--- name: 'step-05-structural-order' description: 'Apply the Golden Circle to create persuasive WHY-HOW-WHAT content flow' nextStepFile: './step-06-generate-content.md' --- # Step 5: Determine Structural Order ## STEP GOAL: Apply Simon Sinek's Golden Circle to sequence all content from previous steps into a persuasive WHY-HOW-WHAT flow that moves users emotionally first, then logically, then to action. ## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST): ### Universal Rules: - 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input - 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action - 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read - 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator - ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT in your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}` ### Role Reinforcement: - ✅ You are a strategic content architect applying Golden Circle methodology - ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and identity, continue to use those while playing this new role - ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response - ✅ You bring structural persuasion expertise, user brings their content priorities - ✅ Maintain a clear, structured tone ### Step-Specific Rules: - 🎯 Focus ONLY on sequencing content into WHY-HOW-WHAT structure - 🚫 FORBIDDEN to generate final content text in this step - 💬 Map all essential information from previous steps to WHY, HOW, or WHAT - 📋 Validate the persuasive flow end-to-end before proceeding ## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS: - 🎯 Follow the Sequence of Instructions exactly - 💾 Document the structural order in structured format - 📖 Reference all content elements from Steps 3-4 (Action Filter + Empowerment Frame) - 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without a validated WHY-HOW-WHAT structure ## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES: - Available context: Purpose (Step 0), Trigger Map (Step 1), Awareness (Step 2), Action Filter (Step 3), Empowerment Frame (Step 4) - Focus: Sequencing existing content elements into persuasive order - Limits: Do not write final content — organize the structure for it - Dependencies: All previous steps provide the content elements to sequence ## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize) ### 1. Identify the WHY Ask: **"What's the emotional opening that connects to their driving forces?"** Opens with user's current emotional state, connects to driving forces from the Trigger Map, makes them care before explaining the solution. ### 2. Identify the HOW Ask: **"What's the method that bridges emotional need to specific solution?"** Explains the approach, shows how transformation happens, uses capability framing from Step 4, contains the "aha moment" insight. ### 3. Identify the WHAT Ask: **"What are the concrete specifics and call to action?"** Names the product/offer, provides social proof, clear CTA with capability framing, risk removal. ### 4. Map Content to Structure Present all content elements from Steps 3-4. Work together to assign each piece to WHY (emotional opening), HOW (method/bridge), or WHAT (specifics/proof). ### 5. Sequence Within Sections Within each section, determine the most persuasive order: - **WHY section:** Problem → Validation → Aspiration - **HOW section:** Approach → Differentiator → Transformation - **WHAT section:** Naming → Proof → Action → Risk Removal ### 6. Validate Persuasive Flow Ask: **"Does WHY → HOW → WHAT create natural emotional → logical → action flow?"** - Can user understand WHY without knowing WHAT yet? - Does HOW bridge the gap naturally? - Does WHAT feel like a natural conclusion (not premature)? ### 7. Document Structural Order ```yaml structural_order: section_why: purpose: "Emotional truth / Why user should care" content_elements: - order: 1 element: "[Opening hook]" rationale: "[Why this opens]" - order: 2 element: "[Validation or aspiration]" rationale: "[Why this comes second]" section_how: purpose: "Method / Bridge from emotion to specifics" content_elements: - order: 1 element: "[Solution approach]" rationale: "[Why this bridges first]" - order: 2 element: "[Key differentiator]" rationale: "[Why this matters here]" - order: 3 element: "[Transformation path]" rationale: "[Why this comes last in HOW]" section_what: purpose: "Specifics / Proof / Action" content_elements: - order: 1 element: "[Product/offer name]" rationale: "[Why we can name it now]" - order: 2 element: "[Social proof]" rationale: "[Why proof comes here]" - order: 3 element: "[CTA]" rationale: "[Why action comes last]" flow_validation: feels_natural: "[yes/no + notes]" persuasive_arc: "[Does WHY → HOW → WHAT create emotional → logical → action flow?]" ``` ### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS Display: **"Select an Option:** [C] Continue" #### Menu Handling Logic: - IF C: Save structural order, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile} - IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#8-present-menu-options) #### EXECUTION RULES: - ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu - ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C' - User can chat or ask questions — always respond and then end with display again of the menu options ## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE ONLY WHEN C is selected and the structural order is documented will you load {nextStepFile} to begin generating and reviewing content. --- ## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS ### ✅ SUCCESS: - WHY is identified (emotional opening, purpose) - HOW is identified (method, bridge, differentiator) - WHAT is identified (specifics, proof, CTA) - All essential information assigned to WHY, HOW, or WHAT - Content sequenced within each section - Flow feels natural and persuasive ### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE: - Generating final content text in this step - Putting WHAT before WHY (salesy, pushy) - Missing the WHY section entirely (cold, transactional) - Not mapping all essential information to a section - Not waiting for user input at menu **Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.