Cassel
647cbec54f
- Rewrite README.md with current architecture, features and stack - Update docs/API.md with all current endpoints (corporate, BI, client 360) - Update docs/ARCHITECTURE.md with cache, modular queries, services, ETL - Update docs/GUIA-USUARIO.md for all roles (admin, corporate, agente) - Add docs/INDEX.md documentation index - Add PROJETO.md comprehensive project reference - Add BI-CCC-Implementation-Guide.md - Include AI agent configs (.claude, .agents, .gemini, _bmad) - Add netbird VPN configuration - Add status report Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
3.6 KiB
3.6 KiB
validationDate: 2026-01-27
workflowName: testarch-trace
workflowPath: {project-root}/src/workflows/testarch/bmad-testarch-trace
validationStatus: COMPLETE
completionDate: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
Validation Report: testarch-trace
Validation Started: 2026-01-27 10:24:01 Validator: BMAD Workflow Validation System (Codex) Standards Version: BMAD Workflow Standards
File Structure & Size
- workflow.md present: YES
- instructions.md present: YES
- workflow.yaml present: YES
- step files found: 8
Step File Sizes:
- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: 72 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-02-discover-tests.md: 61 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-03-map-criteria.md: 57 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-04-analyze-gaps.md: 56 lines [GOOD]
- steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md: 65 lines [GOOD]
- steps-e/step-01-assess.md: 50 lines [GOOD]
- steps-e/step-02-apply-edit.md: 45 lines [GOOD]
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md: 52 lines [GOOD]
- workflow-plan.md present: YES
Frontmatter Validation
- No frontmatter violations found
Critical Path Violations
Config Variables (Exceptions)
Standard BMAD config variables treated as valid exceptions: bmb_creations_output_folder, communication_language, document_output_language, output_folder, planning_artifacts, project-root, project_name, test_artifacts, user_name
-
No {project-root} hardcoded paths detected in body
-
No dead relative links detected
-
No module path assumptions detected
Status: ✅ PASS - No critical violations
Menu Handling Validation
- No menu structures detected (linear step flow) [N/A]
Step Type Validation
- steps-c/step-01-load-context.md: Init [PASS]
- steps-c/step-02-discover-tests.md: Middle [PASS]
- steps-c/step-03-map-criteria.md: Middle [PASS]
- steps-c/step-04-analyze-gaps.md: Middle [PASS]
- steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md: Final [PASS]
- Step type validation assumes linear sequence (no branching/menu). Workflow-plan.md present for reference. [INFO]
Output Format Validation
- Templates present: trace-template.md
- Steps with outputFile in frontmatter:
- steps-c/step-05-gate-decision.md
- steps-v/step-01-validate.md
- checklist.md present: YES
Validation Design Check
- Validation steps folder (steps-v) present: YES
- Validation step(s) present: step-01-validate.md
- Validation steps reference checklist data and auto-proceed
Instruction Style Check
- Instruction style: Prescriptive (appropriate for TEA quality/compliance workflows)
- Steps emphasize mandatory sequence, explicit success/failure metrics, and risk-based guidance
Collaborative Experience Check
- Overall facilitation quality: GOOD
- Steps use progressive prompts and clear role reinforcement; no laundry-list interrogation detected
- Flow progression is clear and aligned to workflow goals
Subagent Optimization Opportunities
- No high-priority subagent optimizations identified; workflow already uses step-file architecture
- Pattern 1 (grep/regex): N/A for most steps
- Pattern 2 (per-file analysis): already aligned to validation structure
- Pattern 3 (data ops): minimal data file loads
- Pattern 4 (parallel): optional for validation only
Cohesive Review
- Overall assessment: GOOD
- Flow is linear, goals are clear, and outputs map to TEA artifacts
- Voice and tone consistent with Test Architect persona
- Recommendation: READY (minor refinements optional)
Plan Quality Validation
- Plan file present: workflow-plan.md
- Planned steps found: 8 (all implemented)
- Plan implementation status: Fully Implemented
Summary
- Validation completed: 2026-01-27 10:24:01
- Critical issues: 0
- Warnings: 0 (informational notes only)
- Readiness: READY (manual review optional)