture patterns"
|
||||
|
||||
**Scalability focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Horizontal vs vertical scaling patterns
|
||||
- Load balancing and caching strategies
|
||||
- Distributed systems and consensus patterns
|
||||
- Performance optimization techniques
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Generate Architectural Patterns Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare architectural analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Architectural Patterns and Design
|
||||
|
||||
### System Architecture Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[System architecture patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Principles and Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
[Design principles analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Scalability and Performance Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Scalability patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration and Communication Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Integration patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Architecture Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Security patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Data Architecture Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Data architecture analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment and Operations Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
[Deployment architecture analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated architectural patterns and present continue option:
|
||||
"I've completed the **architectural patterns analysis** for effective architecture approaches.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Architectural Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- System architecture patterns and trade-offs clearly mapped
|
||||
- Design principles and best practices thoroughly documented
|
||||
- Scalability and performance patterns identified
|
||||
- Integration and communication patterns analyzed
|
||||
- Security and data architecture considerations captured
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to implementation research?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to implementation research
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to the research document
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-05-implementation-research.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document using the structure from step 5.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ System architecture patterns identified with current citations
|
||||
✅ Design principles clearly documented and analyzed
|
||||
✅ Scalability and performance patterns thoroughly mapped
|
||||
✅ Integration and communication patterns captured
|
||||
✅ Security and data architecture considerations analyzed
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to implementation research step
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical system architecture patterns
|
||||
❌ Not analyzing design trade-offs and considerations
|
||||
❌ Incomplete scalability or performance patterns analysis
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for architecture documentation and pattern catalogs
|
||||
- Use architectural conference proceedings and case studies
|
||||
- Research successful system architectures and their evolution
|
||||
- Note architectural decision records (ADRs) and rationales
|
||||
- Research architecture assessment and evaluation frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-05-implementation-research.md` to focus on implementation approaches and technology adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always emphasize current architectural data and rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
|
||||
# Technical Research Step 5: Implementation Research
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE AN IMPLEMENTATION ENGINEER, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on implementation approaches and technology adoption
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after implementation research content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Focus on implementation approaches and technology adoption strategies
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- This step prepares for the final synthesis step
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct comprehensive implementation research with emphasis on practical implementation approaches and technology adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
## IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Implementation Research
|
||||
|
||||
Start with implementation research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll complete our technical research with **implementation approaches and technology adoption** analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Research Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Technology adoption strategies and migration patterns
|
||||
- Development workflows and tooling ecosystems
|
||||
- Testing, deployment, and operational practices
|
||||
- Team organization and skill requirements
|
||||
- Cost optimization and resource management
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current implementation and adoption strategies.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Web Search for Technology Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current adoption strategies:
|
||||
Search the web: "technology adoption strategies migration"
|
||||
|
||||
**Adoption focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Technology migration patterns and approaches
|
||||
- Gradual adoption vs big bang strategies
|
||||
- Legacy system modernization approaches
|
||||
- Vendor evaluation and selection criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Web Search for Development Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current development practices:
|
||||
Search the web: "software development workflows tooling"
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- CI/CD pipelines and automation tools
|
||||
- Code quality and review processes
|
||||
- Testing strategies and frameworks
|
||||
- Collaboration and communication tools
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Web Search for Operational Excellence
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current operational practices:
|
||||
Search the web: "DevOps operations best practices"
|
||||
|
||||
**Operations focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Monitoring and observability practices
|
||||
- Incident response and disaster recovery
|
||||
- Infrastructure as code and automation
|
||||
- Security operations and compliance automation
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Generate Implementation Research Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare implementation analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Implementation Approaches and Technology Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Adoption Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
[Technology adoption analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Development Workflows and Tooling
|
||||
|
||||
[Development workflows analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing and Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
[Testing approaches analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Deployment and Operations Practices
|
||||
|
||||
[Deployment practices analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Team Organization and Skills
|
||||
|
||||
[Team organization analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Cost Optimization and Resource Management
|
||||
|
||||
[Cost optimization analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
[Risk mitigation analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Research Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation roadmap recommendations]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Stack Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Technology stack suggestions]
|
||||
|
||||
### Skill Development Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
[Skill development recommendations]
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Metrics and KPIs
|
||||
|
||||
[Success measurement framework]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated implementation research and present continue option:
|
||||
"I've completed the **implementation research and technology adoption** analysis for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Highlights:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Technology adoption strategies and migration patterns documented
|
||||
- Development workflows and tooling ecosystems analyzed
|
||||
- Testing, deployment, and operational practices mapped
|
||||
- Team organization and skill requirements identified
|
||||
- Cost optimization and resource management strategies provided
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical research phases completed:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Step 1: Research scope confirmation
|
||||
- Step 2: Technology stack analysis
|
||||
- Step 3: Integration patterns analysis
|
||||
- Step 4: Architectural patterns analysis
|
||||
- Step 5: Implementation research (current step)
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to the final synthesis step?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to the research document
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]`
|
||||
- Load: `./step-06-research-synthesis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document using the structure from step 5.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Technology adoption strategies identified with current citations
|
||||
✅ Development workflows and tooling thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Testing and deployment practices clearly documented
|
||||
✅ Team organization and skill requirements mapped
|
||||
✅ Cost optimization and risk mitigation strategies provided
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to synthesis step (step-06)
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical technology adoption strategies
|
||||
❌ Not providing practical implementation guidance
|
||||
❌ Incomplete development workflows or operational practices analysis
|
||||
❌ Not presenting continue option to synthesis step
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
❌ Not routing to step-06-research-synthesis.md
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for implementation case studies and success stories
|
||||
- Research technology migration patterns and lessons learned
|
||||
- Identify common implementation challenges and solutions
|
||||
- Research development tooling ecosystem evaluations
|
||||
- Analyze operational excellence frameworks and maturity models
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNICAL RESEARCH WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- Implementation research step completed
|
||||
- Content appended to research document with source citations
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated with stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
|
||||
- Ready to proceed to final synthesis step
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `./step-06-research-synthesis.md` to produce the comprehensive technical research document with narrative introduction, detailed TOC, and executive summary.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,487 @@
|
||||
# Technical Research Step 6: Technical Synthesis and Completion
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A TECHNICAL RESEARCH STRATEGIST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on comprehensive technical synthesis and authoritative conclusions
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📄 PRODUCE COMPREHENSIVE DOCUMENT with narrative intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after synthesis content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
- 📚 GENERATE COMPLETE DOCUMENT STRUCTURE with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - comprehensive technical analysis
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - achieved through exhaustive technical research
|
||||
- All technical research sections have been completed (overview, architecture, implementation)
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- This is the final synthesis step producing the complete technical research document
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Produce a comprehensive, authoritative technical research document on **{{research_topic}}** with compelling narrative introduction, detailed TOC, and executive summary based on exhaustive technical research.
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPREHENSIVE TECHNICAL DOCUMENT SYNTHESIS:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Technical Document Structure Planning
|
||||
|
||||
**Complete Technical Research Document Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Compelling Technical Title]: Comprehensive {{research_topic}} Technical Research
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[Brief compelling overview of key technical findings and strategic implications]
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
- Technical Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
- Technical Landscape and Architecture Analysis
|
||||
- Implementation Approaches and Best Practices
|
||||
- Technology Stack Evolution and Trends
|
||||
- Integration and Interoperability Patterns
|
||||
- Performance and Scalability Analysis
|
||||
- Security and Compliance Considerations
|
||||
- Strategic Technical Recommendations
|
||||
- Implementation Roadmap and Risk Assessment
|
||||
- Future Technical Outlook and Innovation Opportunities
|
||||
- Technical Research Methodology and Source Documentation
|
||||
- Technical Appendices and Reference Materials
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Generate Compelling Technical Introduction
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Introduction Requirements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Hook reader with compelling technical opening about {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- Establish technical research significance and current relevance
|
||||
- Outline comprehensive technical research methodology
|
||||
- Preview key technical findings and strategic implications
|
||||
- Set authoritative, technical expert tone
|
||||
|
||||
**Web Search for Technical Introduction Context:**
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} technical significance importance"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Synthesize All Technical Research Sections
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Section-by-Section Integration:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Combine technical overview from step-02
|
||||
- Integrate architectural patterns from step-03
|
||||
- Incorporate implementation research from step-04
|
||||
- Add cross-technical insights and connections
|
||||
- Ensure comprehensive technical coverage with no gaps
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Complete Technical Document Content
|
||||
|
||||
#### Final Technical Document Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Compelling Title]: Comprehensive {{research_topic}} Technical Research
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[2-3 paragraph compelling summary of the most critical technical findings and strategic implications for {{research_topic}} based on comprehensive current technical research]
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Technical Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Most significant architectural insights]
|
||||
- [Critical implementation considerations]
|
||||
- [Important technology trends]
|
||||
- [Strategic technical implications]
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Recommendations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Top 3-5 actionable technical recommendations based on research]
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
1. Technical Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
2. {{research_topic}} Technical Landscape and Architecture Analysis
|
||||
3. Implementation Approaches and Best Practices
|
||||
4. Technology Stack Evolution and Current Trends
|
||||
5. Integration and Interoperability Patterns
|
||||
6. Performance and Scalability Analysis
|
||||
7. Security and Compliance Considerations
|
||||
8. Strategic Technical Recommendations
|
||||
9. Implementation Roadmap and Risk Assessment
|
||||
10. Future Technical Outlook and Innovation Opportunities
|
||||
11. Technical Research Methodology and Source Verification
|
||||
12. Technical Appendices and Reference Materials
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Technical Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Research Significance
|
||||
|
||||
[Compelling technical narrative about why {{research_topic}} research is critical right now]
|
||||
_Technical Importance: [Strategic technical significance with current context]_
|
||||
_Business Impact: [Business implications of technical research]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive description of technical research approach including:]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Technical Scope**: [Comprehensive technical coverage areas]
|
||||
- **Data Sources**: [Authoritative technical sources and verification approach]
|
||||
- **Analysis Framework**: [Structured technical analysis methodology]
|
||||
- **Time Period**: [current focus and technical evolution context]
|
||||
- **Technical Depth**: [Level of technical detail and analysis]
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Research Goals and Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**Original Technical Goals:** {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Achieved Technical Objectives:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Technical Goal 1 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Technical Goal 2 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Additional technical insights discovered during research]
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. {{research_topic}} Technical Landscape and Architecture Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Technical Architecture Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive architectural analysis synthesized from step-03 with current context]
|
||||
_Dominant Patterns: [Current architectural approaches]_
|
||||
_Architectural Evolution: [Historical and current evolution patterns]_
|
||||
_Architectural Trade-offs: [Key architectural decisions and implications]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### System Design Principles and Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete system design analysis]
|
||||
_Design Principles: [Core principles guiding {{research_topic}} implementations]_
|
||||
_Best Practice Patterns: [Industry-standard approaches and methodologies]_
|
||||
_Architectural Quality Attributes: [Performance, scalability, maintainability considerations]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Implementation Approaches and Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Implementation Methodologies
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation analysis from step-04 with current context]
|
||||
_Development Approaches: [Current development methodologies and approaches]_
|
||||
_Code Organization Patterns: [Structural patterns and organization strategies]_
|
||||
_Quality Assurance Practices: [Testing, validation, and quality approaches]_
|
||||
_Deployment Strategies: [Current deployment and operations practices]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Framework and Tooling
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive implementation framework analysis]
|
||||
_Development Frameworks: [Popular frameworks and their characteristics]_
|
||||
_Tool Ecosystem: [Development tools and platform considerations]_
|
||||
_Build and Deployment Systems: [CI/CD and automation approaches]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Technology Stack Evolution and Current Trends
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Technology Stack Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
[Technology stack analysis from step-02 with current updates]
|
||||
_Programming Languages: [Current language trends and adoption patterns]_
|
||||
_Frameworks and Libraries: [Popular frameworks and their use cases]_
|
||||
_Database and Storage Technologies: [Current data storage and management trends]_
|
||||
_API and Communication Technologies: [Integration and communication patterns]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Technology Adoption Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive technology adoption analysis]
|
||||
_Adoption Trends: [Technology adoption rates and patterns]_
|
||||
_Migration Patterns: [Technology migration and evolution trends]_
|
||||
_Emerging Technologies: [New technologies and their potential impact]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Integration and Interoperability Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Integration Approaches
|
||||
|
||||
[Integration patterns analysis with current context]
|
||||
_API Design Patterns: [Current API design and implementation patterns]_
|
||||
_Service Integration: [Microservices and service integration approaches]_
|
||||
_Data Integration: [Data exchange and integration patterns]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Interoperability Standards and Protocols
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive interoperability analysis]
|
||||
_Standards Compliance: [Industry standards and compliance requirements]_
|
||||
_Protocol Selection: [Communication protocols and selection criteria]_
|
||||
_Integration Challenges: [Common integration challenges and solutions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Performance and Scalability Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Characteristics and Optimization
|
||||
|
||||
[Performance analysis based on research findings]
|
||||
_Performance Benchmarks: [Current performance characteristics and benchmarks]_
|
||||
_Optimization Strategies: [Performance optimization approaches and techniques]_
|
||||
_Monitoring and Measurement: [Performance monitoring and measurement practices]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Scalability Patterns and Approaches
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive scalability analysis]
|
||||
_Scalability Patterns: [Architectural and design patterns for scalability]_
|
||||
_Capacity Planning: [Capacity planning and resource management approaches]_
|
||||
_Elasticity and Auto-scaling: [Dynamic scaling approaches and implementations]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Security and Compliance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Best Practices and Frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
[Security analysis with current context]
|
||||
_Security Frameworks: [Current security frameworks and best practices]_
|
||||
_Threat Landscape: [Current security threats and mitigation approaches]_
|
||||
_Secure Development Practices: [Secure coding and development lifecycle]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Compliance and Regulatory Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive compliance analysis]
|
||||
_Industry Standards: [Relevant industry standards and compliance requirements]_
|
||||
_Regulatory Compliance: [Legal and regulatory considerations for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Audit and Governance: [Technical audit and governance practices]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Strategic Technical Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Strategy and Decision Framework
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategic technical recommendations based on comprehensive research]
|
||||
_Architecture Recommendations: [Recommended architectural approaches and patterns]_
|
||||
_Technology Selection: [Recommended technology stack and selection criteria]_
|
||||
_Implementation Strategy: [Recommended implementation approaches and methodologies]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Technical Advantage
|
||||
|
||||
[Analysis of technical competitive positioning]
|
||||
_Technology Differentiation: [Technical approaches that provide competitive advantage]_
|
||||
_Innovation Opportunities: [Areas for technical innovation and differentiation]_
|
||||
_Strategic Technology Investments: [Recommended technology investments and priorities]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Implementation Roadmap and Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Implementation Framework
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive implementation guidance based on research findings]
|
||||
_Implementation Phases: [Recommended phased implementation approach]_
|
||||
_Technology Migration Strategy: [Approach for technology adoption and migration]_
|
||||
_Resource Planning: [Technical resources and capabilities planning]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Risk Management
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive technical risk assessment]
|
||||
_Technical Risks: [Major technical risks and mitigation strategies]_
|
||||
_Implementation Risks: [Risks associated with implementation and deployment]_
|
||||
_Business Impact Risks: [Technical risks and their business implications]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Future Technical Outlook and Innovation Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
### Emerging Technology Trends
|
||||
|
||||
[Forward-looking technical analysis based on comprehensive research]
|
||||
_Near-term Technical Evolution: [1-2 year technical development expectations]_
|
||||
_Medium-term Technology Trends: [3-5 year expected technical developments]_
|
||||
_Long-term Technical Vision: [5+ year technical outlook for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Innovation and Research Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Technical innovation analysis and recommendations]
|
||||
_Research Opportunities: [Areas for technical research and innovation]_
|
||||
_Emerging Technology Adoption: [Potential new technologies and adoption timelines]_
|
||||
_Innovation Framework: [Approach for fostering technical innovation]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Technical Research Methodology and Source Verification
|
||||
|
||||
### Comprehensive Technical Source Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete documentation of all technical research sources]
|
||||
_Primary Technical Sources: [Key authoritative technical sources used]_
|
||||
_Secondary Technical Sources: [Supporting technical research and analysis]_
|
||||
_Technical Web Search Queries: [Complete list of technical search queries used]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Research Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
[Technical quality assurance and validation approach]
|
||||
_Technical Source Verification: [All technical claims verified with multiple sources]_
|
||||
_Technical Confidence Levels: [Confidence assessments for uncertain technical data]_
|
||||
_Technical Limitations: [Technical research limitations and areas for further investigation]_
|
||||
_Methodology Transparency: [Complete transparency about technical research approach]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 12. Technical Appendices and Reference Materials
|
||||
|
||||
### Detailed Technical Data Tables
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive technical data tables supporting research findings]
|
||||
_Architectural Pattern Tables: [Detailed architectural pattern comparisons]_
|
||||
_Technology Stack Analysis: [Detailed technology evaluation and comparison data]_
|
||||
_Performance Benchmark Data: [Comprehensive performance measurement data]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Resources and References
|
||||
|
||||
[Valuable technical resources for continued research and implementation]
|
||||
_Technical Standards: [Relevant technical standards and specifications]_
|
||||
_Open Source Projects: [Key open source projects and communities]_
|
||||
_Research Papers and Publications: [Academic and industry research sources]_
|
||||
_Technical Communities: [Professional networks and technical communities]_
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Research Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary of Key Technical Findings
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive summary of the most important technical research findings]
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Technical Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Assessment of technical implications for {{research_topic}}]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps Technical Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Specific next steps for leveraging this technical research]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Research Completion Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Research Period:** current comprehensive technical analysis
|
||||
**Document Length:** As needed for comprehensive technical coverage
|
||||
**Source Verification:** All technical facts cited with current sources
|
||||
**Technical Confidence Level:** High - based on multiple authoritative technical sources
|
||||
|
||||
_This comprehensive technical research document serves as an authoritative technical reference on {{research_topic}} and provides strategic technical insights for informed decision-making and implementation._
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Complete Technical Document and Final Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Document Completion Presentation:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed the **comprehensive technical research document synthesis** for **{{research_topic}}**, producing an authoritative technical research document with:
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Document Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Compelling Technical Introduction**: Engaging technical opening that establishes research significance
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Technical TOC**: Complete navigation structure for technical reference
|
||||
- **Exhaustive Technical Research Coverage**: All technical aspects of {{research_topic}} thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- **Executive Technical Summary**: Key technical findings and strategic implications highlighted
|
||||
- **Strategic Technical Recommendations**: Actionable technical insights based on comprehensive research
|
||||
- **Complete Technical Source Citations**: Every technical claim verified with current sources
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Research Completeness:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Technical landscape and architecture analysis fully documented
|
||||
- Implementation approaches and best practices comprehensively covered
|
||||
- Technology stack evolution and trends detailed
|
||||
- Integration, performance, and security analysis complete
|
||||
- Strategic technical insights and implementation guidance provided
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Document Standards Met:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Exhaustive technical research with no critical gaps
|
||||
- Professional technical structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
- As long as needed for comprehensive technical coverage
|
||||
- Multiple independent technical sources for all claims
|
||||
- current technical data throughout with proper citations
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to complete this comprehensive technical research document?**
|
||||
[C] Complete Research - Save final comprehensive technical document
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Final Technical Completion
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Replace** the template placeholder `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` in the `## Research Overview` section near the top of the document with a concise 2-3 paragraph overview summarizing the research scope, key findings, and a pointer to the full executive summary in the Research Synthesis section
|
||||
- Append the complete technical document to the research file
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]`
|
||||
- Complete the technical research workflow
|
||||
- Provide final technical document delivery confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the complete comprehensive technical research document using the full structure above. Also replace the `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` placeholder in the Research Overview section at the top of the document.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Compelling technical introduction with research significance
|
||||
✅ Comprehensive technical table of contents with complete document structure
|
||||
✅ Exhaustive technical research coverage across all technical aspects
|
||||
✅ Executive technical summary with key findings and strategic implications
|
||||
✅ Strategic technical recommendations grounded in comprehensive research
|
||||
✅ Complete technical source verification with current citations
|
||||
✅ Professional technical document structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Technical research workflow completed with comprehensive document
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not producing compelling technical introduction
|
||||
❌ Missing comprehensive technical table of contents
|
||||
❌ Incomplete technical research coverage across technical aspects
|
||||
❌ Not providing executive technical summary with key findings
|
||||
❌ Missing strategic technical recommendations based on research
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
❌ Producing technical document without professional structure
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for final technical document
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPREHENSIVE TECHNICAL DOCUMENT STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
This step ensures the final technical research document:
|
||||
|
||||
- Serves as an authoritative technical reference on {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- Provides strategic technical insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Includes comprehensive technical coverage with no gaps
|
||||
- Maintains rigorous technical source verification standards
|
||||
- Delivers strategic technical insights and actionable recommendations
|
||||
- Meets professional technical research document quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
## TECHNICAL RESEARCH WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All technical research steps completed (1-5)
|
||||
- Comprehensive technical research document generated
|
||||
- Professional technical document structure with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
- All technical sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Technical research workflow status updated to complete
|
||||
- Final comprehensive technical research document delivered to user
|
||||
|
||||
## FINAL TECHNICAL DELIVERABLE:
|
||||
|
||||
Complete authoritative technical research document on {{research_topic}} that:
|
||||
|
||||
- Establishes technical credibility through comprehensive research
|
||||
- Provides strategic technical insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Serves as technical reference document for continued use
|
||||
- Maintains highest technical research quality standards with current verification
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations on completing comprehensive technical research with professional documentation! 🎉
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
||||
|
||||
# Technical Research Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Conduct comprehensive technical research using current web data and verified sources to produce complete research documents with compelling narratives and proper citations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:** You are a technical research facilitator working with an expert partner. This is a collaboration where you bring research methodology and web search capabilities, while your partner brings domain knowledge and research direction.
|
||||
|
||||
## PREREQUISITE
|
||||
|
||||
**⛔ Web search required.** If unavailable, abort and tell the user.
|
||||
|
||||
## CONFIGURATION
|
||||
|
||||
Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
|
||||
- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
|
||||
- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
|
||||
- `date` as a system-generated value
|
||||
|
||||
## QUICK TOPIC DISCOVERY
|
||||
|
||||
"Welcome {{user_name}}! Let's get started with your **technical research**.
|
||||
|
||||
**What technology, tool, or technical area do you want to research?**
|
||||
|
||||
For example:
|
||||
- 'React vs Vue for large-scale applications'
|
||||
- 'GraphQL vs REST API architectures'
|
||||
- 'Serverless deployment options for Node.js'
|
||||
- 'Or any other technical topic you have in mind...'"
|
||||
|
||||
### Topic Clarification
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the user's topic, briefly clarify:
|
||||
1. **Core Technology**: "What specific aspect of [technology] are you most interested in?"
|
||||
2. **Research Goals**: "What do you hope to achieve with this research?"
|
||||
3. **Scope**: "Should we focus broadly or dive deep into specific aspects?"
|
||||
|
||||
## ROUTE TO TECHNICAL RESEARCH STEPS
|
||||
|
||||
After gathering the topic and goals:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Set `research_type = "technical"`
|
||||
2. Set `research_topic = [discovered topic from discussion]`
|
||||
3. Set `research_goals = [discovered goals from discussion]`
|
||||
4. Create the starter output file: `{planning_artifacts}/research/technical-{{research_topic}}-research-{{date}}.md` with exact copy of the `./research.template.md` contents
|
||||
5. Load: `./technical-steps/step-01-init.md` with topic context
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** The discovered topic from the discussion should be passed to the initialization step, so it doesn't need to ask "What do you want to research?" again - it can focus on refining the scope for technical research.
|
||||
|
||||
**✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`**
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 1: Market Research Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate research content in init step
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS confirm understanding of user's research goals
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A MARKET RESEARCH FACILITATOR, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on clarifying scope and approach
|
||||
- 🔍 NO WEB RESEARCH in init - that's for later steps
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete research
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Confirm research understanding before proceeding
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after scope clarification
|
||||
- 💾 Write initial scope document immediately
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from main workflow discovery are available
|
||||
- Research type = "market" is already set
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - discovered from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - captured from initial discussion
|
||||
- Focus on market research scope clarification
|
||||
- Web search capabilities are enabled for later steps
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Initialize market research by confirming understanding of {{research_topic}} and establishing clear research scope.
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH INITIALIZATION:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Confirm Research Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
**INITIALIZE - DO NOT RESEARCH YET**
|
||||
|
||||
Start with research confirmation:
|
||||
"I understand you want to conduct **market research** for **{{research_topic}}** with these goals: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**My Understanding of Your Research Needs:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Research Topic**: {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- **Research Goals**: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
- **Research Type**: Market Research
|
||||
- **Approach**: Comprehensive market analysis with source verification
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Areas We'll Cover:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size, growth dynamics, and trends
|
||||
- Customer insights and behavior analysis
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and positioning
|
||||
- Strategic recommendations and implementation guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Does this accurately capture what you're looking for?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Refine Research Scope
|
||||
|
||||
Gather any clarifications needed:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Scope Clarification Questions:
|
||||
|
||||
- "Are there specific customer segments or aspects of {{research_topic}} we should prioritize?"
|
||||
- "Should we focus on specific geographic regions or global market?"
|
||||
- "Is this for market entry, expansion, product development, or other business purpose?"
|
||||
- "Any competitors or market segments you specifically want us to analyze?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Document Initial Scope
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Write initial research scope to document:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Market Research: {{research_topic}}
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Understanding Confirmed
|
||||
|
||||
**Topic**: {{research_topic}}
|
||||
**Goals**: {{research_goals}}
|
||||
**Research Type**: Market Research
|
||||
**Date**: {{date}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Scope
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Analysis Focus Areas:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market size, growth projections, and dynamics
|
||||
- Customer segments, behavior patterns, and insights
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and positioning analysis
|
||||
- Strategic recommendations and implementation guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Methodology:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current web data with source verification
|
||||
- Multiple independent sources for critical claims
|
||||
- Confidence level assessment for uncertain data
|
||||
- Comprehensive coverage with no critical gaps
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Workflow:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ Initialization and scope setting (current step)
|
||||
2. Customer Insights and Behavior Analysis
|
||||
3. Competitive Landscape Analysis
|
||||
4. Strategic Synthesis and Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Status**: Scope confirmed, ready to proceed with detailed market analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present Confirmation and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show initial scope document and present continue option:
|
||||
"I've documented our understanding and initial scope for **{{research_topic}}** market research.
|
||||
|
||||
**What I've established:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Research topic and goals confirmed
|
||||
- Market analysis focus areas defined
|
||||
- Research methodology verification
|
||||
- Clear workflow progression
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Status:** Initial scope written to research file for your review
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to begin detailed market research?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Confirm scope and proceed to customer insights analysis
|
||||
[Modify] Suggest changes to research scope before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Handle User Response
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1]`
|
||||
- Add confirmation note to document: "Scope confirmed by user on {{date}}"
|
||||
- Load: `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-02-customer-behavior.md`
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'Modify':
|
||||
|
||||
- Gather user changes to scope
|
||||
- Update document with modifications
|
||||
- Re-present updated scope for confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Research topic and goals accurately understood
|
||||
✅ Market research scope clearly defined
|
||||
✅ Initial scope document written immediately
|
||||
✅ User opportunity to review and modify scope
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Document properly updated with scope confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not confirming understanding of research topic and goals
|
||||
❌ Generating research content instead of just scope clarification
|
||||
❌ Not writing initial scope document to file
|
||||
❌ Not providing opportunity for user to modify scope
|
||||
❌ Proceeding to next step without user confirmation
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor research decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## INITIALIZATION PRINCIPLES:
|
||||
|
||||
This step ensures:
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear mutual understanding of research objectives
|
||||
- Well-defined research scope and approach
|
||||
- Immediate documentation for user review
|
||||
- User control over research direction before detailed work begins
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user confirmation and scope finalization, load `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-02-customer-behavior.md` to begin detailed market research with customer insights analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Init steps confirm understanding and scope, not generate research content!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 2: Customer Behavior and Segments
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on customer behavior patterns and demographic analysis
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete research
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after customer behavior content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from step-01 are available
|
||||
- Focus on customer behavior patterns and demographic analysis
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- Previous step confirmed research scope and goals
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct customer behavior and segment analysis with emphasis on patterns and demographics.
