Cassel
647cbec54f
- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack - Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360) - Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL - Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente) - Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index - Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference - Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md - Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad) - Add netbird VPN configuration - Add status report Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
117 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
117 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
validationDate: 2026-01-27
|
|
workflowName: testarch-nfr
|
|
workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/bmad-testarch-nfr
|
|
validationStatus: COMPLETE
|
|
completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Validation Report: testarch-nfr
|
|
|
|
**Validation Started:** 2026-01-27 10:24:01
|
|
**Validator:** BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex)
|
|
**Standards Version:** BMAD Workflow Standards
|
|
|
|
## File Structure & Size
|
|
|
|
- workflow.md present: YES
|
|
- instructions.md present: YES
|
|
- workflow.yaml present: YES
|
|
- step files found: 8
|
|
|
|
**Step File Sizes:**
|
|
|
|
- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: 77 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-02-define-thresholds.md: 74 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-03-gather-evidence.md: 57 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-04-evaluate-and-score.md: 60 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md: 63 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
|
|
- workflow-plan.md present: YES
|
|
|
|
## Frontmatter Validation
|
|
|
|
- No frontmatter violations found
|
|
|
|
## Critical Path Violations
|
|
|
|
### Config Variables (Exceptions)
|
|
|
|
Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name
|
|
|
|
- No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
|
|
|
|
- No dead relative links detected
|
|
|
|
- No module path assumptions detected
|
|
|
|
**Status:** ✅ PASS - No critical violations
|
|
|
|
## Menu Handling Validation
|
|
|
|
- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
|
|
|
|
## Step Type Validation
|
|
|
|
- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: Init [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-02-define-thresholds.md: Middle [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-03-gather-evidence.md: Middle [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-04-evaluate-and-score.md: Middle [PASS]
|
|
- steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md: Final [PASS]
|
|
- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
|
|
|
|
## Output Format Validation
|
|
|
|
- Templates present: nfr-report-template.md
|
|
- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
|
|
- steps-c/step-05-generate-report.md
|
|
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md
|
|
- checklist.md present: YES
|
|
|
|
## Validation Design Check
|
|
|
|
- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
|
|
- Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
|
|
- Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed
|
|
|
|
## Instruction Style Check
|
|
|
|
- Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
|
|
- Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance
|
|
|
|
## Collaborative Experience Check
|
|
|
|
- Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
|
|
- Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
|
|
- Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals
|
|
|
|
## Subagent Optimization Opportunities
|
|
|
|
- No high-priority subagent optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
|
|
- Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
|
|
- Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
|
|
- Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
|
|
- Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only
|
|
|
|
## Cohesive Review
|
|
|
|
- Overall assessment: GOOD
|
|
- Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
|
|
- Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
|
|
- Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)
|
|
|
|
## Plan Quality Validation
|
|
|
|
- Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
|
|
- Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
|
|
- Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
|
|
- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
|
|
- Critical issues: 0
|
|
- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
|
|
- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)
|