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Customer Behavior Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different customer behavior areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with customer behavior research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **customer behavior analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand customer patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
**Customer Behavior Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior patterns and preferences
|
||||
- Demographic profiles and segmentation
|
||||
- Psychographic characteristics and values
|
||||
- Behavior drivers and influences
|
||||
- Customer interaction patterns and engagement
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current customer behavior insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Customer Behavior Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer behavior patterns"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer demographics"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} psychographic profiles"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer behavior drivers"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for customer behavior studies and research reports
|
||||
- Search for demographic segmentation and analysis
|
||||
- Research psychographic profiling and value systems
|
||||
- Analyze behavior drivers and influencing factors
|
||||
- Study customer interaction and engagement patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate customer behavior findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior patterns and preferences
|
||||
- Demographic profiles and segmentation
|
||||
- Psychographic characteristics and values
|
||||
- Behavior drivers and influences
|
||||
- Customer interaction patterns and engagement
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Behavior Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting demographics, psychographics, and behaviors]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Customer Behavior Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare customer behavior analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Customer Behavior and Segments
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Behavior Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer behavior patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Behavior Drivers: [Key motivations and patterns from web search]_
|
||||
_Interaction Preferences: [Customer engagement and interaction patterns]_
|
||||
_Decision Habits: [How customers typically make decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Demographic Segmentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Demographic analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Age Demographics: [Age groups and preferences]_
|
||||
_Income Levels: [Income segments and purchasing behavior]_
|
||||
_Geographic Distribution: [Regional/city differences]_
|
||||
_Education Levels: [Education impact on behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Psychographic Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[Psychographic analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Values and Beliefs: [Core values driving customer behavior]_
|
||||
_Lifestyle Preferences: [Lifestyle choices and behaviors]_
|
||||
_Attitudes and Opinions: [Customer attitudes toward products/services]_
|
||||
_Personality Traits: [Personality influences on behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Segment Profiles
|
||||
|
||||
[Detailed customer segment profiles with source citations]
|
||||
_Segment 1: [Detailed profile including demographics, psychographics, behavior]_
|
||||
_Segment 2: [Detailed profile including demographics, psychographics, behavior]_
|
||||
_Segment 3: [Detailed profile including demographics, psychographics, behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Behavior Drivers and Influences
|
||||
|
||||
[Behavior drivers analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Emotional Drivers: [Emotional factors influencing behavior]_
|
||||
_Rational Drivers: [Logical decision factors]_
|
||||
_Social Influences: [Social and peer influences]_
|
||||
_Economic Influences: [Economic factors affecting behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Interaction Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer interaction analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Research and Discovery: [How customers find and research options]_
|
||||
_Purchase Decision Process: [Steps in purchase decision making]_
|
||||
_Post-Purchase Behavior: [After-purchase engagement patterns]_
|
||||
_Loyalty and Retention: [Factors driving customer loyalty]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **customer behavior analysis** for {{research_topic}}, focusing on customer patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Customer Behavior Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer behavior patterns clearly identified with drivers
|
||||
- Demographic segmentation thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Psychographic profiles mapped and documented
|
||||
- Customer interaction patterns captured
|
||||
- Multiple sources verified for critical insights
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to customer pain points?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to pain points analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
|
||||
- Load: `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-03-customer-pain-points.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Customer behavior patterns identified with current citations
|
||||
✅ Demographic segmentation thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Psychographic profiles clearly documented
|
||||
✅ Customer interaction patterns captured
|
||||
✅ Multiple sources verified for critical insights
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (customer pain points)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical customer behavior patterns
|
||||
❌ Incomplete demographic segmentation analysis
|
||||
❌ Missing psychographic profile documentation
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to customer pain points analysis step
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor research decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER BEHAVIOR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research customer behavior studies and market research
|
||||
- Use demographic data from authoritative sources
|
||||
- Research psychographic profiling and value systems
|
||||
- Analyze customer interaction and engagement patterns
|
||||
- Focus on current behavior data and trends
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative customer research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable customer insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-03-customer-pain-points.md` to analyze customer pain points, challenges, and unmet needs for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current customer data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 3: Customer Pain Points and Needs
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A CUSTOMER NEEDS ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on customer pain points, challenges, and unmet needs
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after pain points content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CUSTOMER PAIN POINTS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Customer behavior analysis completed in previous step
|
||||
- Focus on customer pain points, challenges, and unmet needs
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct customer pain points and needs analysis with emphasis on challenges and frustrations.
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER PAIN POINTS ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Customer Pain Points Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different customer pain point areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with customer pain points research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **customer pain points analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand customer challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
**Customer Pain Points Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer challenges and frustrations
|
||||
- Unmet needs and unaddressed problems
|
||||
- Barriers to adoption or usage
|
||||
- Service and support pain points
|
||||
- Customer satisfaction gaps
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current customer pain points insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Pain Points Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer pain points challenges"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer frustrations"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} unmet customer needs"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer barriers to adoption"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for customer satisfaction surveys and reports
|
||||
- Search for customer complaints and reviews
|
||||
- Research customer support and service issues
|
||||
- Analyze barriers to customer adoption
|
||||
- Study unmet needs and market gaps
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate customer pain points findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer challenges and frustrations
|
||||
- Unmet needs and unaddressed problems
|
||||
- Barriers to adoption or usage
|
||||
- Service and support pain points
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Pain Points Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting different types of pain points]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Customer Pain Points Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare customer pain points analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Customer Pain Points and Needs
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Challenges and Frustrations
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer challenges analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Primary Frustrations: [Major customer frustrations identified]_
|
||||
_Usage Barriers: [Barriers preventing effective usage]_
|
||||
_Service Pain Points: [Customer service and support issues]_
|
||||
_Frequency Analysis: [How often these challenges occur]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Unmet Customer Needs
|
||||
|
||||
[Unmet needs analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Critical Unmet Needs: [Most important unaddressed needs]_
|
||||
_Solution Gaps: [Opportunities to address unmet needs]_
|
||||
_Market Gaps: [Market opportunities from unmet needs]_
|
||||
_Priority Analysis: [Which needs are most critical]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Barriers to Adoption
|
||||
|
||||
[Adoption barriers analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Price Barriers: [Cost-related barriers to adoption]_
|
||||
_Technical Barriers: [Complexity or technical barriers]_
|
||||
_Trust Barriers: [Trust and credibility issues]_
|
||||
_Convenience Barriers: [Ease of use or accessibility issues]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Service and Support Pain Points
|
||||
|
||||
[Service pain points analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Customer Service Issues: [Common customer service problems]_
|
||||
_Support Gaps: [Areas where customer support is lacking]_
|
||||
_Communication Issues: [Communication breakdowns and frustrations]_
|
||||
_Response Time Issues: [Slow response and resolution problems]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Satisfaction Gaps
|
||||
|
||||
[Satisfaction gap analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Expectation Gaps: [Differences between expectations and reality]_
|
||||
_Quality Gaps: [Areas where quality expectations aren't met]_
|
||||
_Value Perception Gaps: [Perceived value vs actual value]_
|
||||
_Trust and Credibility Gaps: [Trust issues affecting satisfaction]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Emotional Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Emotional impact analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Frustration Levels: [Customer frustration severity assessment]_
|
||||
_Loyalty Risks: [How pain points affect customer loyalty]_
|
||||
_Reputation Impact: [Impact on brand or product reputation]_
|
||||
_Customer Retention Risks: [Risk of customer loss from pain points]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Pain Point Prioritization
|
||||
|
||||
[Pain point prioritization with source citations]
|
||||
_High Priority Pain Points: [Most critical pain points to address]_
|
||||
_Medium Priority Pain Points: [Important but less critical pain points]_
|
||||
_Low Priority Pain Points: [Minor pain points with lower impact]_
|
||||
_Opportunity Mapping: [Pain points with highest solution opportunity]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **customer pain points analysis** for {{research_topic}}, focusing on customer challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Pain Points Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer challenges and frustrations thoroughly documented
|
||||
- Unmet needs and solution gaps clearly identified
|
||||
- Adoption barriers and service pain points analyzed
|
||||
- Customer satisfaction gaps assessed
|
||||
- Pain points prioritized by impact and opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to customer decision processes?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to decision processes analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`
|
||||
- Load: `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-04-customer-decisions.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Customer challenges and frustrations clearly documented
|
||||
✅ Unmet needs and solution gaps identified
|
||||
✅ Adoption barriers and service pain points analyzed
|
||||
✅ Customer satisfaction gaps assessed
|
||||
✅ Pain points prioritized by impact and opportunity
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (customer decisions)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical customer challenges or frustrations
|
||||
❌ Not identifying unmet needs or solution gaps
|
||||
❌ Incomplete adoption barriers analysis
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to customer decisions analysis step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER PAIN POINTS RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research customer satisfaction surveys and reviews
|
||||
- Use customer feedback and complaint data
|
||||
- Analyze customer support and service issues
|
||||
- Study barriers to customer adoption
|
||||
- Focus on current pain point data
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## PAIN POINTS ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative customer research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable pain point insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-04-customer-decisions.md` to analyze customer decision processes, journey mapping, and decision factors for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current customer pain points data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 4: Customer Decisions and Journey
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A CUSTOMER DECISION ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on customer decision processes and journey mapping
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CONTENT IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] continue option after decision processes content generation
|
||||
- 📝 WRITE CUSTOMER DECISIONS ANALYSIS TO DOCUMENT IMMEDIATELY
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY proceed when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Customer behavior and pain points analysis completed in previous steps
|
||||
- Focus on customer decision processes and journey mapping
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - established from initial discussion
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct customer decision processes and journey analysis with emphasis on decision factors and journey mapping.
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER DECISIONS ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Customer Decisions Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**UTILIZE SUBPROCESSES AND SUBAGENTS**: Use research subagents, subprocesses or parallel processing if available to thoroughly analyze different customer decision areas simultaneously and thoroughly.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with customer decisions research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **customer decision processes analysis** for **{{research_topic}}** to understand customer decision-making.
|
||||
|
||||
**Customer Decisions Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer decision-making processes
|
||||
- Decision factors and criteria
|
||||
- Customer journey mapping
|
||||
- Purchase decision influencers
|
||||
- Information gathering patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current customer decision insights.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Parallel Decisions Research Execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Execute multiple web searches simultaneously:**
|
||||
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer decision process"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} buying criteria factors"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} customer journey mapping"
|
||||
Search the web: "{{research_topic}} decision influencing factors"
|
||||
|
||||
**Analysis approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for customer decision research studies
|
||||
- Search for buying criteria and factor analysis
|
||||
- Research customer journey mapping methodologies
|
||||
- Analyze decision influence factors and channels
|
||||
- Study information gathering and evaluation patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Analyze and Aggregate Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Collect and analyze findings from all parallel searches:**
|
||||
|
||||
"After executing comprehensive parallel web searches, let me analyze and aggregate customer decision findings:
|
||||
|
||||
**Research Coverage:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer decision-making processes
|
||||
- Decision factors and criteria
|
||||
- Customer journey mapping
|
||||
- Decision influence factors
|
||||
|
||||
**Cross-Decisions Analysis:**
|
||||
[Identify patterns connecting decision factors and journey stages]
|
||||
|
||||
**Quality Assessment:**
|
||||
[Overall confidence levels and research gaps identified]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Customer Decisions Content
|
||||
|
||||
**WRITE IMMEDIATELY TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare customer decisions analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Customer Decision Processes and Journey
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Decision-Making Processes
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision processes analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Decision Stages: [Key stages in customer decision making]_
|
||||
_Decision Timelines: [Timeframes for different decisions]_
|
||||
_Complexity Levels: [Decision complexity assessment]_
|
||||
_Evaluation Methods: [How customers evaluate options]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Factors and Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision factors analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Primary Decision Factors: [Most important factors in decisions]_
|
||||
_Secondary Decision Factors: [Supporting factors influencing decisions]_
|
||||
_Weighing Analysis: [How different factors are weighed]_
|
||||
_Evoluton Patterns: [How factors change over time]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
[Journey mapping analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Awareness Stage: [How customers become aware of {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Consideration Stage: [Evaluation and comparison process]_
|
||||
_Decision Stage: [Final decision-making process]_
|
||||
_Purchase Stage: [Purchase execution and completion]_
|
||||
_Post-Purchase Stage: [Post-decision evaluation and behavior]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Touchpoint Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Touchpoint analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Digital Touchpoints: [Online and digital interaction points]_
|
||||
_Offline Touchpoints: [Physical and in-person interaction points]_
|
||||
_Information Sources: [Where customers get information]_
|
||||
_Influence Channels: [What influences customer decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Information Gathering Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Information patterns analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Research Methods: [How customers research options]_
|
||||
_Information Sources Trusted: [Most trusted information sources]_
|
||||
_Research Duration: [Time spent gathering information]_
|
||||
_Evaluation Criteria: [How customers evaluate information]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Decision Influencers
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision influencer analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Peer Influence: [How friends and family influence decisions]_
|
||||
_Expert Influence: [How expert opinions affect decisions]_
|
||||
_Media Influence: [How media and marketing affect decisions]_
|
||||
_Social Proof Influence: [How reviews and testimonials affect decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Purchase Decision Factors
|
||||
|
||||
[Purchase decision factors analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Immediate Purchase Drivers: [Factors triggering immediate purchase]_
|
||||
_Delayed Purchase Drivers: [Factors causing purchase delays]_
|
||||
_Brand Loyalty Factors: [Factors driving repeat purchases]_
|
||||
_Price Sensitivity: [How price affects purchase decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Decision Optimizations
|
||||
|
||||
[Decision optimization analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Friction Reduction: [Ways to make decisions easier]_
|
||||
_Trust Building: [Building customer trust in decisions]_
|
||||
_Conversion Optimization: [Optimizing decision-to-purchase rates]_
|
||||
_Loyalty Building: [Building long-term customer relationships]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Analysis and Continue Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Show analysis and present continue option:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed **customer decision processes analysis** for {{research_topic}}, focusing on customer decision-making.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Decision Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customer decision-making processes clearly mapped
|
||||
- Decision factors and criteria thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Customer journey mapping completed across all stages
|
||||
- Decision influencers and touchpoints identified
|
||||
- Information gathering patterns documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to proceed to competitive analysis?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to document and proceed to competitive analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Continue Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- **CONTENT ALREADY WRITTEN TO DOCUMENT**
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
|
||||
- Load: `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-05-competitive-analysis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
Content is already written to document when generated in step 4. No additional append needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Customer decision-making processes clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Decision factors and criteria thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Customer journey mapping completed across all stages
|
||||
✅ Decision influencers and touchpoints identified
|
||||
✅ Information gathering patterns documented
|
||||
✅ Content written immediately to document
|
||||
✅ [C] continue option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Proper routing to next step (competitive analysis)
|
||||
✅ Research goals alignment maintained
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing critical decision-making process stages
|
||||
❌ Not identifying key decision factors
|
||||
❌ Incomplete customer journey mapping
|
||||
❌ Not writing content immediately to document
|
||||
❌ Not presenting [C] continue option after content generation
|
||||
❌ Not routing to competitive analysis step
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## CUSTOMER DECISIONS RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Research customer decision studies and psychology
|
||||
- Use customer journey mapping methodologies
|
||||
- Analyze buying criteria and decision factors
|
||||
- Study decision influence and touchpoint analysis
|
||||
- Focus on current decision data
|
||||
- Present conflicting information when sources disagree
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels appropriately
|
||||
|
||||
## DECISION ANALYSIS STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Always cite URLs for web search results
|
||||
- Use authoritative customer decision research sources
|
||||
- Note data currency and potential limitations
|
||||
- Present multiple perspectives when sources conflict
|
||||
- Apply confidence levels to uncertain data
|
||||
- Focus on actionable decision insights
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C', load `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/market-steps/step-05-competitive-analysis.md` to analyze competitive landscape, market positioning, and competitive strategies for {{research_topic}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Always write research content to document immediately and emphasize current customer decision data with rigorous source verification!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 5: Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A COMPETITIVE ANALYST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on competitive landscape and market positioning
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after competitive analysis content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Focus on competitive landscape and market positioning analysis
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- May need to search for specific competitor information
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Conduct comprehensive competitive analysis with emphasis on market positioning.
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with competitive research approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll conduct **competitive analysis** to understand the competitive landscape.
|
||||
|
||||
**Competitive Analysis Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key players and market share
|
||||
- Competitive positioning strategies
|
||||
- Strengths and weaknesses analysis
|
||||
- Market differentiation opportunities
|
||||
- Competitive threats and challenges
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current competitive information.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Generate Competitive Analysis Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare competitive analysis with web search citations:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Competitive Landscape
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Market Players
|
||||
|
||||
[Key players analysis with market share data]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Share Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Market share analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
[Positioning analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strengths and Weaknesses
|
||||
|
||||
[SWOT analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Differentiation
|
||||
|
||||
[Differentiation analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Threats
|
||||
|
||||
[Threats analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Competitive opportunities analysis with source citations]
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Present Analysis and Complete Option
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated competitive analysis and present complete option:
|
||||
"I've completed the **competitive analysis** for the competitive landscape.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Competitive Findings:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Key market players and market share identified
|
||||
- Competitive positioning strategies mapped
|
||||
- Strengths and weaknesses thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- Market differentiation opportunities identified
|
||||
- Competitive threats and challenges documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to complete the market research?**
|
||||
[C] Complete Research - Save final document and conclude
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Handle Complete Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to the research document
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3]`
|
||||
- Complete the market research workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document using the structure from step 2.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Key market players identified
|
||||
✅ Market share analysis completed with source verification
|
||||
✅ Competitive positioning strategies clearly mapped
|
||||
✅ Strengths and weaknesses thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Market differentiation opportunities identified
|
||||
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
✅ Market research workflow completed successfully
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing key market players or market share data
|
||||
❌ Incomplete competitive positioning analysis
|
||||
❌ Not identifying market differentiation opportunities
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for research workflow
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPETITIVE RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for industry reports and competitive intelligence
|
||||
- Use competitor company websites and annual reports
|
||||
- Research market research firm competitive analyses
|
||||
- Note competitive advantages and disadvantages
|
||||
- Search for recent market developments and disruptions
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All market research steps completed
|
||||
- Comprehensive market research document generated
|
||||
- All sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Market research workflow status updated
|
||||
- Final recommendations provided to user
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEPS:
|
||||
|
||||
Market research workflow complete. User may:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use market research to inform product development strategies
|
||||
- Conduct additional competitive research on specific companies
|
||||
- Combine market research with other research types for comprehensive insights
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations on completing comprehensive market research! 🎉
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,476 @@
|
||||
# Market Research Step 6: Research Completion
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without web search verification
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ Search the web to verify and supplement your knowledge with current facts
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A MARKET RESEARCH STRATEGIST, not content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on strategic recommendations and actionable insights
|
||||
- 🔍 WEB SEARCH REQUIRED - verify current facts against live sources
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show web search analysis before presenting findings
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present [C] complete option after completion content generation
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Complete)
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]` before completing workflow
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to complete workflow until C is selected
|
||||
- 📚 GENERATE COMPLETE DOCUMENT STRUCTURE with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- **Research topic = "{{research_topic}}"** - comprehensive market analysis
|
||||
- **Research goals = "{{research_goals}}"** - achieved through exhaustive market research
|
||||
- All market research sections have been completed (customer behavior, pain points, decisions, competitive analysis)
|
||||
- Web search capabilities with source verification are enabled
|
||||
- This is the final synthesis step producing the complete market research document
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Produce a comprehensive, authoritative market research document on **{{research_topic}}** with compelling narrative introduction, detailed TOC, and executive summary based on exhaustive market research.
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH COMPLETION SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Begin Strategic Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
Start with strategic synthesis approach:
|
||||
"Now I'll complete our market research with **strategic synthesis and recommendations** .
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategic Synthesis Focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Integrated insights from market, customer, and competitive analysis
|
||||
- Strategic recommendations based on research findings
|
||||
- Market entry or expansion strategies
|
||||
- Risk assessment and mitigation approaches
|
||||
- Actionable next steps and implementation guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Let me search for current strategic insights and best practices.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Web Search for Market Entry Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current market strategies:
|
||||
Search the web: "market entry strategies best practices"
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategy focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market entry timing and approaches
|
||||
- Go-to-market strategies and frameworks
|
||||
- Market positioning and differentiation tactics
|
||||
- Customer acquisition and growth strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Web Search for Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Search for current risk approaches:
|
||||
Search the web: "market research risk assessment frameworks"
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk focus:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market risks and uncertainty management
|
||||
- Competitive threats and mitigation strategies
|
||||
- Regulatory and compliance risks
|
||||
- Economic and market volatility considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Generate Complete Market Research Document
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare comprehensive market research document with full structure:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Complete Document Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# [Compelling Title]: Comprehensive {{research_topic}} Market Research
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
[Brief compelling overview of key market findings and strategic implications]
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
- Market Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
- {{research_topic}} Market Analysis and Dynamics
|
||||
- Customer Insights and Behavior Analysis
|
||||
- Competitive Landscape and Positioning
|
||||
- Strategic Market Recommendations
|
||||
- Market Entry and Growth Strategies
|
||||
- Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
- Implementation Roadmap and Success Metrics
|
||||
- Future Market Outlook and Opportunities
|
||||
- Market Research Methodology and Source Documentation
|
||||
- Market Research Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Market Research Introduction and Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Significance
|
||||
|
||||
**Compelling market narrative about why {{research_topic}} research is critical now**
|
||||
_Market Importance: [Strategic market significance with up-to-date context]_
|
||||
_Business Impact: [Business implications of market research]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Methodology
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive description of market research approach including:]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Market Scope**: [Comprehensive market coverage areas]
|
||||
- **Data Sources**: [Authoritative market sources and verification approach]
|
||||
- **Analysis Framework**: [Structured market analysis methodology]
|
||||
- **Time Period**: [current focus and market evolution context]
|
||||
- **Geographic Coverage**: [Regional/global market scope]
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Goals and Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**Original Market Goals:** {{research_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Achieved Market Objectives:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Market Goal 1 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Market Goal 2 achievement with supporting evidence]
|
||||
- [Additional market insights discovered during research]
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. {{research_topic}} Market Analysis and Dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Size and Growth Projections
|
||||
|
||||
_[Comprehensive market analysis]_
|
||||
_Market Size: [Current market valuation and size]_
|
||||
_Growth Rate: [CAGR and market growth projections]_
|
||||
_Market Drivers: [Key factors driving market growth]_
|
||||
_Market Segments: [Detailed market segmentation analysis]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Trends and Dynamics
|
||||
|
||||
[Current market trends analysis]
|
||||
_Emerging Trends: [Key market trends and their implications]_
|
||||
_Market Dynamics: [Forces shaping market evolution]_
|
||||
_Consumer Behavior Shifts: [Changes in customer behavior and preferences]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing and Business Model Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive pricing and business model analysis]
|
||||
_Pricing Strategies: [Current pricing approaches and models]_
|
||||
_Business Model Evolution: [Emerging and successful business models]_
|
||||
_Value Proposition Analysis: [Customer value proposition assessment]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Customer Insights and Behavior Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Behavior Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Customer insights analysis with current context]
|
||||
_Behavior Patterns: [Key customer behavior trends and patterns]_
|
||||
_Customer Journey: [Complete customer journey mapping]_
|
||||
_Decision Factors: [Factors influencing customer decisions]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Pain Points and Needs
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive customer pain point analysis]
|
||||
_Pain Points: [Key customer challenges and frustrations]_
|
||||
_Unmet Needs: [Unsolved customer needs and opportunities]_
|
||||
_Customer Expectations: [Current customer expectations and requirements]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Customer Segmentation and Targeting
|
||||
|
||||
[Detailed customer segmentation analysis]
|
||||
_Customer Segments: [Detailed customer segment profiles]_
|
||||
_Target Market Analysis: [Most attractive customer segments]_
|
||||
_Segment-specific Strategies: [Tailored approaches for key segments]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Competitive Landscape and Positioning
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive competitive analysis]
|
||||
_Market Leaders: [Dominant competitors and their strategies]_
|
||||
_Emerging Competitors: [New entrants and innovative approaches]_
|
||||
_Competitive Advantages: [Key differentiators and competitive advantages]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Positioning Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategic positioning analysis]
|
||||
_Positioning Opportunities: [Opportunities for market differentiation]_
|
||||
_Competitive Gaps: [Unserved market needs and opportunities]_
|
||||
_Positioning Framework: [Recommended positioning approach]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Strategic Market Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Opportunity Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategic market opportunities analysis]
|
||||
_High-Value Opportunities: [Most attractive market opportunities]_
|
||||
_Market Entry Timing: [Optimal timing for market entry or expansion]_
|
||||
_Growth Strategies: [Recommended approaches for market growth]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive strategic recommendations]
|
||||
_Market Entry Strategy: [Recommended approach for market entry/expansion]_
|
||||
_Competitive Strategy: [Recommended competitive positioning and approach]_
|
||||
_Customer Acquisition Strategy: [Recommended customer acquisition approach]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Market Entry and Growth Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### Go-to-Market Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive go-to-market approach]
|
||||
_Market Entry Approach: [Recommended market entry strategy and tactics]_
|
||||
_Channel Strategy: [Optimal channels for market reach and customer acquisition]_
|
||||
_Partnership Strategy: [Strategic partnership and collaboration opportunities]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Growth and Scaling Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Market growth and scaling analysis]
|
||||
_Growth Phases: [Recommended phased approach to market growth]_
|
||||
_Scaling Considerations: [Key factors for successful market scaling]_
|
||||
_Expansion Opportunities: [Opportunities for geographic or segment expansion]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Risk Assessment and Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Risk Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive market risk assessment]
|
||||
_Market Risks: [Key market-related risks and uncertainties]_
|
||||
_Competitive Risks: [Competitive threats and mitigation strategies]_
|
||||
_Regulatory Risks: [Regulatory and compliance considerations]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Mitigation Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
[Risk mitigation and contingency planning]
|
||||
_Risk Mitigation Approaches: [Strategies for managing identified risks]_
|
||||
_Contingency Planning: [Backup plans and alternative approaches]_
|
||||
_Market Sensitivity Analysis: [Impact of market changes on strategy]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Implementation Roadmap and Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Framework
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive implementation guidance]
|
||||
_Implementation Timeline: [Recommended phased implementation approach]_
|
||||
_Required Resources: [Key resources and capabilities needed]_
|
||||
_Implementation Milestones: [Key milestones and success criteria]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Metrics and KPIs
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive success measurement framework]
|
||||
_Key Performance Indicators: [Critical metrics for measuring success]_
|
||||
_Monitoring and Reporting: [Approach for tracking and reporting progress]_
|
||||
_Success Criteria: [Clear criteria for determining success]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 9. Future Market Outlook and Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
### Future Market Trends
|
||||
|
||||
[Forward-looking market analysis]
|
||||
_Near-term Market Evolution: [1-2 year market development expectations]_
|
||||
_Medium-term Market Trends: [3-5 year expected market developments]_
|
||||
_Long-term Market Vision: [5+ year market outlook for {{research_topic}}]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Market opportunity analysis and recommendations]
|
||||
_Emerging Opportunities: [New market opportunities and their potential]_
|
||||
_Innovation Opportunities: [Areas for market innovation and differentiation]_
|
||||
_Strategic Market Investments: [Recommended market investments and priorities]_
|
||||
_Source: [URL]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Market Research Methodology and Source Verification
|
||||
|
||||
### Comprehensive Market Source Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
[Complete documentation of all market research sources]
|
||||
_Primary Market Sources: [Key authoritative market sources used]_
|
||||
_Secondary Market Sources: [Supporting market research and analysis]_
|
||||
_Market Web Search Queries: [Complete list of market search queries used]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Research Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
[Market research quality assurance and validation approach]
|
||||
_Market Source Verification: [All market claims verified with multiple sources]_
|
||||
_Market Confidence Levels: [Confidence assessments for uncertain market data]_
|
||||
_Market Research Limitations: [Market research limitations and areas for further investigation]_
|
||||
_Methodology Transparency: [Complete transparency about market research approach]_
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Market Research Appendices and Additional Resources
|
||||
|
||||
### Detailed Market Data Tables
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive market data tables supporting research findings]
|
||||
_Market Size Data: [Detailed market size and growth data tables]_
|
||||
_Customer Analysis Data: [Detailed customer behavior and segmentation data]_
|
||||
_Competitive Analysis Data: [Detailed competitor comparison and positioning data]_
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Resources and References
|
||||
|
||||
[Valuable market resources for continued research and implementation]
|
||||
_Market Research Reports: [Authoritative market research reports and publications]_
|
||||
_Industry Associations: [Key industry organizations and market resources]_
|
||||
_Market Analysis Tools: [Tools and resources for ongoing market analysis]_
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Research Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary of Key Market Findings
|
||||
|
||||
[Comprehensive summary of the most important market research findings]
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Market Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
[Assessment of market implications for {{research_topic}}]
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps Market Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
[Specific next steps for leveraging this market research]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Completion Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Research Period:** current comprehensive market analysis
|
||||
**Document Length:** As needed for comprehensive market coverage
|
||||
**Source Verification:** All market facts cited with current sources
|
||||
**Market Confidence Level:** High - based on multiple authoritative market sources
|
||||
|
||||
_This comprehensive market research document serves as an authoritative market reference on {{research_topic}} and provides strategic market insights for informed decision-making._
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Complete Market Research Document and Final Option
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Document Completion Presentation:**
|
||||
|
||||
"I've completed the **comprehensive market research document synthesis** for **{{research_topic}}**, producing an authoritative market research document with:
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Compelling Market Introduction**: Engaging opening that establishes market research significance
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Market TOC**: Complete navigation structure for market reference
|
||||
- **Exhaustive Market Research Coverage**: All market aspects of {{research_topic}} thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
- **Executive Market Summary**: Key market findings and strategic implications highlighted
|
||||
- **Strategic Market Recommendations**: Actionable market insights based on comprehensive research
|
||||
- **Complete Market Source Citations**: Every market claim verified with current sources
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Research Completeness:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Market analysis and dynamics fully documented
|
||||
- Customer insights and behavior analysis comprehensively covered
|
||||
- Competitive landscape and positioning detailed
|
||||
- Strategic market recommendations and implementation guidance provided
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Standards Met:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Exhaustive market research with no critical gaps
|
||||
- Professional market structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
- As long as needed for comprehensive market coverage
|
||||
- Multiple independent sources for all market claims
|
||||
- current market data throughout with proper citations
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to complete this comprehensive market research document?**
|
||||
[C] Complete Research - Save final comprehensive market research document
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Handle Complete Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Complete Research):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Replace** the template placeholder `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` in the `## Research Overview` section near the top of the document with a concise 2-3 paragraph overview summarizing the research scope, key findings, and a pointer to the full executive summary in the Research Synthesis section
|
||||
- Append the final content to the research document
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2, 3, 4]`
|
||||
- Complete the market research workflow
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the research document using the structure from step 4. Also replace the `[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]` placeholder in the Research Overview section at the top of the document.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Compelling market introduction with research significance
|
||||
✅ Comprehensive market table of contents with complete document structure
|
||||
✅ Exhaustive market research coverage across all market aspects
|
||||
✅ Executive market summary with key findings and strategic implications
|
||||
✅ Strategic market recommendations grounded in comprehensive research
|
||||
✅ Complete market source verification with current citations
|
||||
✅ Professional market document structure and compelling narrative
|
||||
✅ [C] complete option presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Market research workflow completed with comprehensive document
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not producing compelling market introduction
|
||||
❌ Missing comprehensive market table of contents
|
||||
❌ Incomplete market research coverage across market aspects
|
||||
❌ Not providing executive market summary with key findings
|
||||
❌ Missing strategic market recommendations based on research
|
||||
❌ Relying solely on training data without web verification for current facts
|
||||
❌ Producing market document without professional structure
|
||||
❌ Not presenting completion option for final market document
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## STRATEGIC RESEARCH PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Search for current market strategy frameworks and best practices
|
||||
- Research successful market entry cases and approaches
|
||||
- Identify risk management methodologies and frameworks
|
||||
- Research implementation planning and execution strategies
|
||||
- Consider market timing and readiness factors
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPREHENSIVE MARKET DOCUMENT STANDARDS:
|
||||
|
||||
This step ensures the final market research document:
|
||||
|
||||
- Serves as an authoritative market reference on {{research_topic}}
|
||||
- Provides strategic market insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Includes comprehensive market coverage with no gaps
|
||||
- Maintains rigorous market source verification standards
|
||||
- Delivers strategic market insights and actionable recommendations
|
||||
- Meets professional market research document quality standards
|
||||
|
||||
## MARKET RESEARCH WORKFLOW COMPLETION:
|
||||
|
||||
When 'C' is selected:
|
||||
|
||||
- All market research steps completed (1-4)
|
||||
- Comprehensive market research document generated
|
||||
- Professional market document structure with intro, TOC, and summary
|
||||
- All market sections appended with source citations
|
||||
- Market research workflow status updated to complete
|
||||
- Final comprehensive market research document delivered to user
|
||||
|
||||
## FINAL MARKET DELIVERABLE:
|
||||
|
||||
Complete authoritative market research document on {{research_topic}} that:
|
||||
|
||||
- Establishes professional market credibility through comprehensive research
|
||||
- Provides strategic market insights for informed decision-making
|
||||
- Serves as market reference document for continued use
|
||||
- Maintains highest market research quality standards with current verification
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEPS:
|
||||
|
||||
Comprehensive market research workflow complete. User may:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use market research document to inform business strategies and decisions
|
||||
- Conduct additional market research on specific segments or opportunities
|
||||
- Combine market research with other research types for comprehensive insights
|
||||
- Move forward with implementation based on strategic market recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulations on completing comprehensive market research with professional documentation! 🎉
|
||||
29
_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/research.template.md
Normal file
29
_bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/research/research.template.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
stepsCompleted: []
|
||||
inputDocuments: []
|
||||
workflowType: 'research'
|
||||
lastStep: 1
|
||||
research_type: '{{research_type}}'
|
||||
research_topic: '{{research_topic}}'
|
||||
research_goals: '{{research_goals}}'
|
||||
user_name: '{{user_name}}'
|
||||
date: '{{date}}'
|
||||
web_research_enabled: true
|
||||
source_verification: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Research Report: {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Author:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
**Research Type:** {{research_type}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Research Overview
|
||||
|
||||
[Research overview and methodology will be appended here]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Content will be appended sequentially through research workflow steps -->
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-create-ux-design
|
||||
description: 'Plan UX patterns and design specifications. Use when the user says "lets create UX design" or "create UX specifications" or "help me plan the UX"'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
||||
# Step 1: UX Design Workflow Initialization
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on initialization and setup only - don't look ahead to future steps
|
||||
- 🚪 DETECT existing workflow state and handle continuation properly
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Initialize document and update frontmatter
|
||||
- 📖 Set up frontmatter `stepsCompleted: [1]` before loading next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until setup is complete
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Variables from workflow.md are available in memory
|
||||
- Previous context = what's in output document + frontmatter
|
||||
- Don't assume knowledge from other steps
|
||||
- Input document discovery happens in this step
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Initialize the UX design workflow by detecting continuation state and setting up the design specification document.
|
||||
|
||||
## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Check for Existing Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
First, check if the output document already exists:
|
||||
|
||||
- Look for file at `{planning_artifacts}/*ux-design-specification*.md`
|
||||
- If exists, read the complete file including frontmatter
|
||||
- If not exists, this is a fresh workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Handle Continuation (If Document Exists)
|
||||
|
||||
If the document exists and has frontmatter with `stepsCompleted`:
|
||||
|
||||
- **STOP here** and load `./step-01b-continue.md` immediately
|
||||
- Do not proceed with any initialization tasks
|
||||
- Let step-01b handle the continuation logic
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Fresh Workflow Setup (If No Document)
|
||||
|
||||
If no document exists or no `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter:
|
||||
|
||||
#### A. Input Document Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
Discover and load context documents using smart discovery. Documents can be in the following locations:
|
||||
- {planning_artifacts}/**
|
||||
- {output_folder}/**
|
||||
- {product_knowledge}/**
|
||||
- {project-root}/docs/**
|
||||
|
||||
Also - when searching - documents can be a single markdown file, or a folder with an index and multiple files. For Example, if searching for `*foo*.md` and not found, also search for a folder called *foo*/index.md (which indicates sharded content)
|
||||
|
||||
Try to discover the following:
|
||||
- Product Brief (`*brief*.md`)
|
||||
- Research Documents (`*prd*.md`)
|
||||
- Project Documentation (generally multiple documents might be found for this in the `{product_knowledge}` or `docs` folder.)
|
||||
- Project Context (`**/project-context.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
<critical>Confirm what you have found with the user, along with asking if the user wants to provide anything else. Only after this confirmation will you proceed to follow the loading rules</critical>
|
||||
|
||||
**Loading Rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Load ALL discovered files completely that the user confirmed or provided (no offset/limit)
|
||||
- If there is a project context, whatever is relevant should try to be biased in the remainder of this whole workflow process
|
||||
- For sharded folders, load ALL files to get complete picture, using the index first to potentially know the potential of each document
|
||||
- index.md is a guide to what's relevant whenever available
|
||||
- Track all successfully loaded files in frontmatter `inputDocuments` array
|
||||
|
||||
#### B. Create Initial Document
|
||||
|
||||
Copy the template from `../ux-design-template.md` to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
Initialize frontmatter in the template.
|
||||
|
||||
#### C. Complete Initialization and Report
|
||||
|
||||
Complete setup and report to user:
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Setup:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Created: `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md` from template
|
||||
- Initialized frontmatter with workflow state
|
||||
|
||||
**Input Documents Discovered:**
|
||||
Report what was found:
|
||||
"Welcome {{user_name}}! I've set up your UX design workspace for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Documents Found:**
|
||||
|
||||
- PRD: {number of PRD files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
- Product brief: {number of brief files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
- Other context: {number of other files loaded or "None found"}
|
||||
|
||||
**Files loaded:** {list of specific file names or "No additional documents found"}
|
||||
|
||||
Do you have any other documents you'd like me to include, or shall we continue to the next step?
|
||||
|
||||
[C] Continue to UX discovery"
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects [C] to continue, ensure the file `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md` has been created and saved, and then load `./step-02-discovery.md` to begin the UX discovery phase.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-02 until output file has been updated and user explicitly selects [C] to continue!
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Existing workflow detected and handed off to step-01b correctly
|
||||
✅ Fresh workflow initialized with template and frontmatter
|
||||
✅ Input documents discovered and loaded using sharded-first logic
|
||||
✅ All discovered files tracked in frontmatter `inputDocuments`
|
||||
✅ User confirmed document setup and can proceed
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Proceeding with fresh initialization when existing workflow exists
|
||||
❌ Not updating frontmatter with discovered input documents
|
||||
❌ Creating document without proper template
|
||||
❌ Not checking sharded folders first before whole files
|
||||
❌ Not reporting what documents were found to user
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
|
||||
# Step 1B: UX Design Workflow Continuation
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on understanding where we left off and continuing appropriately
|
||||
- 🚪 RESUME workflow from exact point where it was interrupted
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis of current state before taking action
|
||||
- 💾 Keep existing frontmatter `stepsCompleted` values
|
||||
- 📖 Only load documents that were already tracked in `inputDocuments`
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to modify content completed in previous steps
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter are already loaded
|
||||
- Previous context = complete document + existing frontmatter
|
||||
- Input documents listed in frontmatter were already processed
|
||||
- Last completed step = `lastStep` value from frontmatter
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Resume the UX design workflow from where it was left off, ensuring smooth continuation.
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTINUATION SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Analyze Current State
|
||||
|
||||
Review the frontmatter to understand:
|
||||
|
||||
- `stepsCompleted`: Which steps are already done
|
||||
- `lastStep`: The most recently completed step number
|
||||
- `inputDocuments`: What context was already loaded
|
||||
- All other frontmatter variables
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Load All Input Documents
|
||||
|
||||
Reload the context documents listed in `inputDocuments`:
|
||||
|
||||
- For each document in `inputDocuments`, load the complete file
|
||||
- This ensures you have full context for continuation
|
||||
- Don't discover new documents - only reload what was previously processed
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Summarize Current Progress
|
||||
|
||||
Welcome the user back and provide context:
|
||||
"Welcome back {{user_name}}! I'm resuming our UX design collaboration for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Progress:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Steps completed: {stepsCompleted}
|
||||
- Last worked on: Step {lastStep}
|
||||
- Context documents available: {len(inputDocuments)} files
|
||||
- Current UX design specification is ready with all completed sections
|
||||
|
||||
**Document Status:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Current UX design document is ready with all completed sections
|
||||
- Ready to continue from where we left off
|
||||
|
||||
Does this look right, or do you want to make any adjustments before we proceed?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Determine Next Step
|
||||
|
||||
Based on `lastStep` value, determine which step to load next:
|
||||
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 1` → Load `./step-02-discovery.md`
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 2` → Load `./step-03-core-experience.md`
|
||||
- If `lastStep = 3` → Load `./step-04-emotional-response.md`
|
||||
- Continue this pattern for all steps
|
||||
- If `lastStep` indicates final step → Workflow already complete
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present Continuation Options
|
||||
|
||||
After presenting current progress, ask:
|
||||
"Ready to continue with Step {nextStepNumber}: {nextStepTitle}?
|
||||
|
||||
[C] Continue to Step {nextStepNumber}"
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ All previous input documents successfully reloaded
|
||||
✅ Current workflow state accurately analyzed and presented
|
||||
✅ User confirms understanding of progress
|
||||
✅ Correct next step identified and prepared for loading
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Discovering new input documents instead of reloading existing ones
|
||||
❌ Modifying content from already completed steps
|
||||
❌ Loading wrong next step based on `lastStep` value
|
||||
❌ Proceeding without user confirmation of current state
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW ALREADY COMPLETE?
|
||||
|
||||
If `lastStep` indicates the final step is completed:
|
||||
"Great news! It looks like we've already completed the UX design workflow for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
The final UX design specification is ready at {planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md with all sections completed through step {finalStepNumber}.
|
||||
|
||||
The complete UX design includes visual foundations, user flows, and design specifications ready for implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Would you like me to:
|
||||
|
||||
- Review the completed UX design specification with you
|
||||
- Suggest next workflow steps (like wireframe generation or architecture)
|
||||
- Start a new UX design revision
|
||||
|
||||
What would be most helpful?"
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user confirms they're ready to continue, load the appropriate next step file based on the `lastStep` value from frontmatter.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT load the next step until user explicitly selects [C] to continue!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
|
||||
# Step 2: Project Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on understanding project context and user needs
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating project understanding content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper project insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to understand project context
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from step 1 are available
|
||||
- Input documents (PRD, briefs, epics) already loaded are in memory
|
||||
- No additional data files needed for this step
|
||||
- Focus on project and user understanding
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Understand the project context, target users, and what makes this product special from a UX perspective.
|
||||
|
||||
## PROJECT DISCOVERY SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Review Loaded Context
|
||||
|
||||
Start by analyzing what we know from the loaded documents:
|
||||
"Based on the project documentation we have loaded, let me confirm what I'm understanding about {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**From the documents:**
|
||||
{summary of key insights from loaded PRD, briefs, and other context documents}
|
||||
|
||||
**Target Users:**
|
||||
{summary of user information from loaded documents}
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Features/Goals:**
|
||||
{summary of main features and goals from loaded documents}
|
||||
|
||||
Does this match your understanding? Are there any corrections or additions you'd like to make?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Fill Context Gaps (If no documents or gaps exist)
|
||||
|
||||
If no documents were loaded or key information is missing:
|
||||
"Since we don't have complete documentation, let's start with the essentials:
|
||||
|
||||
**What are you building?** (Describe your product in 1-2 sentences)
|
||||
|
||||
**Who is this for?** (Describe your ideal user or target audience)
|
||||
|
||||
**What makes this special or different?** (What's the unique value proposition?)
|
||||
|
||||
**What's the main thing users will do with this?** (Core user action or goal)"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Explore User Context Deeper
|
||||
|
||||
Dive into user understanding:
|
||||
"Let me understand your users better to inform the UX design:
|
||||
|
||||
**User Context Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What problem are users trying to solve?
|
||||
- What frustrates them with current solutions?
|
||||
- What would make them say 'this is exactly what I needed'?
|
||||
- How tech-savvy are your target users?
|
||||
- What devices will they use most?
|
||||
- When/where will they use this product?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Identify UX Design Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
Surface the key UX challenges to address:
|
||||
"From what we've discussed, I'm seeing some key UX design considerations:
|
||||
|
||||
**Design Challenges:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Identify 2-3 key UX challenges based on project type and user needs]
|
||||
- [Note any platform-specific considerations]
|
||||
- [Highlight any complex user flows or interactions]
|
||||
|
||||
**Design Opportunities:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Identify 2-3 areas where great UX could create competitive advantage]
|
||||
- [Note any opportunities for innovative UX patterns]
|
||||
|
||||
Does this capture the key UX considerations we need to address?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Generate Project Understanding Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Vision
|
||||
|
||||
[Project vision summary based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Users
|
||||
|
||||
[Target user descriptions based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Design Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
[Key UX challenges identified based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Opportunities
|
||||
|
||||
[Design opportunities identified based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated project understanding content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've documented our understanding of {{project_name}} from a UX perspective. This will guide all our design decisions moving forward.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 5]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to core experience definition"
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: `stepsCompleted: [1, 2]`
|
||||
- Load `./step-03-core-experience.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document. Only after the content is saved to document, read fully and follow: `./step-03-core-experience.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ All available context documents reviewed and synthesized
|
||||
✅ Project vision clearly articulated
|
||||
✅ Target users well understood
|
||||
✅ Key UX challenges identified
|
||||
✅ Design opportunities surfaced
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not reviewing loaded context documents thoroughly
|
||||
❌ Making assumptions about users without asking
|
||||
❌ Missing key UX challenges that will impact design
|
||||
❌ Not identifying design opportunities
|
||||
❌ Generating generic content without real project insight
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-03 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
|
||||
# Step 3: Core Experience Definition
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on defining the core user experience and platform
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating core experience content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper experience insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define optimal user experience
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Project understanding from step 2 informs this step
|
||||
- No additional data files needed for this step
|
||||
- Focus on core experience and platform decisions
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Define the core user experience, platform requirements, and what makes the interaction effortless.
|
||||
|
||||
## CORE EXPERIENCE DISCOVERY SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Define Core User Action
|
||||
|
||||
Start by identifying the most important user interaction:
|
||||
"Now let's dig into the heart of the user experience for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Experience Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What's the ONE thing users will do most frequently?
|
||||
- What user action is absolutely critical to get right?
|
||||
- What should be completely effortless for users?
|
||||
- If we nail one interaction, everything else follows - what is it?
|
||||
|
||||
Think about the core loop or primary action that defines your product's value."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Explore Platform Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Determine where and how users will interact:
|
||||
"Let's define the platform context for {{project_name}}:
|
||||
|
||||
**Platform Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Web, mobile app, desktop, or multiple platforms?
|
||||
- Will this be primarily touch-based or mouse/keyboard?
|
||||
- Any specific platform requirements or constraints?
|
||||
- Do we need to consider offline functionality?
|
||||
- Any device-specific capabilities we should leverage?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Identify Effortless Interactions
|
||||
|
||||
Surface what should feel magical or completely seamless:
|
||||
"**Effortless Experience Design:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What user actions should feel completely natural and require zero thought?
|
||||
- Where do users currently struggle with similar products?
|
||||
- What interaction, if made effortless, would create delight?
|
||||
- What should happen automatically without user intervention?
|
||||
- Where can we eliminate steps that competitors require?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Define Critical Success Moments
|
||||
|
||||
Identify the moments that determine success or failure:
|
||||
"**Critical Success Moments:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What's the moment where users realize 'this is better'?
|
||||
- When does the user feel successful or accomplished?
|
||||
- What interaction, if failed, would ruin the experience?
|
||||
- What are the make-or-break user flows?
|
||||
- Where does first-time user success happen?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Synthesize Experience Principles
|
||||
|
||||
Extract guiding principles from the conversation:
|
||||
"Based on our discussion, I'm hearing these core experience principles for {{project_name}}:
|
||||
|
||||
**Experience Principles:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Principle 1 based on core action focus]
|
||||
- [Principle 2 based on effortless interactions]
|
||||
- [Principle 3 based on platform considerations]
|
||||
- [Principle 4 based on critical success moments]
|
||||
|
||||
These principles will guide all our UX decisions. Do these capture what's most important?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Core Experience Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Core User Experience
|
||||
|
||||
### Defining Experience
|
||||
|
||||
[Core experience definition based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Platform Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Platform requirements and decisions based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Effortless Interactions
|
||||
|
||||
[Effortless interaction areas identified based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Success Moments
|
||||
|
||||
[Critical success moments defined based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Experience Principles
|
||||
|
||||
[Guiding principles for UX decisions based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated core experience content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've defined the core user experience for {{project_name}} based on our conversation. This establishes the foundation for all our UX design decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine the core experience definition
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on the user experience
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to emotional response definition"
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current core experience content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced experience insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the core experience definition? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current core experience definition
|
||||
- Process the collaborative experience improvements that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the core experience definition? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-04-emotional-response.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Core user action clearly identified and defined
|
||||
✅ Platform requirements thoroughly explored
|
||||
✅ Effortless interaction areas identified
|
||||
✅ Critical success moments mapped out
|
||||
✅ Experience principles established as guiding framework
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing the core user action that defines the product
|
||||
❌ Not properly considering platform requirements
|
||||
❌ Overlooking what should be effortless for users
|
||||
❌ Not identifying critical make-or-break interactions
|
||||
❌ Experience principles too generic or not actionable
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-04-emotional-response.md` to define desired emotional responses.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-04 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
|
||||
# Step 4: Desired Emotional Response
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on defining desired emotional responses and user feelings
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating emotional response content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper emotional insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define optimal emotional responses
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Core experience definition from step 3 informs emotional response
|
||||
- No additional data files needed for this step
|
||||
- Focus on user feelings and emotional design goals
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Define the desired emotional responses users should feel when using the product.
|
||||
|
||||
## EMOTIONAL RESPONSE DISCOVERY SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Explore Core Emotional Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Start by understanding the emotional objectives:
|
||||
"Now let's think about how {{project_name}} should make users feel.
|
||||
|
||||
**Emotional Response Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What should users FEEL when using this product?
|
||||
- What emotion would make them tell a friend about this?
|
||||
- How should users feel after accomplishing their primary goal?
|
||||
- What feeling differentiates this from competitors?
|
||||
|
||||
Common emotional goals: Empowered and in control? Delighted and surprised? Efficient and productive? Creative and inspired? Calm and focused? Connected and engaged?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Identify Emotional Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
Explore feelings at different stages:
|
||||
"**Emotional Journey Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How should users feel when they first discover the product?
|
||||
- What emotion during the core experience/action?
|
||||
- How should they feel after completing their task?
|
||||
- What if something goes wrong - what emotional response do we want?
|
||||
- How should they feel when returning to use it again?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Define Micro-Emotions
|
||||
|
||||
Surface subtle but important emotional states:
|
||||
"**Micro-Emotions to Consider:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Confidence vs. Confusion
|
||||
- Trust vs. Skepticism
|
||||
- Excitement vs. Anxiety
|
||||
- Accomplishment vs. Frustration
|
||||
- Delight vs. Satisfaction
|
||||
- Belonging vs. Isolation
|
||||
|
||||
Which of these emotional states are most critical for your product's success?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Connect Emotions to UX Decisions
|
||||
|
||||
Link feelings to design implications:
|
||||
"**Design Implications:**
|
||||
|
||||
- If we want users to feel [emotional state], what UX choices support this?
|
||||
- What interactions might create negative emotions we want to avoid?
|
||||
- Where can we add moments of delight or surprise?
|
||||
- How do we build trust and confidence through design?
|
||||
|
||||
**Emotion-Design Connections:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Emotion 1] → [UX design approach]
|
||||
- [Emotion 2] → [UX design approach]
|
||||
- [Emotion 3] → [UX design approach]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Validate Emotional Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Check if emotional goals align with product vision:
|
||||
"Let me make sure I understand the emotional vision for {{project_name}}:
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Emotional Goal:** [Summarize main emotional response]
|
||||
**Secondary Feelings:** [List supporting emotional states]
|
||||
**Emotions to Avoid:** [List negative emotions to prevent]
|
||||
|
||||
Does this capture the emotional experience you want to create? Any adjustments needed?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Emotional Response Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Desired Emotional Response
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Emotional Goals
|
||||
|
||||
[Primary emotional goals based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Emotional Journey Mapping
|
||||
|
||||
[Emotional journey mapping based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Micro-Emotions
|
||||
|
||||
[Micro-emotions identified based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Implications
|
||||
|
||||
[UX design implications for emotional responses based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Emotional Design Principles
|
||||
|
||||
[Guiding principles for emotional design based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated emotional response content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've defined the desired emotional responses for {{project_name}}. These emotional goals will guide our design decisions to create the right user experience.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine the emotional response definition
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on user emotional needs
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to inspiration analysis"
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current emotional response content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced emotional insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the emotional response definition? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current emotional response definition
|
||||
- Process the collaborative emotional insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the emotional response definition? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-05-inspiration.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Primary emotional goals clearly defined
|
||||
✅ Emotional journey mapped across user experience
|
||||
✅ Micro-emotions identified and addressed
|
||||
✅ Design implications connected to emotional responses
|
||||
✅ Emotional design principles established
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Missing core emotional goals or being too generic
|
||||
❌ Not considering emotional journey across different stages
|
||||
❌ Overlooking micro-emotions that impact user satisfaction
|
||||
❌ Not connecting emotional goals to specific UX design choices
|
||||
❌ Emotional principles too vague or not actionable
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-05-inspiration.md` to analyze UX patterns from inspiring products.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-05 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
|
||||
# Step 5: UX Pattern Analysis & Inspiration
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on analyzing existing UX patterns and extracting inspiration
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating inspiration analysis content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper pattern insights
|
||||
- **P ( Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to analyze UX patterns
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Emotional response goals from step 4 inform pattern analysis
|
||||
- No additional data files needed for this step
|
||||
- Focus on analyzing existing UX patterns and extracting lessons
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Analyze inspiring products and UX patterns to inform design decisions for the current project.
|
||||
|
||||
## INSPIRATION ANALYSIS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Identify User's Favorite Apps
|
||||
|
||||
Start by gathering inspiration sources:
|
||||
"Let's learn from products your users already love and use regularly.
|
||||
|
||||
**Inspiration Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Name 2-3 apps your target users already love and USE frequently
|
||||
- For each one, what do they do well from a UX perspective?
|
||||
- What makes the experience compelling or delightful?
|
||||
- What keeps users coming back to these apps?
|
||||
|
||||
Think about apps in your category or even unrelated products that have great UX."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Analyze UX Patterns and Principles
|
||||
|
||||
Break down what makes these apps successful:
|
||||
"For each inspiring app, let's analyze their UX success:
|
||||
|
||||
**For [App Name]:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What core problem does it solve elegantly?
|
||||
- What makes the onboarding experience effective?
|
||||
- How do they handle navigation and information hierarchy?
|
||||
- What are their most innovative or delightful interactions?
|
||||
- What visual design choices support the user experience?
|
||||
- How do they handle errors or edge cases?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Extract Transferable Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Identify patterns that could apply to your project:
|
||||
"**Transferable UX Patterns:**
|
||||
Looking across these inspiring apps, I see patterns we could adapt:
|
||||
|
||||
**Navigation Patterns:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Pattern 1] - could work for your [specific use case]
|
||||
- [Pattern 2] - might solve your [specific challenge]
|
||||
|
||||
**Interaction Patterns:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Pattern 1] - excellent for [your user goal]
|
||||
- [Pattern 2] - addresses [your user pain point]
|
||||
|
||||
**Visual Patterns:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Pattern 1] - supports your [emotional goal]
|
||||
- [Pattern 2] - aligns with your [platform requirements]
|
||||
|
||||
Which of these patterns resonate most for your product?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Identify Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
||||
|
||||
Surface what not to do based on analysis:
|
||||
"**UX Anti-Patterns to Avoid:**
|
||||
From analyzing both successes and failures in your space, here are patterns to avoid:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Anti-pattern 1] - users find this confusing/frustrating
|
||||
- [Anti-pattern 2] - this creates unnecessary friction
|
||||
- [Anti-pattern 3] - doesn't align with your [emotional goals]
|
||||
|
||||
Learning from others' mistakes is as important as learning from their successes."
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Define Design Inspiration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Create a clear strategy for using this inspiration:
|
||||
"**Design Inspiration Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
**What to Adopt:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Specific pattern] - because it supports [your core experience]
|
||||
- [Specific pattern] - because it aligns with [user needs]
|
||||
|
||||
**What to Adapt:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Specific pattern] - modify for [your unique requirements]
|
||||
- [Specific pattern] - simplify for [your user skill level]
|
||||
|
||||
**What to Avoid:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Specific anti-pattern] - conflicts with [your goals]
|
||||
- [Specific anti-pattern] - doesn't fit [your platform]
|
||||
|
||||
This strategy will guide our design decisions while keeping {{project_name}} unique."
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Inspiration Analysis Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## UX Pattern Analysis & Inspiration
|
||||
|
||||
### Inspiring Products Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
[Analysis of inspiring products based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Transferable UX Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Transferable patterns identified based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
||||
|
||||
[Anti-patterns to avoid based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Inspiration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Strategy for using inspiration based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated inspiration analysis content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've analyzed inspiring UX patterns and products to inform our design strategy for {{project_name}}. This gives us a solid foundation of proven patterns to build upon.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's deepen our UX pattern analysis
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on inspiration sources
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to design system choice"
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current inspiration analysis content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced pattern insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the inspiration analysis? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current inspiration analysis
|
||||
- Process the collaborative pattern insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the inspiration analysis? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Read fully and follow: `./step-06-design-system.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Inspiring products identified and analyzed thoroughly
|
||||
✅ UX patterns extracted and categorized effectively
|
||||
✅ Transferable patterns identified for current project
|
||||
✅ Anti-patterns identified to avoid common mistakes
|
||||
✅ Clear design inspiration strategy established
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not getting specific examples of inspiring products
|
||||
❌ Surface-level analysis without deep pattern extraction
|
||||
❌ Missing opportunities for pattern adaptation
|
||||
❌ Not identifying relevant anti-patterns to avoid
|
||||
❌ Strategy too generic or not actionable
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-06-design-system.md` to choose the appropriate design system approach.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-06 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
|
||||
# Step 6: Design System Choice
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on choosing appropriate design system approach
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE decision-making, not recommendation-only
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating design system decision content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper design system insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to evaluate design system options
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Platform requirements from step 3 inform design system choice
|
||||
- Inspiration patterns from step 5 guide design system selection
|
||||
- Focus on choosing foundation for consistent design
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Choose appropriate design system approach based on project requirements and constraints.
|
||||
|
||||
## DESIGN SYSTEM CHOICE SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Present Design System Options
|
||||
|
||||
Educate about design system approaches:
|
||||
"For {{project_name}}, we need to choose a design system foundation. Think of design systems like LEGO blocks for UI - they provide proven components and patterns, ensuring consistency and speeding development.
|
||||
|
||||
**Design System Approaches:**
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Custom Design System**
|
||||
|
||||
- Complete visual uniqueness
|
||||
- Full control over every component
|
||||
- Higher initial investment
|
||||
- Perfect for established brands with unique needs
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Established System (Material Design, Ant Design, etc.)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Fast development with proven patterns
|
||||
- Great defaults and accessibility built-in
|
||||
- Less visual differentiation
|
||||
- Ideal for startups or internal tools
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Themeable System (MUI, Chakra UI, Tailwind UI)**
|
||||
|
||||
- Customizable with strong foundation
|
||||
- Brand flexibility with proven components
|
||||
- Moderate learning curve
|
||||
- Good balance of speed and uniqueness
|
||||
|
||||
Which direction feels right for your project?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Analyze Project Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Guide decision based on project context:
|
||||
"**Let's consider your specific needs:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Based on our previous conversations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Platform: [platform from step 3]
|
||||
- Timeline: [inferred from user conversation]
|
||||
- Team Size: [inferred from user conversation]
|
||||
- Brand Requirements: [inferred from user conversation]
|
||||
- Technical Constraints: [inferred from user conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision Factors:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Need for speed vs. need for uniqueness
|
||||
- Brand guidelines or existing visual identity
|
||||
- Team's design expertise
|
||||
- Long-term maintenance considerations
|
||||
- Integration requirements with existing systems"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Explore Specific Design System Options
|
||||
|
||||
Dive deeper into relevant options:
|
||||
"**Recommended Options Based on Your Needs:**
|
||||
|
||||
**For [Your Platform Type]:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Option 1] - [Key benefit] - [Best for scenario]
|
||||
- [Option 2] - [Key benefit] - [Best for scenario]
|
||||
- [Option 3] - [Key benefit] - [Best for scenario]
|
||||
|
||||
**Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Component library size and quality
|
||||
- Documentation and community support
|
||||
- Customization capabilities
|
||||
- Accessibility compliance
|
||||
- Performance characteristics
|
||||
- Learning curve for your team"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Facilitate Decision Process
|
||||
|
||||
Help user make informed choice:
|
||||
"**Decision Framework:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. What's most important: Speed, uniqueness, or balance?
|
||||
2. How much design expertise does your team have?
|
||||
3. Are there existing brand guidelines to follow?
|
||||
4. What's your timeline and budget?
|
||||
5. Long-term maintenance needs?
|
||||
|
||||
Let's evaluate options based on your answers to these questions."
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Finalize Design System Choice
|
||||
|
||||
Confirm and document the decision:
|
||||
"Based on our analysis, I recommend [Design System Choice] for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**Rationale:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Reason 1 based on project needs]
|
||||
- [Reason 2 based on constraints]
|
||||
- [Reason 3 based on team considerations]
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
- We'll customize this system to match your brand and needs
|
||||
- Define component strategy for custom components needed
|
||||
- Establish design tokens and patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Does this design system choice feel right to you?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Design System Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Design System Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.1 Design System Choice
|
||||
|
||||
[Design system choice based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Rationale for Selection
|
||||
|
||||
[Rationale for design system selection based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation approach based on chosen system]
|
||||
|
||||
### Customization Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Customization strategy based on project needs]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated design system content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've documented our design system choice for {{project_name}}. This foundation will ensure consistency and speed up development.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our design system decision
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring technical perspectives on design systems
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to defining experience
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current design system content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced design system insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the design system decision? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current design system choice
|
||||
- Process the collaborative design system insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the design system decision? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-07-defining-experience.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Design system options clearly presented and explained
|
||||
✅ Decision framework applied to project requirements
|
||||
✅ Specific design system chosen with clear rationale
|
||||
✅ Implementation approach planned
|
||||
✅ Customization strategy defined
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not explaining design system concepts clearly
|
||||
❌ Rushing to recommendation without understanding requirements
|
||||
❌ Not considering technical constraints or team capabilities
|
||||
❌ Choosing design system without clear rationale
|
||||
❌ Not planning implementation approach
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-07-defining-experience.md` to define the core user interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-07 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,255 @@
|
||||
# Step 7: Defining Core Experience
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on defining the core interaction that defines the product
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating defining experience content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper experience insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define optimal core experience
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Core experience from step 3 provides foundation
|
||||
- Design system choice from step 6 informs implementation
|
||||
- Focus on the defining interaction that makes the product special
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Define the core interaction that, if nailed, makes everything else follow in the user experience.
|
||||
|
||||
## DEFINING EXPERIENCE SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Identify the Defining Experience
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on the core interaction:
|
||||
"Every successful product has a defining experience - the core interaction that, if we nail it, everything else follows.
|
||||
|
||||
**Think about these famous examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Tinder: "Swipe to match with people"
|
||||
- Snapchat: "Share photos that disappear"
|
||||
- Instagram: "Share perfect moments with filters"
|
||||
- Spotify: "Discover and play any song instantly"
|
||||
|
||||
**For {{project_name}}:**
|
||||
What's the core action that users will describe to their friends?
|
||||
What's the interaction that makes users feel successful?
|
||||
If we get ONE thing perfectly right, what should it be?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Explore the User's Mental Model
|
||||
|
||||
Understand how users think about the core task:
|
||||
"**User Mental Model Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How do users currently solve this problem?
|
||||
- What mental model do they bring to this task?
|
||||
- What's their expectation for how this should work?
|
||||
- Where are they likely to get confused or frustrated?
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Solutions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What do users love/hate about existing approaches?
|
||||
- What shortcuts or workarounds do they use?
|
||||
- What makes existing solutions feel magical or terrible?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Define Success Criteria for Core Experience
|
||||
|
||||
Establish what makes the core interaction successful:
|
||||
"**Core Experience Success Criteria:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What makes users say 'this just works'?
|
||||
- When do they feel smart or accomplished?
|
||||
- What feedback tells them they're doing it right?
|
||||
- How fast should it feel?
|
||||
- What should happen automatically?
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Indicators:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Success indicator 1]
|
||||
- [Success indicator 2]
|
||||
- [Success indicator 3]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Identify Novel vs. Established Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Determine if we need to innovate or can use proven patterns:
|
||||
"**Pattern Analysis:**
|
||||
Looking at your core experience, does this:
|
||||
|
||||
- Use established UX patterns that users already understand?
|
||||
- Require novel interaction design that needs user education?
|
||||
- Combine familiar patterns in innovative ways?
|
||||
|
||||
**If Novel:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What makes this different from existing approaches?
|
||||
- How will we teach users this new pattern?
|
||||
- What familiar metaphors can we use?
|
||||
|
||||
**If Established:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Which proven patterns should we adopt?
|
||||
- How can we innovate within familiar patterns?
|
||||
- What's our unique twist on established interactions?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Define Experience Mechanics
|
||||
|
||||
Break down the core interaction into details:
|
||||
"**Core Experience Mechanics:**
|
||||
Let's design the step-by-step flow for [defining experience]:
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Initiation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How does the user start this action?
|
||||
- What triggers or invites them to begin?
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Interaction:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What does the user actually do?
|
||||
- What controls or inputs do they use?
|
||||
- How does the system respond?
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Feedback:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What tells users they're succeeding?
|
||||
- How do they know when it's working?
|
||||
- What happens if they make a mistake?
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Completion:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How do users know they're done?
|
||||
- What's the successful outcome?
|
||||
- What's next?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Defining Experience Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 2. Core User Experience
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 Defining Experience
|
||||
|
||||
[Defining experience description based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 User Mental Model
|
||||
|
||||
[User mental model analysis based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
[Success criteria for core experience based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 Novel UX Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Novel UX patterns analysis based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.5 Experience Mechanics
|
||||
|
||||
[Detailed mechanics for core experience based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated defining experience content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've defined the core experience for {{project_name}} - the interaction that will make users love this product.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine the core experience definition
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on the defining interaction
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to visual foundation
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current defining experience content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced experience insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the defining experience? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current defining experience
|
||||
- Process the collaborative experience insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the defining experience? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-08-visual-foundation.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Defining experience clearly articulated
|
||||
✅ User mental model thoroughly analyzed
|
||||
✅ Success criteria established for core interaction
|
||||
✅ Novel vs. established patterns properly evaluated
|
||||
✅ Experience mechanics designed in detail
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not identifying the true core interaction
|
||||
❌ Missing user's mental model and expectations
|
||||
❌ Not establishing clear success criteria
|
||||
❌ Not properly evaluating novel vs. established patterns
|
||||
❌ Experience mechanics too vague or incomplete
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-08-visual-foundation.md` to establish visual design foundation.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-08 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
|
||||
# Step 8: Visual Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on establishing visual design foundation (colors, typography, spacing)
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE discovery, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating visual foundation content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper visual insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define visual foundation
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Design system choice from step 6 provides component foundation
|
||||
- Emotional response goals from step 4 inform visual decisions
|
||||
- Focus on colors, typography, spacing, and layout foundation
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Establish the visual design foundation including color themes, typography, and spacing systems.
|
||||
|
||||
## VISUAL FOUNDATION SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Brand Guidelines Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Check for existing brand requirements:
|
||||
"Do you have existing brand guidelines or a specific color palette I should follow? (y/n)
|
||||
|
||||
If yes, I'll extract and document your brand colors and create semantic color mappings.
|
||||
If no, I'll generate theme options based on your project's personality and emotional goals from our earlier discussion."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Generate Color Theme Options (If no brand guidelines)
|
||||
|
||||
Create visual exploration opportunities:
|
||||
"If no existing brand guidelines, I'll create a color theme visualizer to help you explore options.
|
||||
|
||||
🎨 I can generate comprehensive HTML color theme visualizers with multiple theme options, complete UI examples, and the ability to see how colors work in real interface contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
This will help you make an informed decision about the visual direction for {{project_name}}."
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Define Typography System
|
||||
|
||||
Establish the typographic foundation:
|
||||
"**Typography Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- What should the overall tone feel like? (Professional, friendly, modern, classic?)
|
||||
- How much text content will users read? (Headings only? Long-form content?)
|
||||
- Any accessibility requirements for font sizes or contrast?
|
||||
- Any brand fonts we must use?
|
||||
|
||||
**Typography Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Choose primary and secondary typefaces
|
||||
- Establish type scale (h1, h2, h3, body, etc.)
|
||||
- Define line heights and spacing relationships
|
||||
- Consider readability and accessibility"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Establish Spacing and Layout Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
Define the structural foundation:
|
||||
"**Spacing and Layout Foundation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How should the overall layout feel? (Dense and efficient? Airy and spacious?)
|
||||
- What spacing unit should we use? (4px, 8px, 12px base?)
|
||||
- How much white space should be between elements?
|
||||
- Should we use a grid system? If so, what column structure?
|
||||
|
||||
**Layout Principles:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Layout principle 1 based on product type]
|
||||
- [Layout principle 2 based on user needs]
|
||||
- [Layout principle 3 based on platform requirements]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Create Visual Foundation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Synthesize all visual decisions:
|
||||
"**Visual Foundation Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Color System:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Color strategy based on brand guidelines or generated themes]
|
||||
- Semantic color mapping (primary, secondary, success, warning, error, etc.)
|
||||
- Accessibility compliance (contrast ratios)
|
||||
|
||||
**Typography System:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Typography strategy based on content needs and tone]
|
||||
- Type scale and hierarchy
|
||||
- Font pairing rationale
|
||||
|
||||
**Spacing & Layout:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Spacing strategy based on content density and platform]
|
||||
- Grid system approach
|
||||
- Component spacing relationships
|
||||
|
||||
This foundation will ensure consistency across all our design decisions."
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Visual Foundation Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Visual Design Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
### Color System
|
||||
|
||||
[Color system strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Typography System
|
||||
|
||||
[Typography system strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Spacing & Layout Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
[Spacing and layout foundation based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Accessibility Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
[Accessibility considerations based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated visual foundation content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've established the visual design foundation for {{project_name}}. This provides the building blocks for consistent, beautiful design.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our visual foundation
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring design perspectives on visual choices
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to design directions
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current visual foundation content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced visual insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the visual foundation? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current visual foundation
|
||||
- Process the collaborative visual insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the visual foundation? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-09-design-directions.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Brand guidelines assessed and incorporated if available
|
||||
✅ Color system established with accessibility consideration
|
||||
✅ Typography system defined with appropriate hierarchy
|
||||
✅ Spacing and layout foundation created
|
||||
✅ Visual foundation strategy documented
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not checking for existing brand guidelines first
|
||||
❌ Color palette not aligned with emotional goals
|
||||
❌ Typography not suitable for content type or readability needs
|
||||
❌ Spacing system not appropriate for content density
|
||||
❌ Missing accessibility considerations
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-09-design-directions.md` to generate design direction mockups.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-09 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
|
||||
# Step 9: Design Direction Mockups
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on generating and evaluating design direction variations
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE exploration, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating design direction content
|
||||
- 💾 Generate HTML visualizer for design directions
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper design insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to evaluate design directions
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Visual foundation from step 8 provides design tokens
|
||||
- Core experience from step 7 informs layout and interaction design
|
||||
- Focus on exploring different visual design directions
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Generate comprehensive design direction mockups showing different visual approaches for the product.
|
||||
|
||||
## DESIGN DIRECTIONS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Generate Design Direction Variations
|
||||
|
||||
Create diverse visual explorations:
|
||||
"I'll generate 6-8 different design direction variations exploring:
|
||||
|
||||
- Different layout approaches and information hierarchy
|
||||
- Various interaction patterns and visual weights
|
||||
- Alternative color applications from our foundation
|
||||
- Different density and spacing approaches
|
||||
- Various navigation and component arrangements
|
||||
|
||||
Each mockup will show a complete vision for {{project_name}} with all our design decisions applied."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Create HTML Design Direction Showcase
|
||||
|
||||
Generate interactive visual exploration:
|
||||
"🎨 Design Direction Mockups Generated!
|
||||
|
||||
I'm creating a comprehensive HTML design direction showcase at `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-directions.html`
|
||||
|
||||
**What you'll see:**
|
||||
|
||||
- 6-8 full-screen mockup variations
|
||||
- Interactive states and hover effects
|
||||
- Side-by-side comparison tools
|
||||
- Complete UI examples with real content
|
||||
- Responsive behavior demonstrations
|
||||
|
||||
Each mockup represents a complete visual direction for your app's look and feel."
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Present Design Exploration Framework
|
||||
|
||||
Guide evaluation criteria:
|
||||
"As you explore the design directions, look for:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Layout Intuitiveness** - Which information hierarchy matches your priorities?
|
||||
✅ **Interaction Style** - Which interaction style fits your core experience?
|
||||
✅ **Visual Weight** - Which visual density feels right for your brand?
|
||||
✅ **Navigation Approach** - Which navigation pattern matches user expectations?
|
||||
✅ **Component Usage** - How well do the components support your user journeys?
|
||||
✅ **Brand Alignment** - Which direction best supports your emotional goals?
|
||||
|
||||
Take your time exploring - this is a crucial decision that will guide all our design work!"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Facilitate Design Direction Selection
|
||||
|
||||
Help user choose or combine elements:
|
||||
"After exploring all the design directions:
|
||||
|
||||
**Which approach resonates most with you?**
|
||||
|
||||
- Pick a favorite direction as-is
|
||||
- Combine elements from multiple directions
|
||||
- Request modifications to any direction
|
||||
- Use one direction as a base and iterate
|
||||
|
||||
**Tell me:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Which layout feels most intuitive for your users?
|
||||
- Which visual weight matches your brand personality?
|
||||
- Which interaction style supports your core experience?
|
||||
- Are there elements from different directions you'd like to combine?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Document Design Direction Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Capture the chosen approach:
|
||||
"Based on your exploration, I'm understanding your design direction preference:
|
||||
|
||||
**Chosen Direction:** [Direction number or combination]
|
||||
**Key Elements:** [Specific elements you liked]
|
||||
**Modifications Needed:** [Any changes requested]
|
||||
**Rationale:** [Why this direction works for your product]
|
||||
|
||||
This will become our design foundation moving forward. Are we ready to lock this in, or do you want to explore variations?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Design Direction Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Design Direction Decision
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Directions Explored
|
||||
|
||||
[Summary of design directions explored based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Chosen Direction
|
||||
|
||||
[Chosen design direction based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
[Rationale for design direction choice based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Approach
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation approach based on chosen direction]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated design direction content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've documented our design direction decision for {{project_name}}. This visual approach will guide all our detailed design work.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our design direction
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on visual choices
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to user journey flows
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current design direction content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced design insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the design direction? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current design direction
|
||||
- Process the collaborative design insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the design direction? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-10-user-journeys.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Multiple design direction variations generated
|
||||
✅ HTML showcase created with interactive elements
|
||||
✅ Design evaluation criteria clearly established
|
||||
✅ User able to explore and compare directions effectively
|
||||
✅ Design direction decision made with clear rationale
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not creating enough variation in design directions
|
||||
❌ Design directions not aligned with established foundation
|
||||
❌ Missing interactive elements in HTML showcase
|
||||
❌ Not providing clear evaluation criteria
|
||||
❌ Rushing decision without thorough exploration
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-10-user-journeys.md` to design user journey flows.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-10 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
|
||||
# Step 10: User Journey Flows
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on designing user flows and journey interactions
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE flow design, not assumption-based layouts
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating user journey content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper journey insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to design user flows
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Design direction from step 9 informs flow layout and visual design
|
||||
- Core experience from step 7 defines key journey interactions
|
||||
- Focus on designing detailed user flows with Mermaid diagrams
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Design detailed user journey flows for critical user interactions.
|
||||
|
||||
## USER JOURNEY FLOWS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Load PRD User Journeys as Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
Start with user journeys already defined in the PRD:
|
||||
"Great! Since we have the PRD available, let's build on the user journeys already documented there.
|
||||
|
||||
**Existing User Journeys from PRD:**
|
||||
I've already loaded these user journeys from your PRD:
|
||||
[Journey narratives from PRD input documents]
|
||||
|
||||
These journeys tell us **who** users are and **why** they take certain actions. Now we need to design **how** those journeys work in detail.
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Journeys to Design Flows For:**
|
||||
Looking at the PRD journeys, I need to design detailed interaction flows for:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Critical journey 1 identified from PRD narratives]
|
||||
- [Critical journey 2 identified from PRD narratives]
|
||||
- [Critical journey 3 identified from PRD narratives]
|
||||
|
||||
The PRD gave us the stories - now we design the mechanics!"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Design Each Journey Flow
|
||||
|
||||
For each critical journey, design detailed flow:
|
||||
|
||||
**For [Journey Name]:**
|
||||
"Let's design the flow for users accomplishing [journey goal].
|
||||
|
||||
**Flow Design Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How do users start this journey? (entry point)
|
||||
- What information do they need at each step?
|
||||
- What decisions do they need to make?
|
||||
- How do they know they're progressing successfully?
|
||||
- What does success look like for this journey?
|
||||
- Where might they get confused or stuck?
|
||||
- How do they recover from errors?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Create Flow Diagrams
|
||||
|
||||
Visualize each journey with Mermaid diagrams:
|
||||
"I'll create detailed flow diagrams for each journey showing:
|
||||
|
||||
**[Journey Name] Flow:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Entry points and triggers
|
||||
- Decision points and branches
|
||||
- Success and failure paths
|
||||
- Error recovery mechanisms
|
||||
- Progressive disclosure of information
|
||||
|
||||
Each diagram will map the complete user experience from start to finish."
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Optimize for Efficiency and Delight
|
||||
|
||||
Refine flows for optimal user experience:
|
||||
"**Flow Optimization:**
|
||||
For each journey, let's ensure we're:
|
||||
|
||||
- Minimizing steps to value (getting users to success quickly)
|
||||
- Reducing cognitive load at each decision point
|
||||
- Providing clear feedback and progress indicators
|
||||
- Creating moments of delight or accomplishment
|
||||
- Handling edge cases and error recovery gracefully
|
||||
|
||||
**Specific Optimizations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Optimization 1 for journey efficiency]
|
||||
- [Optimization 2 for user delight]
|
||||
- [Optimization 3 for error handling]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Document Journey Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Extract reusable patterns across journeys:
|
||||
"**Journey Patterns:**
|
||||
Across these flows, I'm seeing some common patterns we can standardize:
|
||||
|
||||
**Navigation Patterns:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Navigation pattern 1]
|
||||
- [Navigation pattern 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision Patterns:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Decision pattern 1]
|
||||
- [Decision pattern 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Feedback Patterns:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Feedback pattern 1]
|
||||
- [Feedback pattern 2]
|
||||
|
||||
These patterns will ensure consistency across all user experiences."
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate User Journey Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## User Journey Flows
|
||||
|
||||
### [Journey 1 Name]
|
||||
|
||||
[Journey 1 description and Mermaid diagram]
|
||||
|
||||
### [Journey 2 Name]
|
||||
|
||||
[Journey 2 description and Mermaid diagram]
|
||||
|
||||
### Journey Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Journey patterns identified based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Flow Optimization Principles
|
||||
|
||||
[Flow optimization principles based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated user journey content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've designed detailed user journey flows for {{project_name}}. These flows will guide the detailed design of each user interaction.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our user journey designs
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on user flows
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to component strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current user journey content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced journey insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the user journeys? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current user journeys
|
||||
- Process the collaborative journey insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the user journeys? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-11-component-strategy.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Critical user journeys identified and designed
|
||||
✅ Detailed flow diagrams created for each journey
|
||||
✅ Flows optimized for efficiency and user delight
|
||||
✅ Common journey patterns extracted and documented
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not identifying all critical user journeys
|
||||
❌ Flows too complex or not optimized for user success
|
||||
❌ Missing error recovery paths
|
||||
❌ Not extracting reusable patterns across journeys
|
||||
❌ Flow diagrams unclear or incomplete
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-11-component-strategy.md` to define component library strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-11 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
|
||||
# Step 11: Component Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on defining component library strategy and custom components
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE component planning, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating component strategy content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper component insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define component strategy
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Design system choice from step 6 determines available components
|
||||
- User journeys from step 10 identify component needs
|
||||
- Focus on defining custom components and implementation strategy
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Define component library strategy and design custom components not covered by the design system.
|
||||
|
||||
## COMPONENT STRATEGY SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Analyze Design System Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
Review what components are available vs. needed:
|
||||
"Based on our chosen design system [design system from step 6], let's identify what components are already available and what we need to create custom.
|
||||
|
||||
**Available from Design System:**
|
||||
[List of components available in chosen design system]
|
||||
|
||||
**Components Needed for {{project_name}}:**
|
||||
Looking at our user journeys and design direction, we need:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Component need 1 from journey analysis]
|
||||
- [Component need 2 from design requirements]
|
||||
- [Component need 3 from core experience]
|
||||
|
||||
**Gap Analysis:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Gap 1 - needed but not available]
|
||||
- [Gap 2 - needed but not available]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Design Custom Components
|
||||
|
||||
For each custom component needed, design thoroughly:
|
||||
|
||||
**For each custom component:**
|
||||
"**[Component Name] Design:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** What does this component do for users?
|
||||
**Content:** What information or data does it display?
|
||||
**Actions:** What can users do with this component?
|
||||
**States:** What different states does it have? (default, hover, active, disabled, error, etc.)
|
||||
**Variants:** Are there different sizes or styles needed?
|
||||
**Accessibility:** What ARIA labels and keyboard support needed?
|
||||
|
||||
Let's walk through each custom component systematically."
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Document Component Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
Create detailed specifications for each component:
|
||||
|
||||
**Component Specification Template:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
### [Component Name]
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose:** [Clear purpose statement]
|
||||
**Usage:** [When and how to use]
|
||||
**Anatomy:** [Visual breakdown of parts]
|
||||
**States:** [All possible states with descriptions]
|
||||
**Variants:** [Different sizes/styles if applicable]
|
||||
**Accessibility:** [ARIA labels, keyboard navigation]
|
||||
**Content Guidelines:** [What content works best]
|
||||
**Interaction Behavior:** [How users interact]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Define Component Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Establish overall component library approach:
|
||||
"**Component Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Foundation Components:** (from design system)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Foundation component 1]
|
||||
- [Foundation component 2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Custom Components:** (designed in this step)
|
||||
|
||||
- [Custom component 1 with rationale]
|
||||
- [Custom component 2 with rationale]
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Approach:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Build custom components using design system tokens
|
||||
- Ensure consistency with established patterns
|
||||
- Follow accessibility best practices
|
||||
- Create reusable patterns for common use cases"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Plan Implementation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
Define how and when to build components:
|
||||
"**Implementation Roadmap:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 1 - Core Components:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Component 1] - needed for [critical flow]
|
||||
- [Component 2] - needed for [critical flow]
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2 - Supporting Components:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Component 3] - enhances [user experience]
|
||||
- [Component 4] - supports [design pattern]
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 3 - Enhancement Components:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Component 5] - optimizes [user journey]
|
||||
- [Component 6] - adds [special feature]
|
||||
|
||||
This roadmap helps prioritize development based on user journey criticality."
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Component Strategy Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Component Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Design System Components
|
||||
|
||||
[Analysis of available design system components based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Custom Components
|
||||
|
||||
[Custom component specifications based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Component implementation strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation roadmap based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated component strategy content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've defined the component strategy for {{project_name}}. This balances using proven design system components with custom components for your unique needs.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our component strategy
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring technical perspectives on component design
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to UX patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current component strategy content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced component insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the component strategy? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current component strategy
|
||||
- Process the collaborative component insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the component strategy? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-12-ux-patterns.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Design system coverage properly analyzed
|
||||
✅ All custom components thoroughly specified
|
||||
✅ Component strategy clearly defined
|
||||
✅ Implementation roadmap prioritized by user need
|
||||
✅ Accessibility considered for all components
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not analyzing design system coverage properly
|
||||
❌ Custom components not thoroughly specified
|
||||
❌ Missing accessibility considerations
|
||||
❌ Component strategy not aligned with user journeys
|
||||
❌ Implementation roadmap not prioritized effectively
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-12-ux-patterns.md` to define UX consistency patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-12 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
|
||||
# Step 12: UX Consistency Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on establishing consistency patterns for common UX situations
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE pattern definition, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating UX patterns content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper pattern insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define UX patterns
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to next step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Component strategy from step 11 informs pattern decisions
|
||||
- User journeys from step 10 identify common pattern needs
|
||||
- Focus on consistency patterns for common UX situations
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Establish UX consistency patterns for common situations like buttons, forms, navigation, and feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
## UX PATTERNS SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Identify Pattern Categories
|
||||
|
||||
Determine which patterns need definition for your product:
|
||||
"Let's establish consistency patterns for how {{project_name}} behaves in common situations.
|
||||
|
||||
**Pattern Categories to Define:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Button hierarchy and actions
|
||||
- Feedback patterns (success, error, warning, info)
|
||||
- Form patterns and validation
|
||||
- Navigation patterns
|
||||
- Modal and overlay patterns
|
||||
- Empty states and loading states
|
||||
- Search and filtering patterns
|
||||
|
||||
Which categories are most critical for your product? We can go through each thoroughly or focus on the most important ones."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Define Critical Patterns First
|
||||
|
||||
Focus on patterns most relevant to your product:
|
||||
|
||||
**For [Critical Pattern Category]:**
|
||||
"**[Pattern Type] Patterns:**
|
||||
What should users see/do when they need to [pattern action]?
|
||||
|
||||
**Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Visual hierarchy (primary vs. secondary actions)
|
||||
- Feedback mechanisms
|
||||
- Error recovery
|
||||
- Accessibility requirements
|
||||
- Mobile vs. desktop considerations
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Example 1 for this pattern type]
|
||||
- [Example 2 for this pattern type]
|
||||
|
||||
How should {{project_name}} handle [pattern type] interactions?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Establish Pattern Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
Document specific design decisions:
|
||||
|
||||
**Pattern Guidelines Template:**
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
### [Pattern Type]
|
||||
|
||||
**When to Use:** [Clear usage guidelines]
|
||||
**Visual Design:** [How it should look]
|
||||
**Behavior:** [How it should interact]
|
||||
**Accessibility:** [A11y requirements]
|
||||
**Mobile Considerations:** [Mobile-specific needs]
|
||||
**Variants:** [Different states or styles if applicable]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Design System Integration
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure patterns work with chosen design system:
|
||||
"**Integration with [Design System]:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How do these patterns complement our design system components?
|
||||
- What customizations are needed?
|
||||
- How do we maintain consistency while meeting unique needs?
|
||||
|
||||
**Custom Pattern Rules:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Custom rule 1]
|
||||
- [Custom rule 2]
|
||||
- [Custom rule 3]"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Create Pattern Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
Generate comprehensive pattern library:
|
||||
|
||||
**Pattern Library Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Clear usage guidelines for each pattern
|
||||
- Visual examples and specifications
|
||||
- Implementation notes for developers
|
||||
- Accessibility checklists
|
||||
- Mobile-first considerations
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate UX Patterns Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## UX Consistency Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Button Hierarchy
|
||||
|
||||
[Button hierarchy patterns based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Feedback Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Feedback patterns based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Form Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Form patterns based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Navigation Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Navigation patterns based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
[Additional patterns based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated UX patterns content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've established UX consistency patterns for {{project_name}}. These patterns ensure users have a consistent, predictable experience across all interactions.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our UX patterns
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on consistency patterns
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and move to responsive design
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current UX patterns content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced pattern insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the UX patterns? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current UX patterns
|
||||
- Process the collaborative pattern insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the UX patterns? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-13-responsive-accessibility.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Critical pattern categories identified and prioritized
|
||||
✅ Consistency patterns clearly defined and documented
|
||||
✅ Patterns integrated with chosen design system
|
||||
✅ Accessibility considerations included for all patterns
|
||||
✅ Mobile-first approach incorporated
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not identifying the most critical pattern categories
|
||||
❌ Patterns too generic or not actionable
|
||||
❌ Missing accessibility considerations
|
||||
❌ Patterns not aligned with design system
|
||||
❌ Not considering mobile differences
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-13-responsive-accessibility.md` to define responsive design and accessibility strategy.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-13 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
|
||||
# Step 13: Responsive Design & Accessibility
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- ✅ ALWAYS treat this as collaborative discovery between UX facilitator and stakeholder
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A UX FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on responsive design strategy and accessibility compliance
|
||||
- 🎯 COLLABORATIVE strategy definition, not assumption-based design
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- ⚠️ Present A/P/C menu after generating responsive/accessibility content
|
||||
- 💾 ONLY save when user chooses C (Continue)
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted.
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until C is selected
|
||||
|
||||
## COLLABORATION MENUS (A/P/C):
|
||||
|
||||
This step will generate content and present choices:
|
||||
|
||||
- **A (Advanced Elicitation)**: Use discovery protocols to develop deeper responsive/accessibility insights
|
||||
- **P (Party Mode)**: Bring multiple perspectives to define responsive/accessibility strategy
|
||||
- **C (Continue)**: Save the content to the document and proceed to final step
|
||||
|
||||
## PROTOCOL INTEGRATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- When 'A' selected: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill
|
||||
- When 'P' selected: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill
|
||||
- PROTOCOLS always return to this step's A/P/C menu
|
||||
- User accepts/rejects protocol changes before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Current document and frontmatter from previous steps are available
|
||||
- Platform requirements from step 3 inform responsive design
|
||||
- Design direction from step 9 influences responsive layout choices
|
||||
- Focus on cross-device adaptation and accessibility compliance
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Define responsive design strategy and accessibility requirements for the product.
|
||||
|
||||
## RESPONSIVE & ACCESSIBILITY SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Define Responsive Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Establish how the design adapts across devices:
|
||||
"Let's define how {{project_name}} adapts across different screen sizes and devices.
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsive Design Questions:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Desktop Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
- How should we use extra screen real estate?
|
||||
- Multi-column layouts, side navigation, or content density?
|
||||
- What desktop-specific features can we include?
|
||||
|
||||
**Tablet Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Should we use simplified layouts or touch-optimized interfaces?
|
||||
- How do gestures and touch interactions work on tablets?
|
||||
- What's the optimal information density for tablet screens?
|
||||
|
||||
**Mobile Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Bottom navigation or hamburger menu?
|
||||
- How do layouts collapse on small screens?
|
||||
- What's the most critical information to show mobile-first?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Establish Breakpoint Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Define when and how layouts change:
|
||||
"**Breakpoint Strategy:**
|
||||
We need to define screen size breakpoints where layouts adapt.
|
||||
|
||||
**Common Breakpoints:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Mobile: 320px - 767px
|
||||
- Tablet: 768px - 1023px
|
||||
- Desktop: 1024px+
|
||||
|
||||
**For {{project_name}}, should we:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use standard breakpoints or custom ones?
|
||||
- Focus on mobile-first or desktop-first design?
|
||||
- Have specific breakpoints for your key use cases?"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Design Accessibility Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Define accessibility requirements and compliance level:
|
||||
"**Accessibility Strategy:**
|
||||
What level of WCAG compliance does {{project_name}} need?
|
||||
|
||||
**WCAG Levels:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Level A (Basic)** - Essential accessibility for legal compliance
|
||||
- **Level AA (Recommended)** - Industry standard for good UX
|
||||
- **Level AAA (Highest)** - Exceptional accessibility (rarely needed)
|
||||
|
||||
**Based on your product:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [Recommendation based on user base, legal requirements, etc.]
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Accessibility Considerations:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Color contrast ratios (4.5:1 for normal text)
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation support
|
||||
- Screen reader compatibility
|
||||
- Touch target sizes (minimum 44x44px)
|
||||
- Focus indicators and skip links"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Define Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Plan how to ensure responsive design and accessibility:
|
||||
"**Testing Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsive Testing:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Device testing on actual phones/tablets
|
||||
- Browser testing across Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
|
||||
- Real device network performance testing
|
||||
|
||||
**Accessibility Testing:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Automated accessibility testing tools
|
||||
- Screen reader testing (VoiceOver, NVDA, JAWS)
|
||||
- Keyboard-only navigation testing
|
||||
- Color blindness simulation testing
|
||||
|
||||
**User Testing:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Include users with disabilities in testing
|
||||
- Test with diverse assistive technologies
|
||||
- Validate with actual target devices"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Document Implementation Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
Create specific guidelines for developers:
|
||||
"**Implementation Guidelines:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Responsive Development:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use relative units (rem, %, vw, vh) over fixed pixels
|
||||
- Implement mobile-first media queries
|
||||
- Test touch targets and gesture areas
|
||||
- Optimize images and assets for different devices
|
||||
|
||||
**Accessibility Development:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Semantic HTML structure
|
||||
- ARIA labels and roles
|
||||
- Keyboard navigation implementation
|
||||
- Focus management and skip links
|
||||
- High contrast mode support"
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Generate Responsive & Accessibility Content
|
||||
|
||||
Prepare the content to append to the document:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Content Structure:
|
||||
|
||||
When saving to document, append these Level 2 and Level 3 sections:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Responsive Design & Accessibility
|
||||
|
||||
### Responsive Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Responsive strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Breakpoint Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Breakpoint strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Accessibility Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Accessibility strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
[Testing strategy based on conversation]
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Guidelines
|
||||
|
||||
[Implementation guidelines based on conversation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present Content and Menu
|
||||
|
||||
Show the generated responsive and accessibility content and present choices:
|
||||
"I've defined the responsive design and accessibility strategy for {{project_name}}. This ensures your product works beautifully across all devices and is accessible to all users.
|
||||
|
||||
**Here's what I'll add to the document:**
|
||||
|
||||
[Show the complete markdown content from step 6]
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do?**
|
||||
[A] Advanced Elicitation - Let's refine our responsive/accessibility strategy
|
||||
[P] Party Mode - Bring different perspectives on inclusive design
|
||||
[C] Continue - Save this to the document and complete the workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Handle Menu Selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'A' (Advanced Elicitation):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill with the current responsive/accessibility content
|
||||
- Process the enhanced insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these improvements to the responsive/accessibility strategy? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'P' (Party Mode):
|
||||
|
||||
- Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill with the current responsive/accessibility strategy
|
||||
- Process the collaborative insights that come back
|
||||
- Ask user: "Accept these changes to the responsive/accessibility strategy? (y/n)"
|
||||
- If yes: Update content with improvements, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
- If no: Keep original content, then return to A/P/C menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### If 'C' (Continue):
|
||||
|
||||
- Append the final content to `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Update frontmatter: append step to end of stepsCompleted array
|
||||
- Load `./step-14-complete.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## APPEND TO DOCUMENT:
|
||||
|
||||
When user selects 'C', append the content directly to the document using the structure from step 6.
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Responsive strategy clearly defined for all device types
|
||||
✅ Appropriate breakpoint strategy established
|
||||
✅ Accessibility requirements determined and documented
|
||||
✅ Comprehensive testing strategy planned
|
||||
✅ Implementation guidelines provided for development team
|
||||
✅ A/P/C menu presented and handled correctly
|
||||
✅ Content properly appended to document when C selected
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not considering all device types and screen sizes
|
||||
❌ Accessibility requirements not properly researched
|
||||
❌ Testing strategy not comprehensive enough
|
||||
❌ Implementation guidelines too generic or unclear
|
||||
❌ Not addressing specific accessibility challenges for your product
|
||||
❌ Not presenting A/P/C menu after content generation
|
||||
❌ Appending content without user selecting 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEP:
|
||||
|
||||
After user selects 'C' and content is saved to document, load `./step-14-complete.md` to finalize the UX design workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
Remember: Do NOT proceed to step-14 until user explicitly selects 'C' from the A/P/C menu and content is saved!
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
|
||||
# Step 14: Workflow Completion
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ THIS IS A FINAL STEP - Workflow completion required
|
||||
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: ALWAYS read the complete step file before taking any action - partial understanding leads to incomplete decisions
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure the entire file is read and understood before proceeding
|
||||
- 🛑 NO content generation - this is a wrap-up step
|
||||
- 📋 FINALIZE document and update workflow status
|
||||
- 💬 FOCUS on completion, validation, and next steps
|
||||
- 🎯 UPDATE workflow status files with completion information
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Show your analysis before taking any action
|
||||
- 💾 Update the main workflow status file with completion information
|
||||
- 📖 Suggest potential next workflow steps for the user
|
||||
- 🚫 DO NOT load additional steps after this one
|
||||
|
||||
## TERMINATION STEP PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- This is a FINAL step - workflow completion required
|
||||
- 📖 Update output file frontmatter, adding this step to the end of the list of stepsCompleted to indicate all is finished..
|
||||
- Output completion summary and next step guidance
|
||||
- Update the main workflow status file with finalized document
|
||||
- Suggest potential next workflow steps for the user
|
||||
- Mark workflow as complete in status tracking
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Complete UX design specification is available from all previous steps
|
||||
- Workflow frontmatter shows all completed steps
|
||||
- All collaborative content has been generated and saved
|
||||
- Focus on completion, validation, and next steps
|
||||
|
||||
## YOUR TASK:
|
||||
|
||||
Complete the UX design workflow, update status files, and suggest next steps for the project.
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW COMPLETION SEQUENCE:
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Announce Workflow Completion
|
||||
|
||||
Inform user that the UX design is complete:
|
||||
"🎉 **UX Design Complete, {{user_name}}!**
|
||||
|
||||
I've successfully collaborated with you to create a comprehensive UX design specification for {{project_name}}.
|
||||
|
||||
**What we've accomplished:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Project understanding and user insights
|
||||
- ✅ Core experience and emotional response definition
|
||||
- ✅ UX pattern analysis and inspiration
|
||||
- ✅ Design system choice and implementation strategy
|
||||
- ✅ Core interaction definition and experience mechanics
|
||||
- ✅ Visual design foundation (colors, typography, spacing)
|
||||
- ✅ Design direction mockups and visual explorations
|
||||
- ✅ User journey flows and interaction design
|
||||
- ✅ Component strategy and custom component specifications
|
||||
- ✅ UX consistency patterns for common interactions
|
||||
- ✅ Responsive design and accessibility strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**The complete UX design specification is now available at:** `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Supporting Visual Assets:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Color themes visualizer: `{planning_artifacts}/ux-color-themes.html`
|
||||
- Design directions mockups: `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-directions.html`
|
||||
|
||||
This specification is now ready to guide visual design, implementation, and development."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Workflow Status Update
|
||||
|
||||
Update the main workflow status file:
|
||||
|
||||
- Load the project's workflow status file (if one exists)
|
||||
- Update workflow_status["create-ux-design"] = `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- Save file, preserving all comments and structure
|
||||
- Mark current timestamp as completion time
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Suggest Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
UX Design complete. Invoke the `bmad-help` skill.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Final Completion Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Congratulate the user on the completion you both completed together of the UX.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## SUCCESS METRICS:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ UX design specification contains all required sections
|
||||
✅ All collaborative content properly saved to document
|
||||
✅ Workflow status file updated with completion information
|
||||
✅ Clear next step guidance provided to user
|
||||
✅ Document quality validation completed
|
||||
✅ User acknowledges completion and understands next options
|
||||
|
||||
## FAILURE MODES:
|
||||
|
||||
❌ Not updating workflow status file with completion information
|
||||
❌ Missing clear next step guidance for user
|
||||
❌ Not confirming document completeness with user
|
||||
❌ Workflow not properly marked as complete in status tracking
|
||||
❌ User unclear about what happens next
|
||||
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Reading only partial step file - leads to incomplete understanding and poor decisions
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Proceeding with 'C' without fully reading and understanding the next step file
|
||||
❌ **CRITICAL**: Making decisions without complete understanding of step requirements and protocols
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW COMPLETION CHECKLIST:
|
||||
|
||||
### Design Specification Complete:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Executive summary and project understanding
|
||||
- [ ] Core experience and emotional response definition
|
||||
- [ ] UX pattern analysis and inspiration
|
||||
- [ ] Design system choice and strategy
|
||||
- [ ] Core interaction mechanics definition
|
||||
- [ ] Visual design foundation (colors, typography, spacing)
|
||||
- [ ] Design direction decisions and mockups
|
||||
- [ ] User journey flows and interaction design
|
||||
- [ ] Component strategy and specifications
|
||||
- [ ] UX consistency patterns documentation
|
||||
- [ ] Responsive design and accessibility strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Process Complete:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All steps completed with user confirmation
|
||||
- [ ] All content saved to specification document
|
||||
- [ ] Frontmatter properly updated with all steps
|
||||
- [ ] Workflow status file updated with completion
|
||||
- [ ] Next steps clearly communicated
|
||||
|
||||
## NEXT STEPS GUIDANCE:
|
||||
|
||||
**Immediate Options:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Wireframe Generation** - Create low-fidelity layouts based on UX spec
|
||||
2. **Interactive Prototype** - Build clickable prototypes for testing
|
||||
3. **Solution Architecture** - Technical design with UX context
|
||||
4. **Figma Visual Design** - High-fidelity UI implementation
|
||||
5. **Epic Creation** - Break down UX requirements for development
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Sequence:**
|
||||
For design-focused teams: Wireframes → Prototypes → Figma Design → Development
|
||||
For technical teams: Architecture → Epic Creation → Development
|
||||
|
||||
Consider team capacity, timeline, and whether user validation is needed before implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW FINALIZATION:
|
||||
|
||||
- Set `lastStep = 14` in document frontmatter
|
||||
- Update workflow status file with completion timestamp
|
||||
- Provide completion summary to user
|
||||
- Do NOT load any additional steps
|
||||
|
||||
## FINAL REMINDER:
|
||||
|
||||
This UX design workflow is now complete. The specification serves as the foundation for all visual and development work. All design decisions, patterns, and requirements are documented to ensure consistent, accessible, and user-centered implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Congratulations on completing the UX Design Specification for {{project_name}}!** 🎉
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Deliverables:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ UX Design Specification: `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
- ✅ Color Themes Visualizer: `{planning_artifacts}/ux-color-themes.html`
|
||||
- ✅ Design Directions: `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-directions.html`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
stepsCompleted: []
|
||||
inputDocuments: []
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# UX Design Specification {{project_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Author:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- UX design content will be appended sequentially through collaborative workflow steps -->
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||
# Create UX Design Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create comprehensive UX design specifications through collaborative visual exploration and informed decision-making where you act as a UX facilitator working with a product stakeholder.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
|
||||
|
||||
This uses **micro-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
|
||||
|
||||
- Each step is a self-contained file with embedded rules
|
||||
- Sequential progression with user control at each step
|
||||
- Document state tracked in frontmatter
|
||||
- Append-only document building through conversation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## INITIALIZATION
|
||||
|
||||
### Configuration Loading
|
||||
|
||||
Load config from `{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml` and resolve:
|
||||
|
||||
- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
|
||||
- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
|
||||
- `date` as system-generated current datetime
|
||||
|
||||
### Paths
|
||||
|
||||
- `default_output_file` = `{planning_artifacts}/ux-design-specification.md`
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
- Read fully and follow: `./steps/step-01-init.md` to begin the UX design workflow.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-edit-prd
|
||||
description: 'Edit an existing PRD. Use when the user says "edit this PRD".'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step E-1: Discovery & Understanding
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Understand what the user wants to edit in the PRD, detect PRD format/type, check for validation report guidance, and route appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement guidance
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on discovering user intent and PRD format
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make any edits yet
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Inquisitive and analytical, understanding before acting
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a branch step - may route to legacy conversion
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Discover user's edit requirements
|
||||
- 🎯 Auto-detect validation reports in PRD folder (use as guide)
|
||||
- 🎯 Load validation report if provided (use as guide)
|
||||
- 🎯 Detect PRD format (BMAD/legacy)
|
||||
- 🎯 Route appropriately based on format
|
||||
- 💾 Document discoveries for next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without understanding requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file to edit, optional validation report, auto-detected validation reports
|
||||
- Focus: User intent discovery and format detection only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't edit yet, don't validate yet
|
||||
- Dependencies: None - this is first edit step
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Load PRD Purpose Standards
|
||||
|
||||
Load and read the complete file at:
|
||||
`{prdPurpose}` (data/prd-purpose.md)
|
||||
|
||||
This file defines what makes a great BMAD PRD. Internalize this understanding - it will guide improvement recommendations.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Discover PRD to Edit
|
||||
|
||||
"**PRD Edit Workflow**
|
||||
|
||||
Which PRD would you like to edit?
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide the path to the PRD file you want to edit."
|
||||
|
||||
**Wait for user to provide PRD path.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Validate PRD Exists and Load
|
||||
|
||||
Once PRD path is provided:
|
||||
- Check if PRD file exists at specified path
|
||||
- If not found: "I cannot find a PRD at that path. Please check the path and try again."
|
||||
- If found: Load the complete PRD file including frontmatter
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Check for Existing Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Check if validation report exists in the PRD folder:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Look for most recent validation report in the PRD folder
|
||||
ls -t {prd_folder_path}/validation-report-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**If validation report found:**
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
"**📋 Found Validation Report**
|
||||
|
||||
I found a validation report from {validation_date} in the PRD folder.
|
||||
|
||||
This report contains findings from previous validation checks and can help guide our edits to fix known issues.
|
||||
|
||||
**Would you like to:**
|
||||
- **[U] Use validation report** - Load it to guide and prioritize edits
|
||||
- **[S] Skip** - Proceed with manual edit discovery"
|
||||
|
||||
**Wait for user input.**
|
||||
|
||||
**IF U (Use validation report):**
|
||||
- Load the validation report file
|
||||
- Extract findings, issues, and improvement suggestions
|
||||
- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
|
||||
- Continue to step 5
|
||||
|
||||
**IF S (Skip) or no validation report found:**
|
||||
- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
|
||||
- Continue to step 5
|
||||
|
||||
**If no validation report found:**
|
||||
- Note: "No validation report found in PRD folder"
|
||||
- Continue to step 5 without asking user
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Ask About Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
"**Do you have a validation report to guide edits?**
|
||||
|
||||
If you've run the validation workflow on this PRD, I can use that report to guide improvements and prioritize changes.
|
||||
|
||||
Validation report path (or type 'none'):"
|
||||
|
||||
**Wait for user input.**
|
||||
|
||||
**If validation report path provided:**
|
||||
- Load the validation report
|
||||
- Extract findings, severity, improvement suggestions
|
||||
- Note: "Validation report loaded - will use it to guide prioritized improvements"
|
||||
|
||||
**If no validation report:**
|
||||
- Note: "Proceeding with manual edit discovery"
|
||||
- Continue to step 6
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Discover Edit Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
"**What would you like to edit in this PRD?**
|
||||
|
||||
Please describe the changes you want to make. For example:
|
||||
- Fix specific issues (information density, implementation leakage, etc.)
|
||||
- Add missing sections or content
|
||||
- Improve structure and flow
|
||||
- Convert to BMAD format (if legacy PRD)
|
||||
- General improvements
|
||||
- Other changes
|
||||
|
||||
**Describe your edit goals:**"
|
||||
|
||||
**Wait for user to describe their requirements.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Detect PRD Format
|
||||
|
||||
Analyze the loaded PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract all ## Level 2 headers** from PRD
|
||||
|
||||
**Check for BMAD PRD core sections:**
|
||||
1. Executive Summary
|
||||
2. Success Criteria
|
||||
3. Product Scope
|
||||
4. User Journeys
|
||||
5. Functional Requirements
|
||||
6. Non-Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Classify format:**
|
||||
- **BMAD Standard:** 5-6 core sections present
|
||||
- **BMAD Variant:** 3-4 core sections present, generally follows BMAD patterns
|
||||
- **Legacy (Non-Standard):** Fewer than 3 core sections, does not follow BMAD structure
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Route Based on Format and Context
|
||||
|
||||
**IF validation report provided OR PRD is BMAD Standard/Variant:**
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Edit Requirements Understood**
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD Format:** {classification}
|
||||
{If validation report: "**Validation Guide:** Yes - will use validation report findings"}
|
||||
**Edit Goals:** {summary of user's requirements}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to deep review and analysis...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Read fully and follow: `./step-e-02-review.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**IF PRD is Legacy (Non-Standard) AND no validation report:**
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Format Detected:** Legacy PRD
|
||||
|
||||
This PRD does not follow BMAD standard structure (only {count}/6 core sections present).
|
||||
|
||||
**Your edit goals:** {user's requirements}
|
||||
|
||||
**How would you like to proceed?**"
|
||||
|
||||
Present MENU OPTIONS below for user selection
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Present MENU OPTIONS (Legacy PRDs Only)
|
||||
|
||||
**[C] Convert to BMAD Format** - Convert PRD to BMAD standard structure, then apply your edits
|
||||
**[E] Edit As-Is** - Apply your edits without converting the format
|
||||
**[X] Exit** - Exit and review conversion options
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed based on user selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF C (Convert): Read fully and follow: `./step-e-01b-legacy-conversion.md`
|
||||
- IF E (Edit As-Is): Display "Proceeding with edits..." then load next step
|
||||
- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
|
||||
- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- User's edit requirements clearly understood
|
||||
- Auto-detected validation reports loaded and analyzed (when found)
|
||||
- Manual validation report loaded and analyzed (if provided)
|
||||
- PRD format detected correctly
|
||||
- BMAD PRDs proceed directly to review step
|
||||
- Legacy PRDs pause and present conversion options
|
||||
- User can choose conversion path or edit as-is
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not discovering user's edit requirements
|
||||
- Not auto-detecting validation reports in PRD folder
|
||||
- Not loading validation report when provided (auto or manual)
|
||||
- Missing format detection
|
||||
- Not pausing for legacy PRDs without guidance
|
||||
- Auto-proceeding without understanding intent
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Understand before editing. Detect format early so we can guide users appropriately. Auto-detect and use validation reports for prioritized improvements.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step E-1B: Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standards, identify gaps, propose conversion strategy, and let user choose how to proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring BMAD standards expertise and conversion guidance
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and edit requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on conversion assessment and proposal
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform conversion yet (that comes in edit step)
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Analytical gap analysis with clear recommendations
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a branch step - user chooses conversion path
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Analyze legacy PRD against BMAD standard
|
||||
- 💾 Identify gaps and estimate conversion effort
|
||||
- 📖 Present conversion options with effort estimates
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Legacy PRD, user's edit requirements, prd-purpose standards
|
||||
- Focus: Conversion assessment only (not actual conversion)
|
||||
- Limits: Don't convert yet, don't validate yet
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step e-01 detected legacy format and routed here
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform legacy PRD conversion assessment:
|
||||
|
||||
**Load the PRD and prd-purpose.md**
|
||||
|
||||
**For each BMAD PRD section, analyze:**
|
||||
1. Does PRD have this section? (Executive Summary, Success Criteria, Product Scope, User Journeys, Functional Requirements, Non-Functional Requirements)
|
||||
2. If present: Is it complete and well-structured?
|
||||
3. If missing: What content exists that could migrate to this section?
|
||||
4. Effort to create/complete: Minimal / Moderate / Significant
|
||||
|
||||
**Identify:**
|
||||
- Core sections present: {count}/6
|
||||
- Content gaps in each section
|
||||
- Overall conversion effort: Quick / Moderate / Substantial
|
||||
- Recommended approach: Full restructuring vs targeted improvements
|
||||
|
||||
Return conversion assessment with gap analysis and effort estimate."
|
||||
|
||||
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
|
||||
- Manually check PRD for each BMAD section
|
||||
- Note what's present and what's missing
|
||||
- Estimate conversion effort
|
||||
- Identify best conversion approach
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Build Gap Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**For each BMAD core section:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Executive Summary:**
|
||||
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
|
||||
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
|
||||
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Product Scope:**
|
||||
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
|
||||
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**User Journeys:**
|
||||
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
|
||||
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
|
||||
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
- Present: [Yes/No/Partial]
|
||||
- Gap: [what's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Assessment:**
|
||||
- Sections Present: {count}/6
|
||||
- Total Conversion Effort: [Quick/Moderate/Substantial]
|
||||
- Recommended: [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements]
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Present Conversion Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
|
||||
"**Legacy PRD Conversion Assessment**
|
||||
|
||||
**Current PRD Structure:**
|
||||
- Core sections present: {count}/6
|
||||
{List which sections are present/missing}
|
||||
|
||||
**Gap Analysis:**
|
||||
|
||||
{Present gap analysis table showing each section's status and effort}
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Conversion Effort:** {effort level}
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Edit Goals:**
|
||||
{Reiterate user's stated edit requirements}
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
{Based on effort and user goals, recommend best approach}
|
||||
|
||||
**How would you like to proceed?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**[R] Restructure to BMAD** - Full conversion to BMAD format, then apply your edits
|
||||
**[I] Targeted Improvements** - Apply your edits to existing structure without restructuring
|
||||
**[E] Edit & Restructure** - Do both: convert format AND apply your edits
|
||||
**[X] Exit** - Review assessment and decide
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed based on user selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF R (Restructure): Note conversion mode, then load next step
|
||||
- IF I (Targeted): Note targeted mode, then load next step
|
||||
- IF E (Edit & Restructure): Note both mode, then load next step
|
||||
- IF X (Exit): Display summary, exit
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Document Conversion Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Store conversion decision for next step:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conversion mode:** [Full restructuring / Targeted improvements / Both]
|
||||
- **Edit requirements:** [user's requirements from step e-01]
|
||||
- **Gap analysis:** [summary of gaps identified]
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Conversion Strategy Documented**
|
||||
|
||||
Mode: {conversion mode}
|
||||
Edit goals: {summary}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to deep review...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Read fully and follow: `./step-e-02-review.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All 6 BMAD core sections analyzed for gaps
|
||||
- Effort estimates provided for each section
|
||||
- Overall conversion effort assessed correctly
|
||||
- Clear recommendation provided based on effort and user goals
|
||||
- User chooses conversion strategy (restructure/targeted/both)
|
||||
- Conversion strategy documented for next step
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not analyzing all 6 core sections
|
||||
- Missing effort estimates
|
||||
- Not providing clear recommendation
|
||||
- Auto-proceeding without user selection
|
||||
- Not documenting conversion strategy
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Legacy PRDs need conversion assessment so users understand the work involved and can choose the best approach.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReport: '{validation_report_path}' # If provided
|
||||
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step E-2: Deep Review & Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Thoroughly review the existing PRD, analyze validation report findings (if provided), and prepare a detailed change plan before editing.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and improvement planning
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on review and analysis, not editing yet
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes to PRD in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Thorough analysis with user confirmation on plan
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a middle step - user confirms plan before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Load and analyze validation report (if provided)
|
||||
- 🎯 Deep review of entire PRD
|
||||
- 🎯 Map validation findings to specific sections
|
||||
- 🎯 Prepare detailed change plan
|
||||
- 💬 Get user confirmation on plan
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed to edit without user approval
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, validation report (if provided), user requirements from step e-01
|
||||
- Focus: Analysis and planning only (no editing)
|
||||
- Limits: Don't change PRD yet, don't validate yet
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step e-01 completed - requirements and format known
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Deep Review
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform deep PRD review and change planning:
|
||||
|
||||
**Context from step e-01:**
|
||||
- User's edit requirements: {user_requirements}
|
||||
- PRD format: {BMAD/legacy}
|
||||
- Validation report provided: {yes/no}
|
||||
- Conversion mode: {restructure/targeted/both} (if legacy)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF validation report provided:**
|
||||
1. Extract all findings from validation report
|
||||
2. Map findings to specific PRD sections
|
||||
3. Prioritize by severity: Critical > Warning > Informational
|
||||
4. For each critical issue: identify specific fix needed
|
||||
5. For user's manual edit goals: identify where in PRD to apply
|
||||
|
||||
**IF no validation report:**
|
||||
1. Read entire PRD thoroughly
|
||||
2. Analyze against BMAD standards (from prd-purpose.md)
|
||||
3. Identify issues in:
|
||||
- Information density (anti-patterns)
|
||||
- Structure and flow
|
||||
- Completeness (missing sections/content)
|
||||
- Measurability (unmeasurable requirements)
|
||||
- Traceability (broken chains)
|
||||
- Implementation leakage
|
||||
4. Map user's edit goals to specific sections
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:**
|
||||
- Section-by-section analysis
|
||||
- Specific changes needed for each section
|
||||
- Prioritized action list
|
||||
- Recommended order for applying changes
|
||||
|
||||
Return detailed change plan with section breakdown."
|
||||
|
||||
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
|
||||
- Manually read PRD sections
|
||||
- Manually analyze validation report findings (if provided)
|
||||
- Build section-by-section change plan
|
||||
- Prioritize changes by severity/user goals
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Build Change Plan
|
||||
|
||||
**Organize by PRD section:**
|
||||
|
||||
**For each section (in order):**
|
||||
- **Current State:** Brief description of what exists
|
||||
- **Issues Identified:** [List from validation report or manual analysis]
|
||||
- **Changes Needed:** [Specific changes required]
|
||||
- **Priority:** [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
|
||||
- **User Requirements Met:** [Which user edit goals address this section]
|
||||
|
||||
**Include:**
|
||||
- Sections to add (if missing)
|
||||
- Sections to update (if present but needs work)
|
||||
- Content to remove (if incorrect/leakage)
|
||||
- Structure changes (if reformatting needed)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Prepare Change Plan Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Summary sections:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes by Type:**
|
||||
- **Additions:** {count} sections to add
|
||||
- **Updates:** {count} sections to update
|
||||
- **Removals:** {count} items to remove
|
||||
- **Restructuring:** {yes/no} if format conversion needed
|
||||
|
||||
**Priority Distribution:**
|
||||
- **Critical:** {count} changes (must fix)
|
||||
- **High:** {count} changes (important)
|
||||
- **Medium:** {count} changes (nice to have)
|
||||
- **Low:** {count} changes (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
**Estimated Effort:**
|
||||
[Quick/Moderate/Substantial] based on scope and complexity
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present Change Plan to User
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
|
||||
"**Deep Review Complete - Change Plan**
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD Analysis:**
|
||||
{Brief summary of PRD current state}
|
||||
|
||||
{If validation report provided:}
|
||||
**Validation Findings:**
|
||||
{count} issues identified: {critical} critical, {warning} warnings
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Edit Requirements:**
|
||||
{summary of what user wants to edit}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proposed Change Plan:**
|
||||
|
||||
**By Section:**
|
||||
{Present section-by-section breakdown}
|
||||
|
||||
**By Priority:**
|
||||
- Critical: {count} items
|
||||
- High: {count} items
|
||||
- Medium: {count} items
|
||||
|
||||
**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
|
||||
|
||||
**Questions:**
|
||||
1. Does this change plan align with what you had in mind?
|
||||
2. Any sections I should add/remove/reprioritize?
|
||||
3. Any concerns before I proceed with edits?
|
||||
|
||||
**Review the plan and let me know if you'd like any adjustments.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Get User Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
Wait for user to review and provide feedback.
|
||||
|
||||
**If user wants adjustments:**
|
||||
- Discuss requested changes
|
||||
- Revise change plan accordingly
|
||||
- Represent for confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
**If user approves:**
|
||||
- Note: "Change plan approved. Proceeding to edit step."
|
||||
- Continue to step 6
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Document Approved Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Store approved change plan for next step:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
|
||||
- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
|
||||
- **User confirmed:** Yes
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Change Plan Approved**
|
||||
|
||||
{Brief summary of approved plan}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to edit step...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Read fully and follow: `./step-e-03-edit.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Present MENU OPTIONS (If User Wants Discussion)
|
||||
|
||||
**[A] Advanced Elicitation** - Get additional perspectives on change plan
|
||||
**[P] Party Mode** - Discuss with team for more ideas
|
||||
**[C] Continue to Edit** - Proceed with approved plan
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed to edit when user selects 'C'
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill, then return to discussion
|
||||
- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill, then return to discussion
|
||||
- IF C: Document approval, then load step-e-03-edit.md
|
||||
- IF Any other: discuss, then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Validation report findings fully analyzed (if provided)
|
||||
- Deep PRD review completed systematically
|
||||
- Change plan built section-by-section
|
||||
- Changes prioritized by severity/user goals
|
||||
- User presented with clear plan
|
||||
- User confirms or adjusts plan
|
||||
- Approved plan documented for next step
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not analyzing validation report findings (if provided)
|
||||
- Superficial review instead of deep analysis
|
||||
- Missing section-by-section breakdown
|
||||
- Not prioritizing changes
|
||||
- Proceeding without user approval
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Plan before editing. Thorough analysis ensures we make the right changes in the right order. User approval prevents misalignment.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
prdPurpose: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/data/prd-purpose.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step E-3: Edit & Update
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Apply changes to the PRD following the approved change plan from step e-02, including content updates, structure improvements, and format conversion if needed.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 ALWAYS generate content WITH user input/approval
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical expertise and precise editing skills
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and approval authority
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on implementing approved changes from step e-02
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make changes beyond the approved plan
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Methodical, section-by-section execution
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a middle step - user can request adjustments
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Follow approved change plan systematically
|
||||
- 💾 Edit PRD content according to plan
|
||||
- 📖 Update frontmatter as needed
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without completion
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, approved change plan from step e-02, prd-purpose standards
|
||||
- Focus: Implementing changes from approved plan only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't add changes beyond plan, don't validate yet
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step e-02 completed - plan approved by user
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Retrieve Approved Change Plan
|
||||
|
||||
From step e-02, retrieve:
|
||||
- **Approved changes:** Section-by-section list
|
||||
- **Priority order:** Sequence to apply changes
|
||||
- **User requirements:** Edit goals from step e-01
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Starting PRD Edits**
|
||||
|
||||
**Change Plan:** {summary}
|
||||
**Total Changes:** {count}
|
||||
**Estimated Effort:** {effort level}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding with edits section by section...**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Attempt Sub-Process Edits (For Complex Changes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool with sub-agent for major sections:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Execute PRD edits for {section_name}:
|
||||
|
||||
**Context:**
|
||||
- Section to edit: {section_name}
|
||||
- Current content: {existing content}
|
||||
- Changes needed: {specific changes from plan}
|
||||
- BMAD PRD standards: Load from prd-purpose.md
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
1. Read current PRD section
|
||||
2. Apply specified changes
|
||||
3. Ensure BMAD PRD principles compliance:
|
||||
- High information density (no filler)
|
||||
- Measurable requirements
|
||||
- Clear structure
|
||||
- Proper markdown formatting
|
||||
4. Return updated section content
|
||||
|
||||
Apply changes and return updated section."
|
||||
|
||||
**Graceful degradation (if no Task tool):**
|
||||
- Perform edits directly in current context
|
||||
- Load PRD section, apply changes, save
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Execute Changes Section-by-Section
|
||||
|
||||
**For each section in approved plan (in priority order):**
|
||||
|
||||
**a) Load current section**
|
||||
- Read the current PRD section content
|
||||
- Note what exists
|
||||
|
||||
**b) Apply changes per plan**
|
||||
- Additions: Create new sections with proper content
|
||||
- Updates: Modify existing content per plan
|
||||
- Removals: Remove specified content
|
||||
- Restructuring: Reformat content to BMAD standard
|
||||
|
||||
**c) Update PRD file**
|
||||
- Apply changes to PRD
|
||||
- Save updated PRD
|
||||
- Verify changes applied correctly
|
||||
|
||||
**Display progress after each section:**
|
||||
"**Section Updated:** {section_name}
|
||||
Changes: {brief summary}
|
||||
{More sections remaining...}"
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Handle Restructuring (If Needed)
|
||||
|
||||
**If conversion mode is "Full restructuring" or "Both":**
|
||||
|
||||
**For restructuring:**
|
||||
- Reorganize PRD to BMAD standard structure
|
||||
- Ensure proper ## Level 2 headers
|
||||
- Reorder sections logically
|
||||
- Update PRD frontmatter to match BMAD format
|
||||
|
||||
**Follow BMAD PRD structure:**
|
||||
1. Executive Summary
|
||||
2. Success Criteria
|
||||
3. Product Scope
|
||||
4. User Journeys
|
||||
5. Domain Requirements (if applicable)
|
||||
6. Innovation Analysis (if applicable)
|
||||
7. Project-Type Requirements
|
||||
8. Functional Requirements
|
||||
9. Non-Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**PRD Restructured**
|
||||
BMAD standard structure applied.
|
||||
{Sections added/reordered}"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Update PRD Frontmatter
|
||||
|
||||
**Ensure frontmatter is complete and accurate:**
|
||||
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
workflowType: 'prd'
|
||||
workflow: 'create' # or 'validate' or 'edit'
|
||||
classification:
|
||||
domain: '{domain}'
|
||||
projectType: '{project_type}'
|
||||
complexity: '{complexity}'
|
||||
inputDocuments: [list of input documents]
|
||||
stepsCompleted: ['step-e-01-discovery', 'step-e-02-review', 'step-e-03-edit']
|
||||
lastEdited: '{current_date}'
|
||||
editHistory:
|
||||
- date: '{current_date}'
|
||||
changes: '{summary of changes}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Update frontmatter accordingly.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Final Review of Changes
|
||||
|
||||
**Load complete updated PRD**
|
||||
|
||||
**Verify:**
|
||||
- All approved changes applied correctly
|
||||
- PRD structure is sound
|
||||
- No unintended modifications
|
||||
- Frontmatter is accurate
|
||||
|
||||
**If issues found:**
|
||||
- Fix them now
|
||||
- Note corrections made
|
||||
|
||||
**If user wants adjustments:**
|
||||
- Accept feedback and make adjustments
|
||||
- Re-verify after adjustments
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Confirm Completion
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
|
||||
"**PRD Edits Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes Applied:** {count} sections modified
|
||||
**PRD Updated:** {prd_file_path}
|
||||
|
||||
**Summary of Changes:**
|
||||
{Brief bullet list of major changes}
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD is ready for:**
|
||||
- Use in downstream workflows (UX, Architecture)
|
||||
- Validation (if not yet validated)
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do next?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**[V] Run Validation** - Execute full validation workflow (./steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
|
||||
**[S] Summary Only** - End with summary of changes (no validation)
|
||||
**[A] Adjust** - Make additional edits
|
||||
**[X] Exit** - Exit edit workflow
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed based on user selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF V (Validate): Display "Starting validation workflow..." then read fully and follow: `./steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md`
|
||||
- IF S (Summary): Present edit summary and exit
|
||||
- IF A (Adjust): Accept additional requirements, loop back to editing
|
||||
- IF X (Exit): Display summary and exit
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All approved changes from step e-02 applied correctly
|
||||
- Changes executed in planned priority order
|
||||
- Restructuring completed (if needed)
|
||||
- Frontmatter updated accurately
|
||||
- Final verification confirms changes
|
||||
- User can proceed to validation or exit with summary
|
||||
- Option to run validation seamlessly integrates edit and validate modes
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Making changes beyond approved plan
|
||||
- Not following priority order
|
||||
- Missing restructuring (if conversion mode)
|
||||
- Not updating frontmatter
|
||||
- No final verification
|
||||
- Not saving updated PRD
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Execute the plan exactly as approved. PRD is now ready for validation or downstream use. Validation integration ensures quality.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step E-4: Complete & Validate
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Present summary of completed edits and offer next steps including seamless integration with validation workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 ALWAYS generate content WITH user input/approval
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and PRD Improvement Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring synthesis and summary expertise
|
||||
- ✅ User chooses next actions
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on presenting summary and options
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to make additional changes
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Clear, concise summary with actionable options
|
||||
- 🚪 This is the final edit step - no more edits
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Compile summary of all changes made
|
||||
- 🎯 Present options clearly with expected outcomes
|
||||
- 📖 Route to validation if user chooses
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Updated PRD file, edit history from step e-03
|
||||
- Focus: Summary and options only (no more editing)
|
||||
- Limits: Don't make changes, just present options
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step e-03 completed - all edits applied
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Compile Edit Summary
|
||||
|
||||
From step e-03 change execution, compile:
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes Made:**
|
||||
- Sections added: {list with names}
|
||||
- Sections updated: {list with names}
|
||||
- Content removed: {list}
|
||||
- Structure changes: {description}
|
||||
|
||||
**Edit Details:**
|
||||
- Total sections affected: {count}
|
||||
- Mode: {restructure/targeted/both}
|
||||
- Priority addressed: {Critical/High/Medium/Low}
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD Status:**
|
||||
- Format: {BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Legacy (converted)}
|
||||
- Completeness: {assessment}
|
||||
- Ready for: {downstream use cases}
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Present Completion Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
|
||||
"**✓ PRD Edit Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
**Updated PRD:** {prd_file_path}
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes Summary:**
|
||||
{Present bulleted list of major changes}
|
||||
|
||||
**Edit Mode:** {mode}
|
||||
**Sections Modified:** {count}
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD Format:** {format}
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD is now ready for:**
|
||||
- Downstream workflows (UX Design, Architecture)
|
||||
- Validation to ensure quality
|
||||
- Production use
|
||||
|
||||
**What would you like to do next?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
|
||||
**[V] Run Full Validation** - Execute complete validation workflow (steps-v) to verify PRD quality
|
||||
**[E] Edit More** - Make additional edits to the PRD
|
||||
**[S] Summary** - End with detailed summary of changes
|
||||
**[X] Exit** - Exit edit workflow
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed based on user selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- **IF V (Run Full Validation):**
|
||||
- Display: "**Starting Validation Workflow**"
|
||||
- Display: "This will run all 13 validation checks on the updated PRD."
|
||||
- Display: "Preparing to validate: {prd_file_path}"
|
||||
- Display: "**Proceeding to validation...**"
|
||||
- Read fully and follow: {validationWorkflow} (steps-v/step-v-01-discovery.md)
|
||||
- Note: This hands off to the validation workflow which will run its complete 13-step process
|
||||
|
||||
- **IF E (Edit More):**
|
||||
- Display: "**Additional Edits**"
|
||||
- Ask: "What additional edits would you like to make?"
|
||||
- Accept input, then display: "**Returning to edit step...**"
|
||||
- Read fully and follow: `./step-e-03-edit.md` again
|
||||
|
||||
- **IF S (Summary):**
|
||||
- Display detailed summary including:
|
||||
- Complete list of all changes made
|
||||
- Before/after comparison (key improvements)
|
||||
- Recommendations for next steps
|
||||
- Display: "**Edit Workflow Complete**"
|
||||
- Exit
|
||||
|
||||
- **IF X (Exit):**
|
||||
- Display summary
|
||||
- Display: "**Edit Workflow Complete**"
|
||||
- Exit
|
||||
|
||||
- **IF Any other:** Help user, then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Complete edit summary compiled accurately
|
||||
- All changes clearly documented
|
||||
- Options presented with clear expectations
|
||||
- Validation option seamlessly integrates with steps-v workflow
|
||||
- User can validate, edit more, or exit
|
||||
- Clean handoff to validation workflow (if chosen)
|
||||
- Edit workflow completes properly
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Missing changes in summary
|
||||
- Not offering validation option
|
||||
- Not documenting completion properly
|
||||
- No clear handoff to validation workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Edit workflow seamlessly integrates with validation. User can edit → validate → edit again → validate again in iterative improvement cycle.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
main_config: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# PRD Edit Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Edit and improve existing PRDs through structured enhancement workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
**Your Role:** PRD improvement specialist.
|
||||
|
||||
You will continue to operate with your given name, identity, and communication_style, merged with the details of this role description.
|
||||
|
||||
## WORKFLOW ARCHITECTURE
|
||||
|
||||
This uses **step-file architecture** for disciplined execution:
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
- **Micro-file Design**: Each step is a self contained instruction file that is a part of an overall workflow that must be followed exactly
|
||||
- **Just-In-Time Loading**: Only the current step file is in memory - never load future step files until told to do so
|
||||
- **Sequential Enforcement**: Sequence within the step files must be completed in order, no skipping or optimization allowed
|
||||
- **State Tracking**: Document progress in output file frontmatter using `stepsCompleted` array when a workflow produces a document
|
||||
- **Append-Only Building**: Build documents by appending content as directed to the output file
|
||||
|
||||
### Step Processing Rules
|
||||
|
||||
1. **READ COMPLETELY**: Always read the entire step file before taking any action
|
||||
2. **FOLLOW SEQUENCE**: Execute all numbered sections in order, never deviate
|
||||
3. **WAIT FOR INPUT**: If a menu is presented, halt and wait for user selection
|
||||
4. **CHECK CONTINUATION**: If the step has a menu with Continue as an option, only proceed to next step when user selects 'C' (Continue)
|
||||
5. **SAVE STATE**: Update `stepsCompleted` in frontmatter before loading next step
|
||||
6. **LOAD NEXT**: When directed, read fully and follow the next step file
|
||||
|
||||
### Critical Rules (NO EXCEPTIONS)
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 **NEVER** load multiple step files simultaneously
|
||||
- 📖 **ALWAYS** read entire step file before execution
|
||||
- 🚫 **NEVER** skip steps or optimize the sequence
|
||||
- 💾 **ALWAYS** update frontmatter of output files when writing the final output for a specific step
|
||||
- 🎯 **ALWAYS** follow the exact instructions in the step file
|
||||
- ⏸️ **ALWAYS** halt at menus and wait for user input
|
||||
- 📋 **NEVER** create mental todo lists from future steps
|
||||
|
||||
## INITIALIZATION SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Configuration Loading
|
||||
|
||||
Load and read full config from {main_config} and resolve:
|
||||
|
||||
- `project_name`, `output_folder`, `planning_artifacts`, `user_name`
|
||||
- `communication_language`, `document_output_language`, `user_skill_level`
|
||||
- `date` as system-generated current datetime
|
||||
|
||||
✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the configured `{communication_language}`.
|
||||
✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS WRITE all artifact and document content in `{document_output_language}`.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Route to Edit Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
"**Edit Mode: Improving an existing PRD.**"
|
||||
|
||||
Prompt for PRD path: "Which PRD would you like to edit? Please provide the path to the PRD.md file."
|
||||
|
||||
Then read fully and follow: `./steps-e/step-e-01-discovery.md`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: bmad-validate-prd
|
||||
description: 'Validate a PRD against standards. Use when the user says "validate this PRD" or "run PRD validation"'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Follow the instructions in ./workflow.md.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
||||
type: skill
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
|
||||
domain,signals,complexity,key_concerns,required_knowledge,suggested_workflow,web_searches,special_sections
|
||||
healthcare,"medical,diagnostic,clinical,FDA,patient,treatment,HIPAA,therapy,pharma,drug",high,"FDA approval;Clinical validation;HIPAA compliance;Patient safety;Medical device classification;Liability","Regulatory pathways;Clinical trial design;Medical standards;Data privacy;Integration requirements","domain-research","FDA software medical device guidance {date};HIPAA compliance software requirements;Medical software standards {date};Clinical validation software","clinical_requirements;regulatory_pathway;validation_methodology;safety_measures"
|
||||
fintech,"payment,banking,trading,investment,crypto,wallet,transaction,KYC,AML,funds,fintech",high,"Regional compliance;Security standards;Audit requirements;Fraud prevention;Data protection","KYC/AML requirements;PCI DSS;Open banking;Regional laws (US/EU/APAC);Crypto regulations","domain-research","fintech regulations {date};payment processing compliance {date};open banking API standards;cryptocurrency regulations {date}","compliance_matrix;security_architecture;audit_requirements;fraud_prevention"
|
||||
govtech,"government,federal,civic,public sector,citizen,municipal,voting",high,"Procurement rules;Security clearance;Accessibility (508);FedRAMP;Privacy;Transparency","Government procurement;Security frameworks;Accessibility standards;Privacy laws;Open data requirements","domain-research","government software procurement {date};FedRAMP compliance requirements;section 508 accessibility;government security standards","procurement_compliance;security_clearance;accessibility_standards;transparency_requirements"
|
||||
edtech,"education,learning,student,teacher,curriculum,assessment,K-12,university,LMS",medium,"Student privacy (COPPA/FERPA);Accessibility;Content moderation;Age verification;Curriculum standards","Educational privacy laws;Learning standards;Accessibility requirements;Content guidelines;Assessment validity","domain-research","educational software privacy {date};COPPA FERPA compliance;WCAG education requirements;learning management standards","privacy_compliance;content_guidelines;accessibility_features;curriculum_alignment"
|
||||
aerospace,"aircraft,spacecraft,aviation,drone,satellite,propulsion,flight,radar,navigation",high,"Safety certification;DO-178C compliance;Performance validation;Simulation accuracy;Export controls","Aviation standards;Safety analysis;Simulation validation;ITAR/export controls;Performance requirements","domain-research + technical-model","DO-178C software certification;aerospace simulation standards {date};ITAR export controls software;aviation safety requirements","safety_certification;simulation_validation;performance_requirements;export_compliance"
|
||||
automotive,"vehicle,car,autonomous,ADAS,automotive,driving,EV,charging",high,"Safety standards;ISO 26262;V2X communication;Real-time requirements;Certification","Automotive standards;Functional safety;V2X protocols;Real-time systems;Testing requirements","domain-research","ISO 26262 automotive software;automotive safety standards {date};V2X communication protocols;EV charging standards","safety_standards;functional_safety;communication_protocols;certification_requirements"
|
||||
scientific,"research,algorithm,simulation,modeling,computational,analysis,data science,ML,AI",medium,"Reproducibility;Validation methodology;Peer review;Performance;Accuracy;Computational resources","Scientific method;Statistical validity;Computational requirements;Domain expertise;Publication standards","technical-model","scientific computing best practices {date};research reproducibility standards;computational modeling validation;peer review software","validation_methodology;accuracy_metrics;reproducibility_plan;computational_requirements"
|
||||
legaltech,"legal,law,contract,compliance,litigation,patent,attorney,court",high,"Legal ethics;Bar regulations;Data retention;Attorney-client privilege;Court system integration","Legal practice rules;Ethics requirements;Court filing systems;Document standards;Confidentiality","domain-research","legal technology ethics {date};law practice management software requirements;court filing system standards;attorney client privilege technology","ethics_compliance;data_retention;confidentiality_measures;court_integration"
|
||||
insuretech,"insurance,claims,underwriting,actuarial,policy,risk,premium",high,"Insurance regulations;Actuarial standards;Data privacy;Fraud detection;State compliance","Insurance regulations by state;Actuarial methods;Risk modeling;Claims processing;Regulatory reporting","domain-research","insurance software regulations {date};actuarial standards software;insurance fraud detection;state insurance compliance","regulatory_requirements;risk_modeling;fraud_detection;reporting_compliance"
|
||||
energy,"energy,utility,grid,solar,wind,power,electricity,oil,gas",high,"Grid compliance;NERC standards;Environmental regulations;Safety requirements;Real-time operations","Energy regulations;Grid standards;Environmental compliance;Safety protocols;SCADA systems","domain-research","energy sector software compliance {date};NERC CIP standards;smart grid requirements;renewable energy software standards","grid_compliance;safety_protocols;environmental_compliance;operational_requirements"
|
||||
process_control,"industrial automation,process control,PLC,SCADA,DCS,HMI,operational technology,OT,control system,cyberphysical,MES,historian,instrumentation,I&C,P&ID",high,"Functional safety;OT cybersecurity;Real-time control requirements;Legacy system integration;Process safety and hazard analysis;Environmental compliance and permitting;Engineering authority and PE requirements","Functional safety standards;OT security frameworks;Industrial protocols;Process control architecture;Plant reliability and maintainability","domain-research + technical-model","IEC 62443 OT cybersecurity requirements {date};functional safety software requirements {date};industrial process control architecture;ISA-95 manufacturing integration","functional_safety;ot_security;process_requirements;engineering_authority"
|
||||
building_automation,"building automation,BAS,BMS,HVAC,smart building,lighting control,fire alarm,fire protection,fire suppression,life safety,elevator,access control,DDC,energy management,sequence of operations,commissioning",high,"Life safety codes;Building energy standards;Multi-trade coordination and interoperability;Commissioning and ongoing operational performance;Indoor environmental quality and occupant comfort;Engineering authority and PE requirements","Building automation protocols;HVAC and mechanical controls;Fire alarm, fire protection, and life safety design;Commissioning process and sequence of operations;Building codes and energy standards","domain-research","smart building software architecture {date};BACnet integration best practices;building automation cybersecurity {date};ASHRAE building standards","life_safety;energy_compliance;commissioning_requirements;engineering_authority"
|
||||
gaming,"game,player,gameplay,level,character,multiplayer,quest",redirect,"REDIRECT TO GAME WORKFLOWS","Game design","game-brief","NA","NA"
|
||||
general,"",low,"Standard requirements;Basic security;User experience;Performance","General software practices","continue","software development best practices {date}","standard_requirements"
|
||||
|
@@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
|
||||
# BMAD PRD Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
**The PRD is the top of the required funnel that feeds all subsequent product development work in rhw BMad Method.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What is a BMAD PRD?
|
||||
|
||||
A dual-audience document serving:
|
||||
1. **Human Product Managers and builders** - Vision, strategy, stakeholder communication
|
||||
2. **LLM Downstream Consumption** - UX Design → Architecture → Epics → Development AI Agents
|
||||
|
||||
Each successive document becomes more AI-tailored and granular.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Philosophy: Information Density
|
||||
|
||||
**High Signal-to-Noise Ratio**
|
||||
|
||||
Every sentence must carry information weight. LLMs consume precise, dense content efficiently.
|
||||
|
||||
**Anti-Patterns (Eliminate These):**
|
||||
- ❌ "The system will allow users to..." → ✅ "Users can..."
|
||||
- ❌ "It is important to note that..." → ✅ State the fact directly
|
||||
- ❌ "In order to..." → ✅ "To..."
|
||||
- ❌ Conversational filler and padding → ✅ Direct, concise statements
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Maximum information per word. Zero fluff.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The Traceability Chain
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD starts the chain:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Vision → Success Criteria → User Journeys → Functional Requirements → (future: User Stories)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**In the PRD, establish:**
|
||||
- Vision → Success Criteria alignment
|
||||
- Success Criteria → User Journey coverage
|
||||
- User Journey → Functional Requirement mapping
|
||||
- All requirements traceable to user needs
|
||||
|
||||
**Why:** Each downstream artifact (UX, Architecture, Epics, Stories) must trace back to documented user needs and business objectives. This chain ensures we build the right thing.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What Makes Great Functional Requirements?
|
||||
|
||||
### FRs are Capabilities, Not Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
**Good FR:** "Users can reset their password via email link"
|
||||
**Bad FR:** "System sends JWT via email and validates with database" (implementation leakage)
|
||||
|
||||
**Good FR:** "Dashboard loads in under 2 seconds for 95th percentile"
|
||||
**Bad FR:** "Fast loading time" (subjective, unmeasurable)
|
||||
|
||||
### SMART Quality Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Specific:** Clear, precisely defined capability
|
||||
**Measurable:** Quantifiable with test criteria
|
||||
**Attainable:** Realistic within constraints
|
||||
**Relevant:** Aligns with business objectives
|
||||
**Traceable:** Links to source (executive summary or user journey)
|
||||
|
||||
### FR Anti-Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Subjective Adjectives:**
|
||||
- ❌ "easy to use", "intuitive", "user-friendly", "fast", "responsive"
|
||||
- ✅ Use metrics: "completes task in under 3 clicks", "loads in under 2 seconds"
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Leakage:**
|
||||
- ❌ Technology names, specific libraries, implementation details
|
||||
- ✅ Focus on capability and measurable outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
**Vague Quantifiers:**
|
||||
- ❌ "multiple users", "several options", "various formats"
|
||||
- ✅ "up to 100 concurrent users", "3-5 options", "PDF, DOCX, TXT formats"
|
||||
|
||||
**Missing Test Criteria:**
|
||||
- ❌ "The system shall provide notifications"
|
||||
- ✅ "The system shall send email notifications within 30 seconds of trigger event"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What Makes Great Non-Functional Requirements?
|
||||
|
||||
### NFRs Must Be Measurable
|
||||
|
||||
**Template:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
"The system shall [metric] [condition] [measurement method]"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Examples:**
|
||||
- ✅ "The system shall respond to API requests in under 200ms for 95th percentile as measured by APM monitoring"
|
||||
- ✅ "The system shall maintain 99.9% uptime during business hours as measured by cloud provider SLA"
|
||||
- ✅ "The system shall support 10,000 concurrent users as measured by load testing"
|
||||
|
||||
### NFR Anti-Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
**Unmeasurable Claims:**
|
||||
- ❌ "The system shall be scalable" → ✅ "The system shall handle 10x load growth through horizontal scaling"
|
||||
- ❌ "High availability required" → ✅ "99.9% uptime as measured by cloud provider SLA"
|
||||
|
||||
**Missing Context:**
|
||||
- ❌ "Response time under 1 second" → ✅ "API response time under 1 second for 95th percentile under normal load"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Domain-Specific Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Auto-Detect and Enforce Based on Project Context**
|
||||
|
||||
Certain industries have mandatory requirements that must be present:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Healthcare:** HIPAA Privacy & Security Rules, PHI encryption, audit logging, MFA
|
||||
- **Fintech:** PCI-DSS Level 1, AML/KYC compliance, SOX controls, financial audit trails
|
||||
- **GovTech:** NIST framework, Section 508 accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA), FedRAMP, data residency
|
||||
- **E-Commerce:** PCI-DSS for payments, inventory accuracy, tax calculation by jurisdiction
|
||||
|
||||
**Why:** Missing these requirements in the PRD means they'll be missed in architecture and implementation, creating expensive rework. During PRD creation there is a step to cover this - during validation we want to make sure it was covered. For this purpose steps will utilize a domain-complexity.csv and project-types.csv.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Structure (Markdown, Human-Readable)
|
||||
|
||||
### Required Sections
|
||||
1. **Executive Summary** - Vision, differentiator, target users
|
||||
2. **Success Criteria** - Measurable outcomes (SMART)
|
||||
3. **Product Scope** - MVP, Growth, Vision phases
|
||||
4. **User Journeys** - Comprehensive coverage
|
||||
5. **Domain Requirements** - Industry-specific compliance (if applicable)
|
||||
6. **Innovation Analysis** - Competitive differentiation (if applicable)
|
||||
7. **Project-Type Requirements** - Platform-specific needs
|
||||
8. **Functional Requirements** - Capability contract (FRs)
|
||||
9. **Non-Functional Requirements** - Quality attributes (NFRs)
|
||||
|
||||
### Formatting for Dual Consumption
|
||||
|
||||
**For Humans:**
|
||||
- Clear, professional language
|
||||
- Logical flow from vision to requirements
|
||||
- Easy for stakeholders to review and approve
|
||||
|
||||
**For LLMs:**
|
||||
- ## Level 2 headers for all main sections (enables extraction)
|
||||
- Consistent structure and patterns
|
||||
- Precise, testable language
|
||||
- High information density
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Downstream Impact
|
||||
|
||||
**How the PRD Feeds Next Artifacts:**
|
||||
|
||||
**UX Design:**
|
||||
- User journeys → interaction flows
|
||||
- FRs → design requirements
|
||||
- Success criteria → UX metrics
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture:**
|
||||
- FRs → system capabilities
|
||||
- NFRs → architecture decisions
|
||||
- Domain requirements → compliance architecture
|
||||
- Project-type requirements → platform choices
|
||||
|
||||
**Epics & Stories (created after architecture):**
|
||||
- FRs → user stories (1 FR could map to 1-3 stories potentially)
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria → story acceptance tests
|
||||
- Priority → sprint sequencing
|
||||
- Traceability → stories map back to vision
|
||||
|
||||
**Development AI Agents:**
|
||||
- Precise requirements → implementation clarity
|
||||
- Test criteria → automated test generation
|
||||
- Domain requirements → compliance enforcement
|
||||
- Measurable NFRs → performance targets
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary: What Makes a Great BMAD PRD?
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **High Information Density** - Every sentence carries weight, zero fluff
|
||||
✅ **Measurable Requirements** - All FRs and NFRs are testable with specific criteria
|
||||
✅ **Clear Traceability** - Each requirement links to user need and business objective
|
||||
✅ **Domain Awareness** - Industry-specific requirements auto-detected and included
|
||||
✅ **Zero Anti-Patterns** - No subjective adjectives, implementation leakage, or vague quantifiers
|
||||
✅ **Dual Audience Optimized** - Human-readable AND LLM-consumable
|
||||
✅ **Markdown Format** - Professional, clean, accessible to all stakeholders
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Remember:** The PRD is the foundation. Quality here ripples through every subsequent phase. A dense, precise, well-traced PRD makes UX design, architecture, epic breakdown, and AI development dramatically more effective.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
||||
project_type,detection_signals,key_questions,required_sections,skip_sections,web_search_triggers,innovation_signals
|
||||
api_backend,"API,REST,GraphQL,backend,service,endpoints","Endpoints needed?;Authentication method?;Data formats?;Rate limits?;Versioning?;SDK needed?","endpoint_specs;auth_model;data_schemas;error_codes;rate_limits;api_docs","ux_ui;visual_design;user_journeys","framework best practices;OpenAPI standards","API composition;New protocol"
|
||||
mobile_app,"iOS,Android,app,mobile,iPhone,iPad","Native or cross-platform?;Offline needed?;Push notifications?;Device features?;Store compliance?","platform_reqs;device_permissions;offline_mode;push_strategy;store_compliance","desktop_features;cli_commands","app store guidelines;platform requirements","Gesture innovation;AR/VR features"
|
||||
saas_b2b,"SaaS,B2B,platform,dashboard,teams,enterprise","Multi-tenant?;Permission model?;Subscription tiers?;Integrations?;Compliance?","tenant_model;rbac_matrix;subscription_tiers;integration_list;compliance_reqs","cli_interface;mobile_first","compliance requirements;integration guides","Workflow automation;AI agents"
|
||||
developer_tool,"SDK,library,package,npm,pip,framework","Language support?;Package managers?;IDE integration?;Documentation?;Examples?","language_matrix;installation_methods;api_surface;code_examples;migration_guide","visual_design;store_compliance","package manager best practices;API design patterns","New paradigm;DSL creation"
|
||||
cli_tool,"CLI,command,terminal,bash,script","Interactive or scriptable?;Output formats?;Config method?;Shell completion?","command_structure;output_formats;config_schema;scripting_support","visual_design;ux_principles;touch_interactions","CLI design patterns;shell integration","Natural language CLI;AI commands"
|
||||
web_app,"website,webapp,browser,SPA,PWA","SPA or MPA?;Browser support?;SEO needed?;Real-time?;Accessibility?","browser_matrix;responsive_design;performance_targets;seo_strategy;accessibility_level","native_features;cli_commands","web standards;WCAG guidelines","New interaction;WebAssembly use"
|
||||
game,"game,player,gameplay,level,character","REDIRECT TO USE THE BMad Method Game Module Agent and Workflows - HALT","game-brief;GDD","most_sections","game design patterns","Novel mechanics;Genre mixing"
|
||||
desktop_app,"desktop,Windows,Mac,Linux,native","Cross-platform?;Auto-update?;System integration?;Offline?","platform_support;system_integration;update_strategy;offline_capabilities","web_seo;mobile_features","desktop guidelines;platform requirements","Desktop AI;System automation"
|
||||
iot_embedded,"IoT,embedded,device,sensor,hardware","Hardware specs?;Connectivity?;Power constraints?;Security?;OTA updates?","hardware_reqs;connectivity_protocol;power_profile;security_model;update_mechanism","visual_ui;browser_support","IoT standards;protocol specs","Edge AI;New sensors"
|
||||
blockchain_web3,"blockchain,crypto,DeFi,NFT,smart contract","Chain selection?;Wallet integration?;Gas optimization?;Security audit?","chain_specs;wallet_support;smart_contracts;security_audit;gas_optimization","traditional_auth;centralized_db","blockchain standards;security patterns","Novel tokenomics;DAO structure"
|
||||
|
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-02-format-detection.md'
|
||||
prdPurpose: '../data/prd-purpose.md'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 1: Document Discovery & Confirmation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Handle fresh context validation by confirming PRD path, discovering and loading input documents from frontmatter, and initializing the validation report.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring systematic validation expertise and analytical rigor
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and specific PRD context
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on discovering PRD and input documents, not validating yet
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform any validation checks in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic discovery with clear reporting to user
|
||||
- 🚪 This is the setup step - get everything ready for validation
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Discover and confirm PRD to validate
|
||||
- 💾 Load PRD and all input documents from frontmatter
|
||||
- 📖 Initialize validation report next to PRD
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until user confirms setup
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD path (user-specified or discovered), workflow configuration
|
||||
- Focus: Document discovery and setup only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't perform validation, don't skip discovery
|
||||
- Dependencies: Configuration loaded from PRD workflow.md initialization
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Load PRD Purpose and Standards
|
||||
|
||||
Load and read the complete file at:
|
||||
`{prdPurpose}`
|
||||
|
||||
This file contains the BMAD PRD philosophy, standards, and validation criteria that will guide all validation checks. Internalize this understanding - it defines what makes a great BMAD PRD.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Discover PRD to Validate
|
||||
|
||||
**If PRD path provided as invocation parameter:**
|
||||
- Use provided path
|
||||
|
||||
**If no PRD path provided, auto-discover:**
|
||||
- Search `{planning_artifacts}` for files matching `*prd*.md`
|
||||
- Also check for sharded PRDs: `{planning_artifacts}/*prd*/*.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**If exactly ONE PRD found:**
|
||||
- Use it automatically
|
||||
- Inform user: "Found PRD: {discovered_path} — using it for validation."
|
||||
|
||||
**If MULTIPLE PRDs found:**
|
||||
- List all discovered PRDs with numbered options
|
||||
- "I found multiple PRDs. Which one would you like to validate?"
|
||||
- Wait for user selection
|
||||
|
||||
**If NO PRDs found:**
|
||||
- "I couldn't find any PRD files in {planning_artifacts}. Please provide the path to the PRD file you want to validate."
|
||||
- Wait for user to provide PRD path.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Validate PRD Exists and Load
|
||||
|
||||
Once PRD path is provided:
|
||||
|
||||
- Check if PRD file exists at specified path
|
||||
- If not found: "I cannot find a PRD at that path. Please check the path and try again."
|
||||
- If found: Load the complete PRD file including frontmatter
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Extract Frontmatter and Input Documents
|
||||
|
||||
From the loaded PRD frontmatter, extract:
|
||||
|
||||
- `inputDocuments: []` array (if present)
|
||||
- Any other relevant metadata (classification, date, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
**If no inputDocuments array exists:**
|
||||
Note this and proceed with PRD-only validation
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Load Input Documents
|
||||
|
||||
For each document listed in `inputDocuments`:
|
||||
|
||||
- Attempt to load the document
|
||||
- Track successfully loaded documents
|
||||
- Note any documents that fail to load
|
||||
|
||||
**Build list of loaded input documents:**
|
||||
- Product Brief (if present)
|
||||
- Research documents (if present)
|
||||
- Other reference materials (if present)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Ask About Additional Reference Documents
|
||||
|
||||
"**I've loaded the following documents from your PRD frontmatter:**
|
||||
|
||||
{list loaded documents with file names}
|
||||
|
||||
**Are there any additional reference documents you'd like me to include in this validation?**
|
||||
|
||||
These could include:
|
||||
- Additional research or context documents
|
||||
- Project documentation not tracked in frontmatter
|
||||
- Standards or compliance documents
|
||||
- Competitive analysis or benchmarks
|
||||
|
||||
Please provide paths to any additional documents, or type 'none' to proceed."
|
||||
|
||||
**Load any additional documents provided by user.**
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Initialize Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Create validation report at: `{validationReportPath}`
|
||||
|
||||
**Initialize with frontmatter:**
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
---
|
||||
validationTarget: '{prd_path}'
|
||||
validationDate: '{current_date}'
|
||||
inputDocuments: [list of all loaded documents]
|
||||
validationStepsCompleted: []
|
||||
validationStatus: IN_PROGRESS
|
||||
---
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Initial content:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# PRD Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD Being Validated:** {prd_path}
|
||||
**Validation Date:** {current_date}
|
||||
|
||||
## Input Documents
|
||||
|
||||
{list all documents loaded for validation}
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation Findings
|
||||
|
||||
[Findings will be appended as validation progresses]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Present Discovery Summary
|
||||
|
||||
"**Setup Complete!**
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD to Validate:** {prd_path}
|
||||
|
||||
**Input Documents Loaded:**
|
||||
- PRD: {prd_name} ✓
|
||||
- Product Brief: {count} {if count > 0}✓{else}(none found){/if}
|
||||
- Research: {count} {if count > 0}✓{else}(none found){/if}
|
||||
- Additional References: {count} {if count > 0}✓{else}(none){/if}
|
||||
|
||||
**Validation Report:** {validationReportPath}
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready to begin validation.**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [C] Continue to Format Detection
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
|
||||
- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
|
||||
- User can ask questions or add more documents - always respond and redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A: Invoke the `bmad-advanced-elicitation` skill, and when finished redisplay the menu
|
||||
- IF P: Invoke the `bmad-party-mode` skill, and when finished redisplay the menu
|
||||
- IF C: Read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} to begin format detection
|
||||
- IF user provides additional document: Load it, update report, redisplay summary
|
||||
- IF Any other: help user, then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- PRD path discovered and confirmed
|
||||
- PRD file exists and loads successfully
|
||||
- All input documents from frontmatter loaded
|
||||
- Additional reference documents (if any) loaded
|
||||
- Validation report initialized next to PRD
|
||||
- User clearly informed of setup status
|
||||
- Menu presented and user input handled correctly
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Proceeding with non-existent PRD file
|
||||
- Not loading input documents from frontmatter
|
||||
- Creating validation report in wrong location
|
||||
- Proceeding without user confirming setup
|
||||
- Not handling missing input documents gracefully
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Complete discovery and setup BEFORE validation. This step ensures everything is in place for systematic validation checks.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-03-density-validation.md'
|
||||
altStepFile: './step-v-02b-parity-check.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2: Format Detection & Structure Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Detect if PRD follows BMAD format and route appropriately - classify as BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Non-Standard, with optional parity check for non-standard formats.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring systematic validation expertise and pattern recognition
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and PRD context
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on detecting format and classifying structure
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform other validation checks in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Analytical and systematic, clear reporting of findings
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a branch step - may route to parity check for non-standard PRDs
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Analyze PRD structure systematically
|
||||
- 💾 Append format findings to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Route appropriately based on format classification
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip format detection or proceed without classification
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file loaded in step 1, validation report initialized
|
||||
- Focus: Format detection and classification only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't perform other validation, don't skip classification
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step 1 completed - PRD loaded and report initialized
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Extract PRD Structure
|
||||
|
||||
Load the complete PRD file and extract:
|
||||
|
||||
**All Level 2 (##) headers:**
|
||||
- Scan through entire PRD document
|
||||
- Extract all ## section headers
|
||||
- List them in order
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD frontmatter:**
|
||||
- Extract classification.domain if present
|
||||
- Extract classification.projectType if present
|
||||
- Note any other relevant metadata
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Check for BMAD PRD Core Sections
|
||||
|
||||
Check if the PRD contains the following BMAD PRD core sections:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Executive Summary** (or variations: ## Executive Summary, ## Overview, ## Introduction)
|
||||
2. **Success Criteria** (or: ## Success Criteria, ## Goals, ## Objectives)
|
||||
3. **Product Scope** (or: ## Product Scope, ## Scope, ## In Scope, ## Out of Scope)
|
||||
4. **User Journeys** (or: ## User Journeys, ## User Stories, ## User Flows)
|
||||
5. **Functional Requirements** (or: ## Functional Requirements, ## Features, ## Capabilities)
|
||||
6. **Non-Functional Requirements** (or: ## Non-Functional Requirements, ## NFRs, ## Quality Attributes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Count matches:**
|
||||
- How many of these 6 core sections are present?
|
||||
- Which specific sections are present?
|
||||
- Which are missing?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Classify PRD Format
|
||||
|
||||
Based on core section count, classify:
|
||||
|
||||
**BMAD Standard:**
|
||||
- 5-6 core sections present
|
||||
- Follows BMAD PRD structure closely
|
||||
|
||||
**BMAD Variant:**
|
||||
- 3-4 core sections present
|
||||
- Generally follows BMAD patterns but may have structural differences
|
||||
- Missing some sections but recognizable as BMAD-style
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Standard:**
|
||||
- Fewer than 3 core sections present
|
||||
- Does not follow BMAD PRD structure
|
||||
- May be completely custom format, legacy format, or from another framework
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Report Format Findings to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Format Detection
|
||||
|
||||
**PRD Structure:**
|
||||
[List all ## Level 2 headers found]
|
||||
|
||||
**BMAD Core Sections Present:**
|
||||
- Executive Summary: [Present/Missing]
|
||||
- Success Criteria: [Present/Missing]
|
||||
- Product Scope: [Present/Missing]
|
||||
- User Journeys: [Present/Missing]
|
||||
- Functional Requirements: [Present/Missing]
|
||||
- Non-Functional Requirements: [Present/Missing]
|
||||
|
||||
**Format Classification:** [BMAD Standard / BMAD Variant / Non-Standard]
|
||||
**Core Sections Present:** [count]/6
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Route Based on Format Classification
|
||||
|
||||
**IF format is BMAD Standard or BMAD Variant:**
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Format Detected:** {classification}
|
||||
|
||||
Proceeding to systematic validation checks..."
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-03-density-validation.md)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF format is Non-Standard (< 3 core sections):**
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Format Detected:** Non-Standard PRD
|
||||
|
||||
This PRD does not follow BMAD standard structure (only {count}/6 core sections present).
|
||||
|
||||
You have options:"
|
||||
|
||||
Present MENU OPTIONS below for user selection
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Present MENU OPTIONS (Non-Standard PRDs Only)
|
||||
|
||||
**[A] Parity Check** - Analyze gaps and estimate effort to reach BMAD PRD parity
|
||||
**[B] Validate As-Is** - Proceed with validation using current structure
|
||||
**[C] Exit** - Exit validation and review format findings
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed based on user selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF A (Parity Check): Read fully and follow: {altStepFile} (step-v-02b-parity-check.md)
|
||||
- IF B (Validate As-Is): Display "Proceeding with validation..." then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
|
||||
- IF C (Exit): Display format findings summary and exit validation
|
||||
- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All ## Level 2 headers extracted successfully
|
||||
- BMAD core sections checked systematically
|
||||
- Format classified correctly based on section count
|
||||
- Findings reported to validation report
|
||||
- BMAD Standard/Variant PRDs proceed directly to next validation step
|
||||
- Non-Standard PRDs pause and present options to user
|
||||
- User can choose parity check, validate as-is, or exit
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not extracting all headers before classification
|
||||
- Incorrect format classification
|
||||
- Not reporting findings to validation report
|
||||
- Not pausing for non-standard PRDs
|
||||
- Proceeding without user decision for non-standard formats
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Format detection determines validation path. Non-standard PRDs require user choice before proceeding.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-03-density-validation.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2B: Document Parity Check
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Analyze non-standard PRD and identify gaps to achieve BMAD PRD parity, presenting user with options for how to proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
|
||||
- ✅ You bring BMAD PRD standards expertise and gap analysis
|
||||
- ✅ User brings domain knowledge and PRD context
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on analyzing gaps and estimating parity effort
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to perform other validation checks in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic gap analysis with clear recommendations
|
||||
- 🚪 This is an optional branch step - user chooses next action
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Analyze each BMAD PRD section for gaps
|
||||
- 💾 Append parity analysis to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Present options and await user decision
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user selection
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: Non-standard PRD from step 2, validation report in progress
|
||||
- Focus: Parity analysis only - what's missing, what's needed
|
||||
- Limits: Don't perform validation checks, don't auto-proceed
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step 2 classified PRD as non-standard and user chose parity check
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Analyze Each BMAD PRD Section
|
||||
|
||||
For each of the 6 BMAD PRD core sections, analyze:
|
||||
|
||||
**Executive Summary:**
|
||||
- Does PRD have vision/overview?
|
||||
- Is problem statement clear?
|
||||
- Are target users identified?
|
||||
- Gap: [What's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Are measurable goals defined?
|
||||
- Is success clearly defined?
|
||||
- Gap: [What's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
|
||||
**Product Scope:**
|
||||
- Is scope clearly defined?
|
||||
- Are in-scope items listed?
|
||||
- Are out-of-scope items listed?
|
||||
- Gap: [What's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
|
||||
**User Journeys:**
|
||||
- Are user types/personas identified?
|
||||
- Are user flows documented?
|
||||
- Gap: [What's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
- Are features/capabilities listed?
|
||||
- Are requirements structured?
|
||||
- Gap: [What's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
- Are quality attributes defined?
|
||||
- Are performance/security/etc. requirements documented?
|
||||
- Gap: [What's missing or incomplete]
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Estimate Effort to Reach Parity
|
||||
|
||||
For each missing or incomplete section, estimate:
|
||||
|
||||
**Effort Level:**
|
||||
- Minimal - Section exists but needs minor enhancements
|
||||
- Moderate - Section missing but content exists elsewhere in PRD
|
||||
- Significant - Section missing, requires new content creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Parity Effort:**
|
||||
- Based on individual section estimates
|
||||
- Classify overall: Quick / Moderate / Substantial effort
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Report Parity Analysis to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Parity Analysis (Non-Standard PRD)
|
||||
|
||||
### Section-by-Section Gap Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Executive Summary:**
|
||||
- Status: [Present/Missing/Incomplete]
|
||||
- Gap: [specific gap description]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria:**
|
||||
- Status: [Present/Missing/Incomplete]
|
||||
- Gap: [specific gap description]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Product Scope:**
|
||||
- Status: [Present/Missing/Incomplete]
|
||||
- Gap: [specific gap description]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**User Journeys:**
|
||||
- Status: [Present/Missing/Incomplete]
|
||||
- Gap: [specific gap description]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
- Status: [Present/Missing/Incomplete]
|
||||
- Gap: [specific gap description]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Functional Requirements:**
|
||||
- Status: [Present/Missing/Incomplete]
|
||||
- Gap: [specific gap description]
|
||||
- Effort to Complete: [Minimal/Moderate/Significant]
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Parity Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Effort to Reach BMAD Standard:** [Quick/Moderate/Substantial]
|
||||
**Recommendation:** [Brief recommendation based on analysis]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Present Parity Analysis and Options
|
||||
|
||||
Display:
|
||||
|
||||
"**Parity Analysis Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
Your PRD is missing {count} of 6 core BMAD PRD sections. The overall effort to reach BMAD standard is: **{effort level}**
|
||||
|
||||
**Quick Summary:**
|
||||
[2-3 sentence summary of key gaps]
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
{recommendation from analysis}
|
||||
|
||||
**How would you like to proceed?**"
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
|
||||
|
||||
**[C] Continue Validation** - Proceed with validation using current structure
|
||||
**[E] Exit & Review** - Exit validation and review parity report
|
||||
**[S] Save & Exit** - Save parity report and exit
|
||||
|
||||
#### EXECUTION RULES:
|
||||
|
||||
- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
|
||||
- Only proceed based on user selection
|
||||
|
||||
#### Menu Handling Logic:
|
||||
|
||||
- IF C (Continue): Display "Proceeding with validation..." then read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
|
||||
- IF E (Exit): Display parity summary and exit validation
|
||||
- IF S (Save): Confirm saved, display summary, exit
|
||||
- IF Any other: help user respond, then redisplay menu
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All 6 BMAD PRD sections analyzed for gaps
|
||||
- Effort estimates provided for each gap
|
||||
- Overall parity effort assessed correctly
|
||||
- Parity analysis reported to validation report
|
||||
- Clear summary presented to user
|
||||
- User can choose to continue validation, exit, or save report
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not analyzing all 6 sections systematically
|
||||
- Missing effort estimates
|
||||
- Not reporting parity analysis to validation report
|
||||
- Auto-proceeding without user decision
|
||||
- Unclear recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Parity check informs user of gaps and effort, but user decides whether to proceed with validation or address gaps first.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-04-brief-coverage-validation.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 3: Information Density Validation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Validate PRD meets BMAD information density standards by scanning for conversational filler, wordy phrases, and redundant expressions that violate conciseness principles.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in systematic validation, not collaborative dialogue
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical rigor and attention to detail
|
||||
- ✅ This step runs autonomously - no user input needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on information density anti-patterns
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to validate other aspects in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic scanning and categorization
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a validation sequence step - auto-proceeds when complete
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Scan PRD for density anti-patterns systematically
|
||||
- 💾 Append density findings to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Display "Proceeding to next check..." and load next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to pause or request user input
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, validation report with format findings
|
||||
- Focus: Information density validation only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't validate other aspects, don't pause for user input
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step 2 completed - format classification done
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool to spawn a subprocess:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform information density validation on this PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Load the PRD file
|
||||
2. Scan for the following anti-patterns:
|
||||
- Conversational filler phrases (examples: 'The system will allow users to...', 'It is important to note that...', 'In order to')
|
||||
- Wordy phrases (examples: 'Due to the fact that', 'In the event of', 'For the purpose of')
|
||||
- Redundant phrases (examples: 'Future plans', 'Absolutely essential', 'Past history')
|
||||
3. Count violations by category with line numbers
|
||||
4. Classify severity: Critical (>10 violations), Warning (5-10), Pass (<5)
|
||||
|
||||
Return structured findings with counts and examples."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Graceful Degradation (if Task tool unavailable)
|
||||
|
||||
If Task tool unavailable, perform analysis directly:
|
||||
|
||||
**Scan for conversational filler patterns:**
|
||||
- "The system will allow users to..."
|
||||
- "It is important to note that..."
|
||||
- "In order to"
|
||||
- "For the purpose of"
|
||||
- "With regard to"
|
||||
- Count occurrences and note line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
**Scan for wordy phrases:**
|
||||
- "Due to the fact that" (use "because")
|
||||
- "In the event of" (use "if")
|
||||
- "At this point in time" (use "now")
|
||||
- "In a manner that" (use "how")
|
||||
- Count occurrences and note line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
**Scan for redundant phrases:**
|
||||
- "Future plans" (just "plans")
|
||||
- "Past history" (just "history")
|
||||
- "Absolutely essential" (just "essential")
|
||||
- "Completely finish" (just "finish")
|
||||
- Count occurrences and note line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Classify Severity
|
||||
|
||||
**Calculate total violations:**
|
||||
- Conversational filler count
|
||||
- Wordy phrases count
|
||||
- Redundant phrases count
|
||||
- Total = sum of all categories
|
||||
|
||||
**Determine severity:**
|
||||
- **Critical:** Total > 10 violations
|
||||
- **Warning:** Total 5-10 violations
|
||||
- **Pass:** Total < 5 violations
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Report Density Findings to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Information Density Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Anti-Pattern Violations:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Conversational Filler:** {count} occurrences
|
||||
[If count > 0, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Wordy Phrases:** {count} occurrences
|
||||
[If count > 0, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Redundant Phrases:** {count} occurrences
|
||||
[If count > 0, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Violations:** {total}
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity Assessment:** [Critical/Warning/Pass]
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
[If Critical] "PRD requires significant revision to improve information density. Every sentence should carry weight without filler."
|
||||
[If Warning] "PRD would benefit from reducing wordiness and eliminating filler phrases."
|
||||
[If Pass] "PRD demonstrates good information density with minimal violations."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Display Progress and Auto-Proceed
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Information Density Validation Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
Severity: {Critical/Warning/Pass}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to next validation check...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-04-brief-coverage-validation.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- PRD scanned for all three anti-pattern categories
|
||||
- Violations counted with line numbers
|
||||
- Severity classified correctly
|
||||
- Findings reported to validation report
|
||||
- Auto-proceeds to next validation step
|
||||
- Subprocess attempted with graceful degradation
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not scanning all anti-pattern categories
|
||||
- Missing severity classification
|
||||
- Not reporting findings to validation report
|
||||
- Pausing for user input (should auto-proceed)
|
||||
- Not attempting subprocess architecture
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Information density validation runs autonomously. Scan, classify, report, auto-proceed. No user interaction needed.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-05-measurability-validation.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
productBrief: '{product_brief_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 4: Product Brief Coverage Validation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Validate that PRD covers all content from Product Brief (if brief was used as input), mapping brief content to PRD sections and identifying gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in systematic validation, not collaborative dialogue
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical rigor and traceability expertise
|
||||
- ✅ This step runs autonomously - no user input needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on Product Brief coverage (conditional on brief existence)
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to validate other aspects in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic mapping and gap analysis
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a validation sequence step - auto-proceeds when complete
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Check if Product Brief exists in input documents
|
||||
- 💬 If no brief: Skip this check and report "N/A - No Product Brief"
|
||||
- 🎯 If brief exists: Map brief content to PRD sections
|
||||
- 💾 Append coverage findings to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Display "Proceeding to next check..." and load next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to pause or request user input
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, input documents from step 1, validation report
|
||||
- Focus: Product Brief coverage only (conditional)
|
||||
- Limits: Don't validate other aspects, conditional execution
|
||||
- Dependencies: Step 1 completed - input documents loaded
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Check for Product Brief
|
||||
|
||||
Check if Product Brief was loaded in step 1's inputDocuments:
|
||||
|
||||
**IF no Product Brief found:**
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Product Brief Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** N/A - No Product Brief was provided as input
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Product Brief Coverage: Skipped** (No Product Brief provided)
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to next validation check...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile}
|
||||
|
||||
**IF Product Brief exists:** Continue to step 2 below
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Attempt Sub-Process Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool to spawn a subprocess:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform Product Brief coverage validation:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Load the Product Brief
|
||||
2. Extract key content:
|
||||
- Vision statement
|
||||
- Target users/personas
|
||||
- Problem statement
|
||||
- Key features
|
||||
- Goals/objectives
|
||||
- Differentiators
|
||||
- Constraints
|
||||
3. For each item, search PRD for corresponding coverage
|
||||
4. Classify coverage: Fully Covered / Partially Covered / Not Found / Intentionally Excluded
|
||||
5. Note any gaps with severity: Critical / Moderate / Informational
|
||||
|
||||
Return structured coverage map with classifications."
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Graceful Degradation (if Task tool unavailable)
|
||||
|
||||
If Task tool unavailable, perform analysis directly:
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract from Product Brief:**
|
||||
- Vision: What is this product?
|
||||
- Users: Who is it for?
|
||||
- Problem: What problem does it solve?
|
||||
- Features: What are the key capabilities?
|
||||
- Goals: What are the success criteria?
|
||||
- Differentiators: What makes it unique?
|
||||
|
||||
**For each item, search PRD:**
|
||||
- Scan Executive Summary for vision
|
||||
- Check User Journeys or user personas
|
||||
- Look for problem statement
|
||||
- Review Functional Requirements for features
|
||||
- Check Success Criteria section
|
||||
- Search for differentiators
|
||||
|
||||
**Classify coverage:**
|
||||
- **Fully Covered:** Content present and complete
|
||||
- **Partially Covered:** Content present but incomplete
|
||||
- **Not Found:** Content missing from PRD
|
||||
- **Intentionally Excluded:** Content explicitly out of scope
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Assess Coverage and Severity
|
||||
|
||||
**For each gap (Partially Covered or Not Found):**
|
||||
- Is this Critical? (Core vision, primary users, main features)
|
||||
- Is this Moderate? (Secondary features, some goals)
|
||||
- Is this Informational? (Nice-to-have features, minor details)
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** Some exclusions may be intentional (valid scoping decisions)
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Report Coverage Findings to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Product Brief Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
**Product Brief:** {brief_file_name}
|
||||
|
||||
### Coverage Map
|
||||
|
||||
**Vision Statement:** [Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded]
|
||||
[If gap: Note severity and specific missing content]
|
||||
|
||||
**Target Users:** [Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded]
|
||||
[If gap: Note severity and specific missing content]
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem Statement:** [Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded]
|
||||
[If gap: Note severity and specific missing content]
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Features:** [Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded]
|
||||
[If gap: List specific features with severity]
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals/Objectives:** [Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded]
|
||||
[If gap: Note severity and specific missing content]
|
||||
|
||||
**Differentiators:** [Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded]
|
||||
[If gap: Note severity and specific missing content]
|
||||
|
||||
### Coverage Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Coverage:** [percentage or qualitative assessment]
|
||||
**Critical Gaps:** [count] [list if any]
|
||||
**Moderate Gaps:** [count] [list if any]
|
||||
**Informational Gaps:** [count] [list if any]
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
[If critical gaps exist] "PRD should be revised to cover critical Product Brief content."
|
||||
[If moderate gaps] "Consider addressing moderate gaps for complete coverage."
|
||||
[If minimal gaps] "PRD provides good coverage of Product Brief content."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Display Progress and Auto-Proceed
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Product Brief Coverage Validation Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
Overall Coverage: {assessment}
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to next validation check...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-05-measurability-validation.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Checked for Product Brief existence correctly
|
||||
- If no brief: Reported "N/A" and skipped gracefully
|
||||
- If brief exists: Mapped all key brief content to PRD sections
|
||||
- Coverage classified appropriately (Fully/Partially/Not Found/Intentionally Excluded)
|
||||
- Severity assessed for gaps (Critical/Moderate/Informational)
|
||||
- Findings reported to validation report
|
||||
- Auto-proceeds to next validation step
|
||||
- Subprocess attempted with graceful degradation
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not checking for brief existence before attempting validation
|
||||
- If brief exists: not mapping all key content areas
|
||||
- Missing coverage classifications
|
||||
- Not reporting findings to validation report
|
||||
- Not auto-proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Product Brief coverage is conditional - skip if no brief, validate thoroughly if brief exists. Always auto-proceed.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-06-traceability-validation.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 5: Measurability Validation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Validate that all Functional Requirements (FRs) and Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs) are measurable, testable, and follow proper format without implementation details.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in systematic validation, not collaborative dialogue
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical rigor and requirements engineering expertise
|
||||
- ✅ This step runs autonomously - no user input needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on FR and NFR measurability
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to validate other aspects in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic requirement-by-requirement analysis
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a validation sequence step - auto-proceeds when complete
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Extract all FRs and NFRs from PRD
|
||||
- 💾 Validate each for measurability and format
|
||||
- 📖 Append findings to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Display "Proceeding to next check..." and load next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to pause or request user input
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, validation report
|
||||
- Focus: FR and NFR measurability only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't validate other aspects, don't pause for user input
|
||||
- Dependencies: Steps 2-4 completed - initial validation checks done
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool to spawn a subprocess:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform measurability validation on this PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Requirements (FRs):**
|
||||
1. Extract all FRs from Functional Requirements section
|
||||
2. Check each FR for:
|
||||
- '[Actor] can [capability]' format compliance
|
||||
- No subjective adjectives (easy, fast, simple, intuitive, etc.)
|
||||
- No vague quantifiers (multiple, several, some, many, etc.)
|
||||
- No implementation details (technology names, library names, data structures unless capability-relevant)
|
||||
3. Document violations with line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs):**
|
||||
1. Extract all NFRs from Non-Functional Requirements section
|
||||
2. Check each NFR for:
|
||||
- Specific metrics with measurement methods
|
||||
- Template compliance (criterion, metric, measurement method, context)
|
||||
- Context included (why this matters, who it affects)
|
||||
3. Document violations with line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
Return structured findings with violation counts and examples."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Graceful Degradation (if Task tool unavailable)
|
||||
|
||||
If Task tool unavailable, perform analysis directly:
|
||||
|
||||
**Functional Requirements Analysis:**
|
||||
|
||||
Extract all FRs and check each for:
|
||||
|
||||
**Format compliance:**
|
||||
- Does it follow "[Actor] can [capability]" pattern?
|
||||
- Is actor clearly defined?
|
||||
- Is capability actionable and testable?
|
||||
|
||||
**No subjective adjectives:**
|
||||
- Scan for: easy, fast, simple, intuitive, user-friendly, responsive, quick, efficient (without metrics)
|
||||
- Note line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
**No vague quantifiers:**
|
||||
- Scan for: multiple, several, some, many, few, various, number of
|
||||
- Note line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
**No implementation details:**
|
||||
- Scan for: React, Vue, Angular, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, AWS, Docker, Kubernetes, Redux, etc.
|
||||
- Unless capability-relevant (e.g., "API consumers can access...")
|
||||
- Note line numbers
|
||||
|
||||
**Non-Functional Requirements Analysis:**
|
||||
|
||||
Extract all NFRs and check each for:
|
||||
|
||||
**Specific metrics:**
|
||||
- Is there a measurable criterion? (e.g., "response time < 200ms", not "fast response")
|
||||
- Can this be measured or tested?
|
||||
|
||||
**Template compliance:**
|
||||
- Criterion defined?
|
||||
- Metric specified?
|
||||
- Measurement method included?
|
||||
- Context provided?
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Tally Violations
|
||||
|
||||
**FR Violations:**
|
||||
- Format violations: count
|
||||
- Subjective adjectives: count
|
||||
- Vague quantifiers: count
|
||||
- Implementation leakage: count
|
||||
- Total FR violations: sum
|
||||
|
||||
**NFR Violations:**
|
||||
- Missing metrics: count
|
||||
- Incomplete template: count
|
||||
- Missing context: count
|
||||
- Total NFR violations: sum
|
||||
|
||||
**Total violations:** FR violations + NFR violations
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Report Measurability Findings to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Measurability Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Total FRs Analyzed:** {count}
|
||||
|
||||
**Format Violations:** {count}
|
||||
[If violations exist, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Subjective Adjectives Found:** {count}
|
||||
[If found, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Vague Quantifiers Found:** {count}
|
||||
[If found, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation Leakage:** {count}
|
||||
[If found, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**FR Violations Total:** {total}
|
||||
|
||||
### Non-Functional Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Total NFRs Analyzed:** {count}
|
||||
|
||||
**Missing Metrics:** {count}
|
||||
[If missing, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Incomplete Template:** {count}
|
||||
[If incomplete, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**Missing Context:** {count}
|
||||
[If missing, list examples with line numbers]
|
||||
|
||||
**NFR Violations Total:** {total}
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Requirements:** {FRs + NFRs}
|
||||
**Total Violations:** {FR violations + NFR violations}
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity:** [Critical if >10 violations, Warning if 5-10, Pass if <5]
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
[If Critical] "Many requirements are not measurable or testable. Requirements must be revised to be testable for downstream work."
|
||||
[If Warning] "Some requirements need refinement for measurability. Focus on violating requirements above."
|
||||
[If Pass] "Requirements demonstrate good measurability with minimal issues."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Display Progress and Auto-Proceed
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Measurability Validation Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
Total Violations: {count} ({severity})
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to next validation check...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-06-traceability-validation.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All FRs extracted and analyzed for measurability
|
||||
- All NFRs extracted and analyzed for measurability
|
||||
- Violations documented with line numbers
|
||||
- Severity assessed correctly
|
||||
- Findings reported to validation report
|
||||
- Auto-proceeds to next validation step
|
||||
- Subprocess attempted with graceful degradation
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not analyzing all FRs and NFRs
|
||||
- Missing line numbers for violations
|
||||
- Not reporting findings to validation report
|
||||
- Not assessing severity
|
||||
- Not auto-proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Requirements must be testable to be useful. Validate every requirement for measurability, document violations, auto-proceed.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-07-implementation-leakage-validation.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 6: Traceability Validation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Validate the traceability chain from Executive Summary → Success Criteria → User Journeys → Functional Requirements is intact, ensuring every requirement traces back to a user need or business objective.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in systematic validation, not collaborative dialogue
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical rigor and traceability matrix expertise
|
||||
- ✅ This step runs autonomously - no user input needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on traceability chain validation
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to validate other aspects in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic chain validation and orphan detection
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a validation sequence step - auto-proceeds when complete
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Build and validate traceability matrix
|
||||
- 💾 Identify broken chains and orphan requirements
|
||||
- 📖 Append findings to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Display "Proceeding to next check..." and load next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to pause or request user input
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, validation report
|
||||
- Focus: Traceability chain validation only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't validate other aspects, don't pause for user input
|
||||
- Dependencies: Steps 2-5 completed - initial validations done
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool to spawn a subprocess:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform traceability validation on this PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Extract content from Executive Summary (vision, goals)
|
||||
2. Extract Success Criteria
|
||||
3. Extract User Journeys (user types, flows, outcomes)
|
||||
4. Extract Functional Requirements (FRs)
|
||||
5. Extract Product Scope (in-scope items)
|
||||
|
||||
**Validate chains:**
|
||||
- Executive Summary → Success Criteria: Does vision align with defined success?
|
||||
- Success Criteria → User Journeys: Are success criteria supported by user journeys?
|
||||
- User Journeys → Functional Requirements: Does each FR trace back to a user journey?
|
||||
- Scope → FRs: Do MVP scope FRs align with in-scope items?
|
||||
|
||||
**Identify orphans:**
|
||||
- FRs not traceable to any user journey or business objective
|
||||
- Success criteria not supported by user journeys
|
||||
- User journeys without supporting FRs
|
||||
|
||||
Build traceability matrix and identify broken chains and orphan FRs.
|
||||
|
||||
Return structured findings with chain status and orphan list."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Graceful Degradation (if Task tool unavailable)
|
||||
|
||||
If Task tool unavailable, perform analysis directly:
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Extract key elements**
|
||||
- Executive Summary: Note vision, goals, objectives
|
||||
- Success Criteria: List all criteria
|
||||
- User Journeys: List user types and their flows
|
||||
- Functional Requirements: List all FRs
|
||||
- Product Scope: List in-scope items
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Validate Executive Summary → Success Criteria**
|
||||
- Does Executive Summary mention the success dimensions?
|
||||
- Are Success Criteria aligned with vision?
|
||||
- Note any misalignment
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Validate Success Criteria → User Journeys**
|
||||
- For each success criterion, is there a user journey that achieves it?
|
||||
- Note success criteria without supporting journeys
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4: Validate User Journeys → FRs**
|
||||
- For each user journey/flow, are there FRs that enable it?
|
||||
- List FRs with no clear user journey origin
|
||||
- Note orphan FRs (requirements without traceable source)
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 5: Validate Scope → FR Alignment**
|
||||
- Does MVP scope align with essential FRs?
|
||||
- Are in-scope items supported by FRs?
|
||||
- Note misalignments
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 6: Build traceability matrix**
|
||||
- Map each FR to its source (journey or business objective)
|
||||
- Note orphan FRs
|
||||
- Identify broken chains
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Tally Traceability Issues
|
||||
|
||||
**Broken chains:**
|
||||
- Executive Summary → Success Criteria gaps: count
|
||||
- Success Criteria → User Journeys gaps: count
|
||||
- User Journeys → FRs gaps: count
|
||||
- Scope → FR misalignments: count
|
||||
|
||||
**Orphan elements:**
|
||||
- Orphan FRs (no traceable source): count
|
||||
- Unsupported success criteria: count
|
||||
- User journeys without FRs: count
|
||||
|
||||
**Total issues:** Sum of all broken chains and orphans
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Report Traceability Findings to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Traceability Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Chain Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Executive Summary → Success Criteria:** [Intact/Gaps Identified]
|
||||
{If gaps: List specific misalignments}
|
||||
|
||||
**Success Criteria → User Journeys:** [Intact/Gaps Identified]
|
||||
{If gaps: List unsupported success criteria}
|
||||
|
||||
**User Journeys → Functional Requirements:** [Intact/Gaps Identified]
|
||||
{If gaps: List journeys without supporting FRs}
|
||||
|
||||
**Scope → FR Alignment:** [Intact/Misaligned]
|
||||
{If misaligned: List specific issues}
|
||||
|
||||
### Orphan Elements
|
||||
|
||||
**Orphan Functional Requirements:** {count}
|
||||
{List orphan FRs with numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Unsupported Success Criteria:** {count}
|
||||
{List unsupported criteria}
|
||||
|
||||
**User Journeys Without FRs:** {count}
|
||||
{List journeys without FRs}
|
||||
|
||||
### Traceability Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
{Summary table showing traceability coverage}
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Traceability Issues:** {total}
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity:** [Critical if orphan FRs exist, Warning if gaps, Pass if intact]
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
[If Critical] "Orphan requirements exist - every FR must trace back to a user need or business objective."
|
||||
[If Warning] "Traceability gaps identified - strengthen chains to ensure all requirements are justified."
|
||||
[If Pass] "Traceability chain is intact - all requirements trace to user needs or business objectives."
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Display Progress and Auto-Proceed
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Traceability Validation Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
Total Issues: {count} ({severity})
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to next validation check...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-07-implementation-leakage-validation.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- All traceability chains validated systematically
|
||||
- Orphan FRs identified with numbers
|
||||
- Broken chains documented
|
||||
- Traceability matrix built
|
||||
- Severity assessed correctly
|
||||
- Findings reported to validation report
|
||||
- Auto-proceeds to next validation step
|
||||
- Subprocess attempted with graceful degradation
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not validating all traceability chains
|
||||
- Missing orphan FR detection
|
||||
- Not building traceability matrix
|
||||
- Not reporting findings to validation report
|
||||
- Not auto-proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Every requirement should trace to a user need or business objective. Orphan FRs indicate broken traceability that must be fixed.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
# File references (ONLY variables used in this step)
|
||||
nextStepFile: './step-v-08-domain-compliance-validation.md'
|
||||
prdFile: '{prd_file_path}'
|
||||
validationReportPath: '{validation_report_path}'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 7: Implementation Leakage Validation
|
||||
|
||||
## STEP GOAL:
|
||||
|
||||
Ensure Functional Requirements and Non-Functional Requirements don't include implementation details - they should specify WHAT, not HOW.
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
|
||||
|
||||
### Universal Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
|
||||
- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
|
||||
- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
|
||||
- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
|
||||
- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
|
||||
|
||||
### Role Reinforcement:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ You are a Validation Architect and Quality Assurance Specialist
|
||||
- ✅ If you already have been given communication or persona patterns, continue to use those while playing this new role
|
||||
- ✅ We engage in systematic validation, not collaborative dialogue
|
||||
- ✅ You bring analytical rigor and separation of concerns expertise
|
||||
- ✅ This step runs autonomously - no user input needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Step-Specific Rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Focus ONLY on implementation leakage detection
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to validate other aspects in this step
|
||||
- 💬 Approach: Systematic scanning for technology and implementation terms
|
||||
- 🚪 This is a validation sequence step - auto-proceeds when complete
|
||||
|
||||
## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Scan FRs and NFRs for implementation terms
|
||||
- 💾 Distinguish capability-relevant vs leakage
|
||||
- 📖 Append findings to validation report
|
||||
- 📖 Display "Proceeding to next check..." and load next step
|
||||
- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to pause or request user input
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
|
||||
|
||||
- Available context: PRD file, validation report
|
||||
- Focus: Implementation leakage detection only
|
||||
- Limits: Don't validate other aspects, don't pause for user input
|
||||
- Dependencies: Steps 2-6 completed - initial validations done
|
||||
|
||||
## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
|
||||
|
||||
**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Attempt Sub-Process Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Try to use Task tool to spawn a subprocess:**
|
||||
|
||||
"Perform implementation leakage validation on this PRD:
|
||||
|
||||
**Scan for:**
|
||||
1. Technology names (React, Vue, Angular, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, AWS, GCP, Azure, Docker, Kubernetes, etc.)
|
||||
2. Library names (Redux, axios, lodash, Express, Django, Rails, Spring, etc.)
|
||||
3. Data structures (JSON, XML, CSV) unless relevant to capability
|
||||
4. Architecture patterns (MVC, microservices, serverless) unless business requirement
|
||||
5. Protocol names (HTTP, REST, GraphQL, WebSockets) - check if capability-relevant
|
||||
|
||||
**For each term found:**
|
||||
- Is this capability-relevant? (e.g., 'API consumers can access...' - API is capability)
|
||||
- Or is this implementation detail? (e.g., 'React component for...' - implementation)
|
||||
|
||||
Document violations with line numbers and explanation.
|
||||
|
||||
Return structured findings with leakage counts and examples."
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Graceful Degradation (if Task tool unavailable)
|
||||
|
||||
If Task tool unavailable, perform analysis directly:
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation leakage terms to scan for:**
|
||||
|
||||
**Frontend Frameworks:**
|
||||
React, Vue, Angular, Svelte, Solid, Next.js, Nuxt, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Frameworks:**
|
||||
Express, Django, Rails, Spring, Laravel, FastAPI, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Databases:**
|
||||
PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Redis, DynamoDB, Cassandra, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Cloud Platforms:**
|
||||
AWS, GCP, Azure, Cloudflare, Vercel, Netlify, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Infrastructure:**
|
||||
Docker, Kubernetes, Terraform, Ansible, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Libraries:**
|
||||
Redux, Zustand, axios, fetch, lodash, jQuery, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
**Data Formats:**
|
||||
JSON, XML, YAML, CSV (unless capability-relevant)
|
||||
|
||||
**For each term found in FRs/NFRs:**
|
||||
- Determine if it's capability-relevant or implementation leakage
|
||||
- Example: "API consumers can access data via REST endpoints" - API/REST is capability
|
||||
- Example: "React components fetch data using Redux" - implementation leakage
|
||||
|
||||
**Count violations and note line numbers**
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Tally Implementation Leakage
|
||||
|
||||
**By category:**
|
||||
- Frontend framework leakage: count
|
||||
- Backend framework leakage: count
|
||||
- Database leakage: count
|
||||
- Cloud platform leakage: count
|
||||
- Infrastructure leakage: count
|
||||
- Library leakage: count
|
||||
- Other implementation details: count
|
||||
|
||||
**Total implementation leakage violations:** sum
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Report Implementation Leakage Findings to Validation Report
|
||||
|
||||
Append to validation report:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Implementation Leakage Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Leakage by Category
|
||||
|
||||
**Frontend Frameworks:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Frameworks:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Databases:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Cloud Platforms:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Infrastructure:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Libraries:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
**Other Implementation Details:** {count} violations
|
||||
{If violations, list examples with line numbers}
|
||||
|
||||
### Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Implementation Leakage Violations:** {total}
|
||||
|
||||
**Severity:** [Critical if >5 violations, Warning if 2-5, Pass if <2]
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
[If Critical] "Extensive implementation leakage found. Requirements specify HOW instead of WHAT. Remove all implementation details - these belong in architecture, not PRD."
|
||||
[If Warning] "Some implementation leakage detected. Review violations and remove implementation details from requirements."
|
||||
[If Pass] "No significant implementation leakage found. Requirements properly specify WHAT without HOW."
|
||||
|
||||
**Note:** API consumers, GraphQL (when required), and other capability-relevant terms are acceptable when they describe WHAT the system must do, not HOW to build it.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Display Progress and Auto-Proceed
|
||||
|
||||
Display: "**Implementation Leakage Validation Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
Total Violations: {count} ({severity})
|
||||
|
||||
**Proceeding to next validation check...**"
|
||||
|
||||
Without delay, read fully and follow: {nextStepFile} (step-v-08-domain-compliance-validation.md)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ SUCCESS:
|
||||
|
||||
- Scanned FRs and NFRs for all implementation term categories
|
||||
- Distinguished capability-relevant from implementation leakage
|
||||
- Violations documented with line numbers and explanations
|
||||
- Severity assessed correctly
|
||||
- Findings reported to validation report
|
||||
- Auto-proceeds to next validation step
|
||||
- Subprocess attempted with graceful degradation
|
||||
|
||||
### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
|
||||
|
||||
- Not scanning all implementation term categories
|
||||
- Not distinguishing capability-relevant from leakage
|
||||
- Missing line numbers for violations
|
||||
- Not reporting findings to validation report
|
||||
- Not auto-proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
**Master Rule:** Requirements specify WHAT, not HOW. Implementation details belong in architecture documents, not PRDs.
|
||||
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